- From: Koji Ishii via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 03:48:54 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Just to clarify again, I'm ok either way since the impl concern on the
performance is gone, thanks to Rossen and your advice on the conf
call, but I didn't understand what you wrote and appreciate
clarification:
> If you have a contenteditable element (or an element that's editable
for other reasons) that's a child of a user-select:none element, in
all browsers:
>
> * the editable element and its descendants are selectable
This can be achieved by a UA stylesheet:
```css
[contenteditable] {
user-select-inside: text;
user-select-outside: contain;
}
```
no? Is it only our assumption of the above UA stylesheet was
different, or did I miss anything?
--
GitHub Notification of comment by kojiishi
Please view or discuss this issue at
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/336#issuecomment-247226851
using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 15 September 2016 03:49:00 UTC