Yeah, the project I'm currently working on is stuck at Java 5 due to our use
of OAS.
I think Java 5 is the new JDK 1.4 :-)
Anyways, I'll go ahead and set the min in the POM, but if anyone else has
any comments, feel free to speak up.
Regards,
Daniel
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 12:30 PM, Alan Krueger <al...@tr...> wrote:
> D&J Gredler wrote:
> > I want to close bug 1337724 (we're no longer compatible with JDK 1.2),
> > which was opened 3 years ago. However, before doing so I'd like to
> > clarify which JDK version the project requires. It seems to me that
> > Java 5 should be the minimum, since that's when the DOM Level 3 APIs
> > were first added to Java. What does everyone think?
> I'm of two minds.
>
> At the Twin Cities Software Symposium in Minneapolis two weeks ago,
> almost a majority of the Java developers in attendance were still stuck
> on JDK 1.4 due to application server compatibility constraints. This is
> often because of political issues, where a business stubbornly refuses
> to upgrade beyond some ancient version of Oracle AS, WebSphere, or
> whatever because it costs so freaking much, but won't consider migrating
> to something newer and cheaper.
>
> On the other hand, Sun's going to stop supporting 1.4 when 7.0 comes
> out, presumably sometime around this summer.
>
> I'm leaning toward 5.0 as the minimum, myself.
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> cssparser-developers mailing list
> css...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cssparser-developers
>
--
Daniel Gredler
http://daniel.gredler.net/
|
