Draft:    http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/WD-css-flexbox-1-20150514/
Title:    CSS Flexible Box Layout Level 3

----
Issue 1.
Summary:  min/max-content sizes of flex containers incorrectly defined
From:     fantasai
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/55D6D14A.3010202@inkedblade.net
Response: 
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 2.
Summary:  Should min/max-content sizes of flex containers include flex-basis?
From:     fantasai
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/55D6D14A.3010202@inkedblade.net
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0007.html
Closed:   Retracted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0038.html
Verified: reporter is spec editor
----
Issue 3.
Summary:  Can percentages resolve given min-size: auto?
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/54F4FC19.2050909@mozilla.com
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0205.html
Open:     Action on dholbert, msft, and blink teams to discuss and decide something
Resolved: [Paris F2F]
----
Issue 4.
Summary:  Quirks mode percentage size resolution, 'flex: 1', and intrinsic heights
From:     Christian Biesinger
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/CAPTJ0XEFH7FP92BjHY8r7VTRQgab8oO-zOL=6QO=ZpfH9Dk-Pw@mail.gmail.com
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0232.html
Closed:   Invalid
----
Issue 5.
Summary:  Impact of align-items on abspos items inconsistent with css-align
From:     Christian Biesinger
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/CAPTJ0XHb621NNGJkjEAeJXuS2DwqN_eHJbbZUVeh+FbNWZTiPw@mail.gmail.com
Open
----
Issue 6.
Summary:  Do flex item determination before anonymous box fixup.
From:     fantasai
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/55A95E05.8040208@inkedblade.net
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0038.html
Verified: reporter is spec editor
----
Issue 7.
Summary:  Clarify % margin/padding behavior
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/5596BE4F.5010306@mozilla.com
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 8.
Summary:  Add a11y requirments to authoring tools
From:     fantasai
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/5580BF2D.7080908@inkedblade.net
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0348.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0064.html
----
Issue 9.
Summary:  Editorial Comments 
From:     timeless
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/CACsW8eE7eRghUk8g+LdVxFR-gHpZFO=EAAsGk=M-nqoG9eUT_w@mail.gmail.com
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/CACsW8eG7gOiNps=b_b8iUMLxNxnjVXu9_2qhk9mHaCgY_b0Vrg@mail.gmail.com
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0344.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0346.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 10.
Summary:  Broken Styling
From:     Ryan Prichard
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/CA+gYnHRp6RC4OECQTicZGSGB_Rq=x+3O8P3mVD=gCY+g0u8EoA@mail.gmail.com
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jun/0027.html
Closed:   Accepted
Note:     Bug appears to have disappeared?
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 11.
Summary:  Blink objects to percentage-margin change
From:     Tab Atkins Jr.
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Feb/0521.html
Note:     Accepting this reversal will require a corresponding change to Grid.
Open
----
Issue 12.
Summary:  Intrinsic Cross size of flex container totally wrong
From:     fantasai
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0253.html
Open:     Need corrected text
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 13.
Summary:  Errors in Intrinsic Main Size determination
From:     fantasai
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0212.html
Closed:   Accepted
Open:     Need to discuss biesi's concerns about this section as a whole
----
Issue 14.
Summary:  Use first available baseline instead of first item's baseline
From:     timeless
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0345.html
Open
----
Issue 15.
Summary:  Add a tab-order property
From:     Bo Campbell
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0285.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0347.html
Closed:   Rejected
----
Issue 16.
Summary:  Are abspos whose containing block is flexbox affected by % resolution change?
From:     Mats Palmgren
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015May/0154.html
Open:     Depends on issue #11
Note:     WG appears to lean towards consistency within grid/flex over consistency within abspos
----