issues.txt

vim:et:

Per discussion 2003-08-25 PM:
 * rename to "CSS3 Syntax"
 * remove specific at-rules (other than @charset)
   @font-fcae -> webfonts
   @namespace -> selectors???
   @alternate, @import -> cascade
   @media -> mq or cascade
   @page -> paged media
 * decide where things removed should go.
 * be a general syntax -- no need for CSS2-syntax property values

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Aug/0066.html
  (and response)

ISSUES COMPLETED OR NOTED IN SPEC:

  http://www.w3.org/Style/Group/css3-src/css3-naming/
  css-style-attr?

  Note to self:  need to add to syntax draft:
   * @namespace stuff
   * Bert's extensions stuff
   [ * grammar of style attribute? -- NO, separate draft ]

  How should grammar connect to selectors?

  (Should , be in selectors or in grammar / C&I?)

  Should we allow nested @-rules within @media?

  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2002Mar/0021.html
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2002JanMar/0383.html
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2001AprJun/0281.html
  http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138415
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2002AprJun/0170.html
  missing whitespace (still need to fix for 2.1):
    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2002Nov/0012.html
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2003Feb/0103.html
    (still need to fix *right* for 2.1)
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2003Feb/0102.html
ISSUES REMAINING:
  Chris Lilley's Comments in thread
    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2003JanMar/thread.html#193

  See Björn Höhrmann's 2001-09-19 post and thread following:
    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2001Sep/thread.html#36
  Should the parsing rules be looser for unknown pseudos?
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2001OctDec/0006.html
  Steven Pemberton's message about parseable sequences of tokens:
    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2002OctDec/0249.html
  untokenizable / unparseable sequences:
    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2002Nov/0014.html
  <Hixie_> dbaron: just looking at css3-syntax -- i don't think the
    grammar covers the fact that unquoted contents of url() forms must
    have balanced {}, [], and () characters.  also i may be mistaken but
    i don't see a token for unquoted 'font-family's.
  Vendor identifier issues:
    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2003Feb/thread.html#151

  Sync up with CSS 2.1.
  Bjorn's comments:
    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2003JulSep/0104.html
  "ignore":
    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2003JulSep/0303.html

  @charset and BOM issues:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2003OctDec/0206.html

  Make it clear namespace declarations from content don't apply.
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Jan/0069

  Ian's comments on namespaces module -- make it
  markup-language-agnostic.

  Define namespace for HTML4.

ISSUES IN OTHER MODULES:
  Selectors draft should list terminology change in the changes section.
  Definition of 'font-size' in fonts module.
  "\A" in generated content
  Does C&I specify use of selectors draft correctly?
  Values & Units needs to incorporate attr():
    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2002JulSep/thread.html#294
    and what's in css3-namespace (see
    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2003Jul/thread.html#261 )
  css3-values#pixel needs to say (from media types list in CSS2):
    Authors should not use pixel units with the tty media type.