Last call document: http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-CSS2-20101207/
Editor's draft: http://www.w3.org/Style/css2-updates/draft-PR-CSS21-201103XX/
Issues can be closed as Accepted, Rejected,
Invalid, or OutOfScope.
The Verified line indicates commentor's acceptance
of the response.
The following categorization convention is used for comments:
| Accepted | WG accepted comments, or commenter accepted WG response |
|---|---|
| No response | Rejected, Invalid, or OutOfScope and no response |
| Objection | Commenter disagreed with WG response |
All issues are public.
CSS2.1 Issue 142. Summary: clarify terms like "ancestor box" From: Boris Zbarsky Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Sep/0126.html #4 Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0443.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Apr/0040.html Closed: Partially-Accepted Note: Full clarification deferred to errata.
CSS2.1 Issue 153. Summary: Clarify which box of a replaced element is vertical-aligned From: fantasai Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-css-testsuite/2010Jan/0030.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0236.html Closed: Accepted.
CSS2.1 Issue 159. Summary: Clarify definition of adjoining margins From: Bruno Fassino Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Feb/0015.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0237.html Closed: Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 179. Summary: Example in anonymous block boxes section is wrong From: Anton Prowse Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0005.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0371.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0399.html Resolution: Replace replace second instance of "P" with "BODY" Closed: Accepted Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0727.html
CSS2.1 Issue 181. Summary: use of 'height' in 10.8 causes confusion over content height and line-height wrt inline elements From: Anton Prowse Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0010.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0587.html Closed: Accepted Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0635.html
CSS2.1 Issue 192. Summary: Clarifications to float's effect on its shortened line From: Anton Prowse Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Oct/0027.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0357.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0358.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0402.html Closed: Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 197.
Summary: Clarify application of 'clear' to run-ins.
From: Boris Zbarsky
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Jan/0404.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0248.html
Closed: OutOfScope
Notes: Run-in removed from CSS 2.1.
Issue deferred to CSS3 Box.
CSS2.1 Issue 198.
Summary: Clarify interaction of run-ins and "elements earlier in the source document".
From: Boris Zbarsky
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Jan/0376.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0247.html
Closed: OutOfScope
Notes: Run-in removed from CSS 2.1.
Issue deferred to CSS3 Box.
CSS2.1 Issue 199. Summary: Define when line boxes are present From: Boris Zbarsky Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010May/0698.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0372.html Followup: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0530.html Closed: Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 203. Summary: Hypothetical border calculation should match actual border calculation From: Anton Prowse Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0261.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0567.html Closed: Accepted Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0570.html
CSS2.1 Issue 204. Summary: Link 8.3.1 to clause about phantom line boxes From: Anton Prowse Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0061.html 20d Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0255.html Closed: Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 205. Summary: Clause about phantom line boxes should say "forced line break" instead of "line feed" From: Anton Prowse Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0074.html 20a Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0256.html Closed: Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 206. Summary: Comments on HASH grammar From: Mark Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0597.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0027.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0491.html Closed: Rejected Status: No verification response
CSS2.1 Issue 207. Summary: Clearance is discontinuous From: Anton Prowse Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0569.html (first half) Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0254.html Closed: Deferred to errata Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0424.html
CSS2.1 Issue 208. Summary: Horizontal scrollbars confuse width/height/etc calculations From: Boris Zbarsky Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0544.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0303.html Closed: Deferred to errata Status: No verification response
CSS2.1 Issue 209. Summary: Does the root element establish a new block formatting context? From: Anton Prowse Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0107.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0302.html Closed: Deferred to errata Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Apr/0088.html
CSS2.1 Issue 210. Summary: 4.1.9 implies comments are not allowed at start or end of style sheet From: Peter Moulder Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0510.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0301.html Closed: Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 211. Summary: Transitivity error in margin collapsing From: L. David Baron Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0439.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0304.html Closed: Rejected Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0258.html
CSS2.1 Issue 212. Summary: Clarify that table wrapper boxes are containing blocks, even though table boxes are not in 9.2.1 From: =WG= Comment: None Response: None Closed: Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 213.
Summary: clarify that forced page breaks on the root element change whether :first is :left or :right
From: Øyvind Stenhaug
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-css-testsuite/2010Nov/0136.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0305.html
Closed: Deferred
Notes: Made undefined for CSS2.1.
Issue deferred to CSS3 Paged Media.
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Apr/0125.html
CSS2.1 Issue 214. Summary: Make it undefined whether white space stripping happens before or after bidi reordering From: L. David Baron Comment: http://wiki.csswg.org/test/css2.1/blocking/bidi-004#discussion Response: None Closed: Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 215. Summary: Undefine containing block formed by a relpos inline split across multiple lines From: =WG= Comment: None Response: None Closed: Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 216. Summary: Drop vertical-align from list of properties supported on ::first-line From: =WG= Comment: None Response: None Closed: Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 218. Summary: Percentage intrinsic widths untestable; remove concept from spec From: L. David Baron Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Nov/0077.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0312.html Closed: Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 219. Summary: Clarify that Line Separator LS and other (non-collapsed) forced-break Unicode chars break the line From: =WG= Comment: http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/css/20101111 Response: None Closed: Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 220. Summary: Clip does not respond to 'direction' in most implementations From: Arron Eicholz Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Nov/0174.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0314.html Closed: Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 221. Summary: Remove gamma-correction section From: =WG= Comment: None Response: None Closed: Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 224. Summary: List style intrinsic sizing rules inconsistent with other image uses From: Tab Atkins Jr. Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Feb/0364.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0325.html Closed: Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 225.
Summary: Auto height calculation rules confused about margin collapsing
From: Anton Prowse
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0108.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0316.html
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0345.html
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Feb/0492.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Apr/0132.html
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Apr/0160.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Apr/0191.html
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Apr/0214.html
Closed: Rejected
Notes: Bert and Daniel and Steve rejected updating the PR spec according to
the last response due being halfway through the PR transition,
and therefore this issue stands as an objection.
CSS2.1 Issue 226. Summary: White space processing clarifications From: Anton Prowse Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0421.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0331.html Resolution: No change Note: Deferred to CSS3 Text (most issues) and errata (issues 4 and 5) Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Apr/0088.html
CSS2.1 Issue 227. Summary: Diagram caption out of date From: Patrick Garies Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0446.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0333.html Closed: Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 228. Summary: Add non-normative note pointing at min/max sections from auto width/height sections. From: Anton Prowse Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0483.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0334.html Closed: Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 229. Summary: Floats effect on lines above placeholder From: Anton Prowse Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0149.html (first half) Response: ? Status: Accepted minutes
CSS2.1 Issue 230. Summary: List item numbering undefined From: Peter Moulder Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0175.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0392.html Closed: Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 231. Summary: Make list-item-ness of root list-item optional From: Peter Moulder Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0205.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0343.html Closed: Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 232. Summary: Define "in-flow" From: Øyvind Stenhaug Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0310.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0348.html Closed: Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 233. Summary: text-indent percentages behavior very odd for table cells and floats From: fantasai Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0431.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0360.html Closed: Rejected Verified: =WG=
CSS2.1 Issue 234. Summary: Margin-collapsing and min-height inconsistent implementations. From: Alan Gresley Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0649.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0356.html Closed: Invalid Status: No verification response
CSS2.1 Issue 235. Summary: Clarify that list of "direction" property effects is not exhaustive From: Peter Moulder Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0728.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0206.html Closed: Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 236. Summary: Propagation of text-decoration to contents of tables From: L. David Baron Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Oct/0407.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0207.html Closed: Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 237. Summary: Border conflict resolution unclear due to equivalence wording of outset/inset and groove/ridge From: Øyvind Stenhaug Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Oct/0560.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0208.html Closed: Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 238. Summary: Provide note or example for system font keywords vs. family names From: Gérard Talbot Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Oct/0622.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0209.html Closed: Deferred to CSS3 Fonts Status: No verification response
CSS2.1 Issue 239. Summary: Propagate "direction" from BODY to ICB From: David Hyatt Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Oct/0750.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0210.html Closed: Rejected Status: No verification response
CSS2.1 Issue 240. Summary: Behavior of min/max width on table elements. From: Øyvind Stenhaug Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Oct/0817.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0217.html Closed: Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 241. Summary: position: static doesn't prevent computation of top/left/bottom/right From: Øyvind Stenhaug Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Nov/0035.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0361.html Closed: Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 242. Summary: Exact behavior of inline split around block not defined. From: Peter Moulder Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Nov/0047.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0222.html Closed: Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 243. Summary: Tables confused about which box is principal box From: Peter Moulder Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Nov/0084.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0252.html Closed: Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 244. Summary: Rendering tree vs. element tree in z-order algo From: Peter Moulder Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Nov/0069.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0362.html Notes: Rendering tree is not defined in CSS2.1 Closed: Deferred to future CSS version Status: No verification response
CSS2.1 Issue 245.
Summary: Clarifications to z-index chapter
From: Peter Moulder
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Nov/0083.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0362.html
Notes: Full revision of z-index chapter deferred to future version.
See also CSS2.1 Issue 60
Closed: Deferred to future CSS version
Status: No verification response
CSS2.1 Issue 246. Summary: Improve clip examples From: Gérard Talbot Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Nov/0187.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0349.html Closed: Accepted Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0351.html
CSS2.1 Issue 247. Summary: Containing block of abspos inside block-in-inline split unclear & inconsistent From: Peter Moulder Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Nov/0444.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0327.html Note: Made undefined in CSS2.1. Closed: Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 248. Summary: Clarification for Floats with height: 0 From: Sylvain Galineau Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Dec/0020.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0328.html Closed: Deferred to errata Status: No verification response
CSS2.1 Issue 249. Summary: Add explanatory sentences to clarify clearance calculation. From: Gérard Talbot Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Dec/0120.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0335.html Closed: Deferred to errata Status: No verification response
CSS2.1 Issue 250. Summary: page grammar missing From: fantasai Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Dec/0211.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0285.html Closed: Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 251. Summary: Add longest-match tokenlization example From: Peter Moulder Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jan/0064.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Apr/0035.html Closed: Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 252. Summary: Error-parsing rules confusion From: Peter Moulder Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jan/0068.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0287.html Closed: Deferred to future CSS version Status: No verification response
CSS2.1 Issue 253. Summary: Clarify end-of-line as end-of-line character (vs. end-of-file) From: Boris Zbarsky Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jan/0091.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0288.html Closed: Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 254. Summary: Clarify "next block" when parsing invalid at-keywords From: Peter Moulder Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jan/0071.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0289.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Apr/0042.html Closed: Invalid Status: No verification response
CSS2.1 Issue 255. Summary: Clarifications to HTML-related definitions From: Anton Prowse Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jan/0072.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0290.html Closed: Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 256. Summary: Clarify form controls and frames From: Anton Prowse Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jan/0072.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0291.html Closed: Rejected Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Apr/0088.html
CSS2.1 Issue 257. Summary: Don't say that boxes have properties From: Anton Prowse Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jan/0073.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Apr/0059.html Closed: Rejected Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Apr/0088.html
CSS2.1 Issue 258. Summary: Bad wording in uri() comment notes From: Peter Moulder Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jan/0074.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0292.html Closed: Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 259. Summary: Assigning of values via inheritance unclear From: Anton Prowse Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jan/0075.html issue 1 Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0382.html Closed: Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 260. Summary: Note about anonymous box inheritance redundant From: Anton Prowse Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jan/0075.html issue 2 Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0383.html Closed: Rejected Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Apr/0088.html
CSS2.1 Issue 261. Summary: Clarify "other attributes" in specificity calculations From: Anton Prowse Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jan/0075.html issue 3 Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0383.html Closed: Deferred Notes: Addressed in Selectors Level 3 Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Apr/0088.html
CSS2.1 Issue 262. Summary: Editorial issues in Ch 8 From: Anton Prowse Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jan/0076.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0384.html Closed: Deferred to errata Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Apr/0088.html
CSS2.1 Issue 263. Summary: Editorial simplification to 9.4.1 BFC root definition From: Anton Prowse Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jan/0077.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0385.html Closed: Deferred to errata Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Apr/0088.html
CSS2.1 Issue 264. Summary: Clarify that float shortening note is wrt margin box From: Anton Prowse Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jan/0078.html issue 1 Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0386.html Closed: Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 265. Summary: Clarify which table box is affected by float overlap restriction From: Anton Prowse Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jan/0078.html issue 2 Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0387.html Closed: Deferred to errata or future CSS version Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Apr/0088.html
CSS2.1 Issue 266. Summary: CSS2.1 Issue 120 follow-up From: Anton Prowse Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jan/0079.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0390.html Closed: Deferred to errata Notes: Accepted issue 6, rest deferred to errata Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Apr/0088.html
CSS2.1 Issue 267. Summary: Clarify that block-in-relpos'd-inline doesn't get position: relative z-index side-effects From: Anton Prowse Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jan/0086.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0391.html Closed: Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 268. Summary: Perceived error in text-indent example of first formatted line From: Anton Prowse Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jan/0085.html issue 1 Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0226.html Closed: Invalid Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Apr/0088.html
CSS2.1 Issue 269. Summary: Justification should be wrt line box, not block container From: Anton Prowse Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jan/0085.html issue 2 Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0226.html Closed: Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 270. Summary: Make text-decoration propagation more clearly recursive From: Anton Prowse Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jan/0085.html issue 3 Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0226.html Closed: Deferred Notes: Fixed in CSS3 Text Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Apr/0088.html
CSS2.1 Issue 271. Summary: Make list-item's additional boxes clause example rather than exhaustive From: Anton Prowse Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jan/0087.html issue 1 Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0225.html Closed: Deferred to errata Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Apr/0088.html
CSS2.1 Issue 272. Summary: Adopt CSS3 exit criteria for CSS2.1 From: CSSWG Closed: Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 273. Summary: Wording incorrect for RTL text next to floats From: Øyvind Stenhaug Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Oct/0058.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0227.html Closed: Deferred to errata Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Apr/0126.html
CSS2.1 Issue 274. Summary: No shortening of line boxes next to later floats From: Anton Prowse Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0131.html issue 1 Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0148.html first half Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0150.html first third Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0228.html Closed: Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 275. Summary: vertical gap possible between line boxes in presence of floats From: Anton Prowse Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Aug/0358.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0230.html Closed: Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 276. Summary: :first-line, :first-letter ambiguous, please remove From: Peter Moulder Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jan/0097.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0231.html Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0273.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Apr/0061.html Closed: Rejected Status: No verification response
CSS2.1 Issue 277. Summary: usage of "rule" imprecise in many cases From: Peter Moulder Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jan/0101.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0232.html Closed: Deferred to errata Status: No verification response
CSS2.1 Issue 278. Summary: floats and margin box From: Anton Prowse Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Jan/0352.html Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Mar/0279.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0233.html Resolution: Proposal accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 279. Summary: new wording about "next to" floats From: Anton Prowse Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0130.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0234.html Closed: Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 280. Summary: left float can be to the right of a right float From: Anton Prowse Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0131.html issue 2 Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0150.html second third Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0240.html Closed: Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 281. Summary: 'line-height' is a property (and its values are 'quantities') not a physical entity; nothing can "start" there From: Anton Prowse Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Mar/0004.html issue 3b Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009May/0191.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0242.html Closed: Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 282. Summary: No passes for background-intrinsic-004 and background-intrinsic-005 From: =WG= Comment: None Response: None Closed: Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 283. Summary: No passes for replaced-intrinsic-ratio-001 From: =WG= Comment: None Response: None Closed: Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 285. Summary: Clearance moving things up (revisited) From: Anton Prowse Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Dec/0474.html Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0427.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0531.html Closed: Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 286. Summary: CSS should not redefine standard units From: Olaf Hoffmann Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Dec/0204.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Dec/0206.html Response: http://www.w3.org/mid/4D9CAFFF.4090307@disruptive-innovations.com Closed: Rejected Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Apr/0161.html Notes: I am unable to tell whether the commenter is satisfied with the response.
CSS2.1 Issue 287. Summary: Multiple clearance is underspecified From: Anton Prowse Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0569.html (first half) Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0254.html Closed: Deferred to errata Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Apr/0088.html
CSS2.1 Issue 288. Summary: Clarify flowing line boxes next to floats From: Anton Prose Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Mar/0366.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0346.html (end) Closed: Deferred to errata Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Apr/0088.html