Draft: https://www.w3.org/TR/2015/WD-css-display-3-20151015/ Title: CSS Display Module Level 3 Note: There were also issues on box-suppress, but it has been deferred to a future level to enable further work. ---- Issue 1. Summary: table-caption & table-cell should use flow-root not flow From: Oriol Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0372.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0064.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0062.html ---- Issue 2. Summary: Define
and From: Ian Hickson, Tab Atkins Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0155.html Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/610 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/610#issuecomment-274911199 Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0065.html Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0066.html Closed: Deferred to HTML https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/2291 Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0062.html ---- Issue 3. Summary: Shouldn't root be in-flow? From: fantasai Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0332.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0062.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0062.html ---- Issue 5. Summary: Interaction of run-in and ::first-letter From: Florian Rivoal Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Feb/0330.html Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/650 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/650#issuecomment-274908554 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0062.html ---- Issue 6. Summary: Inconsistent implementation of 'display: flex' on
From: glanbin Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/321 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/321#issuecomment-232788709 Closed: Invalid Resolved: Editor discretion ---- Issue 7. Summary: Consider removing 'display: run-in' From: Ms2ger Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/339 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/339#issuecomment-234783783 Closed: Rejected Resolved: Editor discretion ----- Issue 8. Summary: Define interaction of 'display: contents' and replaced elements From: Simon Pieters Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/540 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/540#issuecomment-285214950 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://www.w3.org/mid/CADhPm3sQbKYcM6mmRueGJBozPGer_UwQDMyv+eww3kOBAHC7mg@mail.gmail.com ----- Issue 9. Summary: Display value visible to AT From: Dave Cramer, Sara Soueidan Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/560 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/560#issuecomment-270094051 Closed: OutOfScope Resolved: Editor discretion ---- Issue 10. Summary: Effect of 'display: contents' on counter scoping From: Xidorn Quan Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/674 Response: Closed: Accepted Note: Still needs edits in css-lists-3. Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0062.html ---- Issue 11. Summary: Why is introduction normative? Also defining “element”? From: Anne van Kesteren Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/680 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/680#issuecomment-270103941 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editor discretion ---- Issue 12. Summary: 'display: contents' on root element From: Emilio Cobos Álvarez Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/805 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/805#issuecomment-266991346 Closed: Invalid ---- Issue 13. Summary: “run-in box with 'display: flow'” nonsensical From: Mats Palmgren Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/832 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/832#issuecomment-270106512 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix ---- Issue 14. Summary: "flow-root" harmful From: Binyammin Laukstein Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/983 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/983#issuecomment-275141140 Closed: Invalid Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/983#issuecomment-275208753 ---- Issue 15. Summary: Rename flow-root From: Simon Fraser Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/964 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/964#issuecomment-274638719 Closed: Rejected Resolved: https://www.w3.org/mid/CADhPm3sTiUi9iibZpc+G0F4=Pn6y9VMbeBaQQ4SKNKPGyOMowA@mail.gmail.com Verified: https://www.w3.org/mid/CADhPm3sTiUi9iibZpc+G0F4=Pn6y9VMbeBaQQ4SKNKPGyOMowA@mail.gmail.com ---- Issue 16. Summary: Tooltips are wrong From: Mats Palmgren Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/834 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/834#issuecomment-280431244 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial ---- Issue 17. Summary: HTML shouldn't be a normative reference From: Bert Bos Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1011 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1011#issuecomment-286501361 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial ---- Issue 18. Summary: What are form controls? From: Boris Zbarsky Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1024 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1024#issuecomment-285215276 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editor discretion ---- Issue 19. Summary: Anonymous boxes inheriting from `display: contents` From: Oriol, Boris Zbarsky Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1118 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1249 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1118#issuecomment-301942276 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Jun/0009.html Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1118#issuecomment-301953751 ---- Issue 20. Summary: Propagation of text-decoration applied to `display: contents` From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1136 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1136#issuecomment-301938274 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/a9a8bdda32c4d22a2cbc98d6c3724b72f651b6b3 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Jun/0009.html ---- Issue 21. Summary: `display: block` seems to define flex and grid items as block-level From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1175 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1175#issuecomment-292656095 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1175#issuecomment-292738919 Response: Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial ---- Issue 22. Summary: Display erroneously groups ruby with atomic inlines From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1180 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1180#issuecomment-292638199 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix ---- Issue 23. Summary: Block containers can also establish an inline formatting context From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1185 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1185#issuecomment-301622704 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1185#issuecomment-301630234 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1185#issuecomment-314583112 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial ---- Issue 24. Summary: Revisions to *-level definitions From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1186 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1186#issuecomment-294637052 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1186#issuecomment-294646968 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1186#issuecomment-301623329 Closed: Invalid ---- Issue 25. Summary: Do table captions participate in BFC or TFC? From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1189 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1189#issuecomment-301626461 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix ---- Issue 26. Summary: Table contains invalid values From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1225 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1225#issuecomment-301631015 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial ---- Issue 27. Summary: list-item definition implies invalid keyword combos are valid From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1226 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1226#issuecomment-301631288 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial ---- Issue 28. Summary: Do contents and none have outer display type? From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1227 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1227#issuecomment-301631748 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial ---- Issue 29. Summary: Run-in erroneously excludes blocks that establish inline formatting context From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1228 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1228#issuecomment-301632605 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/2f6354014360662e2aef0e25da433852d4fa8b3a Closed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix ---- Issue 30. Summary: Blockification rules not backwards-compatible for inline-block From: Boris Zbarsky Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1246 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1246#issuecomment-301634850 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1246#issuecomment-305246779 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1246#issuecomment-313211986 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Aug/0042.html ---- Issue 31. Summary: Rename “block container” to “flow container” From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1265 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1265#issuecomment-301635795 Closed: Rejected Resolved: Editor discretion Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1265#issuecomment-301639507 ---- Issue 32. Summary: Text nodes vs text runs From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1281 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1281#issuecomment-301942809 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Jun/0009.html ---- Issue 33. Summary: Inheritance with 'display: contents' and ::first-line From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1310 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1310#issuecomment-301641199 Closed: OutOfScope Notes: Deferred to css-pseudo-4, as ::first-line in general needs tighter definition Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018May/0036.html ---- Issue 34. Summary: Define 'display: contents' as a type of box From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1313 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1313#issuecomment-299120942 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1313#issuecomment-299247618 Closed: Retracted ---- Issue 35. Summary: Define more sensible blockification for layout-internal types From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1340 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1340#issuecomment-301641681 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/5aaca4a7030e818cd02ac2d93137e1cd1d295bae Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editor discretion ---- Issue 36. Summary: Inlinification, recursion, and ruby vs display definitions From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1341 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1341#issuecomment-301643296 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1341#issuecomment-301944521 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1341#issuecomment-313204672 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Jun/0009.html ---- Issue 37. Summary: Does display: contents apply to ::before ::after From: Emilio Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1345 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1345#issuecomment-313205067 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017May/0057.html ---- Issue 38. Summary: Define interaction of various box tree fixups From: Boris Zbarsky Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1355 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1355#issuecomment-301878155 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1355#issuecomment-301888405 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1355#issuecomment-302250667 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1355#issuecomment-302748058 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/f5b79e99bb8fc9ebea4ed956ed3420bc69b90786 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial ---- Issue 39. Summary: Root inline box vs anonymous inline boxes From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1383 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1383#issuecomment-301832460 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1383#issuecomment-301833956 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1383#issuecomment-301872204 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/6aeeabe060c8d8c1397ef2196a4e3a62da964d5e Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial ---- Issue 40. Summary: Inlinification by display type or anon box fixup? From: fantasai Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1390 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1390#issuecomment-313211238 Closed: Retracted ---- Issue 41. Summary: Computation of 'float' vs 'position' without a box From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1436 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1436#issuecomment-313215820 Closed: OutOfScope Notes: Accepted, pending edits to css-2 and css-position-3 Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Jul/0015.html ---- Issue 42. Summary: Are run-in contents inside ::first-line? From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1441 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1441#issuecomment-313246128 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editor discretion Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1441#issuecomment-313249402 ---- Issue 43. Summary: “Becoming a formatting context” section is a mess From: Oriol, fantasai Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1457 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1457#issuecomment-313225448 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1563 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1563#issuecomment-314573128 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/94982e838a558e6c66516b3b13e403eae32e27ad Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018May/0030.html ---- Issue 44. Summary: Is 'position: marker' out-of-flow? From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1458 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1458#issuecomment-313224602 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix ---- Issue 45. Summary: Does run-in algo recurse? From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1460 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1460#issuecomment-314593762 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/c9f1bb16d0e5077b9bca7027a7d7252eeff5abf1 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix ---- Issue 46. Summary: Parallel construction should be pairwise disjoint (editorial) From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1470 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/09212af80e10e4e3e57965bb27b2de3fdcd86e06 Closed: Fixed Resolved: Editorial ---- Issue 47. Summary: BFC definition not quite right From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1471 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1471#issuecomment-313240736 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1471#issuecomment-313247457 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1471#issuecomment-313263022 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1471#issuecomment-313252408 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1471#issuecomment-313266528 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/ffc79e46b2f691d334b00d69ed23dde50a4068b3 Closed: Accepted Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/ffc79e46b2f691d334b00d69ed23dde50a4068b3 Resolved: Editorial ---- Issue 48. Summary: Run-in fixup vs block-in-inline fixup From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1472 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1472#issuecomment-313242917 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix ---- Issue 49. Summary: Note wrt inheritance of ::first-line through 'display: contents'. From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1473 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1473#issuecomment-313247421 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial ---- Issue 50. Summary: Display types: on elements or on boxes? From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1480 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1480#issuecomment-314569164 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1480#issuecomment-314583675 ---- Issue 51. Summary: Should 'inline-foo' and 'inline foo' be distinct? From: David Baron Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1486 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1486#issuecomment-320022628 Closed: Invalid ---- Issue 52. Summary: At-risk list omits three-component values From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1490 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/394c62f72fda4ac824c9ce204a99bf991b9e6471 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial ---- Issue 53. Summary: Discrepancies in run-in From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1491 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1491#issuecomment-314570280 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix ---- Issue 54. Summary: Serialization of list-item values not listed From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1493 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1493#issuecomment-314572350 Closed: OutOfScope (to CSSOM) / Rejected (for editorial) Resolved: Bugfix / Editorial ---- Issue 55. Summary: Missing definition of 'inline-list-item' From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1495 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1495#issuecomment-306282449 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Jul/0015.html ---- Issue 56. Summary: Redesign 'flow-root' keyword and related features From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1496 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1496#issuecomment-319986260 Closed: Rejected Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1496#issuecomment-320027059 ---- Issue 57. Summary: Inlinification doesn't inlinify layout-internal boxes From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1582 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1582#issuecomment-314605575 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial ---- Issue 58. Summary: with no box example is confusing From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1584 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1584#issuecomment-313494427 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1584#issuecomment-313494885 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1584#issuecomment-313498359 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1584#issuecomment-391181313 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/beb5964179f6fc815e59e23a1de501cddab7355a Closed: Accepted Notes: See also https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/3702 Resolved: Editorial ---- Issue 59. Summary: Blocks that contain only inlines, establishing BFC+IFC? From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1553 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1553#issuecomment-375120025 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/8bb4d824180eccee53864aa40b883d0eb7140c0a Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial ---- Issue 60. Summary: Define establishing a BFC as a flow-root only thing via used values From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1550 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1550#issuecomment-387160020 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/0258e7ac526cffce6e81d13110ba79a681504fff Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/72141508e866058bd9a431abdb97c3406d9e34b2 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018May/0036.html ---- Issue 61. Summary: Is the principal box unique? From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1604 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1604#issuecomment-374366647 Closed: OutOfScope Notes: Follow-up for css-flow-3 https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1477 ---- Issue 62. Summary: run-in fixup should create inline-block when parent inlinifies From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1607 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1607#issuecomment-374368323 Closed: Invalid ---- Issue 63. Summary: Define how block containers establish an inline formatting context From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1617 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1617#issuecomment-374369526 Closed: Accepted Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1617#issuecomment-374376423 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1617#issuecomment-374385637 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1617#issuecomment-398958073 Resolved: Editor discretion ---- Issue 64. Summary: Position of 'list-item' when serializing 'display' From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1621 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1621#issuecomment-374730492 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix ---- Issue 65. Summary: Clarify that outer display type only affects principal box From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1622 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/c5d8900d4cc8dedd4f7a02d506d0e0cd2cb5a639 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial ---- Issue 66. Summary: Compact at-risk list From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1623 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/9f72f245cba50a173813c36b771f552fe8104964 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial ---- Issue 67. Summary: list-item generates ::marker pseudo-element (not necessarily box) From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1625 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/ed5c6a31724e014f3336dbf7901c5ef5cb1eaf20 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix ---- Issue 68. Summary: Mismatched references (to CSS2 vs css-lists-3) From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1626 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1626#issuecomment-374373751 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/7af6650e9ad441bac22fe833cb413112262f9149 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial ---- Issue 69. Summary: Mention that block ruby generates principal block box From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1629 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/5e90348a26aecbed6d878cce89cbbc7db1b058ff Closed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix ---- Issue 70. Summary: run-in insertion point vs ::marker with 'display' From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1638 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1638#issuecomment-316979494 Closed: Retracted ---- Issue 71. Summary: Are run-in sequences merged during reparenting? From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1639 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/ef3c8fd8b2fe85c32a2dc393ca3b2810a414ea88 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial ---- Issue 72. Summary: Clarify run-in recursion vs anonymous-block wrapping From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1640 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1640#issuecomment-374384660 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/c7841af7ab963a5e91b2436ffe60ece80700cc7e Closed: Accepted Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1640#issuecomment-374390920 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1640#issuecomment-398963365 Closed: Rejected Resolved: Editorial ---- Issue 73. Summary: Define inner display type of replaced elements From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1642 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1642#issuecomment-374399290 Closed: Invalid ---- Issue 74. Summary: How does inner display type compute on replaced elements if out of scope? From: Sebastien Zartner Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1642#issuecomment-317237475 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1642#issuecomment-398964350 Closed: Invalid Resolved: Editorial ---- Issue 75. Summary: Define style computation reflection between boxes and elements From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1643 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1643#issuecomment-350398313 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1702 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1702#issuecomment-374415941 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/b2d484c6ab9c4dbdb8fdca899e2d37d59d6953e3 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Apr/0005.html ---- Issue 76. Summary: Define some box construction guidance for specs From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1643 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1643#issuecomment-350398313 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/533ac0a31b0262c4a0d09c77e19604666fe35e14 Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Apr/0005.html ---- Issue 77. Summary: table grid box is not a defined term From: David Baron Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1643#issuecomment-376733708 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1643#issuecomment-378768000 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/193022f623acd1b95a1fddae76fd98408a618d8b Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial ---- Issue 78. Summary: Rename table box to table grid box (in CSS2 & CSS Tables L3) From: fantasai Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2501 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2501#issuecomment-380792875 Open: Changing back is pending edits to CSS2 and css-tables-3 Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018May/0044.html ---- Issue 79. Summary: Boxes shouldn't have display types, should only have levels/FC-types From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1643#issuecomment-374423595 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1643#issuecomment-407597682 Closed: Rejected Resolved: Editorial ---- Issue 80. Summary: Explicitly exclude non-zero sequences of run-ins from processing From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1663 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1663#issuecomment-398970537 Closed: Rejected Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1663#issuecomment-398982401 Resolved: Editorial ---- Issue 81. Summary: Link to definition of white space From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1664 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/ada381e196c8ed510977cb55916ee5fb96447b25 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix ---- Issue 82. Summary: s/text/text run/ now that text run is defined From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1667 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/c3a695c65170e1667090d87310b87df79d93d398 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial ---- Issue 83. Summary: What if containing block is not ICB and not generated from a box? From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1672 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1672#issuecomment-319916887 Closed: Invalid Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1672#issuecomment-350404179 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1672#issuecomment-374790036 Closed: Rejected Resolved: Editor discretion ---- Issue 84. Summary: Make inlinified 'block ruby' an inline-block instead of inline From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1700 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1700#issuecomment-374415499 Closed: Rejected Resolved: Editor discretion ---- Issue 85. Summary: 'block' only generates block-level boxes in flow layout From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1704 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1704#issuecomment-374418771 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/4358d72a927b265d9b7482a57277dc635c076b76 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix ---- Issue 86. Summary: Clarify blockification of 'run-in flow-root' From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1715 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1715#issuecomment-374420463 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Apr/0005.html ---- Issue 87. Summary: 'display' computed value wrong in propdef table From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1716 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1716 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix ---- Issue 89. Summary: Do empty text nodes generate text runs? From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1808 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1808#issuecomment-329345715 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/4c21a2aa923a757c577bf4a4e33a6291a78c8690 Closed: Accepted ---- Issue 90. Summary: Clarify element tree definition From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1810 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1810#issuecomment-375137826 Closed: OutOfScope Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018May/0036.html ---- Issue 91. Summary: SVG 'display: contents' interaction incompletely defined From: Rune Lillesveen Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2118 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2118#issuecomment-374802030 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/2cdf747bbbfe0c58a87455beca9c35b72555b09a Closed: Accepted ---- Issue 92. Summary: Define interaction of 'display: contents' and MathML From: Emilio Álvarez Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2167 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2167#issuecomment-375119086 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/1d3e6a04c847df82fa3c4023e23f4ea55dcab169 Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2167#issuecomment-375792285 Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Apr/0005.html ---- Issue 93. Summary: Does 'display' affect screen reader semantics? From: Ilya Streltsyn Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2355 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2355#issuecomment-368287740 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2355#issuecomment-375084853 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2355#issuecomment-378670370 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2355#issuecomment-378778909 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial ---- Issue 94. Summary: Does 'display: contents' affect anchor targeting? From: Ilya Streltsyn Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2355#issuecomment-378842501 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2355#issuecomment-378992876 Changes: https://github.com/fergald/csswg-drafts/commit/2343af6382b55e8ce5caf9c0ee40d68ef032b421 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editor discretion ---- Issue 95. Summary: Effect of 'display: contents' on SVG layout attributes From: Amelia Bellamy-Royds Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2502 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2502#issuecomment-378809174 Closed: Accepted Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2502#issuecomment-399498551 ---- Issue 96. Summary: Integrate definition of Shadow Trees From: Anne van Kesteren Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2365 Closed: OutOfScope Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018May/0036.html ---- Issue 97. Summary: Blockification should establish a new formatting context From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2598 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2598#issuecomment-387157017 Closed: Invalid ---- Issue 98. Summary: Swap where default inner/outer display types are defined From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2658 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2658#issuecomment-391175246 Closed: Rejected Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2658#issuecomment-393271657 Resolved: Editorial --- Issue 99. Summary: Blockification of blocks should establish new FC From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2673 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2673#issuecomment-389935782 Closed: Rejected Verified: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Jul/0017.html Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Jul/0017.html ---- Issue 100. Summary: Compute 'display: contents' on elided elements to 'none' From: Emlio Álvarez Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2755 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/f13b84237c6a17823ebdd55919d15d3bac83275b Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Jun/0032.html ---- Issue 101. Summary: Revisit equivalency of `inline-block` and `inline flow-root` From: Oriol Brufau Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2947 Closed: Rejected Notes: See also earlier issues / discussion. Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Aug/0018.html Verified: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Aug/0018.html ----