- From: Brandon McConnell via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2023 20:49:00 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Okay, awesome. I dig that, and it'll basically remove the need for any separate `list()` function down the road.
I'd love to move forward with the model from `spread2()`.
Would it possibly be worth also introducing a second function like `unspread()` specifically to be able to pass an entire spread list as a single object, which would also then immediately remove itself?
Like this, for example:
```css
.foo {
--colors-rgb: spread(red; green; blue);
--colors-cmy: spread(cyan; magenta; yellow);
--random-item: random-item(color-single; random-item(color-group; unspread(--colors-rgb); unspread(--colors-cmy));
}
```
In this example, the innermost nested `random-item()` usage randomly selects either variable `var(--colors-rgb)` or `var(--colors-cmy)`, and then the outer wrapping `random-item()` chooses an item from the inner-selected group of colors.
I'm wondering if this holds any value— being able to pass a spread group as a group rather than its individual pieces in certain contexts, but if you think this would complicate things too much, I can understand and appreciate that viewpoint as well. Thanks.
--
GitHub Notification of comment by brandonmcconnell
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8391#issuecomment-1421426401 using your GitHub account
--
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 7 February 2023 20:49:02 UTC