Title: CSS Images Module Level 5
Status: ED
Work Status: Exploring
Shortname: css-images
Level: 5
Group: csswg
ED: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-images-5/
TR: https://www.w3.org/TR/css-images-5/
Editor: Tab Atkins Jr., Google, http://xanthir.com/contact/, w3cid 42199
Editor: Elika J. Etemad / fantasai, Apple, http://fantasai.inkedblade.net/contact, w3cid 35400
Editor: Lea Verou, Invited Expert, http://lea.verou.me/about, w3cid 52258
Abstract: This module contains the features of CSS level 4 relating to the <> type and replaced elements.
	It includes and extends the functionality of CSS level 2 [[CSS2]] and in the previous level of this specification [[css-images-4]].
Default Highlight: css

	Name: object-view-box
	Value: none | <>
	Initial: none
	Applies to: [=replaced elements=]
	Inherited: no
	Percentages: n/a
	Computed value: specified keyword, or computed  function
	Animation Type: as  if possible, otherwise discrete
	

: none :: The element does not have a view box. : <> :: If the element does not have both a [=natural width=] and a [=natural height=], this value has no effect, similar to ''object-view-box/none''. Otherwise, specifies a view box for the element. First, resolve the <> against a [=<basic-shape>/reference box=] formed by the element's [=natural sizes=] to obtain the element's view box. For all purposes, the element is now treated as having [=natural sizes=] equal to the view box's width and height. If the element had a [=natural aspect ratio=], it's now treated as instead having the same ratio as the view box. Further adjustments to the size/position of the element's contents, such as 'object-position' or 'object-fit', are similarly performed on the view box instead. When the element is painted, its contents are scaled and translated such that the element's contents retain the same position and size, relative to the view box's final size and position, that they had when the view box was determined (above). Issue: Have not yet defined what happens if the view box is zero-area. It's an error case, so precise behavior isn't important; just need to see what impls want to do about it.