Re: ident-003 should be marked invalid, no? (at-keywords-002, at-rules-000) from Dan Connolly on 2010-05-28 (public-css-testsuite@w3.org from May 2010)

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 14:06:13 -0500
To: Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>
Cc: public-css-testsuite <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
Message-ID: <1275073573.15017.134.camel@pav>

On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 21:45 +0200, Bert Bos wrote:
> On Thursday 27 May 2010 00:10:30 Dan Connolly wrote:
> > In
> > http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Test/CSS2.1/20100316/xhtml1/ident-003.xht
[...]
> So yes, this test case needs the "invalid" flag.

Likewise these 2, I'm pretty sure:

http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Test/CSS2.1/20100316/xhtml1/at-keywords-002.xht
  @impor t "support/import-red.css";

http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Test/CSS2.1/20100316/xhtml1/at-rules-000.xht
  @foo{}



-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E

Received on Friday, 28 May 2010 19:04:19 UTC