- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 12:17:42 -0500
- To: Stewart Brodie <stewart.brodie@antplc.com>
- CC: public-css-testsuite@w3.org
Stewart Brodie wrote:
> fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote:
>
>> There's very little overhead for the permission granting form. You can
>> fill it out here: http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/1/testgrants2-200409/
>
> I have now done this.
>
>
>> The template for new tests is here:
>> http://csswg.inkedblade.net/test/css2.1/format
>
> OK, I've had a go at a few that cover some of the text-decoration cases that
> I've been looking at recently: http:///www.metahusky.net/~stewart/css/tests/
> Am I doing it right?
Looks pretty good. I'd suggest three things:
- use black text for the instructions, not green
- assert somewhere that there must be no red
- if you can think of a way to avoid obscuring the instructions with the
test lines in the fourth test, that would be good. :)
"inheritance" isn't quite the right word here, because text-decoration doesn't
inherit in the CSS sense of the word. I'm not sure what to use instead.. maybe
text-decoration-descend, and e.g. "text-decoration should not affect absolutely-
or fixed-positioned descendants"?
~fantasai
Received on Friday, 11 January 2008 17:17:52 UTC