Skip to content

Commit b16967a

Browse files
committed
Removed notes about image-fit and image-position.
1 parent 47025f7 commit b16967a

2 files changed

Lines changed: 0 additions & 20 deletions

File tree

css3-images/Overview.html

Lines changed: 0 additions & 12 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1771,12 +1771,6 @@ <h3 id=object-fit><span class=secno>6.4. </span>Sizing Replaced Elements:
17711771
class=property>object-position</code></a>&rsquo;.</p>
17721772
</div>
17731773

1774-
<p class=issue>Do we need to allow browsers to alias &lsquo;<code
1775-
class=property>image-position</code>&rsquo; and &lsquo;<code
1776-
class=property>image-fit</code>&rsquo; (the old names for these
1777-
properties) to these properties? Does any browser actually need to do
1778-
so?</p>
1779-
17801774
<p class=note>Note: the &lsquo;<a href="#object-fit0"><code
17811775
class=property>object-fit</code></a>&rsquo; property has similar
17821776
semantics to the fit attribute in <a href="#SMIL10"
@@ -1844,12 +1838,6 @@ <h3 id=object-position><span class=secno>6.5. </span>Positioning Replaced
18441838

18451839
<p class=note>Note that areas of the box not covered by the replaced
18461840
element will show the element's background.</p>
1847-
1848-
<p class=issue>Do we need to allow browsers to alias &lsquo;<code
1849-
class=property>image-position</code>&rsquo; and &lsquo;<code
1850-
class=property>image-fit</code>&rsquo; (the old names for these
1851-
properties) to these properties? Does any browser actually need to do
1852-
so?</p>
18531841
</div>
18541842
</div>
18551843

css3-images/Overview.src.html

Lines changed: 0 additions & 8 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1262,10 +1262,6 @@ <h3 id="object-fit">Sizing Replaced Elements: The 'object-fit' Property</h3>
12621262
initial value for 'object-position'.</p>
12631263
</div>
12641264

1265-
<p class=issue>Do we need to allow browsers to alias 'image-position' and 'image-fit'
1266-
(the old names for these properties) to these properties? Does any browser actually
1267-
need to do so?</p>
1268-
12691265
<p class="note">Note: the 'object-fit' property has similar semantics to
12701266
the fit attribute in [[SMIL10]].</p>
12711267
</div>
@@ -1309,10 +1305,6 @@ <h3 id="object-position">Positioning Replaced Images: The 'object-position' Prop
13091305

13101306
<p class="note">Note that areas of the box not covered by the replaced
13111307
element will show the element's background.</p>
1312-
1313-
<p class=issue>Do we need to allow browsers to alias 'image-position' and 'image-fit'
1314-
(the old names for these properties) to these properties? Does any browser actually
1315-
need to do so?</p>
13161308
</div>
13171309
</div>
13181310

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)