Re: CSS2.1 Test Suite Build RC 1

>    http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100917/


This testcase
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100917/html4/bottom-113.htm
is technically correct *_but_* the text assert and/or the comment says
nothing about what is happening really in the testcase. In the testcase,
bottom: 100% is resolved as bottom: auto because the body's height (body
is the containing block here) depends on #div1, etc. I explained and
proposed changes for the assert of that test.


http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100917/html4/right-offset-percentage-001.htm
If you change (or remove) 'position: absolute' and make it static, the
testcase still passes. If you change 'right: 50%' to 'right: auto', the
testcase still passes.


http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100917/html4/left-applies-to-010.htm
I would replace 'left: 0' with 'left: 2em' so that we could clearly see
the list marker. I would do the same for
*-applies-to-010.htm testcases.

http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100917/html4/vertical-align-091.htm
and
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100917/html4/vertical-align-092.htm
#span1
            {
                vertical-align: 7.5ex;
            }

vertical-align computes to 97.5px and rounds up to 98px in Firefox
3.6.10: it's not 96px! That test also fails in Konqueror 4.4.5 due to
the Fractional pixel problem again!

http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100917/html4/font-size-083.htm
and
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100917/html4/font-size-084.htm
Fractional pixel problem here too!

etc...

This is more review stuff actually..
-- 
Contributions to the CSS 2.1 test suite:
http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/

CSS 2.1 test suite (RC1; September 17th 2010):
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100917/html4/toc.html

CSS 2.1 test suite contributors:
http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/

Received on Saturday, 18 September 2010 01:22:34 UTC