100% found this document useful (1 vote)
31 views

Full download Digitalization in Construction 1st Edition Angenette Spalink pdf docx

Digitalization

Uploaded by

lososfalkai
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (1 vote)
31 views

Full download Digitalization in Construction 1st Edition Angenette Spalink pdf docx

Digitalization

Uploaded by

lososfalkai
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 55

Experience Seamless Full Ebook Downloads for Every Genre at textbookfull.

com

Digitalization in Construction 1st Edition


Angenette Spalink

https://textbookfull.com/product/digitalization-in-
construction-1st-edition-angenette-spalink/

OR CLICK BUTTON

DOWNLOAD NOW

Explore and download more ebook at https://textbookfull.com


Recommended digital products (PDF, EPUB, MOBI) that
you can download immediately if you are interested.

Advances in Information Systems Development Designing


Digitalization Bo Andersson

https://textbookfull.com/product/advances-in-information-systems-
development-designing-digitalization-bo-andersson/

textboxfull.com

5G Core Networks Powering Digitalization 1st Edition


Stefan Rommer

https://textbookfull.com/product/5g-core-networks-powering-
digitalization-1st-edition-stefan-rommer/

textboxfull.com

Human Resource Management and Digitalization 1st Edition


Franca Cantoni

https://textbookfull.com/product/human-resource-management-and-
digitalization-1st-edition-franca-cantoni/

textboxfull.com

Business Digitalization : Corporate Identity and


Reputation 1st Edition Pantea Foroudi

https://textbookfull.com/product/business-digitalization-corporate-
identity-and-reputation-1st-edition-pantea-foroudi/

textboxfull.com
101 Case Studies in Construction Management 1st Edition
Len Holm

https://textbookfull.com/product/101-case-studies-in-construction-
management-1st-edition-len-holm/

textboxfull.com

Soils and Geotechnology in Construction 1st Edition Alan


J. Lutenegger

https://textbookfull.com/product/soils-and-geotechnology-in-
construction-1st-edition-alan-j-lutenegger/

textboxfull.com

BASICS Construction Concrete Construction Katrin Hanses

https://textbookfull.com/product/basics-construction-concrete-
construction-katrin-hanses/

textboxfull.com

Leadership and Digital Change The Digitalization Paradox


Einar Iveroth

https://textbookfull.com/product/leadership-and-digital-change-the-
digitalization-paradox-einar-iveroth/

textboxfull.com

The Pseudo Cleft Construction in English 1st Edition F. R.


Higgins

https://textbookfull.com/product/the-pseudo-cleft-construction-in-
english-1st-edition-f-r-higgins/

textboxfull.com
Spon Research

DIGITALIZATION IN
CONSTRUCTION
RECENT TRENDS AND ADVANCES
Edited by
Chansik Park, Farzad Pour Rahimian, Nashwan Dawood,
Akeem Pedro, Dongmin Lee, Rahat Hussain,
and Mehrtash Soltani
Digitalization in Construction

This book highlights the latest trends and advances in applications of digital technologies
in construction engineering and management. A collection of chapters is presented,
explicating how advanced technological solutions can innovatively address challenges
and improve outcomes in the construction industry. Promising technologies that are
highlighted include digital twins, virtual reality, augmented reality, artificial intelligence,
robotics, blockchain, and distributed ledger technologies. The first section presents recent
applications of extended reality technologies for construction education and advanced
project control. The subsequent chapters explore Artificial Intelligence (AI), blockchain,
and BIM-enabled digitalization in construction through a series of case studies, reviews,
and technical studies. Innovative technologies and digitalized solutions are proposed for
improved design, planning, training, monitoring, inspection, and operations management
in Architectural, Engineering and Construction (AEC) contexts. In addition to the
technological perspectives and insights presented, pressing issues such as decarbonization,
safety, and sustainability in the built environment are also discussed.
This book provides foundational knowledge and in-depth technical studies on
emerging technologies for students, academics, and industry practitioners. The research
demonstrates how the effective use of new technologies can enhance work methods,
transform organizational structures, and bring profound advantages to construction
project participants.
Spon Research

Publishes a stream of advanced books for built environment researchers and profes­
sionals from one of the world’s leading publishers. The ISSN for the Spon Research
programme is ISSN 1940-7653 and the ISSN for the Spon Research E-book programme
is ISSN 1940-8005
The Connectivity of Innovation in the Construction Industry
Edited by Malena Ingemansson Havenvid, Åse Linné, Lena E. Bygballe and Chris Harty
Contract Law in the Construction Industry Context
Carl J. Circo
Corruption in Infrastructure Procurement
Emmanuel Kingsford Owusu and Albert P. C. Chan
Improving the Performance of Construction Industries for Developing Countries
Programmes, Initiatives, Achievements and Challenges
Edited by Pantaleo D Rwelamila and Rashid Abdul Aziz
Work Stress Induced Chronic Diseases in Construction
Discoveries Using Data Analytics
Imriyas Kamardeen
Life-Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Commercial Buildings
An Analysis for Green-Building Implementation Using A Green Star Rating System
Cuong N. N. Tran, Vivian W. Y. Tam and Khoa N. Le
Data-driven BIM for Energy Efficient Building Design
Saeed Banihashemi, Hamed Golizadeh and Farzad Pour Rahimian
Successful Development of Green Building Projects
Tayyab Ahmad
BIM and Construction Health and Safety
Uncovering, Adoption and Implementation
Hamed Golizadeh, Saeed Banihashemi, Carol Hon and Robin Drogemuller
Digitalisation in Construction
Recent Trends and Advances
Edited by Chansik Park, Farzad Pour Rahimian, Nashwan Dawood, Akeem Pedro,
Dongmin Lee, Rahat Hussain, Mehrtash Soltani
Digitalization in Construction
Recent Trends and Advances

Edited by Chansik Park,


Farzad Pour Rahimian, Nashwan Dawood,
Akeem Pedro, Dongmin Lee, Rahat Hussain,
and Mehrtash Soltani
First published 2024
by Routledge
4 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN
and by Routledge
605 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10158
Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business
© 2024 selection and editorial matter, Chansik Park, Farzad Pour Rahimian,
Nashwan Dawood, Akeem Pedro, Dongmin Lee, Rahat Hussain and Mehrtash Soltani;
individual chapters, the contributors
The right of Chansik Park, Farzad Pour Rahimian, Nashwan Dawood, Akeem Pedro,
Dongmin Lee, Rahat Hussain and Mehrtash Soltani to be identified as the authors of the
editorial material, and of the authors for their individual chapters, has been asserted in
accordance with sections 77 and 78 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in
any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter
invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or
retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers.
Trademark notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered
trademarks, and are used only for identification and explanation without intent to
infringe.
British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library
Library of Congress Cataloguing-in-Publication Data
Names: Park, Chansik, editor. | Rahimian, Farzad Pour, editor. | Dawood, Nashwan,
editor. | Pedro, Akeem, editor. | Lee, Dongmin (Professor of architecture and building
science) editor. | Hussain, Rahat, editor. | Soltani, Mehrtash, editor.
Title: Digitalization in construction : recent trends and advances / edited by Chansik
Park, Farzad Pour Rahimian, Nashwan Dawood, Akeem Pedro, Dongmin Lee, Rahat
Hussain, Mehrtash Soltani.
Description: Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY : Routledge, 2024. |
Series: Spon research | Includes bibliographical references and index.
Identifiers: LCCN 2023026759 (print) | LCCN 2023026760 (ebook) | ISBN 9781032517896
(hardback) | ISBN 9781032528892 (paperback) | ISBN 9781003408949 (ebook)
Subjects: LCSH: Building information modeling. | Construction industry--
Management--Data processing.
Classification: LCC TH438.13 .D54 2024 (print) | LCC TH438.13 (ebook) | DDC
624.0285--dc23/eng/20231019
LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2023026759
LC ebook record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2023026760
ISBN: 978-1-032-51789-6 (hbk)
ISBN: 978-1-032-52889-2 (pbk)
ISBN: 978-1-003-40894-9 (ebk)
DOI: 10.1201/9781003408949
Typeset in Times New Roman
by MPS Limited, Dehradun
Contents

Preface viii
Editors’ Biographies ix
Contributors xi

1 Multi-user Virtual Reality-Based Design Review of Students’


Construction Designs 1
MEINHARDT THORLUND HAAHR

2 Towards Personalized Mixed Reality-Based Learning


Experience in Construction Education 20
OMOBOLANLE OGUNSEIJU, NIHAR JAMES GONSALVES,
ABIOLA ABOSEDE AKANMU, AND DIANA BAIRAKTAROVA

3 Marker-Based Augmented Reality Framework for Checking


the Installation Status of Onsite Components 39
HUNG PHAM, LINH NGUYEN, MAN-WOO PARK, AND CHAN-SIK PARK

4 Schedule-Driven BIM Model Breakdown Framework


for Construction Monitoring with Augmented Reality 60
THAI-HOA LE, YUN TING SHIH, AND JACOB J. LIN

5 Building Information Model Visualisation in


Augmented Reality 75
VISHAK DUDHEE AND VLADIMIR VUKOVIC

6 Conceptual Framework for Safety Training for Migrant


Construction Workers Using Virtual Reality Techniques 93
RAHAT HUSSAIN, AKEEM PEDRO, SYED FARHAN ALAM ZAIDI,
MUHAMMAD SIBTAIN ABBAS, MEHRTASH SOLTANI, AND CHANSIK PARK
vi Contents

7 Automated Data Retrieval Solution from BIM Using


AI Voice Assistant 104
FARIS ELGHAISH, JATIN KUMAR CHAUHAN, SANDRA MATARNEH,
FARZAD POUR RAHIMIAN, AND M REZA HOSSEINI

8 BIM-VR Integration for Infrastructure Asset Management:


A Systematic Review 126
RHIJUL SOOD AND BOEING LAISHRAM

9 Verification and Validation of a Framework for Collaborative


BIM Implementation, Measurement and Management (CIMM) 147
ANDREW PIDGEON

10 BIM Adoption Issues in Infrastructure Construction Projects:


Analysis and Solutions 173
ANDREW PIDGEON AND NASHWAN DAWOOD

11 A Review of Barriers and Enablers of the BIM Adoption


in Quality Management System 201
NANDINI SHARMA AND BOEING LAISHRAM

12 Transforming Construction Site Safety with iSAFE:


An Automated Safety Management Platform 213
CHANSIK PARK, MEHRTASH SOLTANI, AKEEM PEDRO, JAEHUN YANG,
DOYEOP LEE, AND RAHAT HUSSAIN

13 BIM with Blockchain for Decentralised Circular Construction


Supply Chain 235
FARIS ELGHAISH, M. REZA HOSSEINI, TUBA KOCATURK,
MEHRDAD ARASHPOUR, AND MASOOMEH BARARZADEH LEDARI

14 Developing a Digitized Maintenance Supply Chain System


for Sensitive Assets Using ‘Blockchain of Things’ 260
FARIS ELGHAISH, FARZAD POUR RAHIMIAN, AND NASHWAN DAWOOD

15 Digital Twinning in the Malaysian Construction Industry 271


SHAN JIANCHENG, CHAI CHANG SAAR, AND EEYDZAH AMINUDIN

16 Electromyography-Based Action Recognition of Construction


Workers Using and Not Using Wearable Robots 294
NIHAR JAMES GONSALVES, OMOBOLANLE OGUNSEIJU, AND
ABIOLA ABOSEDE AKANMU
Contents vii

17 Design and Development of Virtual Reality Environment


for Human-Robot Interaction on Construction Site 311
ADETAYO ONOSOSEN, INNOCENT MUSONDA, CHRISTOPHER DZUWA,
AND RAMABODU MOLUSIWA

18 Application of Blockchain Technology in the Engineering


and Construction Sector: A State-of-the-Art Review 322
ARTURO DE JESÚS MIRANDA, EMMANUEL DANIEL, AND
HAMLET REYNOSO VANDERHORST

Index 345
Preface

The rapid proliferation of digital technologies is heralding unprecedented trans-


formation across diverse industries and sectors. This book highlights the latest trends
and advances in applications of digital technologies in construction engineering and
management. A collection of articles is presented, explicating how advanced techno-
logical solutions can innovatively address challenges and improve outcomes in the
construction industry. Promising technologies that are highlighted include digital twins,
virtual reality, augmented reality, artificial intelligence, computer vision, robotics,
blockchain, and distributed ledger technologies.
The drive towards digital transformation is essential for the construction industry,
which tends to lag behind other industries in terms of labor productivity, safety, and cost
efficiency. Unforeseen disruptions such as the COVID-19 pandemic have shown the need
for construction collaboration, training, monitoring, and contracting innovation. The
immense potential of paradigm-shifting technologies such as artificial intelligence,
computer vision, digital twins, and robotics has been recognized. Their integration into
construction workflows is expected to bring tremendous value to the building industry.
However, many challenges and questions regarding the digitalization of construction
remain unaddressed. Many emerging technological tools and solutions in construction
are still at a low level of maturity, and there is a lack of documented work on how they
can be implemented in practice. Issues such as tool interoperability and concerns
regarding the high cost of entry, worker upskilling, and safety remain underexamined.
This book fills this gap by providing a body of research outputs which showcase state-of-
the-art advances and applications of innovative technologies in construction.
The book comprises 18 chapters. The first chapter provides an overview of the state of
the construction industry through a collection of review papers and qualitative studies.
The subsequent chapters explore applications of innovative technologies through case
studies, review articles, conceptual articles, and technical papers. Innovative technologies
and digitalized solutions are proposed for improved design, planning, training,
monitoring, inspection, and operations management in Architectural, Engineering, and
Construction (AEC) contexts. In addition to the technological perspectives and insights
presented, the last few chapters explore pressing issues such as health and safety in the
built environment.
Chansik Park, Farzad Pour Rahimian, Nashwan Dawood,
Akeem Pedro, Dongmin Lee, Rahat Hussain, Mehrtash Soltani
Editors’ Biographies

Chansik Park is a Professor at the School of Architecture and Building Science and a
former Dean of the Graduate School of Construction Engineering of Chung-Ang
University in South Korea. Professor Park has published over 100 papers in peer-
reviewed journals and conferences internationally and has served editorial board member
and reviewer of many international journals including Automation in Construction and
International Journal of Project Management. He has been the recipient of numerous
academic and professional awards, including the prestigious Elsevier Atlas Award in
recognition of ‘outstanding achievement and significant positive contribution to society’.

Farzad Rahimian is a Professor of Digital Engineering and Manufacturing at Teesside


University, UK. He is the Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Smart and Sustainable Built
Environment and Associate Editor of Automation in Construction. He is the author
and editor of a number of books including Industry 4.0 Solutions for Building Design
and Construction (Routledge, 2019) and Industry 4.0 Solutions for Building Design and
Construction (Routledge, 2021)

Nashwan Dawood is a Professor of Digital Construction in the Centre for Sustainable


Engineering at Teesside University. His expertise is in sustainable infrastructure and in
modelling ways to ensure carbon reduction in construction, housing and engineering
projects. He has long-standing experience in undertaking research projects with major
industrial partners in the areas of 5D modelling, serious game engine technology,
Building Information Modelling, and the application of digital technologies for energy-
efficient buildings.

Akeem Pedro is a Research Associate at Chung-Ang University in Seoul, South Korea.


His research focuses on Technology Enhanced Learning, Interactive Learning
Environments, Knowledge Engineering and Informatics for construction safety and
health. He has published and co-authored over 20 papers in international journals and
conferences, garnering over 900 citations.

Dongmin Lee is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Architecture and Building


Science at Chung-Ang University. His research interests lie in the integration of cons-
truction equipment, method, planning, scheduling, and control to support a better human-
robot collaborative working environment. Dr Lee has published around 40 papers in
various journals and conferences internationally. He has also served as a reviewer of many
international as well as national journals.
x Editors’ Biographies

Rahat Hussain is currently working towards PhD degree at Chung-Ang University in


Seoul, South Korea. His current research works focus on construction informatics,
technology-enhanced education, metaverse, visualization technologies for construction
safety, education, and management.

Mehrtash Soltani earned his PhD from the University of Malaya in Malaysia. With over a
decade of research expertise in building materials, waste management, and construction
safety management, he currently serves as a research associate at ConTi Lab, located
at Chung-Ang University in Seoul, South Korea.
Contributors

Abbas Muhammad Sibtain, Chung-Ang University, South Korea


Akanmu Abiola Abosede, Myers Lawson School of Construction, Virginia Tech,
Blacksburg, VA, USA
Aminudin Eeydzah, School of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti
Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai Johor, Malaysia
Arashpour Mehrdad, Department of Civil Engineering, Monash University, Australia
Bairaktarova Diana, Department of Engineering Education, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg,
VA, USA
Chauhan Jatin Kumar, School of Natural and Built Environment, Queen’s University
Belfast, United Kingdom
Daniel Emmanuel, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, United Kingdom
Dawood Nashwan, School of Computing, Engineering and Digital Technologies, Teesside
University, Middlesbrough, UK
Dudhee Vishak, School of Computing, Engineering and Digital Technologies, Teesside
University, Middlesbrough, UK
Dzuwa Christopher, Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment, University of
Johannesburg, South Africa
Elghaish Faris, School of Natural and Built Environment, Queen’s University Belfast,
United Kingdom
Gonsalves Nihar James, Myers-Lawson School of Construction, Virginia Tech,
Blacksburg, VA, USA
Haahr Meinhardt Thorlund, University College of Northern Denmark (UCN), Aalborg,
Denmark
Hosseini M Reza, School of Architecture and Building, Deakin University, Australia
Hussain Rahat, Chung-Ang University, South Korea
Jiancheng Shan, Faculty of Engineering, Computing and Science, Swinburne University
of Technology Sarawak Campus, Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia
xii Contributors

Kocaturk Tuba, School of Architecture and Built Environment, Deakin University,


Australia
Laishram Boeing, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Guwahati, Assam, India
Le Thai-Hoa, Department of Civil Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taiwan
Ledari Masoomeh Bararzadeh, Energy Department, Sharif University of Technology,
Tehran, Iran
Lee Doyeop, Chung-Ang University, South Korea
Lin Jacob J., Department of Civil Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taiwan
Matarneh Sandra, Faculty of Engineering, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman,
Jordan
Miranda Arturo De Jesús, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, United
Kingdom
Molusiwa Ramabodu, Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment, University of
Johannesburg, South Africa
Musonda Innocent, Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment, University of
Johannesburg, South Africa
Nguyen Linh, Myongji University, South Korea
Ogunseiju Omobolanle, School of Building of Construction, College of Design, Georgia
Tech, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Onososen Adetayo, Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment, University of
Johannesburg, South Africa
Park Chan-Sik, Chung-Ang University, South Korea
Park Man-Woo, Myongji University, South Korea
Pedro Akeem, Chung-Ang University, South Korea
Pham Hung, Eindhoven University of Technology, Netherlands
Pidgeon Andrew Gerard, School of Computing, Engineering and Digital Technologies,
Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK
Rahimian Farzad Pour, School of Computing, Engineering and Digital Technologies,
Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK
Saar Chai Chang, Faculty of Engineering, Computing and Science, Swinburne University
of Technology Sarawak Campus, Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia
Sharma Nandini, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Guwahati, Assam, India
Shih Yun Ting, Department of Civil Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taiwan
Soltani Mehrtash, Chung-Ang University, South Korea
Sood Rhijul, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Guwahati, Assam, India
Contributors xiii

Vanderhorst Hamlet Reynoso, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, United


Kingdom
Vukovic Vladimir, School of Computing, Engineering and Digital Technologies, Teesside
University, Middlesbrough, UK
Yang Jaehun, Chung-Ang University, South Korea
Zaidi Syed Farhan Alam, Chung-Ang University, South Korea
1 Multi-user Virtual Reality-Based Design
Review of Students’ Construction Designs
Meinhardt Thorlund Haahr
University College of Northern Denmark (UCN), Aalborg

1.1 Introduction
A construction process is considered successful if the construction is completed on time,
at the agreed price and quality and with a high degree of customer satisfaction.
Unfortunately, there are many examples of this not being achieved (Shirkavand et al.,
2016). McKinsey reported that 98% of megaprojects are associated with overruns or
delays, with an average cost increase being 80% of original budget and least but not last
with an average delay of 20 months (McKinsey Global Institute, 2015). Among others,
they report the cause being, lack of interdisciplinary collaboration and accumulation of
unresolved issues. According to the report conducted by The Danish Construction
Federation, in collaboration with Chalmers University in Gothenburg and the company
BIMobject, the Danish private construction sector can save up to 10.5 billion DKK
(approximately 1.41 billion Euro) by proper use of digital tools and improving com-
munication in the design phase of a construction project (Malmgreen, 2020). Among
other things, they conclude that economic profit can be gained in the transition between
design and construction phases. Here, several ambiguities often arise between consultants
and contractors, leading to misunderstandings and disagreements between the partners.

1.1.1 Communication
Communication, especially information delivery, depends on the context in which the
information is presented, the background of the sender and receiver as well as their
natural environment (Berlo, 1960). For information to be delivered, it must be concep-
tualized and coded in the form of language, text and/or a medium. The prerequisite for
encoding and decoding to be successful is familiarity with the codes that apply in the
culture, in which the communication takes place (Hall, 1980). Design and construction of
buildings and especially its building services are interdisciplinary and complex processes,
as each building is unique, the partners are many, with different educational backgrounds
and change from project to project. Finally, several of the stakeholders, such as users and
the client, are not necessarily building professionals.

1.1.2 Design Review


During the design process, design reviews are conducted in order to detect omissions and
defects, also referred to as issues. Design and execution of building is a complex process,
as each building is unique, and the partners are many and different from project to
project. The current design and review processes in the design phase are predominantly

DOI: 10.1201/9781003408949-1
2 Meinhardt Thorlund Haahr

Figure 1.1 Abstraction pyramid – inspired by Kjems (2000).

communicated via media such as Building Information Model (BIM), design review in
the construction phase is predominantly communicated via media such as 2D drawings
and descriptions and to a lesser extent 3D models. (Haahr et al., 2019; Johansson and
Roupé, 2019). According to space cognition theory (Golledge, 1991), which is grounded
in visuospatial skills, processing and working memory, information delivery in current
media is abstract (Figure 1.1). They place high demands on the individual actor’s ability
to encode and decode information, and as consequence a higher cognitive workload for
the actor (Johansson and Roupé, 2019; Kwiatek et al., 2019).

1.1.3 Virtual Reality


Virtual reality (VR) offers a solution to this problem. By using VR, it is possible to
achieve a more natural and intuitive design review in a size ratio of 1:1, similar to that
used in erected buildings. The goal is that the technology will result in actors arriving at
the same conclusions as they would in a real-world investigation. According to Windham
and Liu, VR significantly improves the (1) understanding of space, (2) detecting and
understanding of potential issues and (3) understanding of functionality (Windham and
Liu, 2018). Furthermore, VR gives a common base of reference in a 1:1 scale, which gives
actors from the Architectural Engineering and Construction (AEC) Industry improved
ability to (1) understand the building as whole, (2) decode the intended design compared
to 2D drawings and 3D models in BIM and lastly (3) detect clashes and design errors
before commenced work (Johansson and Roupé, 2019). A literature study conducted by
the author concludes, that existing studies argue that VR can improve design review
process in the designing phase of a building (Haahr, 2021). Furthermore, VR is mature
for use in the industry and that existing research lacks investigation with many actors in a
multidisciplinary environment, which can give more transferable results.
One disadvantage with existing VR is that most commercialized applications only
involve a single user experience. As opposed to multi-user, the common base of reference
is gained individually. From the author’s own observation, collaboration with single-user
experience (1) leads to actors spending shorter time in an immersive VR experience or
Multi-user Virtual Reality Based Design Review 3

(2) rapidly taking off VR equipment, when reviewing a design. Furthermore, VR is


associated with expensive and troublesome setups, which causes resistance to the adop-
tion of the technology. Fortunately, Prospect offers an easy-to-use and multi-user
solution intended for interdisciplinary immersive collaboration, and is supported by
low-priced VR equipment, Oculus Quest 2 (PROSPECT BY IRISVR, 2022).
The aim of this study is to investigate the value of multi-user VR-supported design
review of buildings in a multidisciplinary collaboration.

1.2 Method
The physical frame around this study was at an annual event at UCN, called The Digital
Days (DDD) (de Digitale Dage, 2022). The purpose of DDD is to bring together students
from different education within the AEC industry to design a building, where the main
goal is to learn digital tools centred around BIM. For the event, students from different
disciplines within AEC industry, work in groups, aiming to use digital applications to
design building projects.

1.2.1 Case
The case was a multi-story building with a real client. Each group received the official
material of the Schematic Design, including a Revit model, see Figure 1.2. Within three
days each group move from Schematic Design to Detailed Design, including considera-
tions and a rough design of Architecture, MEP and Structural bearing system. Each
group had a supervisor from the local AEC industry, which supported the group with his
own experience and knowledge from the AEC industry. The groups compete in making
the best project, by exploring methods, digital applications and collaboration. Before and
during the event, various presentations are held by companies, which are to inspire the
students in their work.

Figure 1.2 An extract of the Revit model and shows a 3D view, ground floor, first floor and second
floor.
4 Meinhardt Thorlund Haahr

Figure 1.3 An overview of data collected during this study.

1.2.2 Data Collection


This year had particular focus on VR, which included two intensive days of VR prior to
the DDD competition. This included different lectures in the use of VR, both theoretical
and practical from two Danish companies. The theoretical lectures focused on the
technology and existing studies on VR in the AEC industry, whereas the practical lectures
focused on the practical use-case and value of VR based on their experience within the
AEC industry. To get some hands-on experience, the students were introduced to dif-
ferent applications for issue detecting and handling, among here Navisworks for clash
detection and Prospect for immersive and collaborative design review.
For this study, data were collected during and after the three days of competition, as
shown in Figure 1.3. During the DDD competition, a VR room was set up for voluntary
design review. The VR room consisted of four sets of Oculus Quest 2 (OQ) for use in
Prospect, furthermore, students could also participate with they’re desktop (DT). Data
was collected through three sources.

1 Observation during the design review sessions: During the observation, quantitative data
was noted, such as number of OQ and DT users as well as time used. Furthermore,
qualitative data was also noted, such as how the design review process proceeded as well
as interactions, statements, announcements and body language between VR users.
2 Issue report from design reviews: Groups that used the issue-handling tool built in
Prospect, handed in their issue report, which consisted of qualitative data, such as
number, discipline, type and priority of issues.
3 Survey: A survey was conducted after the competition and use of VR room. It consists
of both qualitative and quantitative data related to their individual opinion regarding
VR and experience during the VR introduction and/or VR room.

1.3 Results
During the competition period, a total of eight design review sessions were conducted, see
Table 1.1. The sessions were conducted in the VR room by different groups during the
DDD. In total 25 users participated in a total time of 201 minutes, 18 OQ and 7 DT
users. On average, rounded to whole persons, in total three users, two OQ and one DT, in
a 25-minute session.
Multi-user Virtual Reality Based Design Review 5

Table 1.1 Overview of multi-user VR-supported design review session

Session Oculus Desktop Total Time Process Issues


Quest
No. No. of Users Minutes Documentation Approach No. Per Minute

1 4 2 6 39 BCF Digital Structured 19 0.49


2 2 0 2 15 No Analog Semi
3 2 1 3 20 Screenshot Digital Semi
4 1 1 2 25 BCF Digital Structured 6 0.24
5 2 0 2 15 No Analog Non
6 1 1 2 40 BCF Digital Structured 15 0.38
7 3 1 4 22 BCF Digital Structured 8 0.36
8 3 1 4 25 Hand notes Analog Non
Total 18 7 25 201 48
Average 2 1 3 25 12 0.37

Session 1 was the greatest and one of the longest sessions, with a total of six users, four
OQ users and two DTs, and 39 min long. The longest session was 40 minutes, which was
conducted in session 6. On the other hand, in four sessions only two users were partic-
ipating, in which two sessions had two OQ users and the other two sessions had one OQ
and one DC user. In the case of two OQ users, the sessions lasted 15 minutes, which was
the two shortest sessions conducted.

1.3.1 Design Review Process


As mentioned in Section 1.2, the VR-supported design reviews were optional for the
students participating in DDD, where the main objective of DDD is to learn digital
solutions based on hands-on experience and own reflections. Therefore, no instruction
was given on how to perform design reviews in VR. As shown in Table 1.1, in six out of
eight sessions, at least one DT user was participating. Interestingly enough, in all six
sessions, the role of the DT user was to document the issues detected by the OQ user(s). In
all eight sessions, the role of the OQ user was to review the models and detect issues.
The documentation for registered issues was handled in four different ways, Building
Collaboration Format (BCF), screenshots, hand notes or no documentation. In four out
of eight sessions, the detection of issues was documented in the issue-handling tool in
Prospect, in which supports BCF. This allows the users to create a so-called issue, which
among other things saves the location of the issue in the 3D model, screenshot including
any animation (left and right, Figure 1.4) and/or measurements (left, Figure 1.5) created
in VR, description, status and to assign responsibility to a project participant. In session 3
the documentation consisted of DT users taking screenshots in Prospect and reporting
and describing the issues in a Word document. In session 8, the documentation consisted
of DT user taking analogy hand notes on a piece of paper. Common for both sessions 2
and 5 was that no documentation was conducted. Interestingly, these were also the only
two sessions where no DT user participated. Even though, this does not mean that the
design review session was useless. In both sessions, the users gain an improved under-
standing of the project and issues were also detected. For instance, in session 5, when
looking at a bearing beam, one OQ user states “This one is too high up”. Furthermore,
during another conversation, one OQ user states “The suspended ceiling is floating and
6 Meinhardt Thorlund Haahr

Figure 1.4 Examples of issue registration in Prospect. (Left) Hard class between ventilation duct
and ceiling in session 5. (Right) Omission of stair rail from session 6. The animation
shows where stair railing is to be placed.

Figure 1.5 Examples of issue registration from session 1in Prospect. (Left) An issue from poor
accessibility in the kitchen, including a measurement supporting the claim. (Right)
An issue of wrong choice of material in the bathroom floor.

also it must be lowered”, and the other one answers “The models off-set is completely
wrong”. Lastly, when finishing the design review one OQ user states “We made a mess”,
where he implies that there are a lot of problems they have not noticed when designing
and reviewing the project in Revit.
Three different approaches were observed, structured, semi-structured and non-
structured. In four out of eight sessions, a structured approach was conducted. In the
structured approaches, the participants had made a detailed plan of the design review
session in advance, which included they had prioritized and scheduled walking path as
well as a prepared list of point of interest to be reviewed in a joint force. For instance,
in session 1 they start with the first room on the ground floor and begin with the first
thing on the list, which in this particular case was collisions. In two out of eight ses-
sions, the approaches were non-structured. In the non-structured approaches, there was
no plan for the design review session. The participants started walking in random
directions and walked around looking announcing what caught the eye. In the semi-
structured approaches, there was not necessarily a plan in advance, but during the
design review session, the participants, especially the DT, felt a need to start structuring
the process. This was mainly because it was difficult for the DT to keep track of the
issues being reported.
Multi-user Virtual Reality Based Design Review 7

1.3.2 Issue Report


As shown in Table 1.1, in four out of eight sessions, the issue report was documented
using issue-handling tool in Prospect. In Figures 1.4–1.6, six examples of issues from the
issue report are shown. In this section, these issues are analysed and classified. In total 48
issues were registered in the four sessions. In session 1 a total amount of 19 issues was
registered and in relation to effectiveness 0.49 issues were registered per minute, which
was the highest score in relation to total amount and effectiveness. In session 4 total
amount of six issues were registered and in relation to effectiveness, 0.24 issues were
registered per minute, which was the lowest score in relation to total amount of effec-
tiveness. On average a total of 12 issues were registered whereas 0.37 issues were regis-
tered per minute.
Going through all the issue reports, the issues were categorized in relation to type,
discipline and priority. For each category issues were classified, as shown in Table 1.2.

1.3.2.1 Type of Issue


Four different types of issues were identified and classified as follows.
Omission was used when something is missing from the model. A total of 12 issues
were classified as omissions. Among these issues the description was “Missing suspended
ceiling” or “Missing stair rail”, an example is shown in Figure 1.4 (right).
Accessibility was used for one single issue, which was described as “Kitchen
Accessibility”, this example is shown in Figure 1.5 (left). This issue was also noted in the
observation in session 1, as one user moved into the kitchen and stated that there was not

Figure 1.6 Examples of issue registration in Prospect. (Left) Collisions with elevator shaft and
ventilation in session 1. (Right) Collision with elevator shafts and ventilation in section
session 4.

Table 1.2 Shows issue report from Prospect, categorized by type, discipline and priority

Type No. Per cent Discipline No. Per cent Priority No. Per cent

Omission 12 25% Architecture 35 73% Trivial 12 25%


Accessibility 1 2% MEP 11 23% Low 4 8%
Hard Clash 5 10% Structural 2 4% Medium 12 25%
Defect 30 63% High 13 27%
Critical 7 15%
Total 48 100% 48 100% 48 100%
8 Meinhardt Thorlund Haahr

enough space for proper passage in the kitchen. This was followed up by a measurement
in VR, that confirms his claim. This issue was then registered in the issue report as
“Kitchen Accessibility”.
Hard clash was used when two or more objects collide in the model, an example is
shown in the left picture of Figure 1.4. A total of five issues were classified as hard clash.
In all five cases, the issue consisted of MEP colliding with other BIM objects, such as
“Collision between ventilation and bearing beam” and “Plumbing colliding with above
floorplan”.
Defect was used when an object has been modelled poorly or misplaced and not
necessarily is clashing. A total of 40 issues were classified as defect, which consisted of
63%. Examples were “Floating Wall”, “Movement of elevator shaft” and “wrong
material”, an example is shown in Figure 1.5 (right) and Figure 1.6 (right and left).

1.3.2.2 Discipline
The issues were classified into three different disciplines, Architectural, Mechanical
Electrical and Plumbing (MEP) and Structural. With a total of 35 issues, Architectural
issues were by far the highest amount registered. Followed by MEP and Structural, which
consisted of respectively 11 and 2 issues. In some cases, it was not clear who was
responsible for correcting the issue. In this case, this was discussed during the design
review sessions.

1.3.2.3 Priority of Issue


The issues were also classified by their priority. (1) Trivial was used for issues that were
easy to fix and needed no interdisciplinary coordination, such as “Ventilation supply
fitting placement” and “missing glazing on the window”. A total of 12 issues were
registered as trivial. (2) Low was used for issues that were easy to fix, but couldn’t
be decided by a single person such as “Placement of suspended ceiling”. A total of
four issues were registered as low. (3) Medium was used for issues that were somewhat
more difficult to fix and affected at least two disciplines. A total of 12 issues were
registered as medium and examples were “Ceiling level height” and “Misplacement of
stair landing”. (4) High was used for issues that were difficult to fix and affected
multiple disciplines. A total of 13 was registered as high and was the highest amount.
Examples were “Ventilation duct rout collides with elevator shaft” and “Floating
Bearing column”. (5) Critical was used for issues that affected multiple disciplines
and in solving the issue, may have caused new issues. Examples were “Movement of
elevator shafts”, see Figure 1.6 (left and right), and “collision between ventilation and
bearing beam”.

1.3.2.4 Model-Confirmation and Solution-Discussing


In the design review sessions, the participants typically reviewed the whole model. In
all eight sessions, there were incidents where participants started addressing solutions
of the registered issues during the design review session, in order to get an agreement
on how to move on. Furthermore, there were many examples of participants con-
firming their model, such as the following statements from an OQ user “The bearing
beam is good enough” or the conversation between an OC and DT user; OQ said “Is
the suspended ceiling not too faar down?” and the DT user replied, “Let me check
Multi-user Virtual Reality Based Design Review 9

that … no, it is good”. It is noteworthy to mention, that confirming the model was
very valuable, however, these confirmations are not shown in the issue report. Lastly,
it was also observed that accessibility was a subject that was often discussed in many
sessions, however, as shown in Table 1.2, only one issue was registered in issue-
handling tool.

1.3.3 Communication and Interaction


During all eight sessions, observations were made of the participants’ interactions,
statements, announcements and body language. It is important to mention, that when a
user in Prospect moved around, the other users could see his orientation and movement.
Furthermore, for OQ users, the movement of hands was also visible for other users,
making it possible to communicate through body language to a degree. In terms of oral
communication, the OQ and DT have built-in speakers and microphone, making it
possible to communicate orally, however, this was not necessary in this study, since
all users in the design review sessions were in the same room, making it possible to
communicate normally.
During the design review sessions, it was noted that in general the communication
and interaction between the participants, especially communication between OQ users,
was reduced to simple and concrete expressions, such as the oral conversation between
three OQ users in session 1:

OQ1 speech: “Try entering here”


OQ1–3 actions: Move with their controllers
OQ2 action: Turns his head facing upwards
OQ2 speech: “Hold on, that is completely wrong”
OQ2 action: rising his hands upwards
OQ1 and 3 action: turn their head facing upward.
OQ3 speech: “There is also something missing”
OQ1 speech: “OK!, this is really bad”

For an outsider, who was not participating in the VR design review session 1, it is
almost impossible to understand what they were communicating. In the first sentence,
OQ1 requested the other users to enter a place “here”. For the OQ users, here was not
difficult to understand, since it was a simple action of following another user using the
controllers. After entering the place referred to, OQ2 detected something when looking
upwards. He then pointed by using his controller and expressed that “something” was
completely wrong. Both OQ1 and OQ3 reacted, by looking in the direction OQ2 pointed.
Both users seemed to easily understand what OQ1 was refereeing to. This led to OQ3 also
expressing that something was also missing, which OQ1 and OQ2 seemed to “silently”
agree with. Lastly, OQ1 stated that this was bad. The above-mentioned example took
place in session 1. The place referred to by OQ1 was the Common Room on Ground
Floor, see Figure 1.2. The “that” referred to by OQ2 was a ventilation colliding with a
bearing beam, see Figure 1.7 (left). The “something” referred to by OQ3 was a missing
suspended ceiling. The “This” referred to a bigger problem including multiple issues that
needed attending to by multiple and interdisciplinary actions.
Another example of simple and concrete expressions is during session 7, where three
OQ and one DT users were participating. In advance of this particular conversation, the
10 Meinhardt Thorlund Haahr

Figure 1.7 Examples of issue registration in Prospect. (Left) An issue during session 1 of a hard
clash between a bearing beam and ventilation. (Right) An issue during session 7 of the
floor deck is missing underneath the door.

OQ user in question wandered alone around to a distant place of the model, while the rest
of the users were busy registering other issues. During this time the OQ user in question
discovered the issue shown in Figure 1.7 (right), in which the floor deck was missing at a
specific location. However, at the moment of time, DT user was busy. After a while, the
conversation started.

DT speech: “Were was it the floor deck was missing?”


OQ1 speech: “How should I explain …”
OQ1 action: stops and thinks a few seconds
OQ1 speech: “I’ll move to the place in question”
OQ1 action: starts move towards the place in question
DT, OQ2 and OQ3 action: starts to follow OQ1.

For an outsider, who was not participating in the VR design review session 7, it is
almost impossible to know where the place in question is located. All the concrete
information we get is that the floor deck is missing somewhere in the model, which is a
fairly broad demarcation. Even though OQ1 knows of the place in question himself, it
is too difficult for him to explain orally. According to Figure 1.1, an explanation
through oral communication requires the coding and decoding between the sender
(OQ1) and receivers (DT, OQ2 and OQ3) on a more abstract level. However, after
some consideration, the OQ1 user decides to move to the place in question. With no
opposition, the rest of the group move to the location. Even though, the oral com-
munication happens in the VR environment, the act of explaining it orally still requires
high abstraction. On the other hand, by moving to the place in question in VR, the act
of delivering information from sender (OQ1) to receivers (DT, OQ2 and OQ3) is
reduced to a simple movement, by pressing the joystick, hence the communication is on
the lowest level of abstraction.
The two above-mentioned examples were but one of many. Other statement examples
are as such; “I’m standing right behind you”, “There’s nothing here”, “That one is too
high up”, “We made a mess” and “It doesn’t connect here”. Furthermore, in general lots
of body language was observed, such as pointing or waving around to address a single
issue or an area with issues and giving direction when guiding another user around in
the model.
Multi-user Virtual Reality Based Design Review 11

1.3.4 Survey
After the two-day’s introduction to VR and optional VR-supported design review ses-
sions during the DDD, a survey was conducted. The purpose was to get the students’
individual viewpoint about the multi-user VR-supported design review. A total of 37
respondents completed the questionnaire, whereas 25 of them participated in the design
review sessions. Even more so two respondents were present at the VR sessions, but did
not participate in the sessions as an OC or DT user. Lastly, ten of the respondents only
participated in the two days of introduction to VR. Twenty-two of the respondents have
experience in the AEC industry were among them 17 have primary experience within the
construction phase. The other 15 of them have no experience prior to their current study,
as shown in Figure 1.8. In relation to respondents that participated in the VR sessions,
the demography of work experience is somewhat similar to the total. Therefore, even
though the respondent in this study are students, many of them still have a significant
amount of practical experience to support their viewpoint.

1.3.4.1 Strengths and Drawbacks


The result in this section is based on all 37 respondents. In the survey, the respondents
were asked to describe strengths and weaknesses in relation to VR in the AEC industry.
The results are coded and summarized in Table 1.3. In general, the strengths are that VR
improves the understanding of the project, especially compared to 2D and desktop ver-
sion of 3D models. For instance, respondent number (RN) 34;

RN 34 states: “It is possible to discover possible errors in buildings, as well as get an


understanding of how the building will appear in the real world. There is a big difference
from a screen in 3D and then standing in the building in a virtual world”.

Figure 1.8 Amount of work experience by the respondents.


12 Meinhardt Thorlund Haahr

Table 1.3 Shows the strengths and drawbacks of VR appointed by the respondents

Strengths No. Drawbacks No.

General Improves understanding 12 General Difficult with new 12


technology
Improved visualisation 8 Value vs cost and use of 9
time
Improved working 5 Time-consuming and 8
process difficult to set up
Superior to 3D 4 Clumsy to use 2
Improved 3 Motion sickness 1
interdisciplinary
cooperation
Superior to 2D 3
Presentation Client 12 AEC Expensive to implement 14
Building contractor 4 Lack of skills in the 12
industry
Investors 3 Resistance of new 7
technology adoption
Sale 3 Conservatism in AEC- 3
industry
Requires broad agreement 2
among the AEC-
industry
Difficult to implement for 2
small and medium-sized
enterprises
Design phase Quality assurance 24 Technology Inferior Clash detection 4
compared to clash
detection algorithms
Design Review 22 Requires a model with high 4
level of LOD
Collision control 4 Difficult to keep track with 1
many users
Model-confirmation 4
Solution-discussing 3
Construction Quality assurance 22
phase
Design Review 16
Building instructions 4

Furthermore, VR improves interdisciplinary cooperation and the working processes


in general. More specific building contractors, clients, investors and sales departments
would particularly benefit from VR. In terms of quality management, the majority of the
respondents point out that VR improves design review and quality assurance in especially
the designing phase and construction phase. Furthermore, strengths such as model
confirmation and solution discussion in the designing phase are also mentioned as well as
building instructions in the construction phase.
On the other hand, drawbacks are also mentioned. The most drawbacks described are
difficulty with new technology, expensive to implement and lack of skills in the industry.
These drawbacks are of a more general in nature and are supported by drawbacks such
as time consuming and difficult to setup, resistance of new technology adoption, con-
servativism in the AEC industry. For instance;
Multi-user Virtual Reality Based Design Review 13

RN 20 “… in order to achieve a proper implementation of VR, it requires a large


knowledge base to, which we currently don’t have”.

Following on from that, nine respondents also point out that it is not known whether
or not the value of the use of VR is good enough when compared to costs and time
consumption.

RN 29 states: “I think it is difficult for companies to know whether it is a good


investment, and I also think that the investment and retraining of employees there is the
biggest challange”.

In relation to the technology, four respondents point out that a model needs a certain
Level of Detail (LOD), for the AEC industry to gain from using VR. Furthermore, four
respondents mentioned that VR was inferior to clash detection compared with clash
detection algorithms such as in Navisworks.

RS 28 states. “It can be difficult to persuade people to use it when, for example, when you
can do clash detection in Navisworks, without the use of VR glasses”.

1.3.4.2 VR versus Traditional Design Review


The result in this section is based on all 37 respondents. When comparing design review carried
out in 2D drawings and 3D view with VR, the bar chart in Figure 1.9. speaks quite unam-
biguously. To a high degree, the respondents either strongly agree or agree, that compared with
both traditional 2D drawings and 3D views, VR gave them (1) a better understanding of the
project as a whole, (2) more spatial understanding of the project, (3) a better understanding
of the interdisciplinary work and (4) a better opportunity to communicate issues.
Although it is worth mentioning that there were significantly more respondents
that are neutral or disagreed when it comes to a better understanding of the inter-
disciplinary work. For instance, compared with 3D view, a total of four respondents
(14.8%) disagreed and five respondents (18.5%) are neutral. It is also worth mentioning
that in relation to communicating in 3D view versus communicating in VR, for each
answer one respondent answered “I don’t know”, “Disagree” and “Neutral”.

1.3.4.3 Value of VR in Design Review Sessions


The result in this section is based on the 27 respondents, who used were presented during
the design review sessions. This section investigates the respondents’ own experience on
the design review sessions described in Sections 3.1 to 3.3, see also Table 1.1.
The results shown in Figure 1.10 speak quite unambiguously, respondents that par-
ticipated in design review sessions aider strongly agree or agree, that (1) reviewing the
project in general gave them value, (2) a lot of issues were detected when reviewing the
model in VR, (3) without VR, they would not detect some issues and (4) reviewing
the project with multiple VR users gave them value. In the survey, there were many
examples supporting these results such as. In relation to value of VR

RN 12: “We found errors that we couldn’t find in 3D Revit, and as an architect it gave me
a better overview”.
14 Meinhardt Thorlund Haahr

Figure 1.9 The degree to which the respondents agree or disagree to the statement listed above the
charts.

RN 15: “Being able to stand inside the building yourself gives a better understanding of
the entire project, and it is much easier to see and to perform a quality assurance on the
building”.
RN 23: “It was great to be able to walk around inside our building. It gave a better
understanding of room size, corridor widths, stairs, ceiling height, etc. in 1:1”.
RN 25: “It added value to the project because we could see and discuss things that were
not visible in our 2D/3D drawings”.

Respondents also mentioned many examples of issues they would not discover without a
VR design review session such as

RN 2: “There were many technical installations that collided. There were building parts
that collided or were not connected”.
RN 12: “we had some ventilation pipes that we had made holes in the walls to
implement. - We then moved these ventilation pipes, and it turned out when we performed
quality assurance in VR that there was still a hole in the wall”.
RN 14: “ … the elevator shaft collided with a ventilation pipe. It would have been
difficult to see in 3D”.
Other documents randomly have
different content
weather, the design was not wholly completed. On the base of this
column was the following inscription, containing the last request of
Napoleon: “I wish my ashes to repose on the banks of the Seine.” A
wharf had been built at this place for the express purpose of landing
the coffin, and here the body of Napoleon first touched the soil of
France. At the extremity of the wharf a Grecian temple, one hundred
feet in height, was erected; and at the end of the bridge of Neuilly
was a colossal statue of the Empress Josephine.
From Paris to Neuilly there extends a beautiful broad avenue,
ornamented with rows of trees and handsome buildings. Along this
road the population of the capital began to throng in immense
multitudes before daylight the next morning. It was computed that
five hundred thousand persons crowded into this avenue on the
morning of the landing of the body. The troops of the National Guard
were drawn up on the bank of the river; prayers were said over the
corpse, and the coffin was borne to the land by twenty-four sailors.
The artillery fired a salute of twenty-one rounds, and the multitudes
that thronged the banks of the river rent the air with their shouts. The
body was then placed in a magnificent catafalque or funeral car,
twenty-five feet in length, with gilt wheels, and decorated with golden
eagles. On the car was a pedestal eighteen feet long and seven feet
high, richly ornamented and hung with gold and purple cloth. On this
pedestal stood fourteen cariatides or columnar human figures of
colossal size, supporting with their heads and hands an immense
golden shield. The coffin was laid on this shield. On the coffin was
placed a rich cushion, sustaining the sceptre, the hand of justice,
and the imperial crown, studded with jewels. The whole formed a
structure fifty feet in height, and was drawn by sixteen black horses,
richly caparisoned, after the manner of the middle ages.
The procession then took up its march for Paris. In the procession
was the war-horse of Napoleon, and five hundred sailors who
accompanied the corpse from St. Helena. The whole avenue to Paris
was lined with troops. Round the great triumphal arch at the
entrance of the city, were lofty masts bearing tri-colored pennants
surrounded with black crape, and exhibiting each the name of some
one of the armies of the Republic or the Empire, as “The Army of the
Rhine”—“The Army of Italy,” &c. On entering the city, the crowd was
so immense that the procession had great difficulty in forcing its way
onward. The number of spectators was estimated at 800,000. This is
equal to the whole population of Paris; yet when we take into the
account the great numbers that resorted to the capital from all parts
of the kingdom to witness so grand and interesting a ceremony, this
estimate does not appear very improbable.
The place destined for the reception of Napoleon’s body was the
Hotel des Invalides, a spacious edifice erected by Louis XIV. as a
residence for veteran soldiers, and a view of which is given in our
preceding number. It is beautifully situated on the river Seine, with a
spacious esplanade in front. In the chapel of this building,
preparations had been made for the funeral service over the body.
The walls were hung with black draperies bordered with silver, and
large lustres were placed between the pillars, contrasting their
brilliant lights with the dark draperies around them. The pillars were
ornamented with gilded trophies, with the names of Napoleon’s
victories, Marengo, Austerlitz, Wagram, &c. The galleries above,
thronged with countless multitudes of spectators, were also hung
with black, with silver and gold emblems, laurels, and golden letters
commemorating the principal acts of the Emperor’s life. Above were
hung an immense number of standards, taken from the enemy in
different battles. In front of the altar was erected a tomb, standing on
pillars and surmounted by an eagle. This structure was of gilt wood,
and only temporary; it is to be replaced by one of the same shape in
marble.
Here were assembled the king, the royal family, and the chief
personages of the court, the Archbishop of Paris and other
dignitaries of the church, and a great number of generals and
veterans of Napoleon’s wars. At two o’clock the procession arrived,
and the body of Napoleon was brought into the chapel. This was the
most impressive part of the whole ceremony. The steps leading to
the choir were lined on both sides by the military and the veteran
invalids, so many of whom had fought under the deceased Emperor.
The whole of the aisle was filled with troops, and the whole body of
the clergy stood in religious silence, waiting to perform the last
offices of religion. The drums rolled, the cannons roared, and the
muffled drums announced the approach of the body. At the sight of
the coffin, surmounted with the imperial crown of Napoleon, the
whole body of spectators appeared to be struck by a sudden thrill.
Every one rose up and bent forward, but not a word was uttered; a
religious silence and awe pervaded the whole multitude!
Mass was then said over the body according to the forms of the
Roman Catholic religion, after which Mozart’s celebrated requiem
was sung by a choir of musicians. The coffin was then sprinkled with
holy water by the Archbishop, and the ceremony concluded. The
crowd remained long in the chapel to satiate their curiosity by gazing
on the splendid decorations of the place and the long vista of funeral
pomp. At length the military succeeded in clearing the chapel of the
throngs of spectators; the people dispersed; and the body of
Napoleon lay once more in the silence of the tomb!
Our Ancestry.

If you were to visit England, you would hardly imagine that the
people there were descended from a variety of nations, some of
them as savage and wild as our American Indians. The English
people have now a pretty uniform appearance, as if they all
descended from one father and mother: they are generally stoutly
made, with ruddy cheeks, light skin, light hair, and full blue eyes;
though black eyes and brown skins are not uncommon. The people
talk one language too—and at first view they seem one great family,
descended from one parentage.
But if we visit different parts of the country, we shall begin to
remark diversities in the appearance of the people, and especially in
their mode of speech. Though they all speak English, yet in one part
they use many strange words that are not used in another part, and
so singular is the mode of speaking in some places that an American
cannot well understand the people. Thus in Lancashire, which
includes Liverpool and the vicinity, the people speak very differently
from what they do in Yorkshire; and yet in both counties the speech
of the common people cannot be understood, till you become
accustomed to it.
All this is easily explained when we look into the early history of
England; for we then find that the present English people are in fact
descended from several different tribes and nations, that settled
upon the island in ancient times. This subject is very interesting in
itself, and it becomes more so to us from the fact that we too are
descended from the English nation, as nearly all our forefathers, who
settled America, came from England. Let us therefore give a little
attention to this subject.
It appears that the first human beings were created in the valley of
the Euphrates, in Asia. Here they increased, and soon spread
themselves in various directions over the earth. About two thousand
years before Christ, they began to cross the Uralian mountains,
which separate Asia from Europe, and to people the latter country.
Like our western settlers who are now pushing farther and farther
into the wilderness, these Asiatic emigrants continued to spread to
the north and west, until the whole northern and middle portions of
Europe were occupied by them. The southern portions of that
quarter of the globe, Spain, Italy, and Greece, were during this same
period filled up by colonists from Asia and Africa.
Thus the whole of Europe was settled, but by very different
classes of nations. Those who dwelt along the border of the
Mediterranean sea, were acquainted with the arts of civilization;
accordingly they settled down in cities, and carried on commerce.
But those who entered Europe across the mountains, and who
occupied Germany, France, Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Russia, and
Britain, were of a very different character. They were somewhat like
the present Tartars of Asia, half warriors and half husbandmen. They
seldom built permanent towns, but usually wandered from one place
to another, taking large flocks of cattle with them, upon which they
chiefly subsisted. Different tribes or nations often met each other in
their migrations, and, as a matter of course, entered into conflict, the
strong robbing and making slaves of the weak.
The number of these rude tribes that came from Asia into Europe
appears to have been great, and the individuals must have
amounted to many millions. Though of one general cast, still they
were divided into separate tribes, and spoke different languages,
and in some respects differed in religion, manners, and customs.
Of all these Asiatic emigrants, the Celts appear to have been the
most numerous. These were the first settlers of ancient Gaul, now
France, Spain, Belgium, and the British isles. When Julius Cæsar,
the Roman general, made war upon Gaul, about sixty years before
Christ, he found the nation to consist wholly of Celts. In general, they
were a barbarous people, rude in their mode of life, superstitious in
religion, and savage in their feelings. They were divided into three
classes: the nobles or warriors, who were the despotic masters of
the common people; the Druids or priests, whom we have described
in a former number; and the mass of the nation, who performed the
common labor of the community.
Among the nobles, there were many claiming to be princes, and
these held the first rank; the people at large had no acknowledged
rights, and were wholly dependent upon their superiors for
protection. There appears to have been no other government than
that of the chiefs of the several tribes, though in important
expeditions they chose a common leader. The Druids, male and
female, exercised supreme authority in religion, and governed to
some extent in civil matters. They possessed some knowledge of
astronomy and other sciences, which they used to secure their
power over the minds of the people.
Among the Celts of France at the time of Cæsar, duels and
drunkenness were common; there were many villages and few cities;
the houses were circular in form, and made of beams, being laid
upon stone, and covered with thatch; the household utensils were
few and poor. Few of the people tilled the soil, the greater part
subsisting upon their flocks. Their beverage was a kind of beer or
mead; the cultivation of the vine was unknown. The rich had gold,
obtained from mines and the sands of rivers.
In battle, the rich wore checked or plaid cloaks over their
shoulders, but no other garment. The common soldiers were almost
naked. They were of high stature and savage features. Their hair
was yellow, long, and matted—giving them a terrible aspect. Their
blind, headlong courage; their immense numbers; the stunning noise
which proceeded from their numerous wild horns and trumpets; their
terrible devastations in passing through a country; their sacrifice of
captives to their deities; their using the skulls of the slain as trophies
and as drinking-cups, all contributed to render them the terror of the
western world. On one occasion, 389 B. C., the Celts or Gauls
entered Italy, advanced towards Rome, sacrificed in battle the flower
of the Roman youth, sacked and burnt the city, and laid siege to the
capitol, which was only delivered by a Roman army under Camillus.
At the period of which we speak, Cæsar found these Gauls a
most formidable people. For nine campaigns they resisted him; but
their long swords of copper could not withstand the steel swords of
the Romans; and besides, their soldiers wanted discipline, harmony,
and unity of action. Cæsar overcame them at last; and then he
turned his armies against the island of Britain.
The people there were Celts, and generally resembled the Gauls.
They were, however, in a still more rude and savage state. Along the
southern border of the island they were most civilized. Here they
wore a dress of their own manufacture, consisting of a square
mantle, which covered a vest and trowsers, or a plaited shirt or tunic.
Their houses, like those of their Gallic neighbors, were of circular
beams, reared upon stone foundations, and covered with straw
thatch. They manured their lands with marl; raised abundance of
wheat, which they kept in dry pits; and were skilful in training horses,
especially for war-chariots.
Farther north, the Britons were much more wild and savage. They
either went naked, or were only clothed in skins; they had no bread,
and lived entirely on the milk or flesh of their flocks. Marriage was
not practised, and children knew not their parents.
Agricultural operations of the Ancient Britons.
Such was the state of things in the year 55 B. C., when Cæsar
first crossed the British channel from Calais, and made his descent
on Britain. As he approached the cliffs of Dover and Deal, he saw
them crowded with armed men, and therefore stood northward and
entered Pegwell bay. He was obliged, however, to land in the face of
the natives, who had watched his motions, and were here ready to
receive him. They filled the air with their hostile arrows; they
approached the water’s edge, and rushing into the waves, met and
struggled furiously with the Roman soldiers in the sea. But their
courage and strength were vain; Roman discipline prevailed, and
Cæsar made good his landing. This first attack was followed by other
expeditions, and Rome, having taken possession of the island, held
it for nearly five hundred years.
During this long period, the manners of the Britons were greatly
changed. The arts of Rome were adopted in the country; towns and
cities were built; Christianity was introduced; and civilization, to a
certain extent, was spread over the island. Thus the original Celtic
Britons became mixed with the Romans, and were partially
Romanized.
But the Roman empire at last became weakened, and tottered to
its fall. The Roman soldiers were called home for the defence of the
capital, and Britain was once more left to herself.
The Romans quitted England about the year 410, and for a time,
the Britons continued in a feverish state of independence, divided
into small republics. But soon these became subject to ambitious
leaders, who involved the people in repeated struggles. Constant
inroads were also made by the Scots and Picts from the north. To aid
in defending the people from these, fifteen hundred Saxons, who
came accidentally to the coast from Sweden and Norway, were
employed by a British chief named Vortigern. In a few years more
Saxons arrived, and in about one hundred and fifty years the whole
island was subjected to these intruders. The Britons fought bravely
for their liberties, but they were divided among themselves, and were
sacrificed piece-meal by the hordes of Saxons that came like
successive waves to overspread the country.
The Saxons, though a brave and warlike race, were savage and
cruel in the extreme. They drove such of the Britons as resisted to
the mountains of Cornwall and Wales, and the adjacent islands,
making slaves of those who submitted. Thus they established their
dominion, and became not only the ruling people in the country, but
the stock which was to give a distinctive character to the nation ever
after. They were a mixture of Angles, Picts, and Saxons, and were,
taken together, called Anglo-Saxons. It is from this race, chiefly, that
the English people, as well as ourselves, derive existence.
Anglo-Saxons.
The Saxons were robust in their make, tall, at least as compared
with the Romans, possessed of fair complexions, blue eyes, and, in
almost all instances, light or sandy hair. They were distinguished,
from the earliest ages, for indomitable courage and great ferocity. In
their social state they acknowledged four ranks or classes of men,
among whom intermarriages rarely, if ever, occurred; namely, their
nobles, their freemen, their freedmen, and their slaves. They were
particularly jealous of the honor of their wives. In ordinary times they
acknowledged no single chief, but were governed by an aristocracy;
from among the members of which, in the event of war, they chose a
king. But the authority of the sovereign lasted only while hostilities
continued: at their close, he returned to his original station among
the nobles.
The Saxons delighted in the perpetration of cruelties, and were
themselves regardless of danger. They carried on their predatory
warfare chiefly by sea; launching their vessels most cheerfully during
the prevalence of the wildest storms, because they took it for granted
that their intended victims would, at such moments, be least
prepared to escape or to resist them. When the first of these bands
arrived in England, they came under the guidance of two nobles,
Hengist and Horsa, whom they had themselves elected as leaders in
a piratical expedition; and whom they continued to obey, only
because the war, in which they became engaged, lasted during the
lifetime of those who began it.

Danes.
The religion of the Anglo-Saxons, as they imported it into Britain,
was a wild and hideous polytheism, which demanded from its
votaries, among other rites, the occasional offering up of human
victims. Of some of their gods we retain a remembrance in the
names which still attach to the days of the week. They worshipped
the Sun, thence our Sunday; the Moon, thence our Monday; Tiw,
thence Tuesday; Woden, thence Wednesday; Thurse, thence
Thursday; Friga, thence Friday; and Saterne, whence Saturday.
About the year 800, the Danes, a nation of sea rovers and
robbers, began to infest England. This country had been divided into
seven kingdoms, called the Saxon Heptarchy; but these had been
condensed into three, and at last the whole Saxon portion of the
nation became subject to one king, for the first time. This king was
Egbert. He died in 836, and the sceptre passing into feeble hands,
the country was exposed to the incursions of the people whom we
have mentioned above.
The Danes came from Norway, Sweden, and Denmark, and in
many respects resembled the Saxons. They were pirates by
profession, who took to themselves the appellation of Sea-kings; and
Europe has never produced a race of men more stained with the
crimes of treachery and cruelty. Not content, like the generality of
savage warriors, to slay, without remorse, all by whom they were
opposed in battle, the Sea-kings appeared to delight in the infliction
of unnecessary torture; razing to the ground every town of which
they obtained possession, and slaughtering men, women, and
children indiscriminately upon its ruins.

Normans.
It would lead us beyond our present limits to detail all the
struggles with these invaders of Britain. It is sufficient to say that they
continued for many years, and spread desolation over the country.
The wars occasioned by the Danes were replete with suffering,
cruelty, and crime. They were finally checked, and many who had
settled in the country were driven away; but others became mingled
with the inhabitants, and made another ingredient in the compound
of British blood and bone.
The last introduction of foreign people into Britain took place in
1066, when William, Duke of Normandy in France, came with an
army, and triumphed over king Harold in the battle of Hastings, and
established himself and his family on the throne. Many French
people came over with William and settled in the country. The
French language became the language of the court and the laws,
and French customs were largely introduced among the people.
From this brief sketch, we can see that the English people derive
their origin from five races: the Celts, Romans, Anglo-Saxons,
Danes, and Normans; and we, descendants of the English, must
look back for our first grandfathers and grandmothers to these
various nations and tribes. It is from them we derive our blood, our
language, and our customs.
It is true that the Anglo-Saxons form the basis of our ancestry: the
mixture of the other races with them is not considerable. Our
language may afford a pretty fair index to the proportion which the
Saxon stock bears to the others. The foundation of our language is
Saxon, and consisting chiefly of the short expressive words called
monosyllables. To this original stock, we have added words from the
Celtic Britons, the Romans, the Danes, and the Norman French. Our
language may be compared to a patched garment, the main cloth of
which is a Saxon texture; but the patches are furnished by the other
nations that have worn it. It is, however, a pretty good language,
after all.
The Month of March.

Of all the months, March is the least of a favorite. It has neither


the brilliant snows of winter, with its keen and bracing breezes, nor
has it the flowers and fruits of the warmer seasons. It is a capricious
mixture of cold and warm, wet and dry, sometimes visiting us with
storms of sleet and snow, and suddenly changing its temper, it
presents us with soft southern breezes, seeming to remind us of
spring.
As far south as Virginia, March seems to bring spring with it, and
many of the flowers venture to peep forth during this month; but even
there, the weather is uncertain. In New England, nothing can exceed
its versatility. Often the sun will rise bright and clear, and the hills will
seem to breathe the atmosphere of spring. But before noon the
scene is entirely changed; dark and heavy clouds come heaving
from the west, the cold wind rises to a gale, and the whole air is filled
with a whirling storm of snow. And thus the sun that rose on the hills,
where spring had apparently began its reign, as it sets, sees these
hills re-conquered by winter, and wearing its white livery in token of
vassalage. So sudden are these changes, that the birds, weather-
wise as they generally are, are often taken by surprise. The blue-
birds, sparrows, and robins are always in haste to get back to their
birth-places, and accordingly, following the retreat of winter, come
northward as fast as the season will permit. But spring and winter
are, in March, like two armies, constantly contending—one prevailing
one day, and the next day giving way before the other. In these
skirmishes of the seasons the birds we mention are often involved,
and it is not seldom that they are glad to escape to the south, till the
conflict of the elements is over, and the triumphant reign of spring is
established.
Nor are the birds alone in suffering from the capricious tricks of
the month of March. It sometimes happens that a Vermont farmer,
tempted by the solid snow-path, and the appearance of steady cold
weather, sets out with his one-horse sleigh upon a journey of a
hundred miles, to Boston. Though it is perhaps the middle of March,
still the traveller’s sleigh glides along as if upon a railroad, and in two
days he reaches Boston. Here he spends a day or two, and then
sets out to return. But what a change has come over the scene! The
wind has veered from north-west to south-west; the snow is melting
and running in rills down the hill-sides, and every time the horse
steps, he is up to his knees in sposh. The traveller with his sleigh
plods on, but, after a severe day’s work, he advances in his journey
but twenty miles. The next day the snow is entirely gone, and he is
obliged to proceed on foot, as you see him in the preceding picture,
his weary horse dragging the sleigh over the grating mud and
stones. After five days of toil he reaches his home, and has the
comfort to be met by his wife and all his neighbors, exclaiming, with
a jeer, “I told you so!”
But although March has thus acquired a character that is not the
best in the world, there are some pleasant things to be said about it.
William Howitt, who takes a cheerful view of almost everything in
nature, admits that “March is a rude and sometimes boisterous
month, possessing many of the characteristics of winter;”—“yet,” he
adds, “it awakens sensations, perhaps, more delicious than the two
following spring months, for it gives us the first announcement and
taste of spring.”
Bryant too—our own poet, and one of the sweetest that ever sung
—finds something pleasant to say of March; a pretty good proof that
nothing is wanting but good humor to render a person always able to
find something agreeable to talk about. See how truly and yet how
pleasantly Bryant describes this capricious month:—
The stormy March has come at last,
With wind, and cloud, and changing skies;
I hear the rushing of the blast,
That through the snowy valley flies.

Ah! passing few are they who speak,


Wild, stormy month, in praise of thee;
Yet, though thy winds are loud and bleak,
Thou art a welcome month to me.

For thou to northern lands again


The glad and glorious sun dost bring,
And thou hast joined the gentle train,
And wear’st the gentle name of spring.

And in thy reign of blast and storm


Smiles many a long, bright, sunny day,
When the changed winds are soft and warm,
And heaven puts on the bloom of May.

The fourth day of this month will be distinguished this year by the
inauguration of William Henry Harrison as President of the United
States. The people of this country chose him to that office last
autumn, and on the fourth day of March he enters upon its duties. He
goes to the capitol at Washington, and in the presence of the
Senate, and a great concourse of people, he takes an oath,
administered by the chief justice of the nation, by which he pledges
himself to use his best efforts to govern the people according to the
laws, and with a view to promote their best happiness.
The Child and the Violets.
“Oh, mother, mother!” said the child,
“I saw the violets blue;
Thousands were there, all growing wild;
Mother, I tell you true!
They sat so close upon the ground,
Here and there, and all around,
It seemed as if they had no stems,
And all the grass was strown with gems.

“‘Whence came ye, flowers?’ I asked them all;


They would not say a word;
Yet something seemed to hear my call,
And near me was a bird.
I turned mine eye,—he flew away,—
Up he went with joyous lay;
And seemed to sing, as high he flew,
‘From yonder sky come violets blue.’”

The mother answered thus the child:


“The bird did tell you true;
These pretty violets, low and wild,
Of heaven’s own azure hue,
Though here they have their bloom and birth,
And draw their sustenance from earth,
Still One, who fills immensity,
Made these sweet flowers for you and me.”
Varieties.

How to sleep in Snow.—The manner in which Captain Ross’


crew preserved themselves, near the north pole, after the shipwreck
of their vessel, was by digging a trench in the snow when night came
on. This trench was covered with canvass and then with snow. The
trench was made large enough to contain seven people; and there
were three trenches, with one officer and six men in each. At
evening, the shipwrecked mariners got into bags, made of double
blanketing, which they tied round their necks, and thus prevented
their feet from slipping into the snow while asleep; they then crept
into the trenches and lay close together. The cold was generally
sixty-four degrees below the freezing-point of Fahrenheit; but in
January, 1831, the mercury was ninety-two degrees and a half below
the freezing-point.

The Fighting Business.—“What are you thinking of, my man?”


said Lord Hill, as he approached a soldier, who was leaning in a
gloomy mood upon his firelock, while around him lay mangled
thousands of French and English; for it was a few hours after the
battle of Salamanca had been won by the British. The soldier
started, and, after saluting his general, answered, “I was thinking, my
lord, how many widows and orphans I have this day made for one
shilling.” He had fired six hundred bullets that day, and his pay was a
shilling a day.

Anecdote of Franklin.—While Franklin was ambassador to the


English court, a lady, who was about being presented to the king,
noticed his exceedingly plain appearance, and inquired who he was.
“That, madam,” answered the gentleman upon whose arm she was
leaning, “is Dr. Benjamin Franklin, the ambassador from North
Welcome to our website – the ideal destination for book lovers and
knowledge seekers. With a mission to inspire endlessly, we offer a
vast collection of books, ranging from classic literary works to
specialized publications, self-development books, and children's
literature. Each book is a new journey of discovery, expanding
knowledge and enriching the soul of the reade

Our website is not just a platform for buying books, but a bridge
connecting readers to the timeless values of culture and wisdom. With
an elegant, user-friendly interface and an intelligent search system,
we are committed to providing a quick and convenient shopping
experience. Additionally, our special promotions and home delivery
services ensure that you save time and fully enjoy the joy of reading.

Let us accompany you on the journey of exploring knowledge and


personal growth!

textbookfull.com

You might also like