Cascading Style Sheets Level 2 Revision 1 (CSS 2.1) Disposition of Comments

Last call document: http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-CSS2-20101207/

Editor's draft: http://www.w3.org/Style/css2-updates/css2/

The following color coding convention is used for comments:

An issue can be closed as Accepted, OutOfScope, Invalid, Deferred, Rejected, or Retracted. Verified indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.

CSS2.1 Issue 142.
Summary:    clarify terms like "ancestor box"
From:       Boris Zbarsky
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Sep/0126.html #4
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0443.html
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Apr/0040.html
Closed:     Partially-Accepted
Note:       Full clarification deferred to errata.
CSS2.1 Issue 153.
Summary:    Clarify which box of a replaced element is vertical-aligned
From:       fantasai
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-css-testsuite/2010Jan/0030.html
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0236.html
Closed:     Accepted.
CSS2.1 Issue 159.
Summary:    Clarify definition of adjoining margins
From:       Bruno Fassino
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Feb/0015.html
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0237.html
Closed:     Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 179.
Summary:    Example in anonymous block boxes section is wrong
From:       Anton Prowse
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0005.html
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0371.html
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0399.html
Resolution: Replace replace second instance of "P" with "BODY"
Closed:     Accepted
Verified:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0727.html
CSS2.1 Issue 181.
Summary:    use of 'height' in 10.8 causes confusion over content height and line-height wrt inline elements
From:       Anton Prowse
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0010.html
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0587.html
Closed:     Accepted
Verified:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0635.html
CSS2.1 Issue 192.
Summary:    Clarifications to float's effect on its shortened line
From:       Anton Prowse
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Oct/0027.html
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0357.html
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0358.html
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0402.html
Closed:     Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 197.
Summary:    Clarify application of 'clear' to run-ins.
From:       Boris Zbarsky
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Jan/0404.html
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0248.html
Closed:     OutOfScope
Notes:      Run-in removed from CSS 2.1.
            Issue deferred to CSS3 Box.
CSS2.1 Issue 198.
Summary:    Clarify interaction of run-ins and "elements earlier in the source document".
From:       Boris Zbarsky
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Jan/0376.html
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0247.html
Closed:     OutOfScope
Notes:      Run-in removed from CSS 2.1.
            Issue deferred to CSS3 Box.
CSS2.1 Issue 199.
Summary:    Define when line boxes are present
From:       Boris Zbarsky
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010May/0698.html
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0372.html
Followup:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0530.html
Closed:     Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 203.
Summary:    Hypothetical border calculation should match actual border calculation
From:       Anton Prowse
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0261.html
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0567.html
Closed:     Accepted
Verified:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0570.html
CSS2.1 Issue 204.
Summary:    Link 8.3.1 to clause about phantom line boxes
From:       Anton Prowse
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0061.html 20d
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0255.html
Closed:     Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 205.
Summary:    Clause about phantom line boxes should say "forced line break" instead of "line feed"
From:       Anton Prowse
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0074.html 20a
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0256.html
Closed:     Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 206.
Summary:    Comments on HASH grammar
From:       Mark
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0597.html
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0027.html
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0491.html
Closed:     Rejected
CSS2.1 Issue 207.
Summary:    Clearance is discontinuous
From:       Anton Prowse
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0569.html
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0254.html
Closed:     Deferred to errata
Verified:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0424.html
CSS2.1 Issue 208.
Summary:    Horizontal scrollbars confuse width/height/etc calculations
From:       Boris Zbarsky
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0544.html
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0303.html
Closed:     Deferred to errata
CSS2.1 Issue 209.
Summary:    Does the root element establish a new block formatting context?
From:       Anton Prowse
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0107.html
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0302.html
Closed:     Deferred to errata
CSS2.1 Issue 210.
Summary:    4.1.9 implies comments are not allowed at start or end of style sheet
From:       Peter Moulder
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0510.html
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0301.html
Closed:     Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 211.
Summary:    Transitivity error in margin collapsing
From:       L. David Baron
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0439.html
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0304.html
Resolution: No change
Note to dbaron: Is this Invalid or Rejected or Retracted?
CSS2.1 Issue 212.
Summary:    Clarify that table wrapper boxes are containing blocks, even though table boxes are not in 9.2.1
From:       =WG=
Comment:    None
Response:   None
Closed:     Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 213.
Summary:    clarify that forced page breaks on the root element change whether :first is :left or :right
From:       Øyvind Stenhaug
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-css-testsuite/2010Nov/0136.html
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0305.html
Closed:     Deferred
Notes:      Made undefined for CSS2.1.
            Issue deferred to CSS3 Paged Media.
CSS2.1 Issue 214.
Summary:    Make it undefined whether white space stripping happens before or after bidi reordering
From:       L. David Baron
Comment:    http://wiki.csswg.org/test/css2.1/blocking/bidi-004#discussion
Response:   None
Closed:     Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 215.
Summary:    Undefine containing block formed by a relpos inline split across multiple lines
From:       =WG=
Comment:    None
Response:   None
Closed:     Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 216.
Summary:    Drop vertical-align from list of properties supported on ::first-line
From:       =WG=
Comment:    None
Response:   None
Closed:     Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 218.
Summary:    Percentage intrinsic widths untestable; remove concept from spec
From:       L. David Baron
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Nov/0077.html
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0312.html
Closed:     Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 219.
Summary:    Clarify that Line Separator LS and other (non-collapsed) forced-break Unicode chars break the line
From:       =WG=
Comment:    http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/css/20101111
Response:   None
Closed:     Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 220.
Summary:    Clip does not respond to 'direction' in most implementations
From:       Arron Eicholz
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Nov/0174.html
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0314.html
Closed:     Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 221.
Summary:    Remove gamma-correction section
From:       =WG=
Comment:    None
Response:   None
Closed:     Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 224.
Summary:    List style intrinsic sizing rules inconsistent with other image uses
From:       Tab Atkins Jr.
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Feb/0364.html
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0325.html
Closed:     Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 225.
Summary:    Auto height calculation rules confused about margin collapsing
From:       Anton Prowse
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0108.html
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0316.html
Closed:     Invalid
CSS2.1 Issue 226.
Summary:    White space processing clarifications
From:       Anton Prowse
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0421.html
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0331.html
Resolution: No change
Note:       Deferred to CSS3 Text (most issues) and errata (issues 4 and 5)
CSS2.1 Issue 227.
Summary:    Diagram caption out of date
From:       Patrick Garies
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0446.html
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0333.html
Closed:     Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 228.
Summary:    Add non-normative note pointing at min/max sections from auto width/height sections.
From:       Anton Prowse
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0483.html
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0334.html
Closed:     Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 229.
Summary:    Floats effect on lines above placeholder
From:       Anton Prowse
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0149.html
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0240.html
Status:     Accepted http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0309.html
CSS2.1 Issue 230.
Summary:    List item numbering undefined
From:       Peter Moulder
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0175.html
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0392.html
Closed:     Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 231.
Summary:    Make list-item-ness of root list-item optional
From:       Peter Moulder
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0205.html
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0343.html
Closed:     Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 232.
Summary:    Define "in-flow"
From:       Øyvind Stenhaug
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0310.html
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0348.html
Closed:     Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 233.
Summary:    text-indent percentages behavior very odd for table cells and floats
From:       fantasai
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0431.html
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0360.html
Closed:     Rejected
Verified.
CSS2.1 Issue 234.
Summary:    Margin-collapsing and min-height inconsistent implementations.
From:       Alan Gresley
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0649.html
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0356.html
Closed:     Invalid
CSS2.1 Issue 235.
Summary:    Clarify that list of "direction" property effects is not exhaustive
From:       Peter Moulder
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0728.html
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0206.html
Closed:     Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 236.
Summary:    Propagation of text-decoration to contents of tables
From:       L. David Baron
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Oct/0407.html
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0207.html
Closed:     Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 237.
Summary:    Border conflict resolution unclear due to equivalence wording of outset/inset and groove/ridge
From:       Øyvind Stenhaug
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Oct/0560.html
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0208.html
Closed:     Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 238.
Summary:    Provide note or example for system font keywords vs. family names
From:       Gérard Talbot
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Oct/0622.html
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0209.html
Closed:     Deferred to CSS3 Fonts
CSS2.1 Issue 239.
Summary:    Propagate "direction" from BODY to ICB
From:       David Hyatt
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Oct/0750.html
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0210.html
Closed:     Rejected
CSS2.1 Issue 240.
Summary:    Behavior of min/max width on table elements.
From:       Øyvind Stenhaug
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Oct/0817.html
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0217.html
Closed:     Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 241.
Summary:    position: static doesn't prevent computation of top/left/bottom/right
From:       Øyvind Stenhaug
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Nov/0035.html
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0361.html
Closed:     Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 242.
Summary:    Exact behavior of inline split around block not defined.
From:       Peter Moulder
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Nov/0047.html
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0222.html
Closed:     Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 243.
Summary:    Tables confused about which box is principal box
From:       Peter Moulder
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Nov/0084.html
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0252.html
Closed:     Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 244.
Summary:    Rendering tree vs. element tree in z-order algo
From:       Peter Moulder
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Nov/0069.html
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0362.html
Notes:      Rendering tree is not defined in CSS2.1, deferred to future version.
Closed:     Rejected
CSS2.1 Issue 245.
Summary:    Clarifications to z-index chapter
From:       Peter Moulder
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Nov/0083.html
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0362.html
Notes:      Full revision of z-index chapter deferred to future version.
            See also CSS2.1 Issue 60
Closed:     Rejected
CSS2.1 Issue 246.
Summary:    Improve clip examples
From:       Gérard Talbot
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Nov/0187.html
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0349.html
Closed:     Accepted
Verified:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0351.html
CSS2.1 Issue 247.
Summary:    Containing block of abspos inside block-in-inline split unclear & inconsistent
From:       Peter Moulder
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Nov/0444.html
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0327.html
Note:       Made undefined in CSS2.1.
Closed:     Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 248.
Summary:    Clarification for Floats with height: 0
From:       Sylvain Galineau
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Dec/0020.html
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0328.html
Closed:     Deferred to errata
CSS2.1 Issue 249.
Summary:    Add explanatory sentences to clarify clearance calculation.
From:       Gérard Talbot
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Dec/0120.html
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0335.html
Closed:     Deferred to errata
CSS2.1 Issue 250.
Summary:    page grammar missing
From:       fantasai
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Dec/0211.html
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0285.html
Closed:     Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 251.
Summary:    Add longest-match tokenlization example
From:       Peter Moulder
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jan/0064.html
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Apr/0035.html
Closed:     Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 252.
Summary:    Error-parsing rules confusion
From:       Peter Moulder
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jan/0068.html
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0287.html
Resolution: Deferred to later CSS version
CSS2.1 Issue 253.
Summary:    Clarify end-of-line as end-of-line character (vs. end-of-file)
From:       Boris Zbarsky
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jan/0091.html
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0288.html
Closed:     Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 254.
Summary:    Clarify "next block" when parsing invalid at-keywords
From:       Peter Moulder
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jan/0071.html
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0289.html
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Apr/0042.html
Closed:     Invalid
CSS2.1 Issue 255.
Summary:    Clarifications to HTML-related definitions
From:       Anton Prowse
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jan/0072.html
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0290.html
Closed:     Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 256.
Summary:    Clarify form controls and frames
From:       Anton Prowse
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jan/0072.html
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0291.html
Closed:     Rejected
CSS2.1 Issue 257.
Summary:    Don't say that boxes have properties
From:       Anton Prowse
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jan/0073.html
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Apr/0059.html
Closed:     Rejected
CSS2.1 Issue 258.
Summary:    Bad wording in uri() comment notes
From:       Peter Moulder
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jan/0074.html 
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0292.html 
Closed:     Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 259.
Summary:    Assigning of values via inheritance unclear
From:       Anton Prowse
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jan/0075.html issue 1
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0382.html
Closed:     Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 260.
Summary:    Note about anonymous box inheritance redundant
From:       Anton Prowse
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jan/0075.html issue 2
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0383.html
Closed:     Rejected
CSS2.1 Issue 261.
Summary:    Clarify "other attributes" in specificity calculations
From:       Anton Prowse
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jan/0075.html issue 3
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0383.html
Closed:     Deferred
Notes:      Addressed in Selectors Level 3
CSS2.1 Issue 262.
Summary:    Editorial issues in Ch 8
From:       Anton Prowse
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jan/0076.html
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0384.html
Closed:     Deferred to errata
CSS2.1 Issue 263.
Summary:    Editorial simplification to 9.4.1 BFC root definition
From:       Anton Prowse
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jan/0077.html
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0385.html
Closed:     Deferred to errata
CSS2.1 Issue 264.
Summary:    Clarify that float shortening note is wrt margin box
From:       Anton Prowse
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jan/0078.html issue 1
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0386.html
Closed:     Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 265.
Summary:    Clarify which table box is affected by float overlap restriction
From:       Anton Prowse
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jan/0078.html issue 2
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0387.html
Closed:     Deferred
CSS2.1 Issue 266.
Summary:    CSS2.1 Issue 120 follow-up
From:       Anton Prowse
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jan/0079.html
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0390.html
Closed:     Deferred to errata
Notes:      Accepted issue 6, rest deferred to errata
CSS2.1 Issue 267.
Summary:    Clarify that block-in-relpos'd-inline doesn't get position: relative z-index side-effects 
From:       Anton Prowse
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jan/0086.html
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0391.html
Closed:     Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 268.
Summary:    Perceived error in text-indent example of first formatted line
From:       Anton Prowse
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jan/0085.html issue 1
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0226.html
Closed:     Invalid
CSS2.1 Issue 269.
Summary:    Justification should be wrt line box, not block container
From:       Anton Prowse
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jan/0085.html issue 2
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0226.html
Closed:     Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 270.
Summary:    Make text-decoration propagation more clearly recursive
From:       Anton Prowse
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jan/0085.html issue 3
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0226.html
Closed:     Deferred
Notes:      Fixed in CSS3 Text
CSS2.1 Issue 271.
Summary:    Make list-item's additional boxes clause example rather than exhaustive
From:       Anton Prowse
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jan/0087.html issue 1
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0225.html
Closed:     Deferred to errata
CSS2.1 Issue 272.
Summary:    Adopt CSS3 exit criteria for CSS2.1
From:       CSSWG
Closed:     Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 273.
Summary:    Wording incorrect for RTL text next to floats
From:       Øyvind Stenhaug
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Oct/0058.html
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0227.html
Closed:     Deferred to errata
CSS2.1 Issue 274.
Summary:    No shortening of line boxes next to later floats
From:       Anton Prowse
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0131.html issue 1
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0148.html first half
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0150.html first third
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0228.html
Closed:     Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 275.
Summary:    vertical gap possible between line boxes in presence of floats
From:       Anton Prowse
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Aug/0358.html
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0230.html
Closed:     Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 276.
Summary:    :first-line, :first-letter ambiguous, please remove
From:       Peter Moulder
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jan/0097.html
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0231.html
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0273.html
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Apr/0061.html
Closed:     Rejected
CSS2.1 Issue 277.
Summary:    usage of "rule" incorrect in many cases
From:       Peter Moulder
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jan/0101.html
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0232.html
Closed:     Deferred to errata
CSS2.1 Issue 278.
Summary:    floats and margin box
From:       Anton Prowse
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Jan/0352.html
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Mar/0279.html
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0233.html
Resolution: Proposal accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 279.
Summary:    new wording about "next to" floats
From:       Anton Prowse
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0130.html
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0234.html
Closed:     Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 280.
Summary:    left float can be to the right of a right float
From:       Anton Prowse
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0131.html issue 2
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0150.html second third
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0240.html
Closed:     Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 281.
Summary:    'line-height' is a property (and its values are 'quantities') not a physical entity; nothing can "start" there
From:       Anton Prowse
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Mar/0004.html issue 3b
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009May/0191.html
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0242.html
Closed:     Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 282.
Summary:    No passes for background-intrinsic-004 and background-intrinsic-005
From:       =WG=
Comment:    None
Response:   None
Closed:     Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 283.
Summary:    No passes for replaced-intrinsic-ratio-001
From:       =WG=
Comment:    None
Response:   None
Closed:     Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 285.
Summary:    Clearance moving things up (revisited)
From:       Anton Prowse
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Dec/0474.html
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0427.html
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0531.html
Closed:     Accepted
CSS2.1 Issue 286.
Summary:    Clearance example confusing
From:       Arron and fantasai
Comment:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0569.html
Response:   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0590.html
Closed:     Deferred to errata