CSS Grid Layout Level 1 Disposition of Comments for 2015-09-17 WD

Dated Draft: http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/WD-css-grid-1-20150917/

Editor's Draft: http://drafts.csswg.org/css-grid-1/

The following color coding convention is used for comments:

Open issues are marked like this

An issue can be closed as Accepted, OutOfScope, Invalid, Rejected, or Retracted. Verified indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.

Issue 1. #
Summary:  Default alignment of grid tracks should match Flexbox
From:     fantasai & Javier Fernandez
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Oct/0022.html
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Oct/0026.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0121.html
Closed:   Accepted
Verified: reporter is editor
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0031.html
Issue 2. #
Summary:  Confusion over implicit named areas
From:     Mats Palmgren
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Oct/0040.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Oct/0072.html
Closed:   Invalid
Verified: 
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 3. #
Summary:  Abspos item placement in degenerate grids
From:     Mats Palmgren
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Oct/0088.html
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Oct/0098.html
Response: 
Open:     ???
Verified: 
Resolved: 
Issue 4. #
Summary:  Errors in overlarge clamping rule
From:     Mats Palmgren
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Oct/0033.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0068.html
Closed:   Accepted
Verified: 
Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 5. #
Summary:  Missing start = end conflict handling rule
From:     Mats Palmgren
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Oct/0034.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0069.html
Closed:   Accepted
Verified: 
Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 6. #
Summary:  Clarifying percentage resolution against indefinite sizing
From:     Manuel Rego Casasnovas
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Oct/0046.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0074.html
Closed:   OutOfScope
Note:     Filed against CSS Sizing
Verified: 
Resolved: 
Issue 7. #
Summary:  Confusion over baseline content alignment and baseline self alignment
From:     Javier Fernandez
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Oct/0122.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0075.html
Closed:   Accepted
Verified: 
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 8. #
Summary:  Clarify sizing under a min/max-content constraint
From:     Sergio Villar Senin
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0190.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0194.html
Closed:   Invalid
Verified: 
Resolved: 
Issue 9. #
Summary:  Clarify behavior of CSS-wide keywords and reset-only longhands
From:     David Baron
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0255.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0126.html
Closed:   Accepted
Verified: 
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 10. #
Summary:  Percentages resolving against max-height
From:     Tab and fantasai
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0067.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0090.html
Closed:   Invalid
Verified: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0029.html
Issue 11. #
Summary:  Clarifications to repeat()
From:     Mats Plamgren
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0033.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0037.html
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0041.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0043.html
Closed:   Accepted
Verified: 
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 12. #
Summary:  Axis ordering 2-value vs 4-value properties
From:     Tab and fantasai
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Oct/0212.html
Response: 
Closed:   Accepted
Verified: 
Resolved: 
Issue 13. #
Summary:  Linking errors etc. for alignment properties
From:     Manuel Rego Casasnovas
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0030.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0055.html
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0084.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0062.html
Closed:   Accepted
Verified: 
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 14. #
Summary:  Percentage resolution and intrinsic sizing
From:     Sergio Villar Senin
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0295.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0066.html
Closed:   Accepted
Verified: 
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 15. #
Summary:  Example is confusing
From:     Manuel Rego Casasnovas
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0110.html
Response: 
Open
Verified: 
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 15. #
Summary:  Clarification to 'fr'
From:     Manuel Rego Casasnovas
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0323.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0131.html
Closed:   Accepted
Verified: 
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 16. #
Summary:  Error: wrong axis in definition
From:     Manuel Rego Casasnovas
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0263.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0159.html
Closed:   Accepted
Verified: 
Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 17. #
Summary:  Placement algo doesn't handle negative-index implicit lines
From:     Menuel Rego Casasnovas
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0088.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0160.html
Closed:   Accepted
Verified: 
Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 18. #
Summary:  Errors in grid-gap propdef tables
From:     Mats Palmgren
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Oct/0028.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0072.html
Closed:   Accepted
Verified: 
Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 19. #
Summary:  Grid gap suppression at fragmentation breaks
From:     Mats Palmgren
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0245.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0246.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: =WG= Approve, pls.
Issue 20. #
Summary:  ?????
From:     Javier Fernandez
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0255.html
Open
Issue 21. #
Summary:  Confusion about reset-only behavior of 'grid-gap' in 'grid' shorthand
From:     Luke Stebbing
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0273.html
Issue 22. #
Summary:  Errors in definition of 'auto' minimum track sizes
From:     Manuel Rego Casasnovas
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0086.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0158.html
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0288.html
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0032.html
Issue 23. #
Summary:  Tighten up definition of dropping empty tracks
From:     Mats Palmgren
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0034.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0155.html
Closed:   Accepted
Issue 24. #
Summary:  Drop empty tracks at ends or also in the middle?
From:     Mats Palmgren
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0027.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0034.html
Open:     =WG= Discuss / find use cases.
Issue 25. #
Summary:  Subgrids considered essential
From:     Eric Meyer
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0106.html
Open:     ???
Issue 26. #
Summary:  Spanning to missing named lines: which side of the grid?
From:     Manuel Rego Casasnovas
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0063.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0123.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: =WG= Discuss.