[css-display-3] Update DoC

Author: fantasai

css-display-3/issues-wd-2017.bsi

@@ -251,7 +251,8 @@ Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1246
 Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1246#issuecomment-301634850
 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1246#issuecomment-305246779
 Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1246#issuecomment-313211986
-Open:     =WG= Discuss.
+Closed:   Accepted
+Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Aug/0042.html
 ----
 Issue 31.
 Summary:  Rename “block container” to “flow container”
@@ -274,8 +275,10 @@ Issue 33.
 Summary:  Inheritance with 'display: contents' and ::first-line
 From:     Oriol
 Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1310
-Response:
-Open
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1310#issuecomment-301641199
+Closed:   OutOfScope
+Notes:    Deferred to css-pseudo-4, as ::first-line in general needs tighter definition
+Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018May/0036.html
 ----
 Issue 34.
 Summary:  Define 'display: contents' as a type of box
@@ -347,7 +350,9 @@ Summary:  Computation of 'float' vs 'position' without a box
 From:     Oriol
 Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1436
 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1436#issuecomment-313215820
-Open
+Closed:   OutOfScope
+Notes:    Accepted, pending edits to css-2 and css-position-3
+Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Jul/0015.html
 ----
 Issue 42.
 Summary:  Are run-in contents inside ::first-line?
@@ -364,7 +369,10 @@ From:     Oriol, fantasai
 Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1457
 Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1457#issuecomment-313225448
 Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1563
-Open
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1563#issuecomment-314573128
+Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/94982e838a558e6c66516b3b13e403eae32e27ad
+Closed:   Accepted
+Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018May/0030.html
 ----
 Issue 44.
 Summary:  Is 'position: marker' out-of-flow?
@@ -400,7 +408,10 @@ Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1471#issuecomment-313247457
 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1471#issuecomment-313263022
 Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1471#issuecomment-313252408
 Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1471#issuecomment-313266528
-Open
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/ffc79e46b2f691d334b00d69ed23dde50a4068b3
+Closed:   Accepted
+Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/ffc79e46b2f691d334b00d69ed23dde50a4068b3
+Resolved: Editorial
 ----
 Issue 48.
 Summary:  Run-in fixup vs block-in-inline fixup
@@ -431,7 +442,8 @@ Issue 51.
 Summary:  Should 'inline-foo' and 'inline foo' be distinct?
 From:     David Baron
 Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1486
-Open
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1486#issuecomment-320022628
+Closed:   Invalid
 ----
 Issue 52.
 Summary:  At-risk list omits three-component values
@@ -462,7 +474,8 @@ Summary:  Missing definition of 'inline-list-item'
 From:     Oriol
 Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1495
 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1495#issuecomment-306282449
-Open
+Closed:   Accepted
+Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Jul/0015.html
 ----
 Issue 56.
 Summary:  Redesign 'flow-root' keyword and related features
@@ -495,13 +508,20 @@ Issue 59.
 Summary:  Blocks that contain only inlines, establishing BFC+IFC?
 From:     Oriol
 Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1553
-Open
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1553#issuecomment-375120025
+Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/8bb4d824180eccee53864aa40b883d0eb7140c0a
+Closed:   Accepted
+Resolved: Editorial
 ----
 Issue 60.
 Summary:  Define establishing a BFC as a flow-root only thing via used values
 From:     Oriol
 Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1550
-Open
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1550#issuecomment-387160020
+Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/0258e7ac526cffce6e81d13110ba79a681504fff
+Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/72141508e866058bd9a431abdb97c3406d9e34b2
+Closed:   Accepted
+Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018May/0036.html
 ----
 Issue 61.
 Summary:  Is the principal box unique?
@@ -617,7 +637,7 @@ Summary:  How does inner display type compute on replaced elements if out of sco
 From:     Sebastien Zartner
 Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1642#issuecomment-317237475
 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1642#issuecomment-398964350
-Open:     =Tab= Check if we need to edit anything?
+Closed:   Invalid
 Resolved: Editorial
 ----
 Issue 75.
@@ -667,7 +687,9 @@ Summary:  Explicitly exclude non-zero sequences of run-ins from processing
 From:     Oriol
 Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1663
 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1663#issuecomment-398970537
-Open
+Closed:   Rejected
+Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1663#issuecomment-398982401
+Resolved: Editorial
 ----
 Issue 81.
 Summary:  Link to definition of white space
@@ -787,7 +809,8 @@ Summary:  Effect of 'display: contents' on SVG layout attributes
 From:     Amelia Bellamy-Royds
 Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2502
 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2502#issuecomment-378809174
-Open
+Closed:   Accepted
+Veified:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2502#issuecomment-399498551
 ----
 Issue 96.
 Summary:  Integrate definition of Shadow Trees
@@ -816,11 +839,23 @@ Issue 99.
 Summary:  Blockification of blocks should establish new FC
 From:     Oriol
 Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2673
-Open:     =WG= Discuss.
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2673#issuecomment-389935782
+Closed:   Rejected
+Verified: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Jul/0017.html
+Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Jul/0017.html
 ----
 Issue 100.
 Summary:  Compute 'display: contents' on elided elements to 'none'
 From:     Emlio Álvarez
 Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2755
+Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/f13b84237c6a17823ebdd55919d15d3bac83275b
+Closed:   Accepted
+Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Jun/0032.html
+----
+Issue 101.
+Summary:  Revisit equivalency of `inline-block` and `inline flow-root`
+From:     Oriol Brufau
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2947
 Open:     =WG= Discuss.
+Notes:    See also earlier issues / discussion.
 ----