You can subscribe to this list here.
2008 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(33) |
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(3) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(17) |
Dec
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2009 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
2011 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(6) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
|
2012 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2013 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(2) |
Apr
|
May
(2) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(5) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
2014 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(1) |
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2015 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
(3) |
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(3) |
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2017 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(5) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2018 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2019 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2020 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
2022 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
(1) |
11
|
12
|
13
(1) |
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
(2) |
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
(2) |
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
From: Alan K. <al...@tr...> - 2011-06-10 18:02:46
|
On 3/20/2008 1:15 PM, Alan Krueger wrote: > (The question was asked earlier, but in the middle of another message. > I'll restate the question to ensure it doesn't get missed.) > > Does anyone object to using Subversion for our source control? We can't > use both SVN and CVS at the same time. We would have to enable SVN, > convert our existing CVS repository into SVN, then import that into SF's > SVN repository. > > It takes a bit of work, but it should be easy to back out if something > went wrong in the conversion process. I'm in favor of Subversion > myself, I've found it quite a bit easier to use than CVS and more powerful. I got only positive responses back then, but I didn't have time to look at it then. I'd forgotten about this until recently. I've converted over the CVS repo into SVN and imported it. I haven't done any cleanup like adding svn:ignore properties anywhere or removing the CVSROOT from the trunk yet. I disabled the CVS feature in the project, but we can get it back if someone rabidly objects at the last minute. =) Thanks, Alan |