[css-counter-styles-3] cjk-ideographic should be an alias for trad-chinese-informal

Author: tabatkins

css-counter-styles-3/Overview.html

@@ -10,11 +10,11 @@
 
   <meta content="CSS Counter Styles Level 3" name=dcterms.title>
   <meta content=text name=dcterms.type>
-  <meta content=2013-02-05 name=dcterms.issued>
+  <meta content=2013-02-06 name=dcterms.issued>
   <meta content="http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-counter-styles-3/"
    name=dcterms.creator>
   <meta content=W3C name=dcterms.publisher>
-  <meta content="http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/ED-css-counter-styles-3-20130205/"
+  <meta content="http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/ED-css-counter-styles-3-20130206/"
    name=dcterms.identifier>
   <meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv=Content-Type>
   <link href="../default.css" rel=stylesheet type="text/css">
@@ -32,13 +32,13 @@
 
    <h1>CSS Counter Styles Level 3</h1>
 
-   <h2 class="no-num no-toc" id=longstatus-date>Editor's Draft 5 February
+   <h2 class="no-num no-toc" id=longstatus-date>Editor's Draft 6 February
     2013</h2>
 
    <dl>
     <dt>This version:
 
-    <dd><!--<a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/ED-css-counter-styles-3-20130205/">http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-css-counter-styles-3-20130205/</a>-->
+    <dd><!--<a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/ED-css-counter-styles-3-20130206/">http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-css-counter-styles-3-20130206/</a>-->
      <a
      href="http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-counter-styles-3/">http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-counter-styles-3/</a>
 
@@ -1976,8 +1976,8 @@ <h3 id=complex-cjk><span class=secno>6.1. </span> Longhand East Asian
    <dt>cjk-ideographic
 
    <dd> This counter style is identical to ‘<a
-    href="#trad-chinese-formal0"><code
-    class=css>trad-chinese-formal</code></a>’. (It exists for legacy
+    href="#trad-chinese-informal0"><code
+    class=css>trad-chinese-informal</code></a>’. (It exists for legacy
     reasons.)
   </dl>
 

css-counter-styles-3/Overview.src.html

@@ -1468,7 +1468,7 @@ <h3 id='complex-cjk'>
 
 		<dt>cjk-ideographic
 		<dd>
-			This counter style is identical to ''trad-chinese-formal''. 
+			This counter style is identical to ''trad-chinese-informal''. 
 			(It exists for legacy reasons.)
 	</dl>