On Mon, 2007-10-01 at 14:16 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> But for a question a little off topic. Looks like the only way for
> the editor to produce valid code is to use the doctype 'XHTML 1.0
> Transitional', there is some weirdness (align attr. on images) with
> the wysiwyg editor with floating images that 'XHTML 1.0 Strict'
> doesn't like. I know the Xinha editor produces better code, but it
> doesn't work in Opera and Safari.
The main reason I don't use strict is because clients always want to
open some page in a new window, which strict does not allow.
>
> Does anyone know of an OS editor that will work in all browsers yet
> produce valid output ? Or considering the target audience for the end
> user do you reckon I should sacrifice Safari and Opera users to
> produce valid code ?
>
XStandard is really good and supports:
* For Windows 2000, XP, Vista: IE 5.0+, Firefox 1.0+, Safari 3.0+ or
Opera 9.0+
* For OS X 10.3.9+: Firefox 1.0+ or Safari 1.3+
But, the full featured version is not free. Their lite version is free,
cross-browser/platform and might fit the bill.
If you want XML Schema driven WYSIWYG editing, Xopus is the way to go
(we use it in our current CMS) -- it is not free either.
best,
-Rob
> Cheers
