Download full Web Application Development with Streamlit: Develop and Deploy Secure and Scalable Web Applications to the Cloud Using a Pure Python Framework 1st Edition Mohammad Khorasani ebook all chapters
Download full Web Application Development with Streamlit: Develop and Deploy Secure and Scalable Web Applications to the Cloud Using a Pure Python Framework 1st Edition Mohammad Khorasani ebook all chapters
com
OR CLICK BUTTON
DOWNLOAD NOW
https://ebookmeta.com/product/secure-web-application-development-a-
hands-on-guide-with-python-and-django-1st-edition-matthew-baker/
ebookmeta.com
https://ebookmeta.com/product/the-american-war-in-afghanistan-a-
history-1st-edition-malkasian/
ebookmeta.com
Directed Evolution Methods and Protocols Methods in
Molecular Biology 2461 Andrew Currin (Editor)
https://ebookmeta.com/product/directed-evolution-methods-and-
protocols-methods-in-molecular-biology-2461-andrew-currin-editor/
ebookmeta.com
https://ebookmeta.com/product/managing-innovation-integrating-
technological-market-and-organizational-change-6th-edition-joe-tidd/
ebookmeta.com
https://ebookmeta.com/product/reassured-love-club-curve-club-curves-
series-1st-edition-jade-royal-2/
ebookmeta.com
https://ebookmeta.com/product/practical-leadership-in-community-
colleges-navigating-todays-challenges-1st-edition-george-r-boggs/
ebookmeta.com
https://ebookmeta.com/product/an-unexpected-love-a-variation-of-jane-
austen-s-pride-and-prejudice-lily-bernard/
ebookmeta.com
Web Application
Development with
Streamlit
Develop and Deploy Secure
and Scalable Web Applications
to the Cloud Using a Pure
Python Framework
Mohammad Khorasani
Mohamed Abdou
Javier Hernández Fernández
Web Application Development with Streamlit: Develop and Deploy Secure
and Scalable Web Applications to the Cloud Using a Pure Python Framework
v
Table of Contents
vi
Table of Contents
vii
Table of Contents
viii
Table of Contents
ix
Table of Contents
x
Table of Contents
xi
Table of Contents
Bibliography�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������469
Index�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������473
xii
About the Authors
Mohammad Khorasani is a hybrid of
an engineer and a computer scientist
with a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical
Engineering from Texas A&M University and a
master’s degree in Computer Science from the
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Mohammad specializes in developing and
implementing software solutions for the
advancement of renewable energy systems and services at Iberdrola. In
addition, he develops robotic devices using embedded systems and rapid
prototyping technologies. He is also an avid blogger of STEM-related topics
on Towards Data Science – a Medium publication.
linkedin.com/in/mkhorasani/
xiii
About the Authors
xiv
About the Technical Reviewers
Rosario Moscato has a master’s degree in Electronic Engineering
(Federico II University, Naples) as well as a master’s degree in Internet
Software Design (CEFRIEL, Milan). He also has a Diploma in Apologetics
(Pontifical Athenaeum Regina Apostolorum, Rome) and a master’s
degree in Science and Faith (Pontifical Athenaeum Regina Apostolorum,
Rome). Rosario has gained over 20 years of experience, always
focusing his attention on the development and fine-tuning of the most
innovative technologies in various international companies in Europe
and Asia, covering various highly technical, commercial, and business
development roles.
In recent years, his interest has focused exclusively on artificial
intelligence and data science, pursuing, on one hand, the goal of
enhancing and making every business extremely competitive by
introducing and supporting machine and deep learning technologies
and on the other hand, analyzing the ethical-philosophical implications
deriving from the new scenarios that these disciplines open up.
Rosario has authored two books, and he is a speaker at international
research centers and conferences as well as a trainer and technical/
scientific consultant on the huge and changing world of AI.
Currently, he is working as Senior Data Scientist with one of the biggest
multinational IT companies in the world.
xv
Other documents randomly have
different content
concerned in the Riccio assassination, she was little inclined to lean
upon them as before. As the only remaining resource, she began to
give her confidence to the Earl of Bothwell and the Earl of Huntly,
two nobles of great power, but whose administration could not bring
her so much popularity. Bothwell was a man of coarse character,
fully as much disposed as any man in that age to gain his ambitious
ends by violence. As early as March 1561-2, he had formed a plan
for seizing the queen’s person, and carrying her to the castle of
Dumbarton, that he and the Duke of Chatelherault might enjoy the
government between them. He had since then been restored to
favour; but, so far from the queen having ever appeared to regard
him as a lover, she had, so lately as February 1565-6, promoted and
sanctioned his marriage to a friend of her own, a sister of the Earl of
Huntly. He seems now to have thought that an opportunity was
presented for his acquiring a mastery in Scotland. He caused the
wretched Darnley to be murdered at his lodging in the Kirk of Field,
near Edinburgh (March 12, 1567). Being suspected and accused of
this act, he submitted to a trial, but was able to overbear justice,
and to maintain his place in the queen’s councils.
Mary, consequently, suffered in reputation, though whether she was
aware of Bothwell’s guilt is to this day a matter of doubt; much less
is it certain that she had, as has been suspected, a guilty knowledge
of her husband’s death.
Having procured the countenance of some of the nobility to his
plans, Bothwell seized the queen at the river Almond (April 24), and
conducted her to his castle of Dunbar, where he kept her a prisoner,
as was generally believed, by her own consent. His wife being hastily
divorced, he married the queen (May 15), and thus seemed to have
fully attained the object of his ambition; but the Protestant leaders
rose in arms, took the queen away from him, and drove him into
banishment. Mary, as one suspected of horrible crimes, was
imprisoned in Lochleven Castle (June 17), and forced to sign a deed
of abdication in favour of her infant son, who was consequently
crowned as James VI., with the Earl of Moray as regent during his
minority (July 29).
‘Ane guid summer and har’est.’—C. F.
The queen and her husband were obliged,
immediately after their marriage, to set about the 1565. Aug. 6.
suppression of a rebellion. The measure they
adopted for raising troops was according to the custom and rule of
the Scottish government. ‘There was ane proclamation at the Mercat
Cross of Edinburgh, commanding all and sundry earls, lords, barons,
freeholders, gentlemen, and substantious yeomen, to address them
with fifteen days victuals, to pass and convoy the king and queen to
the parts of Fife, under the pain of tinsel [loss] of life, lands, and
guids; and also commanding all and sundry the inhabitants of the
burgh of Edinburgh, betwixt sixteen and sixty, to address them in
the same manner, under the pains aforesaid.’—D. O. On the 22d of
the month, this order was extended to ‘all our sovereign’s lieges.’
This feudal mode of raising an army was felt as a
serious burden, particularly in the larger towns, 1565.
where industry had attained, of course, the highest
organisation. For the Rothschilds of Edinburgh, such as they were,
there was another trouble. The mode of raising money adopted by
Henry and Mary was not quite what would suit the views of modern
men of that class. Sept. 27, ‘Our soveranes causit certain of the
principals of Edinburgh to come to them to Halyrudehouse, and after
their coming, some of free will, and some brought agains their will,
our soverane lady made ane orison to them, desiring them to lend
her certain sowms of money, whilk they refusit to do; and therefore
they were commandit to remain in ward within the auld tower
wherein my lord of Murray lodgit, wherein they remainit.’ Ultimately,
the two difficulties were in a manner solved by each other. On the
6th of October, the above-mentioned notables of the city ‘agreeit
with our soveranes in this manner, to lend their majesties ten
thousand merks, upon the superiority of Leith, under reversion ...
and alse to give their highnesses ane thousand pounds, to suffer the
haill town to remain at hame.’
For some time after, the criminal records abound in cases of persons
‘delatit for abiding from the queen’s host.’ On such occasions, some
are found excusing themselves on account of sickness or personal
infirmity; others plead their having sent substitutes. When no excuse
could be made, fines are imposed. On the whole, it appears to have
been a public burden of no light character, and during the reign of
Mary, and the subsequent regencies, it was, owing to the great
troubles of the country, of frequent occurrence.
If it was at this time, as is likely, that Sir Richard wrote these verses,
he might well calculate on the vigour of the Regent while
prophesying sad days for the Border men.
‘... there was ane proclamation [October 10], to meet the Regent in
Peebles upon the 8 of November next, for the repressing of the
thieves in Annandale and Eskdale; but my Lord Regent thinking they
wald get advertisement, he prevented the day, and came over the
water secretly, and lodged in Dalkeith; this upon the 19 day
[October]; and upon the morrow he departed towards Hawick,
where he came both secretly and suddenly, and there took thirty-
four thieves, whom he partly caused hang and partly drown; five he
let free upon caution; and upon the 2nd day of November, he
brought other ten with him to Edinburgh, and there put them in
irons.’—Bir.
We have some trace of these men in the Lord Treasurer’s accounts
as inmates of the Tolbooth of Edinburgh. On the 30th of November,
thirty-two pounds are paid to Andro Lindsay, keeper of that prison,
for the furnishing of meat and drink to Robert Elliot, alias Clement’s
Hob, and Archy Elliot, called Archy Kene. On the same day, twenty-
three pounds four shillings are disbursed for a month’s board in the
same black hotel, for ‘Robert Elliot, called Mirk Hob; Gavin Elliot,
called Gawin of Ramsiegill; Martin Elliot, called Martin of Heuchous;
Robert Elliot, son to Elder Will; Robert Elliot, called the Vicar’s Rob;
Robert Elliot, called Hob of Thorlieshope; Dandy Grosar, called
Richardtoncleucht; and Robert Grosar, called Son to Cockston.’
In an act of the Privy Council, 6th November 1567,
it is alleged that the thieves of Liddesdale, and 1567.
other parts of the Scottish Border, have been in the
habit, for some time past, of taking sundry persons prisoners, and
giving them up upon ransom—exactly the conduct of the present
banditti of the Apennines. It is also averred that many persons are
content to pay ‘black-mail’ to these thieves, and sit under their
protection, ‘permittand them to reif, herry, and oppress their
neighbours in their sicht, without contradiction or stop.’ Such
practices were now forbidden under severe penalties; and it was
enjoined that ‘when ony companies of thieves or broken men comes
ower the swires within the in-country,’ all dwelling in the bounds
shall ‘incontinent cry on hie, raise the fray, and follow them, as weel
in their in-passing as out-passing,’ in order to recover the property
which may have been stolen.
Walter Scott of Harden, a famous Border chief, was this year married
to Mary Scott of Dryhope, commonly called the Flower of Yarrow.
The pair had six sons, from five of whom descended the families of
Harden (which became extinct); Highchesters, now represented by
Lord Polwarth, Raeburn (from which came Sir Walter Scott of
Abbotsford), Wool, and Synton; and six daughters, all of whom were
married to gentlemen of figure, and all had issue.
It is a curious consideration to the many descendants of Walter Scott
of Harden, that his marriage-contract is signed by a notary, because
none of the parties could write their names. The father-in-law, Scott
of Dryhope, bound himself to find Harden in horse meat and man’s
meat, at his own house, for a year and day; and five barons
engaged that he should remove at the expiration of that period,
without attempting to continue in possession by force.
Harden was a man of parts and sagacity, and living to about the
year 1629, was popularly remembered for many a day thereafter
under the name of ‘Auld Watt.’ One of his descendants relates the
following anecdote of him:—‘His sixth son was slain at a fray, in a
hunting-match, by Scott of Gilmanscleuch. His brothers flew to arms;
but the old laird secured them in the dungeon of his tower, hurried
to Edinburgh, stated the crime, and obtained a gift of the lands of
the offenders from the crown. He returned to Harden with equal
speed, released his sons, and shewed them the charter. “To horse,
lads!” cried the savage warrior, “and let us take possession! The
lands of Gilmanscleuch are well worth a dead son.”’48
Bessie Tailiefeir, in the Canongate, Edinburgh,
having slandered Bailie Thomas Hunter by saying Oct. 30.
‘he had in his house ane false stoup [measure],’
which was found not to be true, she was sentenced to be [brankit]
and set on the Cross for an hour.49
The punishment of branking, which was a
customary one for scolds, slanderers, and other 1567.
offenders of a secondary class, consisted in having
the head enclosed in an iron frame, from which projected a kind of
spike, so as to enter the mouth and prevent speech.
The Branks.
Charles Sandeman, cook, on being made a
Nov. 20.
member of the guild of Edinburgh, came under an
obligation that, from that time forth, ‘he sall not be seen upon the
causey,’ like other cooks, carrying meat to sell in common houses,
but cause his servants pass with the same; and ‘he sall hald his
tavern on the Hie Gait ... and behave himself honestly in all time
coming, under pain of escheat of his wines.’—E. C. R.
‘... At 2 afternoon, the Laird of Airth and the Laird
of Wemyss met upon the Hie Gait of Edinburgh; Nov. 24.
and they and their followers faught a very bluidy
skirmish, where there was many hurt on both sides with shot of
pistol.’—Bir. Apparently in consequence of this affair, there was, on
the 27th, ‘a strait proclamation,’ discharging the wearing of culverins,
dags, pistolets, or ‘sic other firewerks,’ with injunctions that any one
contravening should be seized and subjected to summary trial, ‘as
gif they had committit recent slauchters.’—P. C. R.
This is the first of a series of street-fights by which the Hie Gait of
Edinburgh was reddened during the reign of James VI., and which
scarcely came to an end till his English reign was far advanced. It is
worthy of note that sword and buckler were at this time the ordinary
gear of gallant men in England—a comparatively harmless
furnishing; but we see that small firearms were used in Scotland.
There has been a feeling of rivalry between Perth and Dundee from
time immemorial, and it probably will never cease while both towns
exist. At a parliament now held by the Regent Moray, the
representatives of each burgh strove for the next place after
Edinburgh in that equestrian procession which used to be called the
Riding of the Estates. A tumult consequently arose upon the street,
and it was with difficulty that this was stilled. Birrel relates how the
Regent was ‘much troubled to compose those two turbulent towns of
Perth and Dundee,’ and that ‘it was like to make a very great deal of
business, had not the same been mediate for the present by some
discreet men who dealt in the matter.’ Due investigation was
afterwards made (January 9, 1567-8), that it might be ascertained
‘in whais default the said tumult happenit.’ It was found that ‘James
Wedderburn and George Mitchell, burgesses of Dundee, and William
Rysie, bearer of the handsenyie [ensign] thereof,’ were no wise
culpable; and they were accordingly allowed to depart.