- From: Steinar H. Gunderson via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 12:38:53 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Even more:
* `.foo { .bar &, .baz { … } }` — I assume this should be interpreted as `.bar &, & .baz`?
* `.foo { :is(.bar &, .baz) { … } }` — but this should be interpreted as `:is(.bar &, .baz)`, so not consistent with the previous one?
* `.foo { > .bar, .baz { … } }` — and this should be `& > .bar, & .baz`?
* `.foo { > .bar, + .baz { … } }` — and this should be `& > .bar, & + .baz`?
--
GitHub Notification of comment by sesse
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7834#issuecomment-1293465698 using your GitHub account
--
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 27 October 2022 12:38:55 UTC