Draft:    https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/CR-css-flexbox-1-20171019/
Title:    CSS Flexible Box Module Level 1

----
Issue 1.
Summary:  Move min-width/min-height: auto definitions to css-sizing
From:     Oriol Brufau
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1920
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1920#issuecomment-342008468
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2103
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2103#issuecomment-360955736
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Dec/0004.html
----
Issue 2.
Summary:  Choose single option for resolving margin/padding percentages
From:     Rossen Atanassov
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2085
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2085#issuecomment-362000362
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/db68ee43e752fabf68fd1e776a0ac840f4d3e971
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Feb/0000.html
----
Issue 3.
Summary:  When does min-width/min-height: auto compute to auto vs zero?
From:     fantasai
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2230
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/cf709be33562b27fddd4200824d876378f47fe6d
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Feb/0000.html
----
Issue 4.
Summary:  Make min-width: auto compute to auto always, resolve to zero as needed
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2248#issuecomment-362114572
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2248#issuecomment-365688138
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2248#issuecomment-370625542
----
Issue 5.
Summary:  Min-content sizing too smart to be web compatible
From:     François Remy
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2353
Open
----
Issue 6.
Summary:  Make order do semantic reordering
From:     Robert Utasi
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2405
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2405#issuecomment-371528202
???:      https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2405#issuecomment-371590054
Closed:   Rejected
Resolved: previous CSSWG resolutions, Web platform architectural principles, etc.
----
Issue 7.
Summary:  Use more formal language in note
From:     Nadya678
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2431
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2431#issuecomment-372120318
Closed:   Accepted
Changes:  (note was removed entirely due to issue 2)
----