[css-flexbox] Update DoC

--HG--
extra : rebase_source : c23fe3f97c78774506eab4ad902ae115cfa562a4

Author: fantasai

css-flexbox/issues-lc-20140325.txt

@@ -170,5 +170,64 @@ Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0107.html
 Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0008.html
 Closed:   Accepted
 Resolved: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0051.html
+Open:     http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0160.html
+          http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0038.html
 Note:     Open to better suggestion on the currently-named 'main-size' keyword
 ----
+Summary:  Cross-size of stretched flex size should be definite if flexbox is def
+From:     Rossen Atanassov
+Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0012.html
+Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0012.html
+Closed:   Accepted
+Open:     NEEDS REVIEW
+----
+Summary:  Advise authors to reorder focus order together with box order
+From:     PFWG
+Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0247.html
+Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0256.html
+Closed:   Rejected
+----
+Summary:  Masonry effect
+From:     JK
+Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0046.html
+Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0053.html
+Closed:   OutOfScope
+----
+Summary:  Possible typo in main-size keyword conversion
+From:     Daniel Holbert
+Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0125.html
+----
+Summary:  Clarify "any definite size constraints"
+From:     Daniel Holbert
+Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0053.html
+----
+Summary:  Restrict min-size: auto overflow check to appropriate axis
+From:     Daniel Holbert
+Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0317.html
+----
+Summary:  What is the flexbox height when computed height is indefinite?
+From:     Daniel Holbert
+Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0438.html
+----
+Summary:  Shrinkwrapping of block-level flex containers undefined/suboptimal
+From:     fantasai
+Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0502.html
+----
+Summary:  Overflow directions should relate to content ordering
+From:     Daniel Holbert
+Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0380.html
+----
+Summary:  min-content default problematic for scroll root descendants
+From:     Daniel Holbert
+Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0589.html
+----
+Summary:  Should intrinsic aspect ratio be considered?
+Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0609.html
+----
+Summary:  Error in application of intrinsic ratio
+From:     Daniel Holbert
+Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0098.html
+----
+Summary:  Clarify non-application of ::first-line/::first-letter
+From:     Daniel Holbert
+Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0099.html