Draft: https://www.w3.org/TR/2015/CR-css-ui-3-20150707/ Title: CSS Basic User Interface Module Level 3 (CSS3 UI) ---- Issue 1. Summary: Markup error From: Chris Rebert Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0455.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0460.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial ---- Issue 2. Summary: Typos and grammer errors From: Timeless Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0164.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0148.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial ---- Issue 3. Summary: Clarify hit-testing for the cursor-property From: Chris Rebert Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0010.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0005.html Closed: Accepted Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-test/pull/800#issuecomment-137299957 Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0040.html ---- Issue 4. Summary: Resize should apply to replaced elements From: Elika Etemad Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0333.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0004.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0252.html ---- Issue 5. Summary: Section titles do not match convention From: Elika Etemad Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Mar/0299.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Jan/0072.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial ---- Issue 6. Summary: Missing context makes statement hard to understand From: Elika Etemad Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Mar/0301.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Jan/0073.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial ---- Issue 7. Summary: The combinators and multipliers within the syntaxes should link to the CSS Values module From: Sebastian Zartner Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/147 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/c0c700f9c8b29ba77a5861937a4097f2440ad1f2 Closed: Accepted Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/147#issuecomment-223494303 Resolved: Editorial ---- Issue 8. Summary: Add outline-offset to shorthand From: Yoksel Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/441 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/441#issuecomment-244638068 Closed: Rejected Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/441#issuecomment-248137532 Resolved: Editors' discretion ---- Issue 9. Summary: Remove outline-color: invert From: Chrishtr Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/423 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/423#issuecomment-242421803 Closed: Rejected Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/423#issuecomment-265858664 Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Nov/0079.html ---- Issue 10. Summary: Should caret-color apply to any element? From: Rego Casasnovas Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/725 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/725#issuecomment-263936054 Closed: Accepted Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/725#issuecomment-264031876 Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Nov/0123.html ---- Issue 11. Summary: Allow annimation to/from caret-color:auto From: Florian Rivoal Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/781 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/781#issuecomment-266428994 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/781#issuecomment-266952449 Closed: Retracted Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/781#issuecomment-267304148 Resolved: Editors' discretion ---- Issue 12. Summary: Phrasing of computed value of caret-color ambiguous despite clear intent From: Florian Rivoal Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/741 Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Nov/0123.html Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/741#issuecomment-275015837 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix / Editorial ----