Draft: http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-css3-flexbox-20120918/ Title: CSS Flexible Box Layout Level 1 Open//Accepted/OutOfScope/Invalid/Rejected/Retracted ---- Issue 1. Summary: Handling of zero-length boxes at end of line From: Kang-Hao Lu Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Aug/0094.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0158.html Closed: Accepted ---- Issue 2. Summary: Handling of negative-size flex lines From: Kang-Hao Lu Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Aug/0094.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0158.html Closed: Accepted ---- Issue 3. Summary: Need way to fill flex-item boxes / Make 'stretch' propagate definiteness From: Rudolph Gottesheim Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0204.html Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0207.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0216.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0217.html Closed: Open? Closed? ACTION: Need to check against Grid to ensure consistent behavior Notes: Alternative might be to reflow after stretching in order to resolve percentages inside the item (but treat them as auto for finding the flex item's size), then solve this with height: 100%. ---- Issue 4. Summary: Constant spacing around items From: Giuseppe Bilotta Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0249.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Dec/0046.html Closed: Deferred (most cases possible; maybe add more spacing controls in next level) ---- Issue 5. Summary: If percentage height cannot be resolved, is the flex items stretched? From: Ojan Vafai Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0220.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jul/0505.html Notes: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15392 http://www.w3.org/Style/css2-updates/REC-CSS2-20110607-errata.html#s.10.5a Closed: Accepted ---- Issue 6. Summary: Clarifications to abspos static position in flex containers From: Kang-Hao Lu Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0478.html Closed: Accepted ---- Issue 7. Summary: Conflict in applicability of 'float' to flex items From: Daniel Holbert Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0675.html Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0698.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0691.html Closed: Accepted Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0701.html ---- Issue 8. Summary: Interaction of 'stretch' and items with aspect ratio From: Rossen Atanassov Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0781.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Dec/0040.html Closed: Accepted ---- Issue 9. Summary: Transfer min/max constraints across dimensions via aspect ratio? From: Kang-Hao Lu Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Nov/0010.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Dec/0041.html Closed: Rejected ---- Issue 10. Summary: Do flex items with negative margins increase available space? From: Tony Chang Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Nov/0460.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Nov/0462.html Closed: Rejected ---- Issue 11. Summary: Stretch should clamp cross size to min/max before calculating flex base size From: Kang-Hao Lu Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Dec/0061.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0157.html Closed: Accepted ---- Issue 12. Summary: Orthogonal Flex Layouts Sub-optimally Defined From: Rossen Atanassov Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Dec/0251.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0260.html Closed: Accepted Verified: ---- Issue 13. Summary: Should ::first-line/::first-letter apply to a flex container? From: Tab Atkins Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Dec/0264.html Response: Closed: Accepted ---- Issue 14. Summary: Clarify interaction of min-width and width From: Ojan Vafai Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jan/0046.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jan/0050.html Closed: Invalid ---- Issue 15. Summary: Should 'overflow' apply to flex containers? From: Daniel Holbert Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jan/0465.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0001.html Closed: Accepted ---- Issue 16. Summary: What should percentage margins on a flex item be relative to? From: fantasai Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0143.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0688.html Closed: Accepted ---- Issue 17. Summary: Revert min-size of flex items to 0. From: Tab Atkins Jr. Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0364.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0257.html Closed: Accepted ---- Issue 18. Summary: Paint flex items and table cells atomically From: fantasai Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0707.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Apr/0133.html Closed: Accepted Note: Recommends corresponding CSS2.1 change for Table layout, see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Apr/0145.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013May/0027.html ---- Issue 19. Summary: Re-revert min-size of flex items back to 'auto', with overflow consideration From: Elliot Sprehn Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Apr/0538.html Analysis: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jul/0456.html Open ---- Issue 20. Summary: Min/max constraint sizing of flexible flex-basis: 0. From: Tab Aktins Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013May/0342.html Proposal: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013May/0511.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jul/0463.html Closed: Accepted ---- Issue 21. Summary: Clarify interaction of table fixup and flex itemizing From: Christian Biesinger Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013May/0508.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jul/0462.html Closed: Accepted ---- Issue 22. Summary: Re-evaluate static position of flex items and grid items From: dholbert and fantasai Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013May/0514.html Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jul/0459.html Note: This can probably be left open during LC, since no one is necessarily proposing a change to static pos in Flexbox, just need to ensure alignment with Grid. Open ----