Draft:    https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/CR-css-break-3-20160114/
Title:    CSS Fragmentation Module Level 3

----
Issue 1.
Summary:  Clarify application of widows and orphans
From:     Florian Rivoal
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1823
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1823#issuecomment-335868256
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Oct/0025.html
----
Issue 2.
Summary:  Clarify break propagation
From:     claytron5000
Comment:  https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/issues/7958#issuecomment-384413748
Response: https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/issues/7958#issuecomment-385836225
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2614
Changes:  https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/fa5bc2b61b56
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018May/0029.html
----
Issue 3.
Summary:  Fix applies-to lines for break-*
From:     Mats Palmgren
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1904
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1904#issuecomment-414395314
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/23d5a4c7b28f9767f7f7a621a7b895d4b858bbca
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Aug/0023.html
----
Issue 4.
Summary:  Clarify how inline-block may be not monolithic
From:     Koji Ishii
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1111
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1111
Open:     Accepted, awaiting confirmation
Resolved: Editorial
Verified:
----
Issue 5.
Summary:  Ruby containers are not monolithic
From:     Oriol Brufau
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1474
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1474#issuecomment-414397077
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 6.
Summary:  Define empty fragment at fragmentainer boundary to stay on previous
From:     Morten Stenshorne
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1529
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1529#issuecomment-415592931
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Aug/0023.html
----