- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2012 07:43:26 -0700
- To: public-css-testsuite@w3.org
On 10/21/2012 12:44 AM, Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu wrote:
> In Test the Web Forward@Beijing, it was mentioned that the tests written
> should fail even when the browser doesn't support that feature *at all*.
> I am wondering if this is necessary because it is not at all
> straightforward how you do this for 'border-radius'.
>
> The idea I just suggested to a participant is to add something like
>
> <div id="dummy">
> You would not see this if your browser supports 'border-radius'.
> </div>
>
> #dummy {
> border-radius: 500em;
> width: 10000em;
> height: 10000em;
> overflow: hidden; /* the text would be clipped */
> }
>
> to the test and not to the reference, but as the name suggests, it's
> quite dummy.
>
> Given all browsers support 'border-radius' without prefix now, is
> something like the thingy above still necessary? And does anyone have a
> better idea?
Use a mismatch reference. Same reference, but with border-radius: 0.
If the reference matches, the UA fails.
~fantasai
Received on Saturday, 27 October 2012 14:43:55 UTC