forked from w3c/csswg-drafts
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Expand file tree
/
Copy pathissues-lc-2010.txt
More file actions
96 lines (95 loc) · 4.06 KB
/
issues-lc-2010.txt
File metadata and controls
96 lines (95 loc) · 4.06 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
Open//Accepted/OutOfScope/Invalid/Rejected/Retracted
Verified indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.
Issue 1.
Summary: Remove 'box-shadow' from At-Risk list
From: Sylvain Galineau
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Jun/0483.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Oct/0479.html
Closed: Accepted
----
Issue 2.
Summary: box-shadow spread should specify half the blur radius
From: Tab Atkins?
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Jun/0513.html
Response: very long thread resulting in edits :)
Closed: Accepted
----
Issue 3.
Summary: border-radius for corner-radius confusing; make own section?
From: CSS3.info / Jeffrey Gilbert, Krzysztof Maczyński
Comment: http://www.css3.info/w3c-issues-last-call-for-comments-on-css3-backgrounds-and-borders/#comment-259427
Response: http://www.css3.info/w3c-issues-last-call-for-comments-on-css3-backgrounds-and-borders/#comment-259447
Closed: Accepted
----
Issue 4.
Summary: inset box-shadow should paint over content
From: divya manian
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Jul/0422.html
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Jul/0474.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0111.html
Closed: Rejected
----
Issue 5.
Summary: Initial value currentcolor not defined
From: Christian Roth
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Oct/0015.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Oct/0016.html
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Oct/0019.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Oct/0480.html
Closed: Accepted
----
Issue 6.
Summary: Example inconsistent with prose
From: Brian Manthos
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0368.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0369.html
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0370.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0383.html
Closed: Invalid / OutOfScope
----
Issue 7.
Summary: Not defined how border curve breaks across lines
From: Sylvain Galineau
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0109.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Oct/0395.html
Closed: Accepted
----
Issue 8.
Summary: border-image width numbers should refer to *computed* border-widths
From: Brad Kemper
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0065.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0066.html
Closed: Accepted
----
Issue 9.
Summary: Clarify how background shorthand sets values to layers
From: Øyvind Stenhaug
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0387.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Oct/0478.html
Closed: Accepted
----
Issue 10.
Summary: Add syntax to distinguish foreground images from background images
From: Michael Cooper on behalf of PFWG
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Oct/0821.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Oct/0829.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-wai-pf/2010OctDec/0142.html
Closed: Accepted
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Dec/att-0356/css_response_from_pf.html
----
Issue 11.
Summary: Reference WCAG 2.0 SC1.1.1 F3
From: Michael Cooper on behalf of PFWG
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Oct/0821.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Oct/0829.html
Closed: Accepted
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Dec/att-0356/css_response_from_pf.html
----
Issue 12.
Summary: border-image shorthand inconcistent with CSS2.1 informative grammar
From: Yves
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Nov/0078.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Nov/0405.html
Closed: Rejected
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Nov/0484.html
----