Machine Learning Design Patterns Solutions to Common Challenges in Data Preparation Model Building and MLOps 1st Edition Valliappa Lakshmanan Sara Robinson Michael Munn download pdf
Machine Learning Design Patterns Solutions to Common Challenges in Data Preparation Model Building and MLOps 1st Edition Valliappa Lakshmanan Sara Robinson Michael Munn download pdf
com
OR CLICK BUTTON
DOWNLOAD NOW
https://textbookfull.com/product/data-science-on-the-google-cloud-
platform-1st-edition-valliappa-lakshmanan/
textboxfull.com
https://textbookfull.com/product/practical-python-design-patterns-
pythonic-solutions-to-common-problems-badenhorst/
textboxfull.com
https://textbookfull.com/product/kubernetes-for-mlops-scaling-
enterprise-machine-learning-deep-learning-and-ai-2nd-edition-sam-
charrington/
textboxfull.com
Design Patterns by Tutorials Learning design patterns in
Swift 4 2 Joshua Greene
https://textbookfull.com/product/design-patterns-by-tutorials-
learning-design-patterns-in-swift-4-2-joshua-greene/
textboxfull.com
https://textbookfull.com/product/design-patterns-by-tutorials-third-
edition-learning-design-patterns-in-swift-raywenderlich-tutorial-team/
textboxfull.com
https://textbookfull.com/product/data-science-solutions-on-azure-
tools-and-techniques-using-databricks-and-mlops-julian-soh/
textboxfull.com
e. Summary
i. Numerical Inputs
ii. Categorical Inputs
b. Design Pattern 1: Hashed Feature
i. Problem
ii. Solution
iii. Why It Works
iv. Trade-Offs and Alternatives
i. Problem
ii. Solution
iii. Why It Works
iv. Trade-Offs and Alternatives
i. Problem
ii. Solution
iii. Trade-Offs and Alternatives
f. Summary
i. Problem
ii. Solution
iii. Why It Works
iv. Trade-Offs and Alternatives
i. Problem
ii. Solution
iii. Why It Works
iv. Trade-Offs and Alternatives
g. Summary
i. Problem
ii. Solution
iii. Why It Works
iv. Trade-Offs and Alternatives
c. Design Pattern 12: Checkpoints
i. Problem
ii. Solution
iii. Why It Works
iv. Trade-Offs and Alternatives
i. Problem
ii. Solution
iii. Why It Works
iv. Trade-Offs and Alternatives
i. Problem
ii. Solution
iii. Why It Works
iv. Trade-Offs and Alternatives
i. Problem
ii. Solution
iii. Why It Works
iv. Trade-Offs and Alternatives
g. Summary
6. 5. Design Patterns for Resilient Serving
i. Problem
ii. Solution
iii. Why It Works
iv. Trade-Offs and Alternatives
c. Design Pattern 18: Continued Model Evaluation
i. Problem
ii. Solution
iii. Why It Works
iv. Trade-Offs and Alternatives
d. Design Pattern 19: Two-Phase Predictions
i. Problem
ii. Solution
iii. Trade-Offs and Alternatives
i. Problem
ii. Solution
iii. Trade-Offs and Alternatives
f. Summary
7. 6. Reproducibility Design Patterns
i. Problem
ii. Solution
iii. Trade-Offs and Alternatives
i. Problem
ii. Solution
iii. Why It Works
iv. Trade-Offs and Alternatives
i. Problem
ii. Solution
iii. Trade-Offs and Alternatives
h. Summary
8. 7. Responsible AI
a. Design Pattern 28: Heuristic Benchmark
i. Problem
ii. Solution
iii. Trade-Offs and Alternatives
b. Design Pattern 29: Explainable Predictions
i. Problem
ii. Solution
iii. Trade-Offs and Alternatives
i. Problem
ii. Solution
iii. Trade-Offs and Alternatives
d. Summary
9. 8. Connected Patterns
a. Patterns Reference
b. Pattern Interactions
c. Patterns Within ML Projects
i. ML Life Cycle
ii. AI Readiness
d. Common Patterns by Use Case and Data Type
10. Index
Machine Learning Design
Patterns
Solutions to Common Challenges in Data
Preparation, Model Building, and MLOps
The views expressed in this work are those of the authors, and do not
represent the publisher’s views. While the publisher and the authors have
used good faith efforts to ensure that the information and instructions
contained in this work are accurate, the publisher and the authors disclaim
all responsibility for errors or omissions, including without limitation
responsibility for damages resulting from the use of or reliance on this
work. Use of the information and instructions contained in this work is at
your own risk. If any code samples or other technology this work contains
or describes is subject to open source licenses or the intellectual property
rights of others, it is your responsibility to ensure that your use thereof
complies with such licenses and/or rights.
978-1-098-11578-4
[LSI]
Preface
Who Is This Book For?
Introductory machine learning books usually focus on the what and how of
machine learning (ML). They then explain the mathematical aspects of
new methods from AI research labs and teach how to use AI frameworks
to implement these methods. This book, on the other hand, brings together
hard-earned experience around the “why” that underlies the tips and tricks
that experienced ML practitioners employ when applying machine
learning to real-world problems.
We assume that you have prior knowledge of machine learning and data
processing. This is not a fundamental textbook on machine learning.
Instead, this book is for you if you are a data scientist, data engineer, or
ML engineer who is looking for a second book on practical machine
learning. If you already know the basics, this book will introduce you to a
catalog of ideas, some of which you (an ML practitioner) may recognize,
and give those ideas a name so that you can confidently reach for them.
If you are a computer science student headed for a job in industry, this
book will round out your knowledge and prepare you for the professional
world. It will help you learn how to build high-quality ML systems.
Here are some concrete examples of areas that we intentionally stay away
from because we believe that these topics are more appropriate for college
courses and ML researchers:
ML algorithms
We do not cover the differences between random forests and neural
networks, for example. This is covered in introductory machine
learning textbooks.
Building blocks
We do not cover different types of gradient descent optimizers or
activation functions. We recommend using Adam and ReLU—in our
experience, the potential for improvements in performance by making
different choices in these sorts of things tends to be minor.
ML model architectures
If you are doing image classification, we recommend that you use an
off-the-shelf model like ResNet or whatever the latest hotness is at the
time you are reading this. Leave the design of new image classification
or text classification models to researchers who specialize in this
problem.
Model layers
You won’t find convolutional neural networks or recurrent neural
You won’t find convolutional neural networks or recurrent neural
networks in this book. They are doubly disqualified—first, for being a
building block and second, for being something you can use off-the-
shelf.
In this book, we have tried to include only common patterns of the kind
that machine learning engineers in enterprises will employ in their day-to-
day work.
Code Samples
We provide code for machine learning (sometimes in Keras/TensorFlow,
and other times in scikit-learn or BigQuery ML) and data processing (in
SQL) as a way to show how the techniques we are discussing are
implemented in practice. All the code that is referenced in the book is part
of our GitHub repository, where you will find fully working ML models.
We strongly encourage you to try out those code samples.
The code is secondary in importance to the concepts and techniques being
covered. Our aim has been that the topic and principles should remain
relevant regardless of changes to TensorFlow or Keras, and we can easily
imagine updating the GitHub repository to include other ML frameworks,
for example, while keeping the book text unchanged. Therefore, the book
should be equally informative if your primary ML framework is PyTorch
or even a non-Python framework like H20.ai or R. Indeed, we welcome
your contributions to the GitHub repository of implementations of one or
more of these patterns in your favorite ML framework.
This book is here to help you get your job done. In general, if example
code is offered with this book, you may use it in your programs and
documentation. You do not need to contact us for permission unless
you’re reproducing a significant portion of the code. For example, writing
a program that uses several chunks of code from this book does not
require permission. Selling or distributing examples from O’Reilly books
does require permission. Answering a question by citing this book and
quoting example code does not require permission. Incorporating a
significant amount of example code from this book into your product’s
documentation does require permission.
Italic
Indicates new terms, URLs, email addresses, filenames, and file
extensions.
Constant width
Used for program listings, as well as within paragraphs to refer to
program elements such as variable or function names, databases, data
types, environment variables, statements, and keywords.
TIP
This element signifies a tip or suggestion.
NOTE
This element signifies a general note.
WARNING
This element indicates a warning or caution.
NOTE
For more than 40 years, O’Reilly Media has provided technology and business training,
knowledge, and insight to help companies succeed.
Our unique network of experts and innovators share their knowledge and
expertise through books, articles, and our online learning platform.
O’Reilly’s online learning platform gives you on-demand access to live
training courses, in-depth learning paths, interactive coding environments,
and a vast collection of text and video from O’Reilly and 200+ other
publishers. For more information, visit http://oreilly.com.
How to Contact Us
Please address comments and questions concerning this book to the
publisher:
Sebastopol, CA 95472
707-829-0104 (fax)
We have a web page for this book, where we list errata, examples, and any
additional information. You can access this page at https://oreil.ly/MLDP.
For news and information about our books and courses, visit
http://oreilly.com.
Acknowledgments
A book like this would not be possible without the generosity of numerous
Googlers, especially our colleagues in the Cloud AI, Solution Engineering,
Professional Services, and Developer Relations teams. We are grateful to
them for letting us observe, analyze, and question their solutions to the
challenging problems they encountered in training, improving, and
operationalizing ML models. Thanks to our managers, Karl Weinmeister,
Steve Cellini, Hamidou Dia, Abdul Razack, Chris Hallenbeck, Patrick
Cole, Louise Byrne, and Rochana Golani for fostering the spirit of
openness within Google, giving us the freedom to catalog these patterns,
and publish this book.
Salem Haykal, Benoit Dherin, and Khalid Salama reviewed every pattern
and every chapter. Sal pointed out nuances we had missed, Benoit
narrowed down our claims, and Khalid pointed us to relevant research.
This book would be nowhere near as good without your inputs. Thank
you! Amy Unruh, Rajesh Thallam, Robbie Haertel, Zhitao Li, Anusha
Ramesh, Ming Fang, Parker Barnes, Andrew Zaldivar, James Wexler,
Andrew Sellergren, and David Kanter reviewed parts of this book that
align with their areas of expertise and made numerous suggestions on how
the near-term roadmap would affect our recommendations. Nitin
Aggarwal and Matthew Yeager brought a reader’s eye to the manuscript
and improved its clarity. Special thanks to Rajesh Thallam for prototyping
the design of the very last figure in Chapter 8. Any errors that remain are
ours, of course.
Sara: Jon—you’re a big reason this book exists. Thank you for
encouraging me to write this, for always knowing how to make me laugh,
appreciating my weirdness, and for believing in me especially when I
didn’t. To my parents, thank you for being my biggest fans since day one
and encouraging my love of technology and writing for as long as I can
remember. To Ally, Katie, Randi, and Sophie—thank you for being a
constant source of light and laughter in these uncertain times.
Lak: I took on this book thinking I’d get to work on it while waiting in
airports. COVID-19 made it so that much of the work was done at home.
Thanks Abirami, Sidharth, and Sarada for all your forbearance as I
hunkered down to write yet again. More hikes on weekends now!
The three of us are donating 100% of the royalties from this book to Girls
Who Code, an organization whose mission is to build a large pipeline of
future female engineers. Diversity, equity, and inclusion are particularly
important in machine learning to ensure that AI models don’t perpetuate
existing biases in human society.
Chapter 1. The Need for
Machine Learning Design
Patterns
Each pattern describes a problem which occurs over and over again in
our environment, and then describes the core of the solution to that
problem, in such a way that you can use this solution a million times
over, without ever doing it the same way twice.
…
Each solution is stated in such a way that it gives the essential field of
relationships needed to solve the problem, but in a very general and
abstract way—so that you can solve the problem for yourself, in your
own way, by adapting it to your preferences, and the local conditions at
the place where you are making it.
For example, a couple of the patterns that incorporate human details when
building a home are Light on Two Sides of Every Room and Six-Foot
Balcony. Think of your favorite room in your home, and your least-
favorite room. Does your favorite room have windows on two walls?
What about your least-favorite room? According to Alexander:
Rooms lit on two sides, with natural light, create less glare around
people and objects; this lets us see things more intricately; and most
important, it allows us to read in detail the minute expressions that
flash across people’s faces….
Having a name for this pattern saves architects from having to continually
rediscover this principle. Yet where and how you get two light sources in
any specific local condition is up to the architect’s skill. Similarly, when
designing a balcony, how big should it be? Alexander recommends 6 feet
by 6 feet as being enough for 2 (mismatched!) chairs and a side table, and
12 feet by 12 feet if you want both a covered sitting space and a sitting
space in the sun.
Erich Gamma, Richard Helm, Ralph Johnson, and John Vlissides brought
the idea to software by cataloging 23 object-oriented design patterns in a
1994 book entitled Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-
Oriented Software (Addison-Wesley, 1995). Their catalog includes
patterns such as Proxy, Singleton, and Decorator and led to lasting impact
on the field of object-oriented programming. In 2005 the Association of
Computing Machinery (ACM) awarded their annual Programming
Languages Achievement Award to the authors, recognizing the impact of
their work “on programming practice and programming language design.”
Building production machine learning models is increasingly becoming an
engineering discipline, taking advantage of ML methods that have been
proven in research settings and applying them to business problems. As
machine learning becomes more mainstream, it is important that
practitioners take advantage of tried-and-proven methods to address
recurring problems.
One benefit of our jobs in the customer-facing part of Google Cloud is that
it brings us in contact with a wide variety of machine learning and data
science teams and individual developers from around the world. At the
same time, we each work closely with internal Google teams solving
cutting-edge machine learning problems. Finally, we have been fortunate
to work with the TensorFlow, Keras, BigQuery ML, TPU, and Cloud AI
Platform teams that are driving the democratization of machine learning
research and infrastructure. All this gives us a rather unique perspective
from which to catalog the best practices we have observed these teams
carrying out.
We don’t expect you to read this book sequentially (although you can!).
Instead, we anticipate that you will skim through the book, read a few
sections more deeply than others, reference the ideas in conversations with
colleagues, and refer back to the book when faced with problems you
remember reading about. If you plan to skip around, we recommend that
you start with Chapter 1 and Chapter 8 before dipping into individual
patterns.
You can imagine how this will quickly get complicated as we add more
variables (number of large furniture items, amount of clothing, fragile
items, and so on) and try to handle edge cases. More to the point, asking
for all this information ahead of time from customers can cause them to
abandon the estimation process. Instead, we can train a machine learning
model to estimate moving costs based on past data on previous households
our company has moved.
Machine learning models, regardless of how they are depicted visually, are
mathematical functions and can therefore be implemented from scratch
using a numerical software package. However, ML engineers in industry
tend to employ one of several open source frameworks designed to
provide intuitive APIs for building models. The majority of our examples
will use TensorFlow, an open source machine learning framework created
by Google with a focus on deep learning models. Within the TensorFlow
library, we’ll be using the Keras API in our examples, which can be
imported through tensorflow.keras. Keras is a higher-
level API for building neural networks. While Keras
supports many backends, we’ll be using its TensorFlow backend. In other
examples, we’ll be using scikit-learn, XGBoost, and PyTorch, which are
other popular open source frameworks that provide utilities for preparing
your data, along with APIs for building linear and deep models. Machine
learning continues to become more accessible, and one exciting
development is the availability of machine learning models that can be
expressed in SQL. We’ll use BigQuery ML as an example of this,
Random documents with unrelated
content Scribd suggests to you:
[235] Mr. Fox had been lent Chiswick House by the Duke of
Devonshire, and was moved there at the end of July.
[236] Near Malmesbury, in Wilts.
[237] The funeral was fixed for October 10, by a curious
coincidence the anniversary of his first election for Westminster.
[238] The new appointments were, Lord Howick, Secretary of
State for Foreign Affairs; Mr. T. Grenville, Admiralty, in place of
Lord Howick; Mr. Tierney, President of Board of Control, in
succession to Mr. Grenville; Lord Sidmouth, President of the
Council, in place of Lord Fitzwilliam; and Lord Holland, Lord Privy
Seal, in place of Lord Sidmouth.
[239] Lord Holland states fully his reasons for accepting office
in a letter to Lord Lauderdale, dated September 22. It is
published in Memoirs of the Whig Party, ii. 53.
[240] Early in March Murat was given the Duchy of Berg and
Cleves, ceded to Napoleon by Bavaria, and other territories
claimed by Prussia were occupied by French troops a month later
—this without any communication to the Prussian Cabinet.
These and other arbitrary actions, following closely on the
formation of the Confederation of the Rhine, opened the eyes of
the Prussians to the true policy of the French Emperor, but the
final blow to their amour propre was the discovery of their
Ambassador in France, Lucchesini, that Napoleon had cheated
them over Hanover, by his willingness to restore it to England,
and that he threw no obstacles in the way of the immediate re-
establishment of the Kingdom of Poland.
[241] Prince Louis Ferdinand, nephew of Frederick the Great,
was born in 1772. He served with distinction against Napoleon
and was killed at Saalfeld in 1806 in command of the advance
guard.
[242] ‘They want ordnance, and yet would begin by spiking
one of their great guns.’ Lord Holland relates this as another
remark of Windham’s upon the proposal.
[243] Sir Home Popham’s expedition to South America, where
he effected the capture of Buenos Ayres on June 28. He had been
originally despatched to the Cape of Good Hope, where he met
with complete success and annexed that colony to the British
Empire. Fired with this triumph he made his way to the Rio Plate,
without any instructions from Government, who on hearing of his
destination took steps to stop him, but their orders arrived too
late. Buenos Ayres remained in his hands until August 4, when it
was retaken by the Spaniards, with severe loss to the British.
[244] Lord Morpeth was sent to Berlin to offer the assistance
of England conditionally upon the immediate restoration of
Hanover. He arrived at headquarters two days before the battle of
Jena, and found Haugwitz, with whom he was to negotiate,
unwilling to meet him in any way. The intriguing Prussian still
hoped to retain Hanover, and expected after the battle to be able
to say so. The result, however, was contrary to his expectations,
and as no diplomatic negotiations were possible in the confusion
after the battle Lord Morpeth returned to London.
[245] Bartholomew Frere (1778–1851), a younger brother of
John Hockham Frere, and son of John Frere, M.P. for Norwich. He
was Secretary of Legation to his brother in Spain and held various
minor diplomatic posts.
[246] M. Jacobi, the Prussian Minister, had left England when
diplomatic relations between the two countries were broken off in
the spring. He passed Lord Morpeth on the sea, and reached
England early in October.
[247] In the interval which elapsed since Lady Holland’s last
entry in her journal the whole position of Europe had again
changed. The Prussian army, decimated in one day at Jena and
Auerstadt, had practically ceased to exist; Frederick William was a
fugitive at the eastern end of his dominions in Königsberg.
Napoleon had occupied Berlin, and in two months had become
master of many of the Prussian fortresses, which it should have
taken him years to reduce. Lucchesini in the course of his
negotiations for peace in Berlin was even ready to give up those
strongholds which had not surrendered, but the patriotic party
were too strong to allow the King to consent to further ignominy.
Russia was prepared to give her assistance, and this nerved
Frederick William to continue the war. Haugwitz resigned, but the
King rendered this lucky event ineffective by also dismissing
Count Stein, the only really able man in his councils.
[248] War was formally declared between Russia and the Porte
towards the end of December.
[249] Gustavus IV. succeeded, at the age of fourteen, to the
crown of Sweden after his father’s assassination in 1792. His
hatred of Napoleon and inclination towards an English alliance
were the leading features of his reign—features to which he so
obstinately adhered as to cause his country much unrest and
suffering, and his own downfall. He was deposed in 1809 in
favour of his uncle.
[250] The dissolution took place in October, and the new
Parliament met on December 15. Tierney was defeated at
Southwark by Sir Thomas Turton. He obtained a seat, however, at
Athlone.
[251] Sir Samuel Auchmuty (1756–1822), born in New York, of
Scotch descent. He served the crown in America as a volunteer,
obtaining a commission. He went to India, where he saw much
service. He took Monte Video, and showed considerable skill on
this expedition until superseded by General Whitelocke, who
arrived with further reinforcements. He later returned to India,
and was also employed in the East Indian islands.
Sir Home Popham, who was court-martialled in March, and
reprimanded for his share in the unauthorised expedition to
Buenos Ayres, remained with his fleet off the Rio Plate after the
loss of the town. The Government were much disconcerted by the
whole affair, but the enthusiasm of the public forced them to send
reinforcements instead of orders of recall. Three thousand men
were despatched with Sir Samuel.
[252] General Robert Craufurd (1764–1812). He served under
Lord Cornwallis in India, and was Quartermaster-General in
Ireland during the insurrection of 1798. His force was joined to
General Whitelocke’s. He commanded a light brigade in the
Peninsula and was killed at the storming of Ciudad Rodrigo. This
expedition was intended for the conquest of Chili, but was
diverted to Buenos Ayres.
[253] Aaron Burr’s (1756–1836) conspiracy was a sequel to his
defeat for the Presidency of the United States by Jefferson in
1801. This was mainly brought about by General Hamilton’s
influence, which was again brought to bear against him in 1804
when he stood for the Governorship of New York. A duel took
place in which General Hamilton was shot dead. Burr after this
went to the West and established himself on the Mississippi. He
gained over General Wilkinson, the commander of the United
States army at New Orleans, to assist him in his schemes, though
nobody appeared to know their exact trend. Jefferson, however,
grew alarmed, Wilkinson recanted, Burr was arrested, and the
whole plot fell to the ground. Burr was acquitted of actual
treason, and went to Europe. There he remained, first in one
country, then in another, till 1812, when he returned to America.
He took no further active part in politics, and died in extreme
poverty.
[254] Lord Mulgrave was Secretary for Foreign Affairs, 1805–6.
[255] Preparations for this expedition ceased with the fall of
the Ministry. Their successors again took the project into
consideration, but the troops destined to take part in it under Sir
Arthur Wellesley were sent instead to Portugal.
[256] Charles, third Duke of Richmond; born in 1735, died on
December 29, 1806. He was succeeded by his nephew, Colonel
Lennox.
[257] The charges of immorality raised against the Princess of
Wales by Sir John and Lady Douglas were laid before a
Committee of the Cabinet in 1806 for investigation. It was
composed of four members, the Lord Chancellor, the Lord Chief
Justice (Lord Ellenborough), and Lords Grenville and Spencer,
with Sir Samuel Romilly, the Solicitor-General, as legal adviser.
Their report acquitted her of the more serious charges, but
animadverted with severity on the levity of her conduct. The
Princess replied with a letter to the King ‘the joint composition of
Lord Eldon, Mr. Perceval, and Mr. Plomer; the first furnishing the
law, the second the argument, and the third the prolixity. It
concluded with a request to be restored to the comfort and
honour of his Majesty’s royal presence’ (Memoirs of the Whig
Party, ii. 151). This the King referred to the Cabinet, and after
many deliberations, with the exception of Mr. Windham, they
concurred in the report.
It is curious that Lord Eldon, who it is here suggested was the
secret adviser of George III., was also the confidential adviser of
George IV. at the time of the trial in 1820.
[258] This incident is fully described in Coke of Norfolk, ii. 69–
73. Mrs. Berney and her friend were in the habit of parading the
town every day in a carriage decked in Colonel Wodehouse’s (the
Tory candidate) colours. One day, however, the Whigs produced a
carriage arranged to closely resemble theirs in every particular,
but flaunting the rival hue. A riot ensued, for which the Berney
family held Coke and Windham responsible, though they had in
no way countenanced the trick. All three candidates were
convicted of treating, but as no petition was brought against
Colonel Wodehouse, he retained the seat. Mr. Coke’s brother,
Edward Coke, resigned his seat for Derby, for which the former
was elected; while the latter took the vacant seat at Norwich. Mr.
Windham was returned for Higham Ferrers by Lord Fitzwilliam.
[259] ‘A clear and precise rule was laid down for the regulation
of the circuitous trade by the enemy to the colonies, which
defined the difference between a continuous and intercepted
voyage’ (Alison, History of Europe, v. 677). The discussion of the
question of impressment of seamen was postponed till some
future occasion, owing to the difficulties which surrounded it. The
British Government pledged themselves in the meantime to use
their powers with the utmost moderation. President Jefferson,
however, refused to ratify the treaty.
[260] At the rupture of the Treaty of Amiens.
[261] Lord Minto had been appointed Governor-General of
India. He at first refused to accept office, and only did so at the
earnest desire of Lord Grenville. That he was loath to do so is
shown by letters, published in vol. iii. of his Life and Letters, to
Lady Minto, who on the score of health was precluded from
accompanying him. Fox first offered the appointment to Lord
Lauderdale, but the Court of Directors refused to receive him. He
therefore consented to waive his claim to the dignity.
[262] In answer to Lord Howick Mr. Perceval explained that the
word ‘attached’ was taken from a letter of Mr. Fox to Talleyrand
published in the Correspondence, in which he had ‘subscribed
himself “with the most perfect attachment”’ (Hansard).
[263] William Roscoe (1753–1831), the author of the Lives of
Lorenzo de’ Medici and Leo X. He was elected in the Whig interest
as member for Liverpool in 1806, but was defeated at the
succeeding election.
[264] William Frederick, second Duke of Gloucester (1776–
1834), son of William Henry, Duke of Gloucester, and Maria,
Countess of Waldegrave. He married, in 1816, Princess Mary,
George III.’s daughter.
[265] Adolphus Frederick, Duke of Cambridge (1774–1850),
seventh son of George III.
[266] This is probably the paper printed in Memorials and
Correspondence of C. J. Fox, ii. 340, &c. It was to be delivered to
the King in 1789, with the memorial, also drawn up by Minto and
Burke, containing a justification of the Prince’s and Duke of York’s
conduct during their father’s illness. Both documents were
discussed at a meeting of the Whig leaders held at Carlton House,
and it was decided not to present the memorial with this paper,
but to accompany it only with a short explanatory letter.
[267] Lord-Lieutenant of Ireland.
When the Grenville Ministry first took office on Mr. Pitt’s death
no stipulation was made to the King regarding the Catholic
question. The Irish Catholics, seeing Ministers in power most of
whom they knew to be favourably inclined to their claims, began
at once to agitate for the removal of disadvantages under which
they laboured. The greatest anomaly was, that by the Act of 1793
Irish Catholics could become officers in the army there (though
still unable to rise to certain staff appointments), but could not
hold that rank in England. A promise, however, had been made at
the time that matters would be speedily readjusted. This and
other points were brought to Mr. Fox’s notice soon after he had
taken office, but he advised a postponement of the suggested
petition to Parliament, as likely for the present to be of no
permanent advantage. He stated, however, that he was quite
willing to risk a dissolution of the Ministry on the question, if they
so wished it. Better counsels prevailed; but after Mr. Fox’s death
the matter again came to the front. Ministers were in a dilemma.
On one side they risked the King’s displeasure, on the other they
would be obliged to proclaim certain parts of Ireland where
agitation was breaking out, on a question with which they
themselves sympathised. The former evil was considered the
least, and it was decided by a clause in the Mutiny Act to allow
Irish Catholics and Dissenters to serve in the English army. To this
the King was agreeable; but Ministers desired to go further. It
was found easier to bring forward the matter in the form of a Bill,
and one was drafted which opened the staff appointments to the
Catholics, and also allowed English Dissenters to serve in the
army and navy. Lord Howick thought he had received the King’s
consent to this, but subsequently the latter flatly refused to
confirm it. The Bill was dropped, but the Ministers reserved for
themselves the right to bring forward the question again, should
circumstances so demand. This the King requested them to
withdraw; they refused, and were at once dismissed.
The Correspondence and Minutes of the Cabinet, referred to
here and subsequently, are printed in the Appendix to Lord
Holland’s Memoirs of the Whig Party.
[268] Lieut.-General Whitelocke (1757–1833). He distinguished
himself in St. Domingo in 1793–4, but failed signally before
Buenos Ayres. In his attack on the town he showed himself
incompetent to deal with an unexpectedly determined resistance,
and agreed to a convention whereby the English troops were
obliged to withdraw. On his return to England he was tried by
court martial and cashiered. Lord Holland states in the Memoirs of
the Whig Party that this appointment was due to Windham’s
dislike of General Whitelocke (who held the post of Inspector-
General) and his desire to appoint someone as his successor who
would be more willing to carry out his schemes.
[269] Elizabeth, Countess of Sutherland in her own right, Lord
Granville Leveson-Gower’s sister-in-law, only daughter of William,
eighteenth Earl of Sutherland. She was born in 1765, and
married, in 1785, George Granville, Earl Gower, who succeeded
his father as second Marquess of Stafford in 1803, and was raised
to a Dukedom in 1833. The Duchess died in 1839.
[270] This was in accordance with the resolution which Mr.
Rose says in his Diary he had taken never to say a word or give a
vote on the subject. He disapproved not of the abolition of the
Slave Trade itself, but of the methods pursued in putting it down,
which he considered were unfair to the colonists.
[271] Arthur James, eighth Earl of Fingall (1759–1836), who
succeeded his father in the titles in 1793. He was one of the
leaders of the Catholic movement at this time.
[272] John, second Baron Ponsonby, of Imokilly (1770?–1855),
son of William Brabazon Ponsonby, first Baron Ponsonby, who
died in 1806. He was Ambassador in Constantinople and Vienna
and was created a viscount in 1839. His only sister married Lord
Howick.
[273] William Elliot, of Wells, the Chief Secretary. He died in
1818.
[274] William Conyngham Plunket (1764–1854), created Baron
Plunket in 1827. He was appointed Attorney-General for Ireland in
1805 by Pitt, and retained this office under the Whig Government.
[275] Mr. Charles Kendal Bushe.
[276] See ante, ii. 174. Mr. Eden was Secretary to the
American Commission and Mr. Allen Assistant-Secretary.
[277] A Committee was appointed on February 10, on the
motion of Mr. Biddulph, member for Denbigh Borough, to
examine the efficiency of regulations and checks, already
introduced, to control public expenditure; to consider what
further steps were advisable for the same object, and to diminish
‘the amount of salaries and emoluments without detriment to the
public service.’
[278] William Garrow (1760–1840), barrister, who sat in
several Parliaments in the Whig interest. He was knighted in
1812; made Attorney-General in 1813, and Baron of the
Exchequer 1817–32.
[279] This was the pamphlet drawn up by Perceval, and known
as ‘the Book.’ It was never given to the world, for just as the
Princess’s friends resolved upon its circulation, the Ministry was
dismissed and the Tories returned to power. A few copies escaped
from the printers’ hands, and were bought back for large sums by
the Government.
[280] Owing to the infraction of treaty obligations in Moldavia
and Wallachia by Turkey, largely instigated by Sebastiani the
French Ambassador at Constantinople, Russia thought fit to
declare war with the Porte late in 1806. Alexander, however, had
need of all his forces to meet the French in Central Europe, and
he suggested to the English Government that a fleet should be
sent to Constantinople to secure their joint interests, and to
demand the dismissal of Sebastiani. This was done, and
Arbuthnot, the British Minister, was ordered to insist on the latter
point, on the pain of instant bombardment. Unfortunately
Arbuthnot had to leave owing to ill health, and Sir Thomas
Duckworth, the British Admiral, allowed himself to be drawn into
fruitless negotiations, and finally withdrew without accomplishing
his object.
The force sent to Egypt under General Mackenzie captured
Alexandria, but lost a large number of prisoners in an attack on
Rosetta. Nothing further was effected, and the troops were
removed in the autumn.
[281] John Armstrong (1758–1843), American Minister in
France and Spain 1804–10.
[282] The Right Hon. Charles Long (1761–1838), afterwards
created Lord Farnborough (1820), Secretary of State for Ireland
1806, and Paymaster of the Forces for many years.
[283] George Rose (1744–1818), a devoted adherent of Pitt.
He was for many years Secretary of the Treasury, and held
various minor offices under the Tories.
[284] This is amusing and interesting, in light of Lord
Malmesbury’s conversation with Canning, which he quotes in his
diary as having taken place on March 14. Canning ‘said, what he
had told me before, that he had received and rejected overtures
from Lord Grenville.... He declared with a threat that he never
would sit in the same Cabinet as Addington.’
[285] Sir William Drummond, born about 1770; died in 1828.
He was appointed Minister at the Court of Naples in 1801, and
again in 1806, and Ambassador to the Porte in 1803.
[286] No action was taken in these matters owing to the fall of
the Ministry, and Canning allowed the question to lapse.
[287] Alexander Hamilton, Marquess of Douglas (1767–1852),
British Ambassador at St. Petersburg. He succeeded his father as
tenth Duke of Hamilton in 1819.
[288] He stated in a letter to Lord Holland, dated April 27, that
he wished to attach himself completely to the Prince.
[289] Right Hon. Charles Bragge, who married Lord Sidmouth’s
sister, and took the additional surname of Bathurst in 1804. He
sat in the House of Commons 1790–1823, and died in 1831.
[290] Philip, third Earl of Hardwicke (1757–1834), son of the
Right Hon. Charles Yorke. He succeeded his uncle in 1790, and
was Lord-Lieutenant of Ireland from 1801 to 1806.
[291] Lord Hardwicke’s half-brother, Charles Philip Yorke
(1764–1834). He was Secretary at War, 1801–3; Home Secretary,
1803–4; and First Lord of the Admiralty, 1810–11.
[292] March 18.
[293] Charles Manners-Sutton (1755–1828), raised to the See
of Canterbury in 1805, and father of Viscount Canterbury (for
many years Speaker of the House of Commons).
[294] Lord Auckland was President of the Board of Trade. His
letter is printed in Lord Auckland’s Journal and Correspondence,
iv. 300.
[295] Charles William, Viscount Milton (1786–1857), only son
of William, fourth Earl Fitzwilliam, on whose death in 1833 Lord
Milton succeeded to the titles. He remained member for Yorkshire
until 1831.
[296] The figures were: Wilberforce 11,806, Milton 11,177,
Lascelles 10,989, the two first being therefore returned.
Wilberforce’s expenses, after many of his supporters had paid
their own, amounted to 28,600l., while those of his opponents
were reckoned to be 200,000l. (Dictionary of Nat. Biog.).
[297] Mary Elizabeth, born in 1806. She married, in 1830,
Thomas Atherton, third Baron Lilford, and died in 1891.
[298] Peter Leopold Louis Francis Nassau, fifth Earl Cowper
(1778–1837), who succeeded his brother in 1799. He married, in
1805, Amelia, daughter of Peniston, first Viscount Melbourne.
After Lord Cowper’s death she married Lord Palmerston in 1839.
[299] The Hon. Sir Arthur Paget (1771–1840), second son of
Henry, first Earl of Uxbridge. He held various diplomatic posts,
and was appointed, in 1807, Ambassador to the Porte. He retired
from the service two years later.
[300] David Richard Morier (1784–1877), son of Isaac Morier,
Consul-General of the Levant Company at Constantinople.
Commencing at the age of twenty, he held various diplomatic
posts in the East, was secretary to Lord Castlereagh at Châtillon,
&c., and was for many years Minister at Berne.
[301] Mr. Adam brought a motion in the House of Commons on
July 2, 1807, in defence of the warrant for a pension to the
Scotch Judge, Lord Cullen, of 400l. a year, with a reversion of
200l. for life to his wife. He argued that it was fair, if a judge was
not sufficiently well off to keep up his position. Lord Cullen was
devoting two-thirds of his income to pay his father’s debts.
[302] It was burnt in 1831 by the mob, on account of the
opposition of its owner to the Reform Act.
[303] ‘Conversation’ Sharp.
[304] The History of Brazil was the only part published.
[305] George William, sixth Duke of Argyll (1766–1839), who
succeeded his father in 1806. He married, in 1810, Caroline
Elizabeth, daughter of George, fourth Earl of Jersey, and
previously wife of the Earl of Uxbridge (afterwards Marquess of
Anglesey), whom she divorced.
[306] Lord John Russell.
[307] Lewis, describing this visit in a letter to his mother, says,
‘I happened to wake about six o’clock, and hearing the billiard
balls in motion, I put on my dressing-gown and went into the
gallery, from whence looking down into the great hall, I descried
Tom Sheridan and Mr. Chester (who had not been to bed all
night) playing with great eagerness. Fortunately, Tom was in the
act of making a stroke on which the fate of the whole game
depended; when I shouted to him over the balustrade, “Shame!
Shame! A married man!” on which he started back in a fright,
missed his stroke, and lost the game’ (Life and Correspondence of
M. G. Lewis, ii. 5).
[308] Hon. Henry Edward Fox (1802–59), afterwards fourth
Lord Holland; always a weakly child from birth. He was afflicted
with a form of hip disease, which gave him much trouble all his
life.
[309] Lord Holland says in the Memoirs of the Whig Party: ‘Mr.
Ponsonby was brought into Parliament at the beginning of the
session for the purpose of assuming an ascendency over a large,
intelligent, and independent body of gentlemen with scarcely
twenty of whom he was personally acquainted. A preposterous
scheme!’
[310] William Belsham (1752–1827), author of a series of
works, which he combined to form a History of Great Britain to
the Conclusion of the Peace of Amiens.
[311] Napoleon’s insistence on one of the secret articles of the
Treaty of Tilsit, requiring Russia to close her ports against English
vessels, was the actual reason for the Czar’s declaration of war
against England. Lord Granville Leveson left St. Petersburg early
in November 1807.
[312] Prince Stahremberg was Austrian Minister in London.
Lord Holland states that he did not consider his information
reliable except where it was substantiated by documents.
Metternich was Austrian Ambassador at Paris. The declaration of
war of both Austria and Prussia was entirely due to Napoleon’s
instigation, as one step in his campaign against British commerce.
Both countries had the sense to give no reason for their action.
[313] These letters, Mr. Fox asserted in a speech in the House
of Commons, were the origin of the rupture of the peace of
Amiens. Certainly they were the means of rousing Napoleon’s ire,
for Coleridge had to leave Rome in 1806 in all haste, after a
friendly warning that the Emperor intended his arrest. He was
Secretary to the Governor of Malta, Sir Alexander Ball, 1804–5, a
post which was rather the result of a chance visit to the island
than an official appointment. He wrote for the Courier for several
years at this period of his life.
[314] George, second Lord Kenyon (1776–1855), who
succeeded his father in 1802. Lord Kenyon seconded the Address,
but his speech was delivered in so low a tone as to be inaudible
below the bar (Hansard).
[315] The British expedition to Copenhagen in September
1807, which resulted in the seizure of the Danish fleet and the
bombardment of that city. Canning had private information of the
secret clauses of the Treaty between Napoleon and Alexander at
Tilsit. His refusal to produce papers which would incidentally have
brought his secret agent to light, coupled with what they
considered his shabby behaviour in joining the Tory Government,
caused him much odium amongst the Whigs.
[316] Milnes?
[317] Mr. R. Campbell came over in the Revenge, man-of-war,
with the deputies who had arrived to ask for English assistance
against the French. Napoleon invaded Spain late in 1807, and set
up his brother Joseph on the throne. This was too much for the
amour propre of the Spaniards; they rose in arms, and in every
town occupied by the invader outbreaks of the most ferocious
description took place.
[318] Solano was Governor of Cadiz. The French fleet
consisted of five ships of the line and one frigate, which had
escaped to that port after Trafalgar, and had lain there ever since.
They were forced to surrender a fortnight later to the Spaniards,
as they were unable to leave the harbour on account of Lord
Collingwood’s fleet, which was waiting for them outside.
[319] Don Gonzalo O’Farrill (1754–1831), Spanish General,
who sided with Joseph Bonaparte, and became his War Minister.
[320] At Madrid on May 2 Murat put a large number of people
to death without trial for supposed participation in riots which had
taken place there that day.
[321] The French General, Count Pierre Dupont, who was in
command of the French forces in Andalusia. He was defeated by
Castaños at Baylen in July 1808, and forced to lay down his arms
with 18,000 men.
[322] The Duke of Infantado was implicated, as Lady Holland
relates, in the supposed plot of Ferdinand, Prince of the Asturias,
against his father, Charles IV, in October 1807. The whole
conspiracy was looked upon in many quarters as a device of
Godoy’s to ruin his rival Escoiquiz. The Duke accompanied
Ferdinand to Bayonne the following April, and after his master’s
deposition offered his services to Joseph Bonaparte. On the first
favourable occasion, however, he turned against him and was
given a Spanish command.
[323] The picture was painted in 1763, and is now at Mount
Stuart, Lord Bute’s residence in the Isle of Bute.
[324] Second daughter of Alexander, Duke of Gordon, and
sister of Charlotte, fourth Duchess of Richmond.
[325] At Baylen.
[326] Afterwards better known as Count Torreno. He was a
member of the first Cortes at Cadiz, and had to leave Spain at
Ferdinand’s return. He lived in Paris until 1820, when he came
back to Spain.
[327] Manuel Freyne (1765–1834), general, who served with
distinction throughout the war. He refused employment under
Ferdinand.
[328] From Spain, where he went as Ambassador early in
1809. He succeeded Canning as Foreign Secretary.
[329] John, second Marquess of Lansdowne, previously
referred to in these pages as Lord Wycombe.
[330] By a former family arrangement Lord Lansdowne was
enabled, should his brother die childless, to draw up a deed of
appointment as to the disposition of the property.
[331] Georgina Anne, who died in 1819.
[332] George, ninth Earl of Winchilsea, and fourth Earl of
Nottingham (1752–1826), who succeeded his uncle in 1769.
[333] Joseph Berington (1746–1827), an Englishman educated
at the College of St. Omer. He became a priest, and was one of
the first of that persuasion to wear black clothes in England, from
which others had up to then refrained for fear of persecution. He
was the author of a number of works, historical and philosophical.
[334] Canning’s statement was published in the papers on
November 28. It took the form of a letter to Lord Camden laying
the blame on him for the misunderstanding with Lord
Castlereagh.
[335] Lady Elizabeth Foster married William, fifth Duke of
Devonshire, on October 19, 1809.
[336] For the Chancellorship of the University, rendered vacant
by the death of the Duke of Portland on October 30. Lord
Grenville, Lord Eldon, and the Duke of Beaufort were the rival
candidates.
[337] Martin Davy (1763–1839). He was elected Master of
Caius in 1803, and held that position until his death. He was a
staunch Whig, and was given a living near Cambridge in 1827.
[338] A town in Portugal, one of the sights of which is a
magnificent cathedral.
[339] Lady Anne Fitzpatrick, and her father, Lord Upper Ossory.
[340] An amendment to the Address was moved in both
Houses, deploring the ill-success of the late expeditions, and
demanding an inquiry into the reasons of their failure. Creevey
says in his journal (Creevey Papers, i. 123): ‘Notwithstanding
Tierney’s calculations and prophecy that we should be in a
majority, we were beat by ninety-six.’
[341] The figures were 144 to 92, against the Amendment.
[342] His motion was, ‘To appoint a Committee to inquire into
the policy and conduct of the late expedition to the Scheldt.’
[343] William Frederick Eden, eldest son of William, first Lord
Auckland. He was born in 1782, and was, at the time of his
death, Deputy-Teller of the Exchequer.
[344] Domingo Antonio de Souza, Marquis de Funchal (1765–
1832), Portuguese Ambassador in England.
[345] William Windham died on June 4, 1810, from the effects
of a severe operation for a tumour on his hip. About a year before
he had sustained an injury from some falling woodwork, when
engaged in trying to save from fire a valuable library belonging to
his friend the Hon. Frederick North, and on this the disease
fastened.
Windham’s father, Colonel Windham, married, after his first
wife’s death, Sarah Hicks, widow of Robert Lukin, of Dunmow. To
a nephew by this connection, Captain (afterwards Admiral) Lukin,
Windham left his property on condition he took the family name.
His diary was published by Mrs. Henry Baring in 1866.
[346] As Chancellor of Oxford University.
[347] Henrietta Elizabeth, eldest daughter of the Hon. Edward
Bouverie. She married, in 1790, James St. Clair Erskine, second
Earl of Rosslyn.
[348] John Clerk, of Eldin (1728–1812), seventh son of Sir
John Clerk, of Penicuik. He lived about six miles from Edinburgh.
He was the author of An Essay on Naval Tactics, which he claimed
had much effect on the warfare of the day.
[349] Queen Mary’s remains were removed to Westminster in
1612.
[350] Holland House.
[351] General Fox was appointed Governor of Portsmouth in
1808, on his return from Sicily, and died there three years later.
[352] General Sir Ronald Craufurd Ferguson (1773–1841), son
of William Ferguson, of Raith. He saw much service, and sat for
many years as a Whig in the House of Commons. The
appointment, which he was obliged to relinquish at Cadiz, was
that of second-in-command.
[353] Charles Fox entered the Navy in 1809, but disliked the
life so much that he left in 1813, and entered the sister service
two years later.
[354] The whole building was restored and remodelled by
Street in 1866, and now forms the garrison church.
[355] Captain Graham Moore (1764–1843), afterwards Admiral
Sir Graham Moore, G.C.B., third son of Dr. John Moore. He was in
command of the English squadron which escorted the Regent of
Portugal to Brazil, and was for some years a Lord of the
Admiralty.
[356] James Moore (1763–1834), second son of Dr. John
Moore. He was a surgeon, and wrote two books on his brother’s
life and campaign.
[357] Dom John was appointed Regent of Portugal in 1799, on
account of his mother Queen Maria I.’s insanity. In conformance
with Napoleon’s orders he proclaimed in November 1807, that he
was about to detain all British subjects and property in Lisbon,
upon which the British Minister, Lord Strangford, at once went on
board the fleet, and broke off diplomatic relations. On
consideration, however, the Regent preferred to remain friendly
with the English and move the Court to Brazil; consequently Lord
Strangford returned, but not till after the Portuguese royal family
had already embarked. This is the point here insisted upon, for
Lord Strangford was accused of inferring in his despatch that the
departure of the Court was chiefly due to his own
representations.
[358] Mariano Luis Urquijo (1768–1817), Spanish statesman,
who acted in opposition to the Prince of the Peace and was
imprisoned by him for two years. After the detention of the Royal
family, he gave up hope for Spain, and sided with Joseph, with
whom he fled to France.
[359] Admiral Lord Amelius Beauclerk, G.C.B. (1771–1846),
third son of Aubrey, fifth Duke of St. Albans, and Catherine,
daughter of William, Earl of Bessborough.
[360] Admiral Sir Roger Curtis, Bart. (1746–1816), naval
commander-in-chief at Portsmouth.
[361] Ferdinand of Naples withdrew to Sicily in 1805, and there
established himself with his Court under British protection.
[362] Lord Amherst was Commander-in-Chief in Sicily.
[363] Attorney-General in Lord Grenville’s Administration.
[364] The French army of 72,000 men under Masséna invaded
Portugal early in September. Wellington had only 50,000 men at
his disposal; half of whom were Portuguese. He retreated before
the invaders, but was able to deliver a severe check to their
advance, at Busaco, on September 27, with but little loss to his
own force.
[365] The critical state of the King’s mind was adversely
affected by the illness of Princess Amelia. After her death, on
November 2, he became permanently insane.
[366] Yet Masséna represented to Napoleon some weeks later
that the frontal attack on the British position was only a feint,
which had developed from over-keenness into a general
engagement. His dispatches, however, captured after the action,
made no mention of this fact (Sir Herbert Maxwell’s Life of
Wellington).
[367] Afterwards Sir Thomas Tyrwhitt, and Black Rod.
[368] George Ponsonby.
[369] It is impossible to trace so extended an interpretation in
the report of the speech given in Hansard, though a veiled
meaning is possible in some of his carefully worded allusions to
the royal power.
[370] The ordinary composition of the Cortes was a three-
chamber assembly consisting of clergy, nobility, and commons.
The Central Junta, in whom the power of calling together the
Cortes rested, decided that as a compromise with the extreme
party of reform, only two chambers (the higher clergy and nobility
sitting together in one) should be summoned to assemble early in
March. The advance of the French, however, postponed the
meeting, and the supreme government was placed in the hands
of a Regency of five. These took good care to keep the power as
long as possible, and when the Cortes was at last found
necessary, only one chamber could be elected, and that within
the boundaries of Cadiz, for the French were almost at their
gates. See Appendix B, p. 297.
[371] General Sir Robert Wilson (1777–1849), author of The
History of the British Expedition to Egypt. He served both in the
British army and in various continental corps. He was dismissed
the service in 1820 for his supposed conduct at Queen Caroline’s
funeral, but was reinstated by William IV.
His Lusitanian Legion was amalgamated with the Portuguese
army during its reorganisation.
General Drouet joined Masséna with the Ninth corps, forcing
Wilson across the Mondego, from fear of being surrounded.
[372] Sir Robert’s affair at Puerto de Baños was an attempt to
check Ney, at the head of a large force, with a number of Spanish
and Portuguese levies. He lost a thousand men in the attempt.
[373] Huskisson resigned his post at the Treasury in 1809, and
followed Canning into retirement. His pamphlet entitled ‘The
Depreciation of the Currency’ received much notice.
[374] One of the gentlemen in attendance on the Prince of
Wales. ‘That warlike scaramouch Macmahon,’ of Peter Pindar. He
died in 1817.
[375] The Committee of the House of Lords was appointed by
ballot, each Peer having the right to send in a list of twenty-one
names. That of the House of Commons was named by the
Chancellor of the Exchequer.
[376] The report of the Bullion Committee, of which Horner
was President, was that paper issues were liable to depreciation
unless convertible at any time into money.
[377] The appointment was not filled up till 1812, when Lord
Hertford accepted the post.
[378] Gustavus IV. (1778–1837), who succeeded his father as
King of Sweden in 1792. His tactless and inconsequent behaviour
so irritated his people that they deposed him in 1809, and gave
the crown to his uncle. After leaving Sweden Gustavus lived
chiefly in Switzerland.
[379] Lucien Bonaparte’s second wife was Madame
Jouberthon, the widow of a stockbroker. He quarrelled with his
brother over this marriage, and after the Duc d’Enghien’s death
went to Italy. He attempted to reach America, but was captured
by an English ship, and after a detention at Malta, was brought to
England. There he remained until 1814.
[380] William, fourth Duke of Queensberry (1724–1810), the
celebrated courtier and roué, known as ‘Old Q.’ The larger portion
of his money was left to Lord and Lady Yarmouth, the latter being
Maria Fagniani, whom the Duke always considered was his
daughter. George Selwyn believed that this lady was his child and
not the Duke’s, and also left her money.
[381] Henry, Duke of Buccleugh became fifth Duke of
Queensberry; Sir Charles Douglas, Marquess of Queensberry; and
Lord Wemyss, Earl of March.
[382] The Duke of York had been compelled to resign this post
in 1809, owing to the scandalous charges brought against him by
Mrs. Clarke.
[383] See Further Memoirs of the Whig Party, p. 39.
[384] Grenville.
[385] Lord William Cavendish Bentinck (1774–1839), second
son of William Henry, third Duke of Portland, who saw much
service in various parts of the world and rose to the rank of
major-general in 1808. He was appointed Envoy and Commander-
in-Chief in Sicily in 1811, and for three years was practically
governor of the island. His sudden departure, after a stay of only
ten days, had the desired effect of alarming the Sicilian Court,
which became much more amenable, after his return, to the
reforms he proposed to introduce. The King was notoriously
incapable of reigning, and the power was in the hands of the
Queen, who detested the English, and was intriguing with the
French.
[386] They were imprisoned for a protest against the illegal
taxation which was being enforced by the Court, but were
released and recalled in January 1812.
[387] Hon. Frederick James Lamb (1782–1853), who was
created Lord Beauvale in 1839, and succeeded his brother as
third and last Viscount Melbourne in 1848.
[388] Afterwards Admiral Sir George Cockburn (1772–1853).
He took Napoleon to St. Helena in 1815, and remained there for a
year as Governor until relieved by Sir Hudson Lowe.
The Commission was to attempt to mediate between Spain and
her American Colonies. The Cortes, however, proved intractable,
and the expedition returned to England in August 1812.
[389] See ante, i. 130.
Transcriber’s Notes:
1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also
govern what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most
countries are in a constant state of change. If you are outside
the United States, check the laws of your country in addition to
the terms of this agreement before downloading, copying,
displaying, performing, distributing or creating derivative works
based on this work or any other Project Gutenberg™ work. The
Foundation makes no representations concerning the copyright
status of any work in any country other than the United States.
1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form,
including any word processing or hypertext form. However, if
you provide access to or distribute copies of a Project
Gutenberg™ work in a format other than “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or
other format used in the official version posted on the official
Project Gutenberg™ website (www.gutenberg.org), you must,
at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a copy,
a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy
upon request, of the work in its original “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or
other form. Any alternate format must include the full Project
Gutenberg™ License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
• You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive
from the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using the
method you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The
fee is owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark,
but he has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to
the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty
payments must be paid within 60 days following each date on
which you prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your
periodic tax returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked
as such and sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation at the address specified in Section 4, “Information
about donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation.”
• You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works.
1.F.
Our website is not just a platform for buying books, but a bridge
connecting readers to the timeless values of culture and wisdom. With
an elegant, user-friendly interface and an intelligent search system,
we are committed to providing a quick and convenient shopping
experience. Additionally, our special promotions and home delivery
services ensure that you save time and fully enjoy the joy of reading.
textbookfull.com