forked from w3c/csswg-drafts
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Expand file tree
/
Copy pathissues-lc-2012.txt
More file actions
317 lines (316 loc) · 12.7 KB
/
issues-lc-2012.txt
File metadata and controls
317 lines (316 loc) · 12.7 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
Open//Accepted/OutOfScope/Invalid/Rejected/Retracted
Issue 1.
Summary: Use linear RGB for gradients
From: Witold Baryluk
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jan/0607.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jan/0617.html
Closed: Rejected
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jan/0635.html
----
Issue 2.
Summary: Don't use prepositions in linear-gradient()
From: Robert Biggs
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jan/0720.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jan/0783.html
Comment: (private mail - accepted resolution for radial-gradient, but
didn't accept it for linear-gradient)
Note: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Aug/0271.html
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0384.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0387.html
Closed: Rejected
----
Issue 3.
Summary: Use of 'bounding box' is undefined, should be 'border box'
From: Leif Arne Storset
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0033.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1386.html
Closed: Accepted
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1399.html
----
Issue 4.
Summary: 'element reference identifier' underdefined
From: David Baron
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0253.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0265.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1398.html
Closed: Accepted
----
Issue 5.
Summary: The element() cycle detection algo phrasing implies an incremental
algorithm.
From: David Baron
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0251.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0269.html
Closed: Accepted
----
Issue 6.
Summary: The element() cycle detection algo misses cycles caused by
host-language elements.
From: David Baron
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0254.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0270.html
Closed: Accepted
----
Issue 7.
Summary: The term "paint sources" is insufficiently defined, and should
have explicit definitions for HTML and SVG.
From: David Baron
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0252.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0264.html
Closed: Accepted
----
Issue 8.
Summary: HTML's definition of "paint source" only exists in the WHATWG
version of HTML5, so it should be directly linked to.
From: Leif Arne Storset
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0267.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0271.html
Closed: Accepted
----
Issue 9.
Summary: 'image-orientation' should be applied before any other transformations
From: Kenny Lu
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0404.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0517.html
Closed: Accepted
----
Issue 10.
Summary: Concrete Object Size resolution algorithm has clumsy text,
implying that only one dimension is resolved in one of the steps
From: Kenny Lu
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0395.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0518.html
Closed: Accepted
----
Issue 11.
Summary: element() examples still used old IDENT syntax.
From: Kenny Lu
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0394.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0519.html
Closed: Accepted
----
Issue 12.
Summary: specify element() behavior when the selector matches multiple elements
From: Kenny Lu
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0394.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0519.html
Closed: Accepted
----
Issue 13.
Summary: specify that relative image() urls compute to absolute
From: Kennu Lu
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0393.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0696.html
Closed: Accepted
----
Issue 14.
Summary: image() shouldn't require implementations to support Media Fragments
From: Kenny Lu
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0388.html
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1049.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1102.html
Closed: Partially Accepted - keep requirement, but add a generalized form
of the commenter's idea as well, as suggested by fantasai
----
Issue 15.
Summary: Better define how image-orientation interacts with EXIF data
From: Simon Fraser
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0311.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0877.html
Closed: Accepted
----
Issue 16.
Summary: Gradients shouldn't transition using premultiplied alpha.
From: Rik Cabanier
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1071.html
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1081.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1090.html
Closed: Rejected
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1084.html
----
Issue 17.
Summary: element() function should move to the next level of Images
From: Simon Fraser
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0324.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0347.html
Closed: Rejected
Verified: (Verified as part of in-person discussion during the February CSSWG f2f.)
----
Issue 18.
Summary: Define 'dpi' and 'dpcm' in terms of the real physical units,
not the CSS units
From: Kenny Lu
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0408.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0430.html
Closed: Rejected
Verified: http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/whatwg/20120222#l-80
----
Issue 19.
Summary: Several typos
From: Kenny Lu
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0408.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0430.html
Closed: Accepted
----
Issue 20.
Summary: It's unclear if image-resolution is supposed to apply to images
specified in CSS
From: Simon Fraser
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0323.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0329.html
Closed: Accepted
----
Issue 21.
Summary: The spec points to Values & Units for a definition of <position>,
but it's not defined there.
From: Lea Verou
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jan/0950.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1106.html
Closed: Rejected
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1107.html
----
Issue 22.
Summary: There should be a non-example reference to CSSElementMap
From: Simon Fraser
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0268.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0266.html
Closed: Accepted
----
Issue 23.
Summary: Wording of 'object-fit:fill' seems to imply that the content box
*must* be filled
From: Leif Arne Storset
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0034.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0099.html
Closed: Accepted
----
Issue 24.
Summary: 'object-fit:cover/contain' contain seemingly redundant text
From: Leif Arne Storset
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0036.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0098.html
Note: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011May/0638.html
Open.
----
Issue 25.
Summary: "Concentric ellipses" is imprecise
From: Kenny Lu
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1361.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1375.html
Closed: Accepted
Verified: NEEDS REVIEW
----
Issue 26.
Summary: specify alignment of varying-size pages for broken element()
From: fantasai
Closed: Accepted
----
Issue 27.
Summary: Allow image() to accept element()
From: TabAtkins
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0265.html
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1143.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1398.html
Closed: Accepted
----
Issue 28.
Summary: Use of <svg> as a paint source
From: Erik Dahlstrom
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1124.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1131.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1137.html
Closed: Rejected
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1250.html
----
Issue 29.
Summary: Clarify "not rendered"
From: Erik Dahlstrom
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1124.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1137.html
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1250.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1265.html
Closed: Accepted
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1330.html
----
Issue 30.
Summary: Style resolution of elements not in document
From: Boris Zbarsky
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1256.html
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1268.html
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1269.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1278.html
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1279.html
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1288.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1350.html
Closed: ???
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1356.html
----
Issue 31.
Summary: Define precisely how SVG paint servers are used as paint sources
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1250.html (bottom)
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1265.html (bottom)
Closed: Accepted
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1330.html (bottom)
----
Issue 32.
Summary: objectBoundingBox and userSpaceOnUse are defined to be identical
Note: raised against edits resulting from other issues, not against LC
From: Dirk Schulze
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1296.html
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1304.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1305.html
Closed: Invalid
----
Issue 33.
Summary: aliasing of object-fit/object-position
From: Erik Dahlstrom
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1126.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1127.html
Open.
----
Issue 34.
Summary: element() and 3D Transforms
From: Dirk Schulze
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1294.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1297.html
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1325.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1334.html
Open.
----
Issue 35.
Summary: GCPM element() and Images element()
From: fantasai / Håkon Lie
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1430.html
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1433.html
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0012.html
Open.
----
Issue 36.
Summary: Clarify scope of required Media Fragments support for image()
From: David Baron
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0152.html
Open.
----
Issue 37.
Summary: ltr/rtl annotations should be per image() not per URL
From: Kenny Lu
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0243.html
Open.
----
Issue 38.
Summary: Default object size for replaced elements is incorrect
From: David Baron
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0336.html
Open.
----
Issue 39.
Summary: Concrete object size should link to algorithm
From: David Baron
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0337.html
Open.
----
Issue 40.
Summary: Editorial comments on linear-gradient()
From: David Baron
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0338.html
Open.