Complete Proceedings of The 27th International Conference On Systems Engineering, ICSEng 2020: 182 (Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 182) Henry Selvaraj (Editor) PDF For All Chapters
Complete Proceedings of The 27th International Conference On Systems Engineering, ICSEng 2020: 182 (Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 182) Henry Selvaraj (Editor) PDF For All Chapters
com
OR CLICK BUTTON
DOWLOAD NOW
https://ebookmeta.com/product/microelectronics-circuits-and-
systems-select-proceedings-of-7th-international-conference-on-
micro2020-lecture-notes-in-electrical-engineering-755/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/intelligent-tutoring-systems-18th-
international-conference-its-2022-bucharest-romania-
june-29-july-1-2022-proceedings-scott-crossley/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/digital-transformation-technology-
proceedings-of-itaf-2020-lecture-notes-in-networks-and-
systems-224-dalia-a-magdi/
Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems 182
Henry Selvaraj
Grzegorz Chmaj
Dawid Zydek Editors
Proceedings of the
27th International
Conference
on Systems
Engineering,
ICSEng 2020
Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems
Volume 182
Series Editor
Janusz Kacprzyk, Systems Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences,
Warsaw, Poland
Advisory Editors
Fernando Gomide, Department of Computer Engineering and Automation—DCA,
School of Electrical and Computer Engineering—FEEC, University of Campinas—
UNICAMP, São Paulo, Brazil
Okyay Kaynak, Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering,
Bogazici University, Istanbul, Turkey
Derong Liu, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University
of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, USA; Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy
of Sciences, Beijing, China
Witold Pedrycz, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering,
University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada; Systems Research Institute,
Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland
Marios M. Polycarpou, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering,
KIOS Research Center for Intelligent Systems and Networks, University of Cyprus,
Nicosia, Cyprus
Imre J. Rudas, Óbuda University, Budapest, Hungary
Jun Wang, Department of Computer Science, City University of Hong Kong,
Kowloon, Hong Kong
The series “Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems” publishes the latest
developments in Networks and Systems—quickly, informally and with high quality.
Original research reported in proceedings and post-proceedings represents the core
of LNNS.
Volumes published in LNNS embrace all aspects and subfields of, as well as new
challenges in, Networks and Systems.
The series contains proceedings and edited volumes in systems and networks,
spanning the areas of Cyber-Physical Systems, Autonomous Systems, Sensor
Networks, Control Systems, Energy Systems, Automotive Systems, Biological
Systems, Vehicular Networking and Connected Vehicles, Aerospace Systems,
Automation, Manufacturing, Smart Grids, Nonlinear Systems, Power Systems,
Robotics, Social Systems, Economic Systems and other. Of particular value to both
the contributors and the readership are the short publication timeframe and the
world-wide distribution and exposure which enable both a wide and rapid
dissemination of research output.
The series covers the theory, applications, and perspectives on the state of the art
and future developments relevant to systems and networks, decision making, control,
complex processes and related areas, as embedded in the fields of interdisciplinary
and applied sciences, engineering, computer science, physics, economics, social, and
life sciences, as well as the paradigms and methodologies behind them.
Indexed by SCOPUS, INSPEC, WTI Frankfurt eG, zbMATH, SCImago.
All books published in the series are submitted for consideration in Web of
Science.
Dawid Zydek
Editors
123
Editors
Henry Selvaraj Grzegorz Chmaj
Department of Electrical and Computer Department of Electrical and Computer
Engineering Engineering
University of Nevada Las Vegas University of Nevada Las Vegas
Las Vegas, NV, USA Las Vegas, NV, USA
Dawid Zydek
Department of Electrical and Computer
Engineering
University of Nevada Las Vegas
Las Vegas, NV, USA
This Springer imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature Switzerland AG
The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland
Preface
ICSEng 2020
v
vi Preface
acceptance rate of 48%. The University of Nevada, Las Vegas, is very pleased to
host this Twenty-Seventh International Conference on Systems Engineering.
We would like to thank all the authors, reviewers, participants and student
volunteers for making the conference a success. We wish all the participants a
fruitful conference.
Henry Selvaraj
ICSEng 2020 General Chair
Grzegorz Chmaj
Dawid Zydek
ICSEng 2020 Organizing Committee Co-chairs
Conference Organization
ICSEng 2020
General Chair
H. Selvaraj University of Nevada, Las Vegas, USA
Steering Committee
H. Selvaraj University of Nevada, Las Vegas, USA
G. Chmaj University of Nevada, Las Vegas, USA
D. Zydek University of Nevada, Las Vegas, USA
J. Swiatek Wrocław University of Science and Technology,
Poland
P. Swiatek Wrocław University of Science and Technology,
Poland
K. Burnham University of Wolverhampton, UK
Organizing Committee
G. Chmaj University of Nevada, Las Vegas, USA
D. Zydek University of Nevada, Las Vegas, USA
B. Tiwari University of Nevada, Las Vegas, USA
S. Sharma University of Nevada, Las Vegas, USA
vii
viii Conference Organization
Program Committee
ICSEng 2020
R. J. Baker University of Nevada, Las Vegas, USA
G. Borowik Deep Dive Lab, Poland
A. P. F. Carvalho University of Sao Paulo at Sao Carlos, Brazil
Z. Chaczko University of Technology Sydney, Australia
G. Chmaj University of Nevada, Las Vegas, USA
M. Ezra Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Malaysia
T. Fujimoto Toyo University, Japan
L. Gewali University of Nevada, Las Vegas, USA
T. F. Gonzalez University of California at Santa Barbara, USA
T. Gorski Polish Naval Academy, Poland
A. Iyer Virginia Commonwealth University, USA
L. Jozwiak Eindhoven University of Technology,
Netherlands
J. Kacprzyk Polish Academy of Sciences, Poland
A. Kasprzak Wrocław University of Science and Technology,
Poland
A. Khamis Military Technical College, Cairo, Egypt
M. H. Kolekar Indian Institute of Technology Patna, India
L. Koszalka Wrocław University of Science and Technology,
Poland
T. Luba Warsaw University of Technology, Poland
H. Migliore Portland State University, USA
S. Muthaly Asia Pacific University of Technology &
Innovation, Malaysia
I. Pozniak-Koszalka Wrocław University of Science and Technology,
Poland
J. Rozenblit University of Arizona, USA
H. Selvaraj University of Nevada, Las Vegas, USA
D. Selvathi Mepco Schlenk Engineering College, India
S. Singh University of Nevada, Las Vegas, USA
P. Stubberud University of Nevada, Las Vegas, USA
S. Stubberud Boeing Company, USA
M. Thoma University of Hannover, Germany
A. Vadivel SRM AP, Amaravati, India
R. Venkat University of Nevada, Las Vegas, USA
L. Wang Harbin Institute of Technology, China
M. Wozniak Wrocław University of Science and Technology,
Poland
D. Zydek University of Nevada, Las Vegas, USA
Conference Organization ix
Sponsors
Contents
AeroSpace Systems
A Track Registration Association Technique – Feature Analysis . . . . . . 3
Stephen C. Stubberud and Kathleen A. Kramer
Investigation of Wind Energy Impact on Power Systems Stability
Using Lyapunov Exponents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Mojtaba Amiri, Maryam Dehghani, Alireza Khayatian,
Mohsen Mohammadi, Navid Vafamand, and Jalil Boudjadar
Motor Current Signature Analysis Using Shapelet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
Maryam Iraji, Maryam Dehghani, Mohsen Mohammadi, Navid Vafamand,
and Jalil Boudjadar
A Prototype Telepresence Robot for Use in the Investigation of Ebola
and Lassa Virus Threatened Villages in Nigeria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
S. D. Monk, E. Jorgensen, A. McCulloch, R. Peacock,
I. Sangprachatanaruk, J. Azeta, C. A. Bolu, and C. J. Taylor
Hamiltonian-Based Libration Point Orbit Control on Manifold
of Constant Energy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
Keum W. Lee and Sahjendra N. Singh
State and Control Input Limitations in Sliding Mode Control
with System Uncertainties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
Marek Jaskuła and Piotr Leśniewski
Pointing Orientations for Manipulator End-Effectors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71
Douglas R. Isenberg
Non-switching Reaching Law Based DSMC Strategies in the Context
of Robustness Comparison . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81
Paweł Latosiński and Monika Herkt
xi
xii Contents
Intelligent Systems
Different Approaches to Threshold Estimation for Variation Mode
Decomposition-Based Signal Denoising . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95
Krzysztof Brzostowski and Jerzy Świątek
Multi-criteria Optimization of Freight Parking Planning Along
a Single Corridor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105
Grzegorz Filcek and Maciej Hojda
Synthesis of Index Generation Function Using Linear
and Functional Decomposition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 115
Grzegorz Borowik, Tadeusz Łuba, Dariusz Wąsicki, and Grzegorz Chmaj
Differential Evolution with Taguchi Crossover Using
Polar Coordinates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 128
Peter Stubberud
Using Machine Learning Techniques to Estimate the Remaining
Useful Life of a System with Different Types of Datasets . . . . . . . . . . . . 139
Carlos Lemus and Shahram Latifi
Internet of Things
Adaptation-Enabled Architecture for Internet of Things Systems . . . . . 195
Patryk Schauer and Łukasz Falas
Internet of Things Systems as Complex Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 205
Patryk Schauer, Łukasz Falas, and Arkadiusz Warzyński
Communication Services in the Internet of Things . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 213
Patryk Schauer, Łukasz Falas, and Arkadiusz Warzyński
Contents xiii
1 Introduction
Target registration occurs when multiple target tracking platforms are reporting their
tracks to other platforms, but bias errors in one or more readings causing the potential
for misassociation. Standard association routines are based on nearest neighbor or the
chi-squared-metric [1, 2].
Figures 1 and 2 illustrate the registration problem. In Fig. 1, two platforms are
tracking the same target. If both platforms knew their local coordinates and headings
exactly, their reported tracks would be as shown. Figure 2 illustrates the difference in
reported tracks if one of them had a bias in its reported position, and an offset in its
heading. Standard association routines in such as case can undergo gate out. A gate out
occurs when the association score exceeds a threshold value that defines a score that
indicates that the no association should be allowed.
In [3], an association approach for registration was presented. The approach was an
extension of the association routine first developed in [4, 5]. This image-correlation
technique for general track association gave the foundation for a track representation
that is invariant when registration occurs. The problem with the technique is that when
uncertainty in the track is present, the correlation falls apart.
Fig. 1. Two sensor platforms provide two track reports of the same target.
In this paper, the individual features of the vector representing the tracks are
analyzed. The impact on the association score for each feature is analyzed. The impact
is then used to estimate weighting on the feature to determine is the insensitivity over
different regions of rotation can be increased. Section 2 provides a summary overview
the registration-association technique. In Sect. 3, the feature’s effects on the association
score under different rotation conditions are analyzed. This followed in Sect. 4 with
proposed weighting schemes in the association routine.
The standard tracking algorithm is the extended Kalman filter (EKF). The track state,
usually referred to as x, is a Gaussian random vector with an associated covariance,
often denoted as P. The standard association is referred to as the chi-squared metric.
For standard track-to-track association, the metric is defined as
Since this is the multiplication of two Gaussian random variables, the metric has a
chi-squared distribution. The vector of errors between the two tracks is weighted by the
A Track Registration Association Technique – Feature Analysis 5
Fig. 2. Sensor Platform 2 has a registration error in reporting, both translation and rotation.
vector uncertainties. Thus, differences that are associated with large uncertainties are
weighted less while small differences are amplified when associated with small
uncertainties. An analogy would be close stars in astronomy as compared to missed
putts in golf.
The standard vector used in track association is a vector comprised of position,
velocity, and, sometimes, acceleration. The position-velocity vector is defined as
xT ¼ ½ x x_ y y_ ð2Þ
Each track-pair score is then entered into an assignment matrix after being pro-
cessed as
ev
2
ð3Þ
where
2 3 2 3
xen xn xn1
6 ye 7 6 y y 7
6 n7 6 n n1 7
6e 7¼6 7: ð5Þ
4 x_ n 5 4 x_ n x_ n1 5
y_en y_ n y_ n1
It is important to note that the fourth element in Eq. (4) is only the current heading
information provided by the track state. Unlike the first (distance) element and third
(speed change) element, which were both based upon current and previous state ele-
ments, the heading angle change proved too noisy to be effective, even with smoothing
over time, as used in the second element for the position angle.
The chi-squared metric to determine the association score is from Sensor Plat-
form A to Sensor Platform B therefore generated as.
T 1
v2Reg ¼ V Track pltA V Track pltB HPpltA H T þ HPpltB H T V Track pltA V Track pltB ;
ð6Þ
where
3 02 2~ 3 1
d~n dn
B ~ 7 C
B6 6 hn 7
6~
6 hn 7
7 C
V Trackplt A B
V Trackplt B ¼ B6 7 6 7 C ð7Þ
4 5 4 5 C
@ ~sn ~sn A
u~ n Trackplt A ~ n Trackplt B
u
and the matrix P is the associated standard track four-state position and velocity
covariance matrix. The Jacobian is defined in Eq. (8) as.
2 @hd @hh @hs @hu 3 2 @hd @hh
3
@x @x @x @x @x @x
6 @hd @hu 7 6 @hd @hh
0 7
6 @hh @hs 7 6 7
6 @y @y @y @y 7 6 @y @y 7
H ¼6 7¼6 @hu 7
6 @hd @hh @hs @hu 7 6 @hs 7
4 @ x_ @ x_ @ x_ @ x_ 5 4 0
@ x_ @ x_ 5
@hd @hh @hs @hu @hs @hu
@ y_ @ y_ @ y_ @ y_ @ y_ @ y_
with
@hd @hs 2x_
@x ¼ 2x
1 @x ¼ 1
ðx2 þ y2 Þ2 ðx_ 2 þ y_ 2 Þ2
@hd @hs
@y ¼ 2y
1 @y ¼ 2_y
1
ðx2 þ y2 Þ2 ðx_ 2 þ y_ 2 Þ2 ð8Þ
@hh y @hu _y
¼
@x ðx2 þ y2 Þ @x ðx_ þ y_ 2 Þ
2
@hh @hu x_
¼ ðx2 þx y2 Þ ¼
@y @y ðx_ 2 þ y_ 2 Þ
A Track Registration Association Technique – Feature Analysis 7
Since a single timestep may not be reliable, a small window of track points is used
to create an association score
Xwinsize 1
regassocscore ¼ k¼0
v2Reg ðn kÞ: ð9Þ
The implementation of the metric in the assignment is scaled so that the distances
do not become zero in the exponent and cause computational zeros to be formed. This
causes the order of the matrix to have an effect on the selection. The scale factor is in
the exponent is shown in Eq. (10) where the subscript indicates a two-norm.
3 Feature Analysis
Each of the elements of the feature vector in Eq. (4) provides a portion of the score.
Each has an impact on the score which varies based on the rotation. To analyze this
impact, each feature will be applied alone to the association problem for a variety of
rotation angles. The measure to be used is the correct association.
A three-track scenario, as defined in [5], is used. As seen in Fig. 3, there are two
sensor platforms, each with range-bearing sensors. Platform 1 is located at 300 m north
of the origin point and 100 m east of the origin point. Its sensor has a range accuracy of
0.1 m and a bearing accuracy of 0.0975°. Platform 2 is located at 0m north of the origin
and -100 m east of the origin. Its sensor’s range accuracy is 0.05 m, and its bearing
accuracy is 0.3°. Target 1 performs an S-curve maneuver over the scenario. The second
target flies a straight-line trajectory with constant speed at the beginning of the scenario
followed by a constant acceleration. Target 3 decelerates over a straight-line trajectory.
The window size was selected to be 5.
As can be seen, the most effective single features are the distance-traveled feature,
d, and the speed-change feature, s. These features would provide 81.9% and 94.8%
correct associations on average. The least effective as a solo feature is direction change,
h, at 39.6% average correct associations.
A variety of weighting values for the chi-squared vector features were compared. Based
on the analysis of Sect. 3, Features 1 and 3 were considered exceedingly useful. They
were each given equal weights for all of the comparisons. The direction and heading
features, Features 2 and 4, were varied from values between 0 and 1. Table 5 lists the
correct associations for each angle and an average percentage of correct associations.
10 S. C. Stubberud and K. A. Kramer
As the results show, the weighting can have a small improvement in performance.
If feature weighting were to be used in implementation, a weighting with Features 1
and 3 equally weighted and Feature 2 weighted less than Features 1 and 3 but more
than Feature 4 would be best. All features should be used. The analysis shows that the
technique is effective up to 20 degrees of rotation in most cases and the outrageous
heading error of 90 degrees has deleterious effects. If the 90-degree heading error is not
considered, the top four performing weighting schemes increase to between 95% to
98.75% accuracy.
5 Conclusion
References
1. Blackman, S., Popoli, R.: Design and Analysis of Modern Tracking System. Artech House,
Boston (1999)
2. Bar-Shalom, Y., Blair, W.D. (eds.): Multitarget - Multisensor Tracking: Applications and
Advances, vol. III. Artech House, Boston (2000)
3. Stubberud, S.C.: Track registration using image correlation. In: Proceedings of the 2015
Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, MT, pp. 1–7 (2015)
4. Stanek, C.J., Javidi, B., Yanni, P.: Performance assessment of frequency plane filters applied
to track association and sensor registration. Proc. SPIE 5094, 323–328 (2003)
5. Stanek, C.J.: Gridlocking and correlation methods and arrangements. U.S. Patent
US680399B2 (2004)
6. Stubberud, S.C., Kramer, K.A.: A target registration association technique. In: Submitted to
the IEEE Transactions of Aerospace Electronic Systems (2020)
7. Giernacki, W.: Robust control with optimization of robustness index. In: 2012 IEEE
International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), Seoul, South Korea,
pp. 2389–2394 (2012)
Investigation of Wind Energy Impact on Power
Systems Stability Using Lyapunov Exponents
Abstract. The world tendency is to replace all generators that use fossil fuels
by renewable energy. Although this is a very important step toward keeping the
environment clean, this paper shows that by replacing wind energy by the
conventional generators, the relative stability becomes worse. This does not
mean that the paper is against such replacement, but makes an alert to be aware
of such important issue and to implement appropriate controllers for increasing
the relative stability of the power systems equipped with renewable energy
sources. In this work, a data-driven approach is used to assess the stability of
power grids by just using voltage time-series data. Lyapunov exponent
(LE) index is presented as an effective tool to analyze complex systems stability.
If the maximum LE (MLE) is positive (negative), then the system is unstable
(stable). In the present paper, the MLE is computed for a finite-time interval for
the sample system of the New England 39-Bus system. In the end, the effect of
renewable wind energy on the stability of the system has been investigated and
by substituting the wind farm in different areas of the system, the impact of
adding a wind farm to the system in different locations is found.
1 Introduction
Evaluating the complex power system stability is a critical issue which can be done
through various approaches [1]. The model equations of power systems are highly
nonlinear and these systems are high order systems. There are many approaches to
assess the stability of systems. Many of these methods use the system model. On the
other hand, the nonlinearity of the power systems, as well as the high order of the
systems, is itself a strong reason for the high computational burden which requires
expensive hardware and increases cost. Therefore, the methods that do not use model
equations to analyze stability can be very effective. Because of the importance and
complexity of these systems, the online and model-free voltage stability assessment is
very important.
In [2], Liu et al. used LE to evaluate the behavior of power systems for the first
time. By using measurement data, they have measured the transient chaos of the power
system with LE. That method is applied on a three-machine system. In [3], an appli-
cable LE-based approach is suggested for the online stability evaluation of rotor angle
in the presence of perturbations. The method presented in [3] is an extension of the
results achieved by Lui et al. [2]. In [3], the relation of the MLE with the rotor angle
stability in power systems is studied. The effectiveness of that method for the 200-Bus
system has been investigated. In [4], a data-driven approach is developed to assess the
voltage stability in power systems. The algorithm of [4] is an extension of the method
proposed by Rosenstein et al. [5], in which, the LE is used as an indicator for deter-
mining stability. The authors of [6] proposed an algorithm to evaluate the rotor angle
stability of a power system. That approach is not a model-based approach and can use
phasor measurement unit (PMU) fuzzy measurement data. In that algorithm, the LE
measures the degree of convergence or divergence of the rotor angle trajectories. In [7],
a robust stability analysis is performed for a power system by the means of the LE to
analyze the stability of the voltage and rotor angle. The author of [7] calls that method
as “THRUST”. Contrary to references [8, 9] that have been used only for small sys-
tems, the THRUST has been also utilized to evaluate the stability of a small system
(39-Bus) and a very large system (13029-Bus). In [10], Wei et al. proposed a data-
based approach using LE theory to analyze rotor angle stability. The MLE is obtained
by a method based on the recursive least squares from the measured data of the rotor
angles. The results of that study were applied to the Northeast Power Coordinating
Council 140-Bus and the New England 39-Bus systems and have yielded good results.
In [11], Ge et al. presented an improved method of voltage stability assessment. The
effect of voltage fluctuations on the computation procedure of the LE is studied and a
phase correction method is presented to compensate for the negative effects of voltage
fluctuations. Simulations have been carried out on the Guangdong Province Power
Network of China.
In this research, the LE-based method is used for stability assessment. LE is
introduced by Lyapunov [12] and is a powerful and efficient method to analyze the
stability of a power system [13]. LE is calculated by two methods: I) model-based, and
II) model-free (data-driven) [14, 15]. This paper uses a model-free (data-driven) and
online approach of computation of the MLE to analyze the stability of the power
system using only voltage time-series data. If the MLE value is positive, the system is
unstable and if the LE gets a negative value, the system is stable. In other words, this
paper is an extension of [16–19] in assessing system stability using online data from
system, such as PMU data. Moreover, the use of renewable energies power plants
instead of fossil fuel power plants to reduce pollution and costs is increasing. Replacing
a synchronous generator with a renewable energy system reduces the relative stability
of the power system [20–23]. In the present paper, the effect of replacing a wind farm
with a synchronous generator on the stability of a New England 39-Bus system is
investigated. The effect of replacing a wind farm with all of the synchronous generators
of the system is investigated by using an online model-free approach of MLE com-
putation for several different cases. Power system simulations are done by DIgSILENT.
The paper is organized as follows. The low-inertia systems are represented in
Sect. 2. Section 3 represents the Date-Driven-based stability assessment approach.
14 M. Amiri et al.
In Sect. 4, simulation results on the New England 39-Bus system are presented to
assess the effect of substituting a wind farm with a specific synchronous generator of
the system. Finally, the conclusions are in Sect. 5.
2 Low-Inertia Systems
where M shows the total inertia of the system, xðtÞ is average frequency, Pns and Ps
show the active power of non-synchronous and synchronous generators, respectively.
Pl and Pj show the loads and losses, respectively. Bigger values of M increase the
system’s control ability to and robustness against load fluctuations and faults. By
increasing the number of non-synchronous generators, the value of M is reduced,
causing an increase in the frequency fluctuations and even system failure to maintain
the voltage at a certain value. In order investigate this effect, a data-driven tool is used.
unpredictable. Attractors of a system with one or more positive LEs are called strange
or chaotic. The LE is highly dependent on the initial conditions of the system.
The pioneer numerical algorithm to compute the MLE of the system from time
series was introduced in [5], which was unable to compute the MLE of the big data and
also this algorithm is not robust to delay time changes. System information can be also
obtained from system state-space equations. In the words, it is not enough to only use
set of time-series data or simply a measurement variable. To solve this problem, the
measurement variables should be increased [25] by embedding data in the m-
dimensional delay coordinates. Suppose voltage time series data is available in the form
fv1 ; v2 ; . . .; vk g, the delay coordinates are as follows:
V i ¼ vi ; vi þ s ; . . .; vi þ ðm1Þs ! V ¼ ðV 1 ; V 2 ; . . .; V M ÞT ; ð2Þ
4 Simulation Results
The New England 39-Bus system is considered as the case study and simulated in
DIgSILENT for different cases. First of all, stability analysis of this system is inves-
tigated for six cases. Then, by using MLE, the impact of wind energy on the system
stability is investigated for three cases. The New England 39-Bus System has 10
generators, 12 transformers, 39 buses, and 34 lines. This system is a reduced order of
the transmission system in the USA [28].
By using the data-driven approach presented in Fig. 1 to compute the MLE, the
stability is analyzed in six cases which are mentioned below. The MLE is computed
only using bus voltage time-series data.
Case 1)
A short-circuit at 16th bus is simulated and it is cleared after 180 ms.
Case 2)
A short-circuit at 16th bus is simulated and it is cleared after 200 ms.
Case 3)
A short-circuit at 31th bus is simulated and it is cleared after 210 ms.
Case 4)
A short-circuit at 16th bus is simulated and it is cleared after 230 ms.
Case 5)
A short-circuit at the beginning of Line 2–3 is simulated and it is cleared
after 230 ms.
Case 6) A short-circuit at the beginning of Line 2–3 is simulated and it is cleared
after 250 ms.
The 39 bus voltage trajectories in case 1 are shown in Fig. 2 for 10 s. The MLE
evolution of the system in case 1 is shown in Fig. 3. The value of the MLE in this case
became negative and we can realize that the system is stable. It should be mentioned
that the voltage magnitudes are shown in p. u.
The 39 bus voltage trajectories in case 2 are shown in Fig. 4 for 5 s. Figure 5
shows the MLE evolution of the system in case 2. The value of the MLE, in this case,
became positive and one can realize that the system is unstable.
The 39 bus voltage trajectories in case 3 are given in Fig. 6 for 5 s. Figure 7
illustrates the MLE evolution of the system for the case 3. As can be seen in Fig. 7, the
value of the MLE, in this case, became negative and one can realize that the system is
stable. The simulation results of the other cases for 5 s are shown in Table 1.
For an investigation of wind energy impact on the power system stability, each of
the synchronous generators of the 39-Bus system is replaced by a wind farm,
respectively, and the impact of this substitution is investigated in three cases. It should
be mentioned that the New England 39-Bus system is stable in these three cases when
the substitution is not done. By calculating the MLE of the system using voltage time-
series data, we can analyze the stability of the system in each case. The three cases are
as follows:
Case 1) A short-circuit at 16th Bus is simulated and is cleared after 180 ms.
Case 2) A short-circuit at 31th Bus is simulated and is cleared after 210 ms.
Case 3) A short-circuit at the beginning of “Line 02–03” is simulated and by
switching off the faulted line, this fault is cleared after 230 ms.
Wind farms are connected to the New England 39-Bus system in parallel with
synchronous generators as given in Fig. 8. Each of the synchronous generators is
replaced with a wind farm specified by the active power generation capacity same as
the original generator and the impact of this substitution is investigated by computation
of the MLE of the system using voltage time-series data in 5 s for 3 mentioned cases.
The results of this substitution of the wind farm with synchronous generators are shown
in Table 2. The table shows values of the MLE after 5 s.
Fig. 8. Parallel connection of wind farm with a synchronous generator to the system
20 M. Amiri et al.
The MLE values in the table show that with the displacement of the wind farm in
areas of the system, in most cases, the system becomes unstable and, in some cases, the
relative stability is decreased.
As shown in Table 2, by substitution of 39 buses system synchronous generators in
most cases, the MLE became positive and in two cases reduced relative system sta-
bility. According to this table, the Lyapunov exponent theory can be utilized as a tool
for locating the wind farm.
5 Conclusion
In this paper, first, the low-inertia systems in introduced. Then, the Lyapunov exponent
theorem is introduced and by using the model-free method of computation of the MLE,
the stability of the system is analyzed. It is observed that this method can assess the
stability of power systems in an online manner with low computational burden. Then,
by replacing the wind farm with each of the synchronous generators of a power system,
system stability is evaluated. It is found that these substitutions may reduce relative
stability or make the system unstable. This study proves the importance of controller
design strategies when the renewable energy sources are added to the power system.
References
1. Liu, M., Bizzarri, F., Brambilla, A.M., Milano, F.: On the impact of the dead-band of power
system stabilizers and frequency regulation on power system stability. IEEE Trans. Power
Syst. 34, 3977–3979 (2019)
2. Liu, C.-W., Thorp, J.S., Lu, J., Thomas, R.J., Chiang, H.-D.: Detection of transiently chaotic
swings in power systems using real-time phasor measurements. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 9
(3), 1285–1292 (1994)
Investigation of Wind Energy Impact on Power Systems Stability 21
3. Yan, J., Liu, C.-C., Vaidya, U.: PMU-based monitoring of rotor angle dynamics. IEEE
Trans. Power Syst. 26(4), 2125–2133 (2011)
4. Dasgupta, S., Paramasivam, M., Vaidya, U., Ajjarapu, V.: Real-time monitoring of short-
term voltage stability using PMU data. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 28(4), 3702–3711 (2013)
5. Rosenstein, M.T., Collins, J.J., De Luca, C.J.: A practical method for calculating largest
Lyapunov exponents from small data sets. Physica D 65(1–2), 117–134 (1993)
6. Dasgupta, S., Paramasivam, M., Vaidya, U., Ajjarapu, V.: PMU-based model-free approach
for real-time rotor angle monitoring. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 30(5), 2818–2819 (2014)
7. Khaitan, S.K.: THRUST: a Lyapunov exponents based robust stability analysis method for
power systems. In: 2017 North American Power Symposium (NAPS), pp. 1–6. IEEE (2017)
8. Verdejo, H., Vargas, L., Kliemann, W.: Stability of linear stochastic systems via Lyapunov
exponents and applications to power systems. Appl. Math. Comput. 218(22), 11021–11032
(2012)
9. Dasgupta, S., Paramasivam, M., Vaidya, U., Ajjarapu, V.: PMU-based model-free approach
for short term voltage stability monitoring. In: 2012 IEEE Power and Energy Society
General Meeting, pp. 1–8. IEEE (2012)
10. Wei, S., Yang, M., Qi, J., Wang, J., Ma, S., Han, X.: Model-free MLE estimation for online
rotor angle stability assessment with PMU data. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 33(3), 2463–2476
(2017)
11. Ge, H., et al.: An improved real-time short-term voltage stability monitoring method based
on phase rectification. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 33(1), 1068–1070 (2017)
12. Lyapunov, A.M.: The general problem of the stability of motion. Int. J. Control 55(3), 531–
534 (1992)
13. Amiri, M., Dehghani, M., Khayatian, A., Mohammadi, M.: Lyapunov exponent based
stability assessment of power systems. In: 2019 6th International Conference on Control,
Instrumentation and Automation (ICCIA), pp. 1–5. IEEE (2019)
14. Khodadadi, H., Khaki-Sedigh, A., Ataei, M., Jahed-Motlagh, M.R.: Applying a modified
version of Lyapunov exponent for cancer diagnosis in biomedical images: the case of breast
mammograms. Multidimensional Syst. Signal Process. 29(1), 19–33 (2016)
15. Pikovsky, A., Politi, A.: Lyapunov exponents: a tool to explore complex dynamics.
Cambridge University Press, New York (2016)
16. Dehghani, M., Shayanfard, B., Khayatian, A.R.: PMU ranking based on singular value
decomposition of dynamic stability matrix. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 28(3), 2263–2270
(2013)
17. Shayanfard, B., Dehghani, M., Khayatian, A.: Optimal PMU placement for full observability
and dynamic stability assessment. In: 2011 19th Iranian Conference on Electrical
Engineering, pp. 1–6. IEEE (2011)
18. Mohammadi, H., Khademi, G., Dehghani, M., Simon, D.: Voltage stability assessment using
multi-objective biogeography-based subset selection. Int. J. Electric. Power Energy Syst.
103, 525–536 (2018)
19. Mohammadi, H., Khademi, G., Simon, D., Dehghani, M.: Multi-objective optimization of
decision trees for power system voltage security assessment. In: 2016 Annual IEEE Systems
Conference (SysCon), pp. 1–6. IEEE (2016)
20. Milano, F., Dörfler, F., Hug, G., Hill, D.J., Verbič, G.: Foundations and challenges of low-
inertia systems. In: 2018 Power Systems Computation Conference (PSCC), pp. 1–25. IEEE
(2018)
21. Toor, A., et al.: Energy and performance aware fog computing: a case of DVFS and green
renewable energy. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 101, 1112–1121 (2019)
22. Khooban, M.H., Vafamand, N., Boudjadar, J.: Tracking control for hydrogen fuel cell
systems in zero-emission ferry ships. Complexity 2019 (2019)
22 M. Amiri et al.
23. Vafamand, N., Khooban, M.H., Dragičević, T., Boudjadar, J., Asemani, M.H.: Time-delayed
stabilizing secondary load frequency control of shipboard microgrids. IEEE Syst. J. 13(3),
3233–3241 (2019)
24. Best, E.A.: Stability Assessment of Nonlinear Systems Using the Lyapunov Exponent. Ohio
University, Athens (2003)
25. Takens, F.: Detecting strange attractors in turbulence. In: Dynamical Systems and
Turbulence, Warwick 1980, pp. 366–381. Springer (1981)
26. Fraser, A.M., Swinney, H.L.: Independent coordinates for strange attractors from mutual
information. Phy. Rev. A 33(2), 1134 (1986)
27. Kennel, M.B., Brown, R., Abarbanel, H.D.: Determining embedding dimension for phase-
space reconstruction using a geometrical construction. Phys. Rev. A 45(6), 3403 (1992)
28. Pai, M.: Energy Function Analysis for Power System Stability. Springer, New York (2012)
Motor Current Signature Analysis Using
Shapelet
1 Introduction
Fault detection methods become one of the most critical issues as in the most parts of
industry, faults are likely to occur and it can cause devastating damage in equipments.
In this situation using methods that can detect fault accurately and fast is very
important. Shapelet is a machine learning method that can find local shape-based
differences in signals accurately and fast. So Shapelet method can be employed as one
of the most accurate way to detect faults. In 2009, Eamonn Keogh et al. introduced
shapelet concept as a new classification method for the first time [1]. After that pioneer
work, the shapelet attracts a lot of attention because of its advantages. For instance, the
shapelet can classify datasets high accurately; it can gain some insight into the data; and
it works in both time and frequency domains [1]. Some extensions of the approach of
[1] are logical-shapelet concept [2], shapelet transform [3], unsupervised-shapelet (U-
shapelet), which is a novel method for clustering data [4], and multivariate shapelet
detection (MSD) for multivariate time series [5]. As Shapelet algorithm can recognize
local shape differences, it has been successfully applied on various systems to find
faulty behaviors [6–8]. However, the process of selecting a proper shapelet is very
time-consuming and needs a high computational burden.
Until now, a wide variety of fault detection methods have been presented for the
induction motors (IMs). The IMs are widely exploited in industry, as they are highly
robust and have low cost maintenance, power efficiency and reliability. Though,
continuous care should be taken for their maintenance as the environmental situation
could cause serious faults, like broken rotor bar or shorted stator winding in the IM
systems [9–11]. The fault detection methods can be classified in two ways; invasive and
non-invasive methods [12]. Motor current signature analysis (MCSA) is one of the
popular non-invasive methods. Cusido et al. developed a method that use the convo-
lution of wavelet-based functions [13]. However, to the best knowledge of the authors,
the application of shapelet method in the IMs is not investigated yet, which is the main
motivation of this work.
In this paper, shapelet algorithm with new criteria for the maximum and minimum
number of all class members, is employed for online fault detection and classification in
the IMs. These criteria are defined based on the distance of timeseries from each other
and the number of timeseries that are closer to shapelet candidate than the other ones.
To show the merits of the suggested approach, a train dataset is made by simulating a
normal IM. Then, a type of fault is exerted on the train dataset. The proposed
shapelet algorithm with new criteria is used to discover proper shapelet in order to
detect and classify occurring faults of the IM, accurately. Finally, the chosen shapelet is
utilized to detect faults on a numerical IM system.
The rest of the paper is organized as follow; in Sects. 2 and 3, the study tools for
this paper such as the theory of shapelet and the model of IMs are elaborated. In
Sect. 4, new criteria for shapelet algorithm and the novel method for fault detection and
classification are proposed. In Sect. 5, the case study is presented that consists an IM
with healthy condition and broken rotor fault. Then, the shapelet are utilized in each of
these situations and fault is detected. Section 6 consists of the conclusion about using
shapelet for fault detection.
2 Theory of Shapelet
A time series is a temporal ordered list of real-valued data that is recorded in a fixed
interval. Suppose there is a set of n time series T ¼ fT1 T2 . . .Tn g, where each Ti has
m samples Ti ¼ hti1 ti2 . . .tim i. For the sake of simplicity, it is assumed that all series in
dataset have the same length. Though, inspired by [14], the results of this paper can be
extended to the case that the series do not have the same length. Shapelet is a subset of
one of the time series in the dataset and it is employed to extract a specific feature of
each class, in order to find the best touchstone for achieving fast and accurate classi-
fication. Shapelet is used for finding local shape-based similarity, so shapelet must be
normalized and non-variable to scale and offset [14]. Generally, the shapelet discovery
has three main steps
Motor Current Signature Analysis Using Shapelet 25
X
m
distðS; RÞ ¼ ðsi ri Þ2 ð4Þ
i¼1
where S and R are time series, si and ri are their components and m is their length. For
computing the distance between a time series by length m and a subseries by the length
l, while l m, minimum amount of squared Euclidean distance between normalized
subseries S and all normalized subseries inside Ti with the same length as the S (each of
then is named as R) must be found.
The list of distance between the shapelet candidate S and the time series T is:
DS ¼ dS;1 ; dS;2 ; . . .; dS;n ð6Þ
sp, DS must be divided into AS and BS . The AS consists of all distances of DS \sp and
the BS consists of the rest of distances. So, the IG of sp is
jAS j jBS j
IGðDS ; spÞ ¼ H ðDS Þ H ðAS Þ þ H ðBS Þ ð7Þ
jBS j jDS j
where pðAs Þ and pðBs Þ are the proportion of objects in classes As and Bs with respect to
the overall dataset, respectively as
Optimal Split Point (OPS) is the sp for which the IGS has the maximum value.
In this section, dynamical representation of the IM in the healthy and broken rotor bars
situations are presented. An IM is an extremely symmetrical electromagnetic system.
Fault leads to a specified percent of asymmetry. So, broken rotor bars by inducting a
specific degree of unbalancing are modelled in the rotor parameters [15].
4 Proposed Approach
The proposed method has two main parts. The first part is the offline process that
consists of modeling the IM and its faults in order to make a comprehensive train
dataset. In addition, new criteria for specifying the number of members in all classes
are proposed for the shapelet algorithm described in Sect. 2. In the second part, the
obtained shapelet is employed to detect faults online.
Fig. 1. Filtered and normalized Fourier transform of stator current: (a) healthy condition (b) IM
with broken rotor bars.
where k is the number of classes, n is the number of members for each class and D is
the number of all members in dataset.
The maximum number of each class is considers as Maxn and it can be calculated
by
The algorithm of calculating Minn and Maxn is shown in Fig. 2. As can be seen in
Fig. 2, the Minn are calculated from (16) and at the first step. After that, M must be
calculated from (17) and the value of Maxn is achieved by it. The algorithm of IG
calculation based on the Minn and Maxn is provided in Fig. 3. In comparison with the
conventional IG algorithm, this algorithm considers a range for numbers of objects in
each class. In the algorithm that is shown in Fig. 3, if the number of remaining objects
is less than Maxn , all of them must be put in DA and DB is provided with artificial
objects that do not exist in the dataset. Also, the split point (sp) is considered as a
summation of maximum distance and 2=3 of the last shapelet’s split point.
Motor Current Signature Analysis Using Shapelet 29
5 Case Study
At the first step, a 50 Hz, 6 poles, three phase induction motor is modelled in healthy
situation based on [13]. A dataset of Fourier transform of stator current for phase a, for
healthy condition and 6 broken rotor bar condition are made for train dataset. It consists
of 50 series in frequency domain. This dataset is shown in Fig. 5.
Shapelet Algorithm with new criteria is employed in this step, in order to find best
shapelet for accurate classification. For each condition of the induction motor, a
specific shapelet is found. The shapelets of healthy motor and motor with BRB fault are
Motor Current Signature Analysis Using Shapelet 31
presented in Fig. 6. It is obvious that the shapelet of IM with broken rotor bar fault
consists peaks of signal that caused by fault. on the other hand, the shapelet of
Healthy IM consists smooth signal without peaks. After finding Shapelets, a test dataset
with 800 time series is made for performance evolution. This dataset consist of 400
timeseries in healthy situation and 400 timeseries for IM with 6 broken rotor bars. The
test dataset is shown in Fig. 7. Finally, discovered Shapelets are used to classify test
dataset, the algorithm of the proposed method for classification is shown in Fig. 4.
Fig. 6. (a) Shapelet of healthy IM (b) Shapelet of IM with 6 broken rotor bars
Other documents randomly have
different content
CHAPTER XIV.
DEMOBILISATION.
On June 7th, after many false rumours and one lot of cancelled
orders, the cadre at last left Douai. For the past month the weather
had been very hot and dry, and it was a broiling morning when the
Battalion vehicles and stores were entrained. The officers, with the
loose baggage, occupied one of the well-known cattle trucks, which
was made quite comfortable with a table, some forms and chairs;
the men occupied third-class compartments. Early in the afternoon
the train started. On the way to Arras a glimpse was obtained of the
old camping ground at Feuchy. Then, circling round the ruins of Lens
and passing Bethune and Hazebrouck, the cadre arrived at a siding
near Dunkerque, just before dusk. The night was spent at what was
known as the “dirty” camp—the blankets provided certainly deserved
the name. The next morning the Battalion moved to No. 3 Camp
where it remained for nine days.
No. 3 Camp was the centre through which passed all men and
cadres on their way for demobilisation by the Dunkerque route. It
was managed entirely by the 13th Battalion Duke of Wellington’s
Regt., so the cadre found itself in the midst of friends. Officers’ and
Sergeants’ Messes were thrown open; everything that was wanted
was immediately forthcoming, if available. Two very pleasant
officers’ reunion dinners were held in Dunkerque, and the Officers’
Mess of the 13th Batt. Duke of Wellington’s Regt. held a special
guest night for the officers of the 147th Infantry Brigade. Altogether,
the tedium of the stay on the coast was very much relieved. Strange
to say, No. 3 Camp was pitched on the exact site which the Battalion
had occupied in July, 1917. But how changed was the country! Then
the Battalion had seen nothing but a flat grass patch and a waste of
sand hills, on which to pitch its tents. Now the whole area was
covered by immense camps, mostly of huts, which would
accommodate many thousands of men. The time near Dunkerque
passed uneventfully. The cadre remained there rather longer than
was usual, partly as a result of a violent wind storm which delayed
sailings for two or three days.
On June 16th the cadre sailed. The morning was spent in loading
the vehicles on to the cargo vessel—S.S. “Clutha”—which was to
carry them to Southampton. Among the loading party were several
transport men who had assisted in a similar operation at
Southampton, more than four years before, when the Battalion
sailed for France. In the afternoon the cadre embarked on S.S. “St.
George,” and, about 3-0 p.m., the vessel moved away from the quay.
Among her passengers was Capt. W. B. B. Yates, who had that
morning arrived at Dunkerque on leave from the Murman Coast.
Slowly the ship passed out of Dunkerque harbour and moved along
the French coast, until opposite Calais. The day was perfect. A bright
sun blazed down upon the deck, and there was scarcely a ripple on
the water. Every now and then a fountain of water would rise at
some miles’ distance, followed by the sound of a deep ‘boom,’ as
some mine was destroyed. Opposite Calais the ship turned north
towards the English coast, and, in the early evening, the coast of
France dipped from view, and all said good-bye to the land which
held for them so many memories. A run along the English coast
brought the “St. George,” in the early morning, into Southampton
Water, where it anchored off Netley until about 8-0 a.m.
Soon after breakfast the cadre landed at Southampton Docks and
the work of unloading began. As the vehicles were slung by the
great cranes out of the ship, they were run by the men into a large
covered shed to await entrainment. A change had been made in the
programme. When it left France, the cadre had expected to go to a
camp at Fovant and remain there until stores had been checked
over. But on arrival in England, it was found that only the stores
were to go to Fovant, while the cadre was to proceed direct to
Halifax. As soon as the vehicles were loaded the cadre might leave.
Everyone worked with a will, and, by tea time, everything was on
the train. Then all marched to Southampton West Station to entrain
for London. While the cadre was waiting there, the train carrying the
battalion’s vehicles passed through the station on its way to Fovant,
and a shout of unholy glee was the farewell of the transport men to
their beloved (?) limbers. An uneventful journey brought the party to
London where all spent the night at the Buckingham Palace Hotel.
Shortly after 3-0 p.m. on June 18th, the cadre reached Halifax.
On the platform Brigadier-General R. E. Sugden, C.M.G., D.S.O.,
Lieut.-Colonel H. S. Atkinson, T.D., Lieut.-Colonel J. Walker, D.S.O.,
and many other old officers of the Battalion were waiting to meet
the party and give it a rousing welcome. Outside the station was
Sergt.-Drummer H. Deane, with a band which he had collected. A
colour escort had been sent down from the depot of the 3rd
Battalion Duke of Wellington’s Regt. But, best of all, hundreds of
demobilised men of the Battalion—the men who had made its
history—had paraded there to welcome their old comrades.
“Demobilised men of the 1/4th Duke of Wellington’s Regt. rally round
their old Battalion” was the inscription on the banner which they
carried.
The cadre was photographed at the Station, and then it fell in and
moved off. Notice of its coming had been very short, but the streets
were gay with flags and packed with cheering crowds. Preceded by
the band, and followed by the Colours with their escort and the
demobilised “Dukes,” who once again “moved to the right in fours,”
the cadre marched up Horton Street and round to the Town Hall,
where it was welcomed home by the Mayor. The Commanding
Officer thanked the Mayor for all the town and district had done for
the Battalion while overseas, and for the day’s welcome home. Then,
turning to the men, he said farewell to them in words which all will
remember:—
“The Battalion will now pass to another command, and I take this
opportunity of thanking the men for their loyalty to me, to the
regiment, and to the town and district they have represented. Those
of us who have been spared to come through this great conflict hold a
very sacred trust. We must ever remember the comrades we have left
lying on the battle-fields of France and Flanders. Let us try to prove
worthy of their sacrifice. They have died that we might live; and on
our return to civilian life we must continue to serve our country, our
town, and our homes in the same spirit of loyalty, cheerfulness and
trust that pulled us through four years of war. If you do that you can
look to the future with happiness, certain that your great efforts of
the last few years have not been made in vain.”
THE CADRE AT HALIFAX, JUNE 18th, 1919.
The cadre was then entertained by the Mayor at the Drill Hall, and
afterwards the men dispersed to their homes for the night.
The next day the men paraded for the last time and went to
Ripon for dispersal. And when the time came to say the last good-
bye there were many who regretted that, henceforward, their paths
would lie apart. With the warmest of handshakes, and the deepest
feelings of friendship and respect, we parted one from another, and
the history of the 1/4th Battalion Duke of Wellington’s (West Riding)
Regiment in the Great War came to an end.
APPENDIX I.
ITINERARY OF THE BATTALION.
Date of Move to.
Move.
4.8.14. Halifax Mobilisation of the Battalion.
5.8.14. Hull By train
11.8.14. Immingham By boat.
13.8.14. Great Coates By march route.
15.9.14. Riby Park By march route.
17.10.14. Marsden By train.
5.11.14. Doncaster By train.
St. Martin’s Camp, By train to Folkestone; by S.S.
14.4.15.
Boulogne “Invicta” to Boulogne.
By march route to Hesdigneul; by
15.4.15. Estaires train to Merville; by march route
to Estaires.
22.4.15. Doulieu By march route.
24.4.15. La Croix Lescornez By march route.
No. 3 Section, Relieved 3rd Bn. Worcestershire
26.4.15.
Fleurbaix Sector Regt.
29.4.15. La Croix Lescornez
Inter-relieving with 1/6th Bn. D. of W.
2.6.15. No. 3 Section
Regt.
5.5.15. La Croix Lescornez
8.5.15. Croix Blanche By march route.
9.5.15. No. 3 Section
13.5.15. La Croix Lescornez
17.5.15. No. 3 Section
21.5.15. La Croix Lescornez
25.5.15. No. 3 Section Inter-relieving with 1/6th Bn. D. of W.
29.5.15. La Croix Lescornez Regt.
2.6.15. No. 3 Section
6.6.15. La Croix Lescornez
12.6.15. No. 3 Section
18.6.15. La Croix Lescornez
25.6.15. Sailly-sur-la-Lys
26.6.15. Doulieu
27.6.15. Farms near Bailleul
29.6.15. Flêtre By march route.
Wood near St. Jans ter
30.6.15.
Biezen
Canada Wood, near
7.7.15.
Elverdinghe
Relieved 2nd Bn. Royal Dublin
8.7.15. Lancashire Farm Sector
Fusiliers.
13.7.15. Canal Bank (Bde. Res.)
18.7.15. Lancashire Farm Sector
Wood near Oosthoek Inter-relieving with 1/5th Bn. D. of W.
24.7.15.
(Divl. Res.) Regt.
30.7.15. Lancashire Farm Sector
5.8.15. Canal Bank (Bde. Res.)
Glimpse Cottage
11.8.15.
Sector Inter-relieving with 1/7th Bn. D. of W.
Saragossa Farm (Bde. Regt.
16.8.15.
Res.)
18.8.15. Ypres Left Sector
Malakoff Farm (Bde. Inter-relieving with 1/5th Bn. D. of W.
21.8.15.
Res.) Regt.
24.8.15. Ypres Left Sector
Coppernollehoek (Divl.
26.8.15. Relieved by 1/4th Bn. Y. and L. Regt.
Res.)
Relieved 1/6th Bn. W. Yorks. Regt.
8.9.15. Turco Farm Sector
Regt.
15.9.15. Canal Bank (Bde. Res.)
21.9.15. Turco Farm Sector Inter-relieving with 1/5th Bn. D. of W.
Elverdinghe (Bde. Regt.
27.9.15.
Res.)
Camp near Woesten-
2.10.15.
Poperinghe Road.
Glimpse Cottage
14.10.15. Relieved 1/5th Bn. W. Yorks. Regt.
Sector
21.10.15. Canal Bank (Bde. Res.) Relieved by 1/4th Bn. K.O.Y.L.I.
30.10.15. Ypres Left Sector Relieved 1/7th Bn. D. of W. Regt.
Coppernollehoek (Divl. By motor bus. Relieved by 1/6th Bn.
3.11.15.
Res.) D. of W. Regt.
11.11.15. Ypres Left Sector
Malakoff Farm (Bde. Inter-relieving with 1/5th Bn. D. of W.
15.11.15.
Res.) Regt.
19.11.15. Ypres Left Sector
Malakoff Farm (Bde.
23.11.15. Relieved by 1/6th Bn. D. of W. Regt.
Res.)
Coppernollehoek (Divl.
27.11.15.
Res.)
Malakoff Farm (Bde.
5.12.15.
Res.)
9.12.15. Ypres Left Sector Relieved 1/5th Bn. D of W. Regt.
Malakoff Farm (Bde.
13.12.15.
Res.) Inter-relieving with 1/6th Bn. D. of W.
17.12.15. Ypres Left Sector Regt.
20.12.15. Elverdinghe
27.12.15. Coppernollehoek
30.12.15. Poperinghe
Camp near St. Jans ter
31.12.15. By march route.
Biezen
1.1.16. Houtkerque
15.1.16. Wormhoudt
2/3.2.16. Camps En Amienois By march route to Esquelbecq; by
train to Longueau; by march
route to Ailly; by motor bus to
Camps En Amienois.
11.2.16. Picquigny
12.2.16. Molliens-au-Bois By march route.
13.2.16. Warloy Baillon
Right Section, Authuille
28.2.16. Relieved 1/4th Bn. K.O.Y.L.I.
Trenches
4.3.16. Bouzincourt
5.3.16. Authuille Defences
6.3.16. Mailly-Maillet By march route.
29.3.16. Harponville
30.3.16. Naours
23.4.16. Hedauville By motor bus.
12.5.16. Aveluy Wood
1.6.16. Martinsart Wood
15.6.16. Aveluy Wood
By march route.
20.6.16. Vadencourt Wood
27.6.16. Senlis
28.6.16. Vadencourt Wood
B Assembly Trenches,
30.6.16. By march route, via Senlis.
Aveluy Wood
1.7.16. Crucifix Corner, Aveluy By march route.
2.7.16. Johnstone’s Post Relieved 1/5th Bn. W. Yorks. Regt.
Right Sub-sector,
5.7.16. Relieved 1/5th Bn. D. of W. Regt.
Thiepval Wood
B Assembly Trenches, Relieved by 1/6th Bn. D. of W. Regt.
7.7.16.
Aveluy Wood and 1/5th Bn. K.O.Y.L.I.
Thiepval Wood, Right Relieved 1/6th Bn. D. of W. Regt.
8.7.16.
Sub-sector and 1/5th Bn. K.O.Y.L.I.
Relieved by 1/5th and 1/7th Bns. D.
11.7.16. „ Bde. Res.
of W. Regt.
„ Left Sub-
14.7.16.
sector
17.7.16. „ Bde. Res.
„ Left Sub-
21.7.16.
sector
Inter-relieving with 1/5th Bn. D. of W.
25.7.16. „ Bde. Res.
Regt.
„ Left Sub-
31.7.16.
sector
6.8.16. „ Bde. Res.
„ Left Sub-
12.8.16.
sector
Relieved by 9th Bn. Loyal North
19.8.16. Raincheval
Lancs. Regt.
27.8.16. Forceville By march route.
2.9.16. Martinsart Wood By march route.
Thiepval Wood,
2/3.9.16. For attack on German line.
Assembly Parallels
3.9.16. Martinsart Wood By march route.
7.9.16. Hedauville
15.9.16. Martinsart Wood By march route.
16.9.16. Crucifix Corner, Aveluy
Leipsig Redoubt
18.9.16.
(Support).
Leipsig Redoubt (Front
21.9.16. Relieved 1/5th Bn. D. of W. Regt.
Line)
By march route. Relieved by 12th Bn.
24.9.16. Lealvillers
Middlesex Regt.
25.9.16. Halloy
27.9.16. Humbercamps By march route.
28.9.16. Bienvillers-au-Bois
Hannescamps, Left Relieved 2nd Bn. Royal Welsh
29.9.16.
Sub-sector Fusiliers.
3.10.16. Souastre
Inter-relieving with 1/5th Bn.
Hannescamps, Left K.O.Y.L.I.
9.10.16.
Sub-sector
16.10.16. Bienvillers-au-Bois Relieved by 1/6th Bn. D. of W. Regt.
18.10.16. Humbercamps
19.10.16. St. Amand By march route.
21.10.16. Souastre (Bde. Res.)
24.10.16. Y Sector, Fonquevillers Relieved 1/6th Bn. W. Yorks. Regt.
30.10.16. Souastre
5.11.16. Y Sector
11.11.16. Souastre Inter-relieving with 1/5th Bn. D. of W.
17.11.16. Y Sector Regt.
23.11.16. Souastre
29.11.16. Y Sector
By march route. Relieved by 1/5th
5.12.16. Warlincourt
Bn. Sherwood Foresters.
6.12.16. Halloy By march route.
Berles-au-Bois and By march route. Relieved 2nd Bn.
7.1.17.
Humbercamps Bedfordshire Regt.
B1 Sub-sector, Berles-
10.1.17.
au-Bois
14.1.17. Humbercamps
18.1.17. B1 Sub-sector Inter-relieving with 1/5th Bn. D. of W.
Berles-au-Bois and Regt.
22.1.17.
Humbercamps
26.1.17. B1 Sub-sector
30.1.17. Humbercamps
By march route. Relieved 8th Bn.
1.2.17. Rivière (Bde. Res.)
K.R.R.C.
2.2.17. F1 Sub-sector, Rivière Relieved 7th Bn. K.R.R.C.
7.2.17. Rivière
11.2.17. F1 Sub-sector
16.2.17. Rivière Inter-relieving with 1/5th Bn. D. of W.
20.2.17. F1 Sub-sector Regt.
22.2.17. Bailleulval
26.2.17. F1 Sub-sector
28.2.17. Bailleulval Relieved by 2/9th Bn. London Regt.
1.3.17. Souastre
2.3.17. Halloy By march route.
6.3.17. Neuvillette
By march route to Doullens; by train
7/8.3.17. La Fosse to Merville; by march route to La
Fosse.
Senechal Farm (Bde. By march route. Relieved 12th Bn.
9.3.17.
Res.) London Regt.
13.3.17. Ferme du Bois Sector
17.3.17. Senechal Farm
23.3.17. Ferme du Bois Sector
29.3.17. Senechal Farm
4.4.17. Ferme du Bois Sector
10.4.17. Senechal Farm Inter-relieving with 1/5th Bn. D. of W.
16.4.17. Ferme du Bois Sector Regt.
22.4.17. Senechal Farm
28.4.17. Ferme du Bois Sector
4.5.17. Senechal Farm
10.5.17. Ferme du Bois Sector
16.5.17. Senechal Farm
25.5.17. Estaires By march route.
26.5.17. Sailly-sur-la-Lys By march route.
Relieved 2/5th Bn. Loyal North
27.5.17. Cordonnerie Sector
Lancs. Regt.
Rouge de Bout (Bde.
3.6.17. Inter-relieving with 1/5th Bn. D. of W.
Res.)
Regt.
11.6.17. Cordonnerie Sector
Relieved by 2/4th Bn. Loyal North
15.6.17. Estaires
Lancs. Regt.
18.6.17. Sailly Labourse By motor bus.
19.6.17. Philosophe (Bde. Res.) Relieved 1st Bn. Leicestershire Regt.
25.6.17. St. Elie Sector Relieved 1/6th Bn. D. of W. Regt.
1.7.17. Tower Keep, Vermelles Relieved by 9th Bn. Suffolk Regt.
By march route to Philosophe; by
3.7.17. L’Epinette
motor bus to L’Epinette.
By march route to Merville; by train
13.7.17. Mardyck Camp, St. Pol to Dunkerque; by march route
to St. Pol.
18.7.17. Bray Dunes
20.7.17. Ghyvelde By march route.
31.7.17. La Panne Bains
By motor bus to beyond Oost
Lombartzyde Right Dunkerque; by march route to
3.8.17.
Sub-sector trenches. Relieved 1/5th Bn.
K.O.Y.L.I.
Presque L’Isle
9.8.17.
Defences Inter-relieving with 1/6th Bn. D. of W.
Lombartzyde Right Regt.
13.8.17.
Sub-sector
By march route. Relieved by 20th Bn.
16.8.17. Oost Dunkerque
Royal Fusiliers.
By march route. Relieved 2nd Bn.
17.8.17. Oost Dunkerque Bains Argyle and Sutherland
Highlanders on coast defence.
27.8.17. Surrey Camp
29.8.17. La Panne
13.9.17. Bray Dunes
23.9.17. Coudekerque
24.9.17. Wormhoudt
25.9.17. Buysscheure
28.9.17. Audenthun Area By march route.
Longue Croix (Staple
30.9.17.
Area)
Clyde Camp, near
3.10.17.
Watou
Red Rose Camp,
4.10.17.
Vlamertinghe
Pommern Castle (Bde.
4.10.17. Relieved 1st Bn. Canterbury Regt.
Res.)
Front Line near Relieved 3rd Bn. Canterbury and 3rd
5.10.17.
Abraham Heights Bn. Auckland Regts.
Relieved by 2/5th Bn. Manchester
6.10.17. Pommern Castle
Regt.
Attacked in support of 146th Infantry
9.10.17. Peter Pan
Brigade.
10.10.17. X Camp, St. Jean Relieved by New Zealand Div.
No. 3 Area,
16.10.17.
Vlamertinghe
24.10.17. A Camp, Winnezeele By march route.
Farms near
27.10.17.
Steenvoorde
9.11.17. Canal Area, near Ypres By motor bus.
12.11.17. Swan Area, near Ypres By march route.
Anzac Ridge (Bde.
19.11.17. Relieved 1/7th Bn. W. Yorks. Regt.
Res.)
Molenaarelsthoek
23.11.17. Relieved 1/6th Bn. D. of W. Regt.
Sector
27.11.17. Gordon House Area Relieved by 1/5th Bn. K.O.Y.L.I.
28.11.17. Vancouver Camp By march route.
6.12.17. Dragoon Camp By march route.
7.12.17. Keerselaarhoek Sector Relieved 4th Bn. Suffolk Regt.
10.12.17. Dragoon Camp
Inter-relieving with 1/5th Bn. D. of W.
15.12.17. Keerselaarhoek Sector Regt.