Fix candidate extractor regression (tailwindlabs#8558)

* fix regression

This is a regression where `%>utility<%` didn't properly abstract
`utility`

* update changelog

Author: RobinMalfait

CHANGELOG.md

@@ -7,7 +7,9 @@ and this project adheres to [Semantic Versioning](https://semver.org/spec/v2.0.0
 
 ## [Unreleased]
 
-- Nothing yet!
+### Fixed
+
+- Fix candidate extractor regression ([#8558](https://github.com/tailwindlabs/tailwindcss/pull/8558))
 
 ## [3.1.0] - 2022-06-08
 

src/lib/defaultExtractor.js

@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ function* buildRegExps(context) {
             /(?![{([]])/,
 
             // optionally followed by an opacity modifier
-            /(?:\/[^\s'"\\$]*)?/,
+            /(?:\/[^\s'"\\><$]*)?/,
           ]),
 
           regex.pattern([
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ function* buildRegExps(context) {
           ]),
 
           // Normal values w/o quotes — may include an opacity modifier
-          /[-\/][^\s'"\\$={]*/,
+          /[-\/][^\s'"\\$={><]*/,
         ])
       ),
     ]),

tests/default-extractor.test.js

@@ -438,3 +438,14 @@ test('with double quotes array within function', async () => {
   expect(extractions).toContain('pl-1.5')
   expect(extractions).not.toContain('pl-1')
 })
+
+test('with angle brackets', async () => {
+  const extractions = defaultExtractor(
+    `<div class="bg-blue-200 <% if (useShadow) { %>shadow-xl<% } %>">test</div>`
+  )
+
+  expect(extractions).toContain('bg-blue-200')
+  expect(extractions).toContain('shadow-xl')
+  expect(extractions).not.toContain('>shadow-xl')
+  expect(extractions).not.toContain('shadow-xl<')
+})