Payments Systems in the U S A Guide for the Payments Professional 2nd Edition Carol Coye Benson 2024 scribd download
Payments Systems in the U S A Guide for the Payments Professional 2nd Edition Carol Coye Benson 2024 scribd download
com
https://ebookname.com/product/payments-systems-in-the-u-s-a-
guide-for-the-payments-professional-2nd-edition-carol-coye-
benson/
OR CLICK BUTTON
DOWNLOAD EBOOK
https://ebookname.com/product/recommendations-on-payments-for-
ecosystem-services-in-integrated-water-resources-management-united-
nations/
ebookname.com
https://ebookname.com/product/the-garnaut-review-2011-australia-in-
the-global-response-to-climate-change-ross-garnaut/
ebookname.com
https://ebookname.com/product/the-discourse-of-italian-cinema-and-
beyond-let-cinema-speak-1st-edition-roberta-piazza/
ebookname.com
https://ebookname.com/product/cultureshock-netherlands-a-survival-
guide-to-customs-and-etiquette-2nd-edition-hunt-janin/
ebookname.com
https://ebookname.com/product/city-choreographer-lawrence-halprin-in-
urban-renewal-america-1st-edition-alison-bick-hirsch/
ebookname.com
https://ebookname.com/product/the-heart-of-coaching-supervision-
working-with-reflection-and-self-care-1st-edition-eve-turner-editor/
ebookname.com
Fluid Dynamics and Transport of Droplets and Sprays 2ed.
Edition William A. Sirignano
https://ebookname.com/product/fluid-dynamics-and-transport-of-
droplets-and-sprays-2ed-edition-william-a-sirignano/
ebookname.com
Payments Systems in the U.S.
A GUI DE FOR THE PAYM ENTS PROFESSI ONAL
Email:books@glenbrook.com
Quantity sales:
Special discounts are available on quantity purchases by corporations, associations, and
others. For details, contact us at the email address above.
While every precaution has been taken in the preparation of this book, the publisher
assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions, or for damages resulting from the use
of the information contained in it.
Payments Systems in the U.S./ Benson, Loftesness. —2nd ed. Kindle edition
ISBN 978-0-9827897-3-5
About Glenbrook
Carol Coye Benson and Scott Loftesness are two of the founding partners of
Glenbrook Partners. Founded in 2001, Glenbrook is a consulting, research and education
firm focused on the payments industry. Glenbrook brings to financial services and
financial technology clients a unique combination of specialized skills in payments,
many years of senior, hands-on experience, and a network of professional relationships.
Introduction
Payments are a big part of all of our lives. We pay for things we want and need. We
scramble for change in our purse or pockets; we shuffle through the cards in our wallet to
find the right one for a purchase. We write checks or pay bills online. We buy gift cards
and schedule mortgage payments. We worry about funding big purchases; we try to find
the right path for ordinary purchases. We’re all different. For some of us, convenience is
king; for others, control, or the collection of rewards, or following the patterns our
parents taught us, determine how and why we make payments.
As businesspeople, we may be involved in how our businesses make payments—to
employees, to suppliers, to governments. We may also be involved in how our businesses
collect payments—from consumers or from businesses.
These activities are central to our personal and business lives. And for some of us,
they are also the services that fuel our livelihoods. “Under the hood” of these simple
payment transactions are the systems, products, and companies that form the payments
industry.
This book is written for the payments professional. Payments professionals may work
for companies that enable payments transactions. This includes banks, of course, but also
many other types of companies—processors, payments services, software companies,
point-of-sale terminal manufacturers, service providers, risk managers, and others. Some
of these companies are powerful incumbents, while others are their competitors—start-
ups that are bringing innovation to the industry. Many of these fail or stagnate, but a few
succeed—and join the incumbents watching nervously for the next round of new
challengers. Other payments professionals are responsible within an enterprise for the
collection or disbursement of payments. Still others work as advisors, consultants,
lawyers, or investors in the industry.
As in any industry, the professionals in the payments industry struggle to keep up
with changes in the environment, in technology, and in the payments behavior of
consumers, merchants, and other users of payments systems. Some payments
professionals are well versed in one payments system (cards, perhaps, or ACH); others in
a function such as consumer marketing or risk management. This book provides a
comprehensive view of the entire payments industry, including all its systems and
functions.
This book is not a source for statistics or “league tables” on payments. There are
many such industry sources; each chapter includes a list of resources that offer more
information about a particular payments system or topic.
We have tried to be as unbiased as possible; any opinions, speculations, or anecdotes
on a topic are set in shaded boxes.
We very much welcome your questions and comments. Email books@glenbrook.com
and we’ll respond!
CHAPTER 2
There are many types of payments systems. Most share these common
characteristics:
They operate within a single country, but on a national basis within that country.
They are denominated in the currency of that country.
They are subject, directly or indirectly, to regulation by the government of that
country.
They enable multiple parties to transact with each other.
Payments Systems in the United States
There are six core payments systems in the United States:
Cash
The checking system
The credit card and charge card systems
The debit card systems
The ACH (Automated Clearing House) system
The wire transfer systems
As we will see in Chapter 10, there are many additional ways of making payments,
including methods such as online banking/bill payment and products such as email and
mobile telephone payments services. Almost all of these methods rely on one or more of
the core payments systems to actually transfer value between parties.
The Domains of Payment
Payments are used, of course, for multiple purposes. We categorize these uses into
six domains of payment, each of which exhibits unique characteristics and requirements:
Point of Sale (POS). Payments made at the physical point of sale. Includes store
and restaurant payments, but also unattended environments such as vending
machines and transit kiosks. POS payments are sometimes referred to as
proximity payments.
Remote commerce. Payments made for purchases where the buyer is remote.
This includes online and mobile purchasing, as well as mail-order or telephone-
order buying. Key segments are eRetailing, online travel and entertainment,
online subscriptions, and digital content.
Bill payment. Payments made by individuals or businesses based on receipt of
what is typically a monthly bill.
P2P payment. Person-to-person payments. Includes domestic payments among
friends and families, but also cross-border remittances (e.g., migrant worker
payments to relatives in home countries), and account-to-account transfers by
individuals (referred to as “A2A” or, sometimes, “me to me” payments).
B2B payment. Business-to-business payments. Includes payments from buyer to
supplier, but also intracompany payments and, significantly, financial market
payments (bank-to-bank payments, securities purchases, foreign exchange
transactions, etc.). For the purposes of this framework, governments, nonprofits,
and other types of enterprises are included as “businesses.”
Income payment. Payments to individuals for salary, benefits, and expense
reimbursements.
TERMINOLOGY
Throughout this book, we use the term “end party” to refer to both the receiver and the
sender of funds. An end party may be a consumer, or may be a merchant or other
enterprise—for example, a biller, small business, government, or non- profit. In any
payment transaction, one end party is the payer, and one the receiver, of funds; as we
will see, either the payer or the receiver may initiate the payment, depending on
payments system and type.
We will use the term “provider” to refer to parties who are providing access to the
payments systems to end users and/or other providers. Banks, networks, clearing
houses, processors and service providers are all types of providers. Finally, we use the
term “bank,” unless otherwise noted, to refer to all depository financial institutions in
the United States, including credit unions, thrifts, and savings banks.
The payments systems support activity across these payments domains, and, in fact,
compete with each other at a systems level. A good example of this occurs in the B2B
payments domain where checking, the traditional payments system used, is in decline.
All of the electronic payments systems are competing for volumes shifting away from
check. The ACH system has specialized transaction codes for B2B payments, and carries
remittance data along with the payments. The card networks have business purchasing
cards and small-business credit and debit card products. The wire transfer systems are
enhancing their networks to carry remittance data to meet the requirements of this
domain. Meanwhile, the checking system itself, through imaging, remote deposit
capture, and other advances, is competing to maintain volume.
Payments System Volumes
Payments system volumes are measured in two ways: by count and amount. “Count”
refers to the number of transactions made, and “amount” to the Total dollar value of
those transactions. (Note–other sources, in the card systems in particular, use the term
“volume” refers to the amount, or the dollar value of the transactions.)
Some systems do a better job of measuring themselves than others. The card and wire
transfer systems, for example, have quite precise measures. But checking, and especially
cash, have no formal mechanisms for national measurement, and are therefore simply
estimated.
The table below shows Glenbrook’s estimates for U.S. payments systems volumes as
a percent of total payments systems transactions for the year 2012. Note that wire
transfers are excluded: had they been included, wire would represent less than 1% of the
total “count”, but 93% of the total “amount”—this is because of the high-value financial
market transactions that use that system. The totals shown are large—much larger than
GNP, for instance. This is because a single payment transa ction (such as a consumer
purchase) can result in multiple payments system transactions, as the various parties in
the value chain move funds to effect payment, settlement, etc.
Payments System Models
Payments systems can operate on a variety of models.
Open Loop Systems
Open loop systems operate on a hub-and-spoke model. Almost all large-scale
payments systems use this model. An open loop system requires intermediaries (almost
always banks or depository financial institutions) to join the payments system. These
intermediaries then form business relationships with end parties (consumers, for
example, or merchants).
A transaction is passed from one end party to his or her bank, on to the network, on to
the other end party’s bank, and on to that end party. This structure allows the two end
parties to transact with each other without having direct relationships with each other’s
banks. The banks, similarly, can transact with each other without a direct relationship.
Today, most electronic payments systems—both paper-based and electronic (cards,
ACH, wire transfers and even check images)—operate on this model. This is true despite
the fact that current technology would quite easily permit the exchange of electronic
transactions on a bilateral basis. But, as we will see, the open loop model also creates an
effective means of allocating liability.
The advantage of the open loop structure is that it allows a payments system to scale
quite rapidly. As intermediaries join the payments system, all of their end party
customers are immediately accessible to other intermediaries participating in the
payments system.
Initially formed in the 1800s, check clearing houses were the first large-scale open
loop systems in the United States. Before clearing houses existed, each bank receiving
a deposit containing a check drawn on other banks needed to present that check
directly to the check writer’s bank in order to collect payment on it.
As the volume of checks in use rose, this required a complex web of bilateral
relationships among banks in a city. Clearing a check drawn on a bank in another city
was even more complicated, and often required one or more correspondent banks to
effect payment.
The earliest check clearing house was a simple meeting, each business morning, of
representatives from each participating bank in a city. Clerks from each of the banks
would come to the clearing house bearing bags of checks. At the clearing house, the
checks would be exchanged and each clerk would depart with the checks written on
accounts at his bank. (It is interesting to note that in the early phases of the card
industry, paper “sales drafts” were cleared in much the same way.)
Processing means switching—the way in which a transaction moves from one party
to another. In a closed loop system, this transfers value between the end parties. In an
open loop system, this transfers value between intermediaries on behalf of their end
parties. As the term is used here, processing also includes settlement—the process by
which intermediaries in an open loop system transfer value—usually on a net basis—to
cover the individual transactions each has been party to.
PAYMENTS SYSTEMS
“On-us” transactions occur when the bank intermediary is the same on both sides of a
transaction. Depending on the payments system, the transaction may stay within the
bank (e.g., never be submitted to a clearing house or “hub” for switching), in which
case the bank settles the transaction through an internal book transfer. In other
systems, an on-us transaction is passed through the system and returns to the bank, just
like a regular “off-us” transaction. The growing concentration of U.S. banks is
increasing the percentage of “on-us” transactions.
Correspondent banking relationships between banks allow smaller banks, which may
not participate directly in a payments system, to access that system on behalf of their
customers through a relationship with a participant bank. Many smaller banks in the
United States gain access to the wire transfer systems in this way. This model is also
used extensively for cross-border payments.
“Push” payments are fundamentally much less risky than “pull” payments. In a
“push” payment, the party who has funds is sending the money, so there is essentially
no risk of NSF, or nonsufficient funds—”push” payments can’t “bounce.”
Furthermore, in a “push” payments system the transaction is initiated by the sender’s
bank, which knows that its end party has the money. Other types of fraud, of course,
are still possible.
“Pull” payments are inherently subject to “bouncing.” The bank initiating the
transaction does not know whether or not the bank receiving the transaction will be
able to successfully apply that transaction to the credit or debit account of its
customer. Furthermore, “pull” transactions depend on the payer (“End Party B”)
having authorized the “sender” of the message to effect the transaction. (A signed
check presented to a merchant, or a card swipe with signature or PIN, are examples of
such an authorization.)
Card networks are fundamentally “pull” payment networks. Card payments don’t
bounce—but this doesn’t mean that they are push transactions. They are rather
guaranteed “pull” transactions. The card networks accomplished this by adding a
separate message flow, called the authorization, that runs through the network before
the “pull” payment transaction is submitted. This authorization transaction asks, “Are
there sufficient funds, or available credit balances, to pay this trans- action?” If so,
the “pull” transaction is submitted. Card network rules specify that merchants
receiving this “yes” reply are covered for both insufficient funds and fraud risks.
(Important differences in eCommerce and other environments in which the card is not
present will be discussed in Chapters 5 and 8.)
Settlement in an open loop system refers to the process by which the intermediaries
actually receive or send funds to each other. The settlement function in an open loop
system can be done on either a net or a gross settlement basis:
In a net settlement system, the net obligations of participating intermediaries
are calculated on a periodic basis—most typically daily. At the end of the day, a
participating intermediary is given a net settlement total and instructed either
(a) to fund a settlement account with that amount, should it be in a net debit
position, or (b) that there are funds available to draw on in its settlement
account, should it be in a net credit position. Checking, card payments systems,
and the ACH are all net settlement systems in the United States. In a variant on
the net settlement approach, settlement of checks and ACH, when handled
through a Federal Reserve bank, is done on a batch basis: a bank’s account at a
Federal Reserve Bank is periodically credited or debited with total amounts
from a batch of transactions which have been processed.
In a gross settlement system, each transaction settles as it is processed. With the
Fedwire system, for example, a transaction is effected when the sending bank’s
account at a Federal Reserve Bank is debited and the receiving bank’s account at
a Federal Reserve Bank system is credited. No end-of-day settlement process is
necessary.
How end party settlement is effected depends on the payments system. The timing
and manner of a credit or debit to a consumer, merchant, or enterprise account may be
defined by the payments system, by regulation, or simply by market practices.
In a closed loop system, the only settlement is the end party settlement. The operator
of the system defines how such a settlement is handled.
The Virtual Systems
Two core United States payments systems, cash and checking, operate on a virtual
basis. By this we mean that there is no formal payments system that end parties, or bank
intermediaries, “join.”
We all know, of course, how cash works. The transaction is “switched” and “settled”
directly between the two end parties. From that perspective, it is a push system. Other
aspects of cash payments are covered in Chapter 6.
The checking system in the United States automatically includes all depository
financial institutions—they do not have to “join.” Banks do, however, usually join one or
more clearing houses to switch and settle the checks they receive in deposits. The
clearing houses have rules, but these are much more limited in scope than the rules of the
card or ACH networks. In part, this is because paper checks are covered more
extensively by U.S. law and regulation. Other aspects of checking are covered in Chapter
3.
These virtual systems have no “capital B” brand, and no central network that
promotes their use.
Payments System Ownership and Regulation
Ownership
Most United States payments systems began as bank-owned systems. Over the past
decade, as the table below shows, many of these systems have migrated to different
ownership models. Some of the non-bank-owned payments systems are publicly traded
companies; others are privately held.
Payments systems that are owned by large groups of banks tend to make rules that
benefit the banks as a group. This can have the effect of “leveling the playing field”—all
participating banks have equal access to products and services. Systems with large
budgets for staff and advertising (notably the card networks) create fully defined
products that the member banks then distribute to their customers. Systems with smaller
budgets (such as the ACH) do much less in the way of product definition and
management, and only provide the operating rules and/or platforms that the banks then
use to create products.
Regulation
Payments systems in the United States are regulated by a mix of governmental and
private rules. Government rule, of course, is by law, and by regulations issued by
agencies of the government to implement those laws. In the United States, the primary
issuer of payments regulations is the Federal Reserve Board. Private rules can either take
the form of network rules, or of simple contracts applying to a service used: the Federal
Reserve Bank’s operating circulars (governing the use of the Federal Reserve Bank
payments services offered to banks) are an example of this. Private rules can be thought
of as “agreement-based”.
Private System Rules
Most payments systems require either intermediaries (open loop systems) or end
parties (closed loop systems) to formally join the system. The party joining the system is
bound by the rules of the system. In an open loop system, the intermediary’s contract
with its end party often contains provisions dictated by the operating rules, making the
end parties indirectly governed by some of the rules. These operating rules are extremely
important, particularly for open loop networks, as they define the parameters necessary
for successful interoperability among thousands or millions of end parties.
Operating rules cover a wide range of topics, including:
Technical standards . Data formats, token (e.g., card) specifications, delivery
and receipt capabilities, data security standards, etc.
Processing standards. Time limits for submitting and returning transactions,
requirements for posting to end party accounts, etc.
Membership requirements. Types of institutions that can join, capital
requirements, etc.
Payment acceptance requirements. Constraints on the ability to selectively
accept payments transactions.
Exception processing and dispute resolution. Rights and requirements of
intermediaries and end parties, often with respect to disputing or refusing a
transaction.
Fees. Processing and other charges paid to the payments system; interchange, if
any, among the intermediaries.
Brands and marks. Standards for use of the payments system brand.
A new product at the payments system level (for example, contactless cards) or a new
transaction type (for example, NACHA’s WEB transaction) generally requires a new set
of operating rules that apply to that particular product or transaction type. Operating
rules requirements can have significant financial impact on both users of and providers
to a payments system. Investment may be required to meet technical standards, or to
provide certain forms of services, such as dispute resolution; changes in definition of
liability or allocation of risk can also have large effects.
Some open loop payments systems, Visa, MasterCard, and NACHA, make most of
their operating rules publicly available on their websites. (Note that in the global open
loop card networks, each region has its own operating rules; an additional set of
international operating rules covers cross—border transactions.) Other payments
systems, such as CHIPs and most of the PIN debit networks, do not make their operating
rules available to nonmembers.
Changes to the operating rules of a payments system can be difficult and take years to
implement. Most payments systems have several tiers of committees through which
participants consider proposed rules changes. There is often a year or more of lag time
between approval and implementation of a new rule.
The check payments system in the U.S., as discussed above, is a “virtual” system
with no central authority. Banks do, however, join one or more check clearing houses to
process checks. These clearing houses act like payments systems in that their operating
rules bind the members. Such rules tend to be narrow in scope, however, compared to
those in the card, ACH, and wire transfer systems. Check clearing house rules may
specify times for presenting or returning items, image standards, etc.
United States Law and Federal Reserve Bank Regulation
U.S. law regulates some payments systems specifically, and others more generally.
Federal Reserve Bank regulations implement law and specify requirements that are
binding on the banks that they regulate. Key laws and regulations include:
U.C.C. Article 3—Negotiable Instruments.
U.C.C. Article 4—Bank Deposits and Collections.
U.C.C. Article 4A—Funds Transfers.
The Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act (Check 21).
The Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009.
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010,
including the Durbin Amendment
Federal Reserve Bank Regulation E (implementing provisions in the Electronic
Fund Transfer Act) applies to consumer electronic transactions including debit
cards, ATM withdrawals, and ACH transactions (but not credit cards). Among
other provisions, Regulation E establishes key consumer rights for repudiation
and reversal of non-authorized transactions.
Regulation CC—Availability of Funds and Collection of Checks.
Federal Reserve Bank Regulation Z - Truth in Lending, prescribes uniform
methods for computing the cost of credit, for disclosing credit terms, and for
resolving errors on certain types of credit accounts.
Federal Reserve Bank Regulation J - Collection of Checks and Other Items by
Federal Reserve Banks and Funds Transfers through Fedwire, establishes
procedures, duties, and responsibilities among (1) Federal Reserve Banks, (2)
the senders and payers of checks and other items, and (3) the senders and
recipients of Fedwire funds transfers.
Federal Reserve Bank Regulation II, limits the amount of debit card interchange
for regulated (large) banks and specifies minimum routing options for debit
card networks.
IMAGE CLEARING AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
Today, banks, processors and clearing houses are dealing with a complex regulatory
framework following the dramatic shift to image clearing. For example, some
regulations that apply to paper check clearing no longer apply to image clearing.
This is a transitional period for the industry as it evaluates the right regulatory
model for an all-image clearing world.
A number of other significant laws, regulations, and orders fall under the general
category of bank regulation. These include regulation around money laundering, privacy,
credit reporting, and other issues relevant to payments. Regulatory requirements around
“Know Your Customer” (KYC) are particularly important for banks and non-banks in the
payments industry. Provisions mandated by the Bank Secrecy Act and USA PATRIOT
Act require a variety of identity checking procedures prior to opening a customer
account.
State Banking Authorities
State law and regulations by state banking authorities apply mostly to non-bank
providers of payments services, and are referred to as “money transmitter regulations.”
They regulate sales and issuance of payments instruments, as well as transmitting or
receiving money. Many states require that money transmitters obtain a state license, post
a bond, and/or maintain certain levels of net worth or permissible investments. Notably,
state money transmission regulation is not uniform, creating additional challenges for
payments companies with national ambitions. State banking authorities also regulate
state-chartered banks.
THE FUTURE OF PAYMENTS REGULATION
It is interesting to reflect on what the future may hold for U.S. payments regulation.
One can argue that the U.S. permits much more self-regulation of key payments
systems than do other countries. This may be because banks in the U.S. are heavily
regulated, by multiple authorities. The payments systems, historically owned by
banks, were therefore de facto under a regulatory “umbrella.” Today many payments
systems are no longer bank-owned. Does this mean that federal regulators may begin
to take a more active role in the industry?
In this book, we will examine the economics of each core payments system in turn.
But a few general observations can be made about payments system economics:
In both open loop and closed loop payments systems, providers have a direct
business relationship with end party customers. Providers set prices for their
services, as do other businesses. Providers realize revenue from payments
through direct and indirect sources. This is true whether the end party is a
consumer or an enterprise. Direct revenue comes from fees explicitly charged to
the end party; these may include transaction fees, interest on associated loans,
monthly maintenance fees, and exception fees (overdraft fees, bounced check
fees, late payment fees). Indirect revenue comes from net interest income on
deposit balances, float, and interchange.
In some open loop payments systems, the rule-making body may define
interchange for the system: a fee paid by one intermediary to the other in partial
compensation for handling the transaction.
Providers often price payments products as part of an overall bundle of services
—for example, a checking account with bundled ATM access, checkwriting
privileges, and a debit card. Similarly, a processor may price card acceptance
services to a small merchant on a bundled price model—but may price the same
service to a large merchant on an unbundled basis.
Costs associated with providing payments services are a mix of fixed and
variable costs. Typically, payments system providers have very high fixed costs
and very low incremental costs for each transaction. A bank, for e xample, needs
to cover the costs of staffing and maintaining a branch, engaging the service that
replenishes its ATMs, and working with a check processing center. While unit
costs may be calculated (add up the expenses and divide by the number of
transactions), they are not always accurate indicators of incremental costs.
Many banks realized this as a problem in the last decade when check volumes
began to drop sharply, creating a “death spiral” in which the same fixed-cost
base was spread over a smaller and smaller number of checks. With the advent
of image clearing, however, banks were able to stop this process and reduce
check processing costs.
The payments industry is different from other processing industries in one very
important aspect—the value of the money being transferred through the system.
Providers who realize revenue related to the gross value of the payment
transaction (the “amount”) are more likely to have profitable businesses than
those who realize revenue simply on a fee-per-transaction basis (a “click fee”).
This type of ad valorem (percent of value) revenue may be direct (a fee
calculated as a percentage of the amount of the transaction, or an interest rate
applied to a loan balance) or indirect (the value of deposit balances held at a
bank, or float).
INTERCHANGE
In the U.S., the wire transfer, ACH, and checking open loop systems operate without
interchange—that is, there is no network-defined transfer of value between the
“sending” and “receiving” banks to such transactions. Card network transactions do
bear interchange. The sometimes dramatic difference in economics that results is
fueling a number of different alternative payment schemes.
RISK, FLOAT
Risk Pays Whenever a provider—for example, a credit card issuer or a payments
services provider—proactively assumes risk that another party would otherwise bear,
it is apt to be well compensated. A provider that assumes risk but does not manage it
well, or (worst case!) does not understand that it is assuming risk, is apt to have a
short business life.
What is Float? (Part 1 of 2) Float is the value earned from money held over a period
of time. It is a benefit to a party that holds funds for a period of time before needing to
pay them out. It is a cost to a party that needs to pay out funds prior to receiving them.
Risk Management
All payments transactions are subject to risk. Some risks, notably that of fraud, have
a very high public profile. But there are many types of risk, and all parties to a payments
transaction bear some portion of the risk.
In open loop systems, intermediaries and the network assume certain liabilities for
the actions of their customers, as well as for their own actions. The nature of these
liabilities is determined by the operating rules of the payments system. In the ACH
system, for example, the originating bank of an ACH debit transaction warrants that
its customer has properly obtained the consumer’s consent for the debit to his or her
account. If the consumer successfully disputes a transaction, the originating bank
must reimburse the consumer’s bank. The originating bank will, of course, try to
recoup this from its customer—but if unsuccessful, the bank is left “holding the
bag.” Similarly, in the card networks, if a customer initiates a dispute that
(according to the rules) requires a transaction to be reversed, the acquiring bank is
ultimately responsible to the network for the obligation of its merchant customer.
As shown in the consumer and merchant example in the table below, there are many
types of payments fraud risk, some specific to certain payments systems and others
which are more general. Some payments systems, such as the card systems, have very
high levels of system-defined fraud management. Others, such as checking and ACH,
leave more of the fraud risk management to intermediaries and end parties.
Felton and Van Zandt proceed silently into the thicket. A short
distance from the entrance to the woods is a cleared spot.
“This will probably suit our purpose,” remarks Felton, and, coolly,
he measures off ten paces.
“That will be distance enough, will it not?” he asks. Van Zandt
nods.
“Will you give the word, Mr. Van Zandt?”
“As you please. We will fire at the word ‘Three.’” Both men draw
their revolvers.
“One moment,” interrupts Felton. “In the event of a second fire?”
“There will be no second fire,” is the grim rejoinder. “I shall kill you
with the first.”
“And I will endeavor not to waste mine. Well, sir, I am waiting.”
“One!” Two arms are raised, and not a tremor in either.
“Two!” The pistols click.
The word “Three” is trembling on Van Zandt’s lips, when a shot
rings out from the thicket. Felton clasps his hand to his abdomen,
with an exclamation of pain, sways a moment and pitches headlong
to the earth.
The bushes part and a woman, heavily veiled, steps forth,
smoking pistol in hand and walks to where Felton lies.
She looks upon the body for a moment in silence, and hisses:
“You cowardly hound! Your end is fitting!” Then, throwing back
her veil, she reveals the face of Isabel Harding.
“I have saved you, Phillip,” she says, with a calmness that is very
near madness.
“You have cheated me of my vengeance,” he replies, looking
gloomily upon the body of her victim.
“My wrongs called for greater vengeance than yours,” cries the
woman, her eyes glittering feverishly and her voice breaking
hysterically. “I followed him here. I saw through the cafe window
your meeting with him, and I exulted that I was in time—in time to
save the man I loved! Phillip! Phillip,” sobs Isabel, sinking on one
knee beside him, “I told you that some day you would realize how
much I loved you!”
But Van Zandt, with a shudder and expression of utter aversion,
turns away.
“Ah, I see I am too late,” remarks a quiet voice, and Van Zandt
looks up to see the friendly soldier with the scar.
“To the consul’s if you would save the American girl,” says the
latter. “I’ll look after these obsequies. Come, be off,” as Van Zandt
stares at him in surprise. “A plot is afoot, headed by that precious
Lieut. Sanchez, and you have no time to lose.”
“But the consul—”
“The consul was at his office in the city two hours ago, and is
doubtless there yet. Ah, you are too late.” The clatter of departing
hoof-beats is borne upon their ears. “No; you can reach the consul’s
ahead of them, by the short-cut down the hillside. Here! Take my
revolver! You may need more than one. And mind, don’t waste any
ammunition,” shouts the soldier, as Van Zandt dashes off.
Then he turns to the scene of the tragedy. He kneels beside
Felton’s body and makes a brief examination. Then he straightens
up.
“Go!” he says sternly, to Mrs. Harding. “Your work is done!”
She stares at him a moment, with her glittering eyes; then, with a
little shudder, tosses the revolver into the bushes, turns and walks
slowly away.
The caballero watches her out of sight and again turns to the body
of the Spanish captain.
“Humph!” he grunts, as he lifts the limp form from the ground.
“He is worth a dozen dead men, or my name isn’t John Barker.”
CHAPTER LIV.
AN INTERNATIONAL EPISODE.