csswg-drafts/css-backgrounds/issues-lc-2012.txt at c11572daca7521cfc68d67916caec0b8a342eaf0 · xfq/csswg-drafts · GitHub

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
Draft:    http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-css3-background-20120214/
#Audience: WG
Audience: Director

Set Audience to Director for an HTML version without the Edit fields.

Currently lists all comments on www-style between Feb 14 (publication
date) and Mar 13, 2012 (comment deadline was Mar 6).

Open//Accepted/OutOfScope/Invalid/Rejected/Retracted
Verified indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.

Issue 1.
Summary:  Add 'background-position-x' and 'background-position-y'
From:     Florian Rivoal
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0618.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0628.html
Closed:   Rejected
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0630.html
----
Issue 2.
Summary:  Computed value line for 'background-repeat' is imprecise
From:     David Baron
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1094.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0587.html
Closed:   Accepted
Edit:	  Edited

Issue:    3
Summary:  Reorder the border-*-radius definitions in the spec
From:     Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0258.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0592.html
Closed:   Accepted
Edit:     Edited

Issue:    4
Summary:  “Applies to” for 'border-radius' doesn't match prose
From:     Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0258.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0592.html
Closed:   Accepted
Edit:     Edited

Issue:    5
Summary:  Negative values for 'border-radius' should explicitly be illegal
From:     Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0258.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0592.html
Closed:   Accepted
Edit:     Edited

Issue:    6
Summary:  Rephrase note about inner curve in 5.2
From:     Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0258.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0592.html
Closed:   Accepted
Edit: 	  Elika replaced “adjacent corner” by “opposite side”
	  and will add an image

Issue:    7
Summary:  Unclear text about corner transitions in 5.4
From:     Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0258.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0592.html
Edit: 	  Changed to “Otherwise, the center
	  of color and style transitions
	  between adjoining borders must a point along the curve
	  that is a continuous monotonic function of the ratio of
	  the border widths. However it is not defined what these
	  transitions look like or what function maps from this
	  ratio to a point on the curve.”
Closed:	  Accepted

Issue:    8
Summary:  Insert “two corresponding” in the formula in 5.5
From:     Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0258.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0592.html
Closed:   Accepted
Edit: 	  Edited

Issue:    9
Summary:  Remove redundant paragraph “The rendering must be exactly…” in 5.5
From:     Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0258.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0592.html
Closed:   Accepted
Edit: 	  Edited

Issue:    10
Summary:  Example 24 should have only images A and B, D and C are the same
From:     Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0258.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0592.html
Closed:   Accepted
Edit:     Labeled the images A B B A (no C and D)

Issue:    11
Summary:  Example 25 belongs in 5.1 instead of 5.6
From:     Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0258.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0592.html
Closed:   Accepted
Edit: 	  Edited

Issue:    12
Summary:  Use “{1,2}” instead of “?” in syntax of 'border-radius'
From:     Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0258.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0592.html
Closed:   Accepted
Edit: 	  Edited

Issue:    13
Summary:  Initial value of 'border-radius' should be “see individual properties”
From:     Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0258.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0592.html
Closed:   Accepted
Edit: 	  Edited

Issue:    14
Summary:  Also allow to specify corners with an <angle> instead of two <length>
From:     Christoph Päper
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0324.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Apr/0117.html
Closed:   Rejected (new features are out of scope)
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Apr/0118.html

Issue:    15
Summary:  Add a “cut” corner style (border-corner-shape: normal|curved|sharp)
From:     Christoph Päper
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0324.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Apr/0117.html
Closed:   Rejected (new features are out of scope)
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Apr/0118.html

Issue:    16
Summary:  'Border-image' syntax allows odd trailing slash.
	  Syntax should disallow it. And maybe also disallow
	  two slashes in a row.
From:     Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0179.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0605.html
Edit: 	  Proposal: Solution C, disallow trailing slash in
	  syntax. (But still allow two
	  slashes with nothing in between.)
Closed:   Accepted (solution C)
Edit: 	  Edited, but needs to be verified by WG

Issue:    17
Summary:  'background' shorthand specification text fails to say that
	  'background-image' is reset.
From:     Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0134.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0595.html
Closed:   Accepted
Edit: 	  Edited

Issue:    18
Summary:  The specification should say which background and border
	  properties apply to first-line and first-letter.
From:     Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0133.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0606.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0617.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Apr/0032.html
Edit:     Edited according to Proposal 2 in the last reply.
Closed:   Accepted

Issue:    19
Summary:  What is the background of the page area?
From:     Fantasai (WG member)
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0127.html
Response: (Filed as issue for css3-page)
Closed:   OutOfScope
Verified: Personal communication

Issue:    20
Summary:  Rewording and more verbose grammar (or an informative note)
	  for 'background-position'
From:     Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0124.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Apr/0124.html
Closed:   Accepted
Edit: 	  Edited

Issue:    21
Summary:  Unclear what border style is used on table cells, when
	  'border-image-source' doesn't apply
From:     Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0109.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0602.html
Closed:   Accepted
Edit: 	  Added “(or doesn't apply)” after “cannot be displayed”; and added
	  “otherwise the element's borders are invisible and
	  the border image is drawn as described in the sections below.”

Issue:    22
Summary:  Clarify how border-image applies to table elements with
	  collapsing borders (relation to border conflict resolution)
From:     Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0109.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0602.html
Edit: 	  Added “otherwise the element's borders are
	  invisble and the border image is drawn”.
Edit:	  Proposal for the rest has two options:
	  (A) draw the table borders with invisible
	  ink and then draw the image on top of it; or (B) an image border
	  overrides any other border in the conflict resolution. (The
	  difference is the calculation of the width of each cell.)
Edit: 	  WG decision:
	  Make interaction of border-image with collapsed tables
	  undefined, recommend not applying it to such tables in L3,
	  expect it to be defined in L4.
Edit:	  Edited as per the WG decision. (Added section 6.8.)
Closed:	  Accepted

Issue 23
Summary:  Ambiguous phrasing about 'inset' and tables
From:     Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0106.html
Closed:   Accepted
Edit: 	  Edited (copied wording from CSS 2.1: “In the collapsing
	  border model, drawn the same as 'ridge'.”)

Issue 24
Summary:  Line thickness in 4.3 uses ambiguous words “may not”
	  (“may not be negative”). Should say: “are not allowed.”
From:     Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0103.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0603.html
Closed:   Accepted
Edit: 	  Edited

Issue 25
Summary:  Allow colors (esp. semi-transparent ones) on all background layers.
Edit:	  Tab says (1st response) it's no longer needed, because you
	  can soon use 'image(red)' anywhere a URL is allowed, and (2nd
	  response) that it would throw off the layer counting for the
	  'background-color' property.
From:     Lev Solntsev
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1338.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1341.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1365.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1373.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Apr/0119.html
Closed:   Rejected

Issue:    26
Summary:  What is the “boundary” of a table cell?
From:     Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0258.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0592.html
Edit: 	  Edited: s/boundaries/far border edges/
Closed:   Accepted