<span xmlns:cc="http://creativecommons.org/ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"> <span rel=" dc:type " href=" http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text " property=" dc:title " > My Book </span> by <a rel=" cc:attributionURL " property=" cc:attributionName " href=" http://example.org/me "> My Name </a> is licensed under a <a rel=" license " href=" http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ " >Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License</a>. <span rel=" dc:source " href=" http://example.net/her_book " /> Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at <a rel=" cc:morePermissions " href=" http://example.com/revenue_sharing_agreement ">example.com</a>. </span>
DRMfree “ DRM Voodo” by psd licensed under CC BY 2.0 http://flickr.com/photos/psd/1806247462/
In Innovation, Meta is Max
“The max net-impact innovations, by far, have been meta-innovations, i.e., innovations that changed how fast other innovations accumulated.”
http://www.ccianet.org/artmanager/publish/news/First-Ever_Economic_Study_Calculates_Dollar_Value_of.shtml also see http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/7643
Cyber terrorism (Cyber terror war on) Privacy breaches Loss of Generativity Lock-in Surveillance DRM Censorship Suppression of innovation Electoral fraud
Threat categories
Legitimate security issues
Protectionism
Politics and power
Security theater and fear-based responses (driven by all of above, not just legitimate security issues)
What digital freedoms needed for beneficial collective intelligence?
Keep same rights online/digitally that we (should anyway) have offline/IRL
Permit innovation and participation enabled by digital world even if not possible before (probably follows from above)
How building the commons (free software, free culture, and friends) helps
Security
Data shows FLOSS is more secure
Security through obscurity doesn’t work
FLOSS encourages a heterogeneous computing environment
Free software and free culture both allergic to DRM and other mechanisms that sacrifice security to other goals
Protectionism
Peer production undermines policy arguments for protecting knowledge industries
Free software and free culture both allergic to DRM
Politics and power
Free software and culture improve transparency
... and the ability of all to participate
Peer production works against concentrated power — doesn’t require concentrated production structures and lowers barriers to entry
Security theater and fear
Access to facts mitigates fear and allows rational evaluation of responses
Commons work against three previous threats that drive security theater and fear
Can the success of the (digital) commons alter how we view freedom and power generally?
“The gate that has held the movements for equalization of human beings strictly in a dilemma between ineffectiveness and violence has now been opened. The reason is that we have shifted to a zero marginal cost world. As steel is replaced by software, more and more of the value in society becomes non-rivalrous: it can be held by many without costing anybody more than if it is held by a few.”
Eben Moglen
“If we don’t want to live in a jungle, we must change our attitudes. We must start sending the message that a good citizen is one who cooperates when appropriate, not one who is successful at taking from others.”
Richard Stallman
i.e., we can form collective intelligences instead of forced collectives ... and still “change the world”
Building the commons is key to the future of collective intelligence
Politicians and corporations are unimaginative ... they need to see solutions, or they react in fear
A dominant commons makes many collective stupidity scenarios much less likely
Beneficial collective intelligence needs universal access to culture, educational resources, research ... in machine-readable form
Much less Meta ... 2 of the excellent bootstrap(?) tools CC uses and builds
Semantic MediaWiki ... turn your MediaWiki into a database and database application platform
RDFa ... bridging the Semantic Web and the Web we all use
License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
Attribution
Author: Mike Linksvayer
Link: http://creativecommons.org
Questions?
[email_address]
Detail of image by psd · Licensed under CC Attribution 2.0 · http://flickr.com/photos/psd/1805374441