forked from w3c/csswg-drafts
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Expand file tree
/
Copy pathissues-lc-20140925.txt
More file actions
132 lines (131 loc) · 4.64 KB
/
issues-lc-20140925.txt
File metadata and controls
132 lines (131 loc) · 4.64 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
Draft: http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-css-flexbox-1-20140925/
Title: CSS Flexible Box Layout Level 1
----
Issue 1.
Summary: Use preferred size instead of max-content size
From: Tab Atkins
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0385.html
Open
----
Issue 2.
Summary: Flex item handling of anonymous boxes should be normative
From: Alan Stearns
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Oct/0265.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Oct/0268.html
Closed: Accepted
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Oct/0269.html
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 3.
Summary: Editorial nits
From: Alan Stearns
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Oct/0267.html
----
Issue 4.
Summary: Alignment shouldn't depend on number of lines, but on wrappability
From: fantasai
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Oct/0489.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0341.html
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0004.html
----
Issue 5.
Summary: Clarify sizing of abspos flex containers
From: François Remy
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Sep/0396.html
Response:
Open
----
Issue 6.
Summary: Error in stretch definition
From: Greg Whitworth
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Sep/0429.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Sep/0430.html
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 7.
Summary: Alias no-wrap to nowrap
From: Tab Atkins
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Oct/0188.html
Open
----
Issue 8.
Summary: Error in flex container max-content definition
From: Daniel Holbert
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Oct/0443.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0340.html
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 9.
Summary: Scaled flex shrink factor should multiply by outer, not inner, base size
From: Daniel Holbert
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Oct/0417.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Oct/0495.html
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Editors' discretion
----
Issue 10.
Summary: Revert 'flex-basis: auto' rename, add 'content' value instead
From: Rossen Atanassov
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Nov/0023.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0342.html
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Nov/0401.html
Open: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0346.html
----
Issue 11.
Summary: Clarify that flex layout is writing-mode relative
From: Addison Phillips
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Nov/0058.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0344.html
Open: Waiting for verification.
----
Issue 12.
Summary: Example should state general case, put specific in parens, not vice versa
From: Addison Phillips
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Nov/0060.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0343.html
Closed: Rejected
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 13.
Summary: Why are there sheep?
From: Addison Phillips
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Nov/0059.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Nov/0064.html
Closed: Invalid
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 14.
Summary: 'flex' section needs editorial love
From: fantasai
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Nov/0066.html
Open
----
Issue 15.
Summary: Stray references to old spec prose
From: Daniel Holbert
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Dec/0078.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0089.html
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 16.
Summary: 'order' should affect speech/navigation order
From: Bo Campbell
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0119.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0121.html
Open: Rejected, but still under discussion by WG.
----
Issue 17.
Summary: Forced flex line breaking controls
From: Glen Huang
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0322.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0336.html
Open: Agenda+
----
Issue 18.
Summary: Spec conflicts with itself on interpretation of break controls
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0349.html
Open