Thread: [cssparser-developers] Subversion

(The question was asked earlier, but in the middle of another message.  
I'll restate the question to ensure it doesn't get missed.)

Does anyone object to using Subversion for our source control?  We can't 
use both SVN and CVS at the same time.  We would have to enable SVN, 
convert our existing CVS repository into SVN, then import that into SF's 
SVN repository.

It takes a bit of work, but it should be easy to back out if something 
went wrong in the conversion process.  I'm in favor of Subversion 
myself, I've found it quite a bit easier to use than CVS and more powerful.

Thanks,
Alan

+1

I'd much rather work in SVN than in CVS.

On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 2:15 PM, Alan Krueger <al...@tr...> wrote:

> (The question was asked earlier, but in the middle of another message.
> I'll restate the question to ensure it doesn't get missed.)
>
> Does anyone object to using Subversion for our source control?  We can't
> use both SVN and CVS at the same time.  We would have to enable SVN,
> convert our existing CVS repository into SVN, then import that into SF's
> SVN repository.
>
> It takes a bit of work, but it should be easy to back out if something
> went wrong in the conversion process.  I'm in favor of Subversion
> myself, I've found it quite a bit easier to use than CVS and more
> powerful.
>
> Thanks,
> Alan
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> cssparser-developers mailing list
> css...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cssparser-developers
>



-- 
Daniel Gredler
http://daniel.gredler.net/

Alan Krueger schrieb:
> Does anyone object to using Subversion for our source control?

I don't mind.
-- 
Johannes Koch
In te domine speravi; non confundar in aeternum.
                             (Te Deum, 4th cent.)

On 3/20/2008 1:15 PM, Alan Krueger wrote:
> (The question was asked earlier, but in the middle of another message.
> I'll restate the question to ensure it doesn't get missed.)
>
> Does anyone object to using Subversion for our source control?  We can't
> use both SVN and CVS at the same time.  We would have to enable SVN,
> convert our existing CVS repository into SVN, then import that into SF's
> SVN repository.
>
> It takes a bit of work, but it should be easy to back out if something
> went wrong in the conversion process.  I'm in favor of Subversion
> myself, I've found it quite a bit easier to use than CVS and more powerful.
I got only positive responses back then, but I didn't have time to look 
at it then.  I'd forgotten about this until recently.

I've converted over the CVS repo into SVN and imported it.  I haven't 
done any cleanup like adding svn:ignore properties anywhere or removing 
the CVSROOT from the trunk yet.

I disabled the CVS feature in the project, but we can get it back if 
someone rabidly objects at the last minute.  =)

Thanks,
Alan