Last call document: http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/WD-css3-break-20150129/
Editor's draft: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-break/
The following color coding convention is used for comments:
Open issues are marked like this
An issue can be closed as Accepted, OutOfScope,
Invalid, Rejected, or Retracted.
Verified indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.
Issue 2. # Summary: Clarify slicing requirements for monolithic elements From: Håkon Wium Lie Comment: http://www.w3.org/mid/21703.26184.790775.276339@opera.com Response: Open Resolved: Editorial
Issue 2. # Summary: Slicing/pushing of replaced content should be controllable From: Håkon Wium Lie, Tab Atkins Comment: http://www.w3.org/mid/CAAWBYDDTkpswKPoL0L_Gn1zqCLRR=yW_aeLohj-W4sG6Sm+mjQ@mail.gmail.com Response: Open Resolved: =Agenda=
Issue 3. # Summary: Replace ASCII diagrams with SVG From: Doug Schepers Comment: http://www.w3.org/mid/54FC11AE.9040209@w3.org Response: Open Resolved: Editorial
Issue 4. # Summary: Address line-breaking controls From: Brad Kemper Comment: http://www.w3.org/mid/5E7F055F-13C9-4BAF-B164-2F5828824259@gmail.com Response: http://www.w3.org/mid/95585CF5-A67B-42EC-BDA8-2517CF7BF040@adobe.com Closed: Accepted Note: Handled in CSS Text Level 4 Verified: http://www.w3.org/mid/D7F36DDB-9393-445C-88BE-38BEA5375899@gmail.com Resolved:
Issue 5. # Summary: Grammatical errors From: Brady Duga Comment: http://www.w3.org/mid/CAKpG1kH+JX=fWrcTb_vKhnbPfR5YaNWpaichmLkCoQoMJxh94w@mail.gmail.com Response: Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 6. # Summary: Confusion on break types wrt nested flows From: Brady Duga Comment: http://www.w3.org/mid/CAKpG1kGBU1qNTLsM0xhBesEYCfY+ABbZY2SbTU-e+2HeA9X5Ug@mail.gmail.com Response: Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 7. # Summary: Name of 'any' is confusing From: Brady Duga Comment: http://www.w3.org/mid/CAKpG1kHH5H+OQ5V81u=VTMPJrULq-VDA8rzP5=1_k7SXPqvx-A@mail.gmail.com Response: Open Resolved: =Agenda=
Issue 8. # Summary: Multiple principal boxes problematic From: Brady Duga Comment: http://www.w3.org/mid/CAKpG1kEp8+sfnrNkbuab5sH=HnPiPv3MHg5SQ8Ou=OK1iXy7Hw@mail.gmail.com Response: Closed: Invalid Resolved: Editor's discretion
Issue 9. # Summary: Page progression undefined From: Brady Duga Comment: http://www.w3.org/mid/CAKpG1kG-TbN_pbHY_4QdvdauiG8=nrTu1NEx56vTaGNcWUxaRw@mail.gmail.com Response: Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 10. # Summary: Multiple avoidances From: Brady Duga Comment: http://www.w3.org/mid/CAKpG1kGQucyO-9x=zK4d1u=hK1C_yGrn9yhAJf+SGuYPm37W-w@mail.gmail.com Response: Open Resolved: =Agenda=
Issue 11. # Summary: Breaking rules too specifically defined From: Brady Duga Comment: http://www.w3.org/mid/CAKpG1kFESW0OmVKi8qJ7FGKPG9g1+h-f2rW6JqxFBawrH+4Egw@mail.gmail.com Response: Open Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 12. # Summary: Generated content at breaks From: Sanders Kleinfeld Comment: http://www.w3.org/mid/826769891.862609.1428367549875.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com%28sfid-20150407_103540_382741_CD8ECAC2%29 Response: Closed: Deferred Resolved:
Issue 13. # Summary: box-decoration-break and margins From: Håkon Wium Lie Comment: http://www.w3.org/mid/826769891.862609.1428367549875.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com%28sfid-20150407_103540_382741_CD8ECAC2%29 Response: Open Resolved: =Agenda=