@@ -1301,7 +1301,10 @@ collapsing border model earlier in the spec (17.5.1).
13011301
13021302-Michael
13031303
1304- =WG= Discuss
1304+ Resolution: Keep definiton of 'empty-cells' as is (i.e., doesn't apply to
1305+ collapsed borders). Elika to propose a new example for 17.5.1.
1306+
1307+ =Bert= Edit
13051308------------------------------------------------------------------------
13061309Issue 63.
13071310URI: http://www.w3.org/mid/Pine.LNX.4.58.0507151327520.10214@localhost.localdomain
@@ -1520,7 +1523,9 @@ Does 'table-caption' introduce a new block formatting context?
15201523
15211524Proposal: Yes. Add them to 9.4.1.
15221525
1523- =WG= Discuss
1526+ Resolution: accepted
1527+
1528+ =Tantek= Edit
15241529------------------------------------------------------------------------
15251530Issue 74.
15261531URI: http://www.w3.org/mid/927958.1121607979084.JavaMail.servlet@kundenserver
@@ -1534,6 +1539,9 @@ http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-CSS21-20050613/sample.html
15341539
15351540This is not conistent and should be chanced. [sic]
15361541
1542+ Resolution 1:
1543+ David will look up the previous discussion and see if this is a new argument.
1544+
15371545=WG= Discuss.
15381546------------------------------------------------------------------------
15391547Issue 75.
@@ -1587,7 +1595,9 @@ the spec is saying what it wants to be saying).
15871595
15881596-Boris
15891597
1590- =WG= Discuss
1598+ Resolution: accepted
1599+
1600+ =H�kon= Discuss
15911601------------------------------------------------------------------------
15921602Issue 77.
15931603URI: http://www.w3.org/mid/1121938871.7387.24.camel@c-gsoutter.uk.volantis.com
@@ -1599,7 +1609,9 @@ has not changed since the old CR.
15991609
16001610-Geoff
16011611
1602- =WG= Discuss
1612+ Resolution: Leave example, but David to write an extra example.
1613+
1614+ =H�kon= Edit
16031615------------------------------------------------------------------------
16041616Issue 78.
16051617URI: http://www.w3.org/International/2005/05/css2-1-review.html#comt2-1
@@ -1611,6 +1623,8 @@ Not clear exactly what the request is asking for. -Ian
16111623of CSS 2.0; I'm not sure why it's not in CSS 2.1.
16121624-Bjoern
16131625
1626+ Resolution 1: Elika, David, Tim and Bert agree to add the old 15.2.6 from CSS2
1627+
16141628=WG= Discuss
16151629------------------------------------------------------------------------
16161630Issue 79.
0 commit comments