CSS Exclusions define arbitrary areas around which inline content ([[!CSS21]]) can flow. CSS Exclusions can be defined on any CSS block-level elements. CSS Exclusions extend the notion of content wrapping previously limited to floats.
This specification was previously called “CSS Exclusions and Shapes.” The definitions for shapes are now in a separate specification, see [[CSS-SHAPES]].
This section is not normative.
This specification defines features that allow inline flow content to wrap around outside the exclusion area of elements.
Exclusion box
A box ([[!CSS3BOX]]) that defines an exclusion area for other boxes. The 'wrap-flow' property is used to make an element's generated box an exclusion box. An exclusion box contributes its exclusion area to its containing block's wrapping context. An element with a 'float' computed value other than 'none' does not become an exclusion.
Exclusion area
The area used for excluding inline flow content around an exclusion box. The exclusion area is equivalent to the border box for an exclusion box.
If a user agent implements both CSS Exclusions and CSS Shapes, the shape-outside property defines the exclusion area instead of the border box.
Exclusion element
An exclusion element is a block-level element which is not a float and generates an exclusion box. An element generates an exclusion box when its 'wrap-flow' property's computed value is not 'auto'.
Wrapping context
The wrapping context
of a box is a collection
of exclusion areas
contributed by its associated exclusion boxes.
During layout,
a box wraps its inline flow content
in the wrapping area
that corresponds to the subtraction
of its wrapping context
from its own content area.
A box inherits its containing block's wrapping context unless it specifically resets it using the 'wrap-through' property.
Content area
The content area is normally used for layout of the inline flow content of a box.
Wrapping area
The area used for layout of inline flow content of a box affected by a wrapping context, defined by subtracting the wrapping context from its content area
Outside and inside
In this specification, 'outside' refers to DOM content that is not a descendant of an element while 'inside' refers to the element's descendants.
Exclusion elements define exclusion areas that contribute to their containing block's wrapping context. As a consequence, exclusions impact the layout of their containing block's descendants.
Elements lay out their inline content in their content area and wrap around the exclusion areas in their associated wrapping context. If the element is itself an exclusion, it does not wrap around its own exclusion area and the impact of other exclusions on other exclusions is controlled by the 'z-index' property as explained in the exclusions order section.
An element becomes an exclusion when its 'wrap-flow' property has a computed value other than 'auto'.
| Name: | wrap-flow |
|---|---|
| Value: | auto | both | start | end | minimum | maximum | clear |
| Initial: | auto |
| Applies to: | block-level elements. |
| Inherited: | no |
| Percentages: | N/A |
| Media: | visual |
| Computed value: | as specified except for element's whose 'float' computed value is not
none, in which case the computed value is 'auto'. |
The values of this property have the following meanings:
If the property's computed value is 'auto', the element does not become an exclusion.
Otherwise, a computed 'wrap-flow' property value of 'both', 'start', 'end', 'minimum', 'maximum' or 'clear' on an element makes that element an exclusion element. It's exclusion area is contributed to its containing block's wrapping context, causing the containing block's descendants to wrap around its exclusion area.
Exclusion with 'wrap-flow: start' interacting with various writing modes.
Determining the relevant edges of the exclusion depends on the writing mode [[!CSS3-WRITING-MODES]] of the content wrapping around the exclusion area.
An exclusion element establishes a new block formatting context (see [[!CSS21]]) for its content.
Combining exclusions
The above figure illustrates how exclusions are combined. The outermost box represents an element's content box. The A, B, C and D darker gray boxes represent exclusions in the element's wrapping context. A, B, C and D have their respective 'wrap-flow' computed to 'both', 'start', 'end' and 'clear' respectively. The lighter gray areas show the additional areas that are excluded for inline layout as a result of the 'wrap-flow'value. For example, the area to the right of 'B' cannot be used for inline layout of left-to-right writing mode content because the 'wrap-flow' for 'B' is 'start'.
The background 'blue' area shows what areas are available for a left-to-right writing mode element's inline content layout. All areas represented with a light or dark shade of gray are not available for (left-to-right writing mode) inline content layout.
The 'wrap-flow' property values applied to exclusions as grid items.
<div id="grid">
<div id="top-right" class="exclusion"></div>
<div id="bottom-left" class="exclusion"></div>
<div id="content">Lorem ipsum…</div>
</div>
<style type="text/css">
#grid {
width: 30em;
height: 30em;
display: grid;
grid-columns: 25% 25% 25% 25%;
grid-rows: 25% 25% 25% 25%;
#top-right {
grid-column: 3;
grid-row: 2;
}
#bottom-left {
grid-column: 2;
grid-row: 3;
}
.exclusion {
wrap-flow: <see below>
}
#content {
grid-row: 1;
grid-row-span: 4;
grid-column: 1;
grid-column-span: 4;
}
</style>
The following figures illustrate the visual rendering for different values of the 'wrap-flow' property. The gray grid lines are marking the grid cells. and the blue area is the exclusion box (positioned by the grid).
.exclusion{ wrap-flow: auto; } |
.exclusion{ wrap-flow: both; } |
![]() |
![]() |
.exclusion{ wrap-flow: start; } |
.exclusion{ wrap-flow: end; } |
![]() |
![]() |
.exclusion{ wrap-flow: minimum; } |
.exclusion{ wrap-flow: maximum; } |
![]() |
![]() |
.exclusion{ wrap-flow: clear; } |
|
![]() |
An exclusion affects the inline flow content descended from the exclusion's containing block (defined in CSS 2.1 10.1) and that of all descendant elements of the same containing block. All inline flow content inside the containing block of the exclusions is affected. To stop the effect of exclusions defined outside an element, the 'wrap-through' property can be used (see the propagation of exclusions section below).
As a reminder, for exclusions with 'position:fixed', the containing block is that of the root element.
By default, an element inherits its parent wrapping context. In other words it is subject to the exclusions defined outside the element.
Setting the 'wrap-through' property to 'none' prevents an element from inheriting its parent wrapping context. In other words, exclusions defined 'outside' the element, have not effect on the element's children layout.
| Name: | wrap-through |
|---|---|
| Value: | wrap | none |
| Initial: | wrap |
| Applies to: | block-level elements |
| Inherited: | no |
| Percentages: | N/A |
| Media: | visual |
| Computed value: | as specified |
The values of this property have the following meanings:
Using the 'wrap-through' property to control the effect of exclusions.
<style type="text/css">
#grid {
display: grid;
grid-columns: 25% 50% 25%;
grid-rows: 25% 25% 25% 25%;
}
#exclusion {
grid-row: 2;
grid-row-span: 2;
grid-column: 2;
wrap-flow: <see below>
}
#rowA, #rowB {
grid-row-span: 2;
grid-column: 1;
grid-column-span: 3;
}
#rowA {
grid-row: 1;
}
#rowB {
grid-row: 3;
}
</style>
<style type="text/css">
.exclusion {
wrap-flow: both;
position: absolute;
left: 20%;
top: 20%;
width: 50%;
height: 50%;
background-color: rgba(220, 230, 242, 0.5);
}
</style>
<div id="grid">
<div class=”exclusion”></div>
<div id="rowA" style=”wrap-through: wrap;”> Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet...</div>
<div id="rowB" style=”wrap-through: none;”> Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet...</div>
</div>
Exclusions follow the painting order (See [[!CSS21]] Appendix E). Exclusions are applied in reverse to the document order in which they are defined. The last exclusion appears on top of all other exclusion, thus it affects the inline flow content of all other preceding exclusions or elements descendant of the same containing block. The 'z-index' property can be used to change the ordering of positioned exclusion boxes (see [[!CSS21]]). Statically positioned exclusions are not affected by the 'z-index' property and thus follow the painting order.
Ordering of exclusions.
<style type="text/css">
.exclusion {
wrap-flow: both;
position: absolute;
width: 200px;
}
.topleft {
top: 10px;
left: 10px;
background-color: lightblue;
}
.middle {
top: 90px;
left: 90px;
background-color: lightgreen;
}
.bottomright {
top: 170px;
left: 170px;
background-color: pink;
}
</style>
<div class="exclusion topleft">
The top left div...
</div>
<div class="exclusion middle">
The middle div...
</div>
<div class="exclusion bottomright">
The bottom right div...
</div>
.middle { z-index: auto; } |
.middle { z-index: 1; } |
![]() |
![]() |
Is the CSS exclusions processing model incorrect?
The current draft provides a model for exclusions without a collision-avoidance model. The existing exclusion model in CSS uses floats, which have both exclusion and collision-avoidance behavior. Concerns have been raised that allowing exclusions without collision avoidance could be harmful, particularly with absolutely-positioned elements. Three options should be considered:
Applying exclusions is a two-step process:
In this step, the user agent determines which containing block each
exclusion area belongs to. This is a simple step, based on the
definition of containing blocks and elements with a computed value for 'wrap-flow'
that is not auto.
In this step, starting from the top of the rendering tree (see [[!CSS21]]), the the agent processes each containing block in two sub-steps.
Resolving the position and size of exclusion boxes in the wrapping context may or may not require a layout. For example, if an exclusion box is absolutely positioned and sized, a layout may not be needed to resolve its position and size. In other situations, laying out the containing block's content is required.
When a layout is required, it is carried out without applying any exclusion area. In other words, the containing block is laid out without a wrapping context.
Step 2-A yields a position and size for all exclusion boxes in the wrapping context. Each exclusion box is processed in turn, starting from the top-most, and each exclusion area is computed and contributed to the containing block's wrapping context.
Scrolling is ignored in this step when resolving the position and size of 'position:fixed' exclusion boxes.
Once the containing block's wrapping context is computed, all exclusion boxes in that wrapping context are removed from the normal flow.
Finally, the content of the containing block is laid out, with the inline content wrapping around the wrapping content's exclusion areas
When the containing block itself is an exclusion box, then rules on exclusions order define which exclusions affect the inline and descendant content of the box.
This section illustrates the exclusions processing model with an example. It is meant to be simple. Yet, it contains enough complexity to address the issues of layout dependencies and re-layout.
The code snippet in the following example has two exclusions affecting the document's inline content.
<html>
<style>
#d1 {
position:relative;
height: auto;
color: #46A4E9;
border: 1px solid gray;
}
#e1 {
wrap-flow: both;
position: absolute;
left: 50%;
top: 50%;
width: 40%;
height: 40%;
border: 1px solid red;
margin-left: -20%;
margin-top: -20%;
}
#d2 {
position: static;
width: 100%;
height: auto;
color: #808080;
}
#e2 {
wrap-flow: both;
position: absolute;
right: 5ex;
top: 1em;
width: 12ex;
height: 10em;
border: 1px solid lime;
}
</style>
<body>
<div id="d1">
Lorem ipsusm ...
<p id="e1"></p>
</div>
<div id="d2">
Lorem ipsusm ...
<p id="e2" ></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>
The following figures illustrate:
DOM tree
Layout tree of generated block boxes
The figures illustrate how the boxes corresponding to the element sometimes
have a different containment hierarchy in the layout tree than in the DOM tree.
For example, the box generated by e1 is positioned in
its containing block's box, which is the d1-box, because
e1 is absolutely positioned and d1
is relatively positioned. However, while e2 is also absolutely
positioned, its containing block is the initial containing block (ICB). See the
section 10.1 of the CSS 2.1 specification ([[!CSS21]]) for details.
As a result of the computation of containing blocks for the tree, the boxes belonging to the wrapping contexts of all the elements can be determined:
e2 box: WC-1 (Wrapping Context 1)d1 inherits the body element's
wrapping context and adds the e1-box to it. So the wrapping
context is made of both the e1-box and the
e2-box: WC-2d2 inherits the body element's
wrapping context: WC-1In this step, each containing block is processed in turn. For each containing block, we (conceptually) go through two phases:
In our example, this breaks down to:
d1 element's wrapping context: RWC-2d1 elementd2 element's wrapping context: RWC-1d2 elementThe top-most wrapping context in the layout tree contains the e2
exclusion. Its position and size needs to be resolved. In general, computing an
exclusion's position and size may or may not require laying out other content.
In our example, no content needs to be laid out to resolve the e2
exclusion's position because it is absolutely positioned and its size can be resolved
without layout either. At this point, RWC-1 is resolved and can be used when
laying inline content out.
The process is similar: the position of the
e1 exclusion needs to be resolved. Again, resolving the exclusion's
position and size may require processing the containing block (d1 here).
It is the case here because the size and position of
e1 depend on resolving the percentage lengths. The percentages are relative
to the size of
d1's box. As a result, in order to resolve
a size for d1's box, a first layout of d1
is done without any wrapping context (i.e., no exclusions applied). The layout yields a
position and size for e1's box.
At this point, RWC-2 is resolved because the position and size of both e1 and e2 are resolved.
The important aspect of the above processing example is that once an element's wrapping context is resolved (by resolving its exclusions' position and size), the position and size of the exclusions are not re-processed if the element's size changes between the layout that may be done without considering any wrapping context (as for RWC-2) and the layout done with the resolved wrapping context. This is what breaks the possible circular dependency between the resolution of wrapping contexts and the layout of containing blocks.
There are similarities between floats and exclusions in that inline content wraps around floats and also wraps around exclusion areas. However, there are very significant differences.
Floats have an effect on the positioning of exclusions and the layout of their inline content. For example, if an exclusion is an inline-box which happens to be on the same line as a float, its' position, as computed in Step 2-A will be impacted by the float, as is any other inline content.
Exclusions have an effect on the positioning of floats as they have an effect on inline content. Therefore, in Step 2-B, floats will avoid exclusion areas.
This specification is made possible by input from Andrei Bucur, Alexandru Chiculita, Arron Eicholz, Daniel Glazman, Arno Gourdol, Chris Jones, Bem Jones-Bey, Marcus Mielke, Alex Mogilevsky, Hans Muller, Mihnea Ovidenie, Virgil Palanciuc, Peter Sorotokin, Bear Travis, Eugene Veselov, Stephen Zilles and the CSS Working Group members.