- From: Noam Rosenthal via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 26 May 2025 16:25:38 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> i don't think that asking for the radius of a bevel, notch, or square is very readable Those are very specific values though, and animating between them + all the other values are rounded to an extent. That was the logic for going with general superellipse as the underlying value rather than special-casing bevel/notch. If you think of bevel/notch as a superellipse with a 0/-infinity value, it doesn't only make them more consistent with the term "radius" but also makes those relative to the other values and thus animatable. -- GitHub Notification of comment by noamr Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11623#issuecomment-2910220178 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 26 May 2025 16:25:39 UTC