Title: CSS Text Decoration Module Level 4 Shortname: css-text-decor Level: 4 Status: FPWD Date: 2018-03-13 Prepare for TR: true Work Status: Exploring Group: csswg ED: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-text-decor-4/ TR: https://www.w3.org/TR/css-text-decor-4/ Issue Tracking: Tracker http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Tracker/products/10 Editor: Elika J. Etemad / fantasai, Invited Expert, http://fantasai.inkedblade.net/contact, w3cid 35400 Editor: Koji Ishii, Google, kojiishi@gmail.com, w3cid 45369 Abstract: This module contains the features of CSS relating to text decoration, such as underlines, text shadows, and emphasis marks. Link Defaults: css-color-3 (property) color, css-break-3 (dfn) fragment Ignored Terms: svg shape, svg shapes, invalid, repeatable list, simple list, valid image
spec:css-text-3; type:dfn; text:character
Name: text-decoration-width Value: auto | from-font | <This property, which is also a sub-property of the 'text-decoration' shorthand, sets the stroke thickness of underlines, overlines, and line-throughs. Values have the following meanings:> Initial: auto Applies to: all elements Inherited: no Percentages: N/A Media: visual Computed value: as specified Animatable: no
Since line decorations can span elements with varying font sizes and vertical alignments, the best position for a line decoration is not necessarily the ideal position dictated by the decorating box. Instead, it's calculated, per line, from all text decorated by the decorating box on that line, the considered text. However, descendants of the decorating box that are skipped due to 'text-decoration-skip', descendant inlines with ''text-decoration-skip: ink'', and any descendants that do not participate in the decorating box’s inline formatting context are excluded from the set of considered text.
The line decoration positions are then calculated per line as follows (treating over-positioned underlines as over lines and under-positioned overlines as under lines):
The alphabetic underline position is calculated by taking the ideal offset (from the alphabetic baseline) of each run of considered text, averaging those, and then using the lowest alphabetic baseline to actually position the line. (Alphabetic baselines can differ between ''vertical-align/baseline''-aligned boxes if the dominant baseline is non-alphabetic.) To prevent superscripts and subscripts from throwing this position off-kilter, an inline with a non-initial computed 'vertical-align' is treated as having the ideal underline position of its parent.
For simplicity, line-throughs should draw over each element at that element's preferred/averaged position. This can produce some undesirable jumpiness, but there doesn't appear to be any way to avoid that which is correct in all instances, and all attempts are worryingly complex. What position should line-throughts adopt over elements that have a different font-size, but no considered text?
CSS does not define the thickness of line decorations. In determining the thickness of text decoration lines, user agents may consider the font sizes, faces, and weights of descendants to provide an appropriately averaged thickness.
The following figure shows the averaging for underline:
In the three fragments of underlined text, the underline is drawn consecutively lower and thicker as the ratio of large text to small text increases.
Using the same example, a line-through would in the second fragment, instead of averaging the two font sizes, split the line-through into two segments:
In both cases, however, the superscript, due to the vertical-alignment shift, has no effect on the position of the line.
Name: text-underline-offset Value: auto | from-font | <This property, which is not a sub-property of the 'text-decoration' shorthand, sets the offset of underlines from their initial position. Values have the following meanings:> Initial: auto Applies to: all elements Inherited: yes Percentages: N/A Media: visual Computed value: as specified Animatable: no
| 'text-underline-position' | Initial Position | Positive Direction |
|---|---|---|
| ''text-underline-position/auto'' | alphabetic baseline | over |
| ''text-underline-position/under'' | text-under edge | over |
| ''text-underline-position/over'' | text-over edge | under |
Name: text-decoration-skip Value: none | [ objects || [ spaces | [ leading-spaces || trailing-spaces ] ] || edges || box-decoration ] Initial: objects leading-spaces trailing-spaces Applies to: all elements Inherited: yes Percentages: N/A Media: visual Computed value: as specified Animatable: noIssue: The initial value is quite verbose, which makes it inconvenient to set the property to the initial value plus something else. We should make this easier to specify. Issue: This property will be split into individual properties along the lines of 'text-decoration-skip-ink', to improve its cascading behavior. See discussion and resolution. This property specifies what parts of the element's content any text decoration affecting the element must skip over. It controls all text decoration lines drawn by the element and also any text decoration lines drawn by its ancestors. Values have the following meanings:
''text-decoration-skip: edges'' for <u>石井</u><u>艾俐俐</u>
Note that this property inherits and that descendant elements can have a different setting.
The following addition is made to the default UA stylesheet for HTML:
ins, del { text-decoration-skip: none; }
When the value of the 'text-decoration-line' property is either
''spelling-error'' or ''grammar-error'',
the UA may ignore the value of 'text-decoration-skip'.
Name: text-decoration-skip-ink Value: auto | none Initial: ''auto'' Applies to: all elements Inherited: yes Percentages: N/A Media: visual Computed value: as specified Animatable: noThis property controls how overlines and underlines are drawn when they cross over a glyph. When enabled, decoration lines skip over where glyphs are drawn: interrupt the decoration line to let the shape of the text show through where the text decoration would otherwise cross over a glyph. The UA must also skip a small distance to either side of the glyph outline.
''text-decoration-skip: ink''
This section is under brainstorming. It's also not yet clear if this property is needed quite yet, despite differences in desired behavior among publications.
Name: text-emphasis-skip Value: spaces || punctuation || symbols || narrow Initial: spaces punctuation Applies to: all elements Inherited: yes Percentages: N/A Media: visual Computed value: as specifiedThis property describes for which characters marks are drawn. The values have following meanings:
NFKD-equivalent [[!UAX15]]
to the following characters from the Unicode Po category:
| # | U+0023 | NUMBER SIGN |
| % | U+0025 | PERCENT SIGN |
| ‰ | U+2030 | PER MILLE SIGN |
| ‱ | U+2031 | PER TEN THOUSAND SIGN |
| ٪ | U+066A | ARABIC PERCENT SIGN |
| ؉ | U+0609 | ARABIC-INDIC PER MILLE SIGN |
| ؊ | U+060A | ARABIC-INDIC PER TEN THOUSAND SIGN |
| & | U+0026 | AMPERSAND |
| ⁊ | U+204A | TIRONIAN SIGN ET |
| @ | U+0040 | COMMERCIAL AT |
| § | U+00A7 | SECTION SIGN |
| ¶ | U+00B6 | PILCROW SIGN |
| ⁋ | U+204B | REVERSED PILCROW SIGN |
| 〽️ | U+303D | PART ALTERNATION MARK |
East_Asian_Width property [[!UAX11]]
of the Unicode database [[!UAX44]] is not F (Fullwidth) or W (Wide).
This syntax requires UA to implement drawing marks for spaces. Is there any use case for doing so? If not, should we modify the syntax not to allow drawing marks for spaces? Issue: See also discussion of the initial value. Privacy and Security Considerations {#priv-sec} =============================================== This specification introduces no new privacy or security considerations.