Pattern Discovery in Bioinformatics Theory Algorithms 1st Edition Laxmi Parida - Download the ebook in PDF with all chapters to read anytime
Pattern Discovery in Bioinformatics Theory Algorithms 1st Edition Laxmi Parida - Download the ebook in PDF with all chapters to read anytime
https://ebookultra.com/download/clustering-in-bioinformatics-and-drug-
discovery-1st-edition-john-david-maccuish-author/
https://ebookultra.com/download/bioinformatics-and-drug-discovery-2nd-
edition-kubilay-demir/
https://ebookultra.com/download/applied-pattern-recognition-
algorithms-and-implementation-in-c-4th-edition-dietrich-w-r-paulus/
https://ebookultra.com/download/sparse-modeling-theory-algorithms-and-
applications-1st-edition-irina-rish/
https://ebookultra.com/download/channel-coding-theory-algorithms-and-
applications-1st-edition-david-declercq-editor/
https://ebookultra.com/download/essays-in-bioinformatics-1st-edition-
s-jelaska/
https://ebookultra.com/download/bioinformatics-in-microrna-
research-1st-edition-coll/
https://ebookultra.com/download/fundamentals-of-wavelets-theory-
algorithms-and-applications-2ed-edition-goswami-j/
Pattern Discovery in Bioinformatics Theory Algorithms
1st Edition Laxmi Parida Digital Instant Download
Author(s): Laxmi Parida
ISBN(s): 9781584885498, 1584885491
Edition: 1
File Details: PDF, 3.83 MB
Year: 2007
Language: english
Chapman & Hall/CRC Mathematical and Computational Biology Series
Pattern Discovery
in Bioinformatics
Theory & Algorithms
Series Editors
Alison M. Etheridge
Department of Statistics
University of Oxford
Louis J. Gross
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
University of Tennessee
Suzanne Lenhart
Department of Mathematics
University of Tennessee
Philip K. Maini
Mathematical Institute
University of Oxford
Shoba Ranganathan
Research Institute of Biotechnology
Macquarie University
Hershel M. Safer
Weizmann Institute of Science
Bioinformatics & Bio Computing
Eberhard O. Voit
The Wallace H. Couter Department of Biomedical Engineering
Georgia Tech and Emory University
Proposals for the series should be submitted to one of the series editors above or directly to:
CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group
24-25 Blades Court
Deodar Road
London SW15 2NU
UK
Pattern Discovery
in Bioinformatics
Theory & Algorithms
Laxmi Parida
This book contains information obtained from authentic and highly regarded sources. Reprinted
material is quoted with permission, and sources are indicated. A wide variety of references are
listed. Reasonable efforts have been made to publish reliable data and information, but the author
and the publisher cannot assume responsibility for the validity of all materials or for the conse‑
quences of their use.
No part of this book may be reprinted, reproduced, transmitted, or utilized in any form by any
electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying,
microfilming, and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without written
permission from the publishers.
For permission to photocopy or use material electronically from this work, please access www.
copyright.com (http://www.copyright.com/) or contact the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. (CCC)
222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, 978‑750‑8400. CCC is a not‑for‑profit organization that
provides licenses and registration for a variety of users. For organizations that have been granted a
photocopy license by the CCC, a separate system of payment has been arranged.
Trademark Notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and
are used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe.
Parida, Laxmi.
Pattern discovery in bioinformatics / Laxmi Parida.
p. ; cm. ‑‑ (Chapman & Hall/CRC mathematical and computational biology
series)
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN‑13: 978‑1‑58488‑549‑8 (alk. paper)
ISBN‑10: 1‑58488‑549‑1 (alk. paper)
1. Bioinformatics. 2. Pattern recognition systems. I. Title. II. Series: Chapman
and Hall/CRC mathematical & computational biology series.
[DNLM: 1. Computational Biology‑‑methods. 2. Pattern Recognition,
Automated. QU 26.5 P231p 2008]
QH324.2.P373 2008
572.80285‑‑dc22 2007014582
1 Introduction 1
1.1 Ubiquity of Patterns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.2 Motivations from Biology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.3 The Need for Rigor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.4 Who is a Reader of this Book? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.4.1 About this book . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
I The Fundamentals 7
2 Basic Algorithmics 9
2.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
2.2 Graphs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
2.3 Tree Problem 1: Minimum Spanning Tree . . . . . . . . . . 14
2.3.1 Prim’s algorithm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
2.4 Tree Problem 2: Steiner Tree . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
2.5 Tree Problem 3: Minimum Mutation Labeling . . . . . . . 22
2.5.1 Fitch’s algorithm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
2.6 Storing & Retrieving Elements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
2.7 Asymptotic Functions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
2.8 Recurrence Equations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
2.8.1 Counting binary trees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
2.8.2 Enumerating unrooted trees (Prüfer sequence) . . . 36
2.9 NP-Complete Class of Problems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
2.10 Exercises . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
3 Basic Statistics 47
3.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
3.2 Basic Probability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
3.2.1 Probability space foundations . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
3.2.2 Multiple events (Bayes’ theorem) . . . . . . . . . . 50
3.2.3 Inclusion-exclusion principle . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
3.2.4 Discrete probability space . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
3.2.5 Algebra of random variables . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
3.2.6 Expectations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
3.2.7 Discrete probability distribution (binomial, Poisson) 60
3.2.8 Continuous probability distribution (normal) . . . . 64
3.2.9 Continuous probability space (Ω is R) . . . . . . . 66
References 503
I owe the completion of this book to the patience and understanding of Tuhina
at home and of friends and colleagues outside of home. I am particularly
grateful for Tuhina’s subtle, quiet cheer-leading without which this effort may
have seemed like a thankless chore.
Behind every woman is an army of men. My sincere thanks to Alberto Ap-
sotolico, Saugata Basu, Jaume Bertranpetit, Andrea Califano, Matteo Comin,
David Gilbert, Danny Hermelin, Enam Karim, Gadi Landau, Naren Rama-
krishnan, Ajay Royyuru, David Sankoff, Frank Suits, Maciej Trybilo, Steve
Oshry, Samaresh Parida, Rohit Parikh, Mike Waterman and Oren Weimann
for their, sometimes unwitting, complicity in this endeavor.
1
© 2008 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
2 Pattern Discovery in Bioinformatics: Theory & Algorithms
the domain specifications, but a tacit acknowledgment that each domain de-
serves much closer attention and elaborate treatment that goes well beyond
the scope of this book. Also, this approach compels us to take a hard look at
the problem domain, often giving rise to elegant and clean definitions with a
sound mathematical foundation as well as efficient algorithms.
∗∗
challenging exercises (and sections) are marked with .
The Fundamentals
London. Published by E. Donovan, & Mess.rs Simpkin & Marshall, Jan. 1, 1823.
CONCHOLOGY.
PLATE XXVIII.
MALLEUS MACULATUS
SPOTTED HAMMER SHELL, OR HOUND’S TONGUE.
* Bivalve.
GENERIC CHARACTER.
Shell subquivalve, rough, deformed, generally lengthened and
lobed or hammer-shaped: beaks small and divergent. Hinge without
teeth, a lengthened conic hollow situated under the beaks and
traversing obliquely the facet of the ligament. A lateral slope or
groove at the side of the ligament for the passage of the byssus or
beard with which the animal is furnished.
SPECIFIC CHARACTER.
Shell curved, with a single somewhat straight abbreviated lobe at
the base: reddish yellow, clouded, spotted and dotted with fuscous.
Malleus Maculatus: testa arcuata, lobo basis unico sub-recta
abbreviato flavo-rufescente fusco nebulosa maculata
punctisque.
The singular object now before us, a shell no less remarkable for
the peculiarity of its form than rarity of occurrence, is one of the
most choice productions of the seas surrounding the Friendly Isles.
The discovery of this shell, like that of many others, resulted from
the assiduities of that eminent Naturalist and promoter of scientific
knowledge, the late Sir Joseph Banks, and of Dr. Solander, who
accompanied him in that memorable voyage of Captain Cook to the
Southern Hemisphere, in which the Friendly Isles were discovered.
The fine example of this shell, in particular, from which the drawing
in our plate is taken, it may be also added, was one of those which
were brought to this country by Captain Cook upon the return of the
expedition, and which being shortly after presented to Sir Ashton
Lever, remained in the Museum of that distinguished amateur from
that period to the time of its dissolution in the year 1806.
When we consider the very remote situation of those islands, so
distant from the usual track of all navigators, we cannot be
surprised, admitting the species to be local in those seas, to find it
has remained a very rare shell from the period of its discovery to the
present time. In the course of many years only a few specimens
have occurred to our observation, and while it has remained scarce
with us, it appears to have been still more uncommon in the
continental cabinets: very few of which, if we are informed correctly,
were lately in possession of it.
The first difficulty that arises in the mind of the naturalist upon the
inspection of this shell results from the ambiguity of its generical
peculiarities: we pause to consider where it should be placed.
Linnæus, to whom, as it will be observed, the present shell was
totally unknown, arranged the Hammer Shell, its nearest
approximation, among the Ostreæ. The Hammer Shell, or as it is
more usually denominated the Hammer Oyster Shell, had been
discovered before the time of Linnæus; it had appeared in the work
of Rumpfius, Seba, Gualtieri and Argenville, and the shell had been
examined and described by him in the Museum of Ulrica, Queen of
Sweden, under the name of Ostrea Malleus. That the hinge accords
in some degree with that of the Ostreæ generally must be admitted,
at the same time that it possesses other characters less easily
reconciled to that genus, unless we embrace the Linnæan genus in
all its latitude, and to this the conchologist of the present day cannot
accede, at least without some little difficulties.
The conformation of this shell is very striking, and yet we perceive
that its essential characteristics are less definitive than could be
wished; there are several approximations in the general figure to be
found among shells which nevertheless possess characters
generically distinct. For many years this shell was known in this
country under the name of “Margaritifera maculata,” and the trivial
English appellation of the “Spotted Hound’s Tongue:” it appeared
under those names in the Conchological Museum of M. de Calonne,
while it remained in England, and in the catalogue of that museum,
which is still extant, it will be found under those names. The epithet
of Hound’s Tongue is not inaptly applied to this shell, in allusion to
the elongated form. The term Margaritifera does not refer to the
form, but to the pearly gloss that appears upon the surface of the
dark blue space lying within the shell, immediately below the hinge,
and extending from thence about one fourth part of its whole length.
This is the region in which the animal is attached by its ligament to
the valves of the shell; besides which, a gloss of pearly hue is
observed to pervade the whole of the inner surface, only that it is
most conspicuous in the darker disk of the shell. As a secondary
character this pearliness is very remarkable in the shell before us, at
the same time that as a generical denomination the term
Margaritifera assigned to it from this circumstance alone is liable to
objection; because, the same pearliness prevails in many shells
which have no relation whatever with the present, either in the form
or structure of the hinge, and it is to these we must resort for its
true essential character.
Lamarck constitutes many genera of the shells included in the
Ostrea genus of Linnæus. His Malléacées comprehend five genera,
Crenatula, Perna, Malleus, Avicula, and Meleagrina, all which are
allied more or less remotely to the shell before us. To that particular
family which is known among collectors by the designation of
Hammer Oysters, he gives the name of Malleus, in the French
Marteau, both alike implying the hammer like form of the species
Malleus, which Lamarck assumes as the type of this genus. But even
there after all the renovation that has been attempted, the result is
not satisfactory, because this figure is by no means constant, even in
the few species included by its author in that genus; it contains but
six species, and these are entirely at variance with each other. Thus
for example, in Malleus Vulgaris, the common Hammer Shell, we
have a species with three lobes, a lateral one of considerable size
being advanced on each side the beaks: and another shell of the
same species with only short lateral lobes instead of large ones.
Admitting the hammer form to be still preserved in these, in the next
species, Malleus Normalis, instead of two lobes, the hammer head, if
it may be so expressed, has but a single lobe: in Malleus Anatinus
there is only one lobe, and that very small; and in Malleus
Vulsellatus, although characterised as “lobo oblique porrecto,” the
appearance of the shell implies rather the total absence of any lobe,
for the lobe, if so it may be termed, is so indefinite, that it cannot be
referred without violence to the genus Marteau, while we consider
its hammer like form as a leading character of the genus. With
exception to this inconstant character which may be qualified with
the expression “deformed and generally hammer shaped,” we have
no objection to the Malleus genus, because the byssus of the animal
by means of which it can affix itself to other bodies, and the peculiar
sinus or sulcation of the hinge through which the byssus passes from
the animal to those extraneous bodies, are sufficient to remove it
from the Ostrea genus, in which case if we still adhere to the
Linnæan method we can place it only among his Mytili or Pinnæ,
and it has certainly less affinity with either of those than with
Ostrea. Perhaps the name of Perna under which this shell has been
mentioned a few years ago might have been as well preserved, but
that name Lamarck assigns to an extensive genus of which Ostrea
Isognomum is the type, and it is therefore better to retain the name
Malleus than to alter it to another which could not fail at this time to
create confusion. The same consequence would as unquestionably
result were we to sub-divide the Malléacées into different genera
according to the configuration of the shell or number of its lateral
lobes.
The definition of Malleus in the Règne Animal of Cuvier appears to
intimate the same objection; it does not consider the hammer like
form of the shell as any criterion, it is only stated that the Marteaux
are inequivalve and irregular, that they have a simple hollow for the
ligament as in the oysters, but that they are distinguished by a slope
at the side of the ligament for the passage of the byssus.
It is assuredly true that the presence of a byssus in this tribe of
shells displaces them from any immediate analogy with the Ostrea,
where as Cuvier remarks “Linnæus left them.” But, if however, we
attentively examine the hinge of the common oyster, the two valves,
and the oyster as it lies within the valves, we shall perceive with this
exception a pretty near approximation. The great objection is, that
the animal of the tribe of shells now before us protrudes a byssus
from its body through a lateral opening on one side or slope of the
ligament of the hinge; if we closely inspect the valves of the oyster,
we also find a slight depression or hollow upon each side of the
cartilage of the hinge; these are small, and usually somewhat
lamellar. The oyster, moreover, as it lies in the shell, seems capable
of expanding or spreading that part of the body which lies under the
hinge laterally upon and into these depressions, a circumstance very
easily observed in the half famished oyster, because these lateral
expansions of the animal are then more visibly elongated along the
passage of these lateral grooves of the hinge, and give the pointed
end of the animal a somewhat cornuted appearance. Under the
same circumstance these processes adhere as they lie in the hollow
of these grooves, and thus suggests the idea of the animal having
exerted itself by such extension to obtain refreshment through these
lateral hollows. Those hollows are also so far pervious as to admit
the ingress of moisture while the shells are closed, in the same
manner as it is possible the Malleus genus may receive moisture
under the same circumstance through the sinus, whence the byssus
is protruded. These peculiarities considered, may perhaps afford
some further justification of Linnæus in placing the hammer shells
with the Ostreæ. It has been indeed advanced that Linnæus was not
aware of these hammer shells being furnished with a byssus, or that
he would have referred them to the Mytili, but this observation
cannot be correct, because in the figure given of these shells by
Seba, to which Linnæus refers, the byssus, which is very
conspicuous, is represented pendent or hanging to a considerable
length out of the shell.
From an attentive examination of the different Conchological
authors, it does not appear to us that the shell before us has
hitherto been figured, and we have reason also to believe that it has
never been described. These circumstances are the more probable
since, as we have before observed, the shell is at this time very little
known among the Continental Cabinets. The nearest approach, so
far as we can judge from the description, unassisted by any figure, is
the Marteau Normal (Malleus Normalis) of Lamarck, a species
defined by him as testa biloba; lobo basis unico anticali ad normam,
our shell is certainly bilobate, for it has only one lateral lobe at the
beak, and that moreover advances from the beak, pretty nearly,
though not exactly, in a right line; but its general description does
not sufficiently accord with our shell to authorise as a conclusion
that they are the same. Lamarck informs us that there are two
varieties of his Malleus Normalis, one of which is a native of the
ocean of the Great Indies, the other of the seas of New Holland. The
first, or Indian kind, he describes as being on the inside as well as
outside of a black colour, with a longish lobe at the base of the shell.
[22]
The New Holland kind is described of a whitish colour, with the
lobe at the base abbreviated.[23]
The two last-mentioned shells which Lamarck concludes to be
varieties of the same species, may perhaps prove hereafter to be
species distinct from each other, as Lamarck has himself shewn to be
the case with respect to the common black and the white hammer
shells. The black supposed variety of Malleus Normalis we
apprehend to be distinct from the shell before us, but it is possible
that the New Holland shell which he describes as being whitish, with
the lobe at the base abbreviated, may be a worn or much
depauperated specimen of our present shell; it certainly does not
accord with our shell in any tolerable state of preservation.
Lamarck says nothing of any ruddiness or testaceous hues in his
New Holland variety of Normalis, and admitting these colours to
indicate that the shell had been found with its animal in a living
state, we can scarcely conceive the dark fuscous spotting which is so
conspicuous in the species could by any ordinary accident be so
entirely obliterated as appears to be the case in Lamarck’s specimen,
if his New Holland variety of Malleus Normalis be really of this
species; and it may be further added that if our present shell was
actually intended by his Malleus Normalis, the defects of his shell has
necessarily influenced his specific character and rendered it
imperfect.
We have not adverted to Malleus Anatinus of Chemnitz, because
the figure of that shell is ambiguous. There is a remote resemblance
in the lateral appendages of the beaks, but in other particulars the
resemblance is less obvious, the body is sometimes curved as in the
shell before us and sometimes straight, but the edges of the valves
are parallel, and the shell itself pellucid: the figure in Chemnitz is
less than half the size of our shell. This inhabits the seas of Timor
and the Nicobar Islands.
It should be observed in conclusion that there is a specimen of our
species among the Hammer Shells in the British Museum, the habitat
of which is indicated by the word “Amboina:” it is much smaller than
our shell. Besides this we have lately seen another example from
New Holland, of a growth still larger than the shell we have
delineated.
We have entered thus minutely into the analogies of this shell
from an apprehension we might otherwise in this instance submit as
a new species an object that had been previously described. The
result of our enquiry will tend to shew that if the species has not
remained entirely unnoticed, it has never been described with much
precision.
29
London. Published by E. Donovan & Mess.rs Simpkin & Marshall, Jan.y 1, 1823.
ENTOMOLOGY.
PLATE XXIX.
PAPILIO TROS
TROS’S BUTTERFLY.
Lepidoptera.
GENERIC CHARACTER.
Antennæ thicker towards the tip, and generally terminating in a
knob: wings erect when at rest. Fly by day.
* Equites Trojani.
SPECIFIC CHARACTER
AND
SYNONYMS.
Wings indented, tailed, above and beneath black; on the anterior
wings an abbreviated white band: posterior ones with sanguineous
spots.
Papilio Tros: alis dentato caudatis concoloribus nigris: anticis fascia
abbreviata alba, posticis sanguinea maculari. Fabr. Ent. Syst.
T. 3. p. 1. 10. 30.
Jon. fig. pict. 1. tab. 23.
PLATE XXX.
PSITTACUS MELANOPTERUS
BLACK WINGED PARRAKEET.
Order
Picæ.
GENERIC CHARACTER.
Bill falcated; upper mandible moveable and in general covered
with a cere: nostrils rounded, placed in the base of the bill: tongue
fleshy, obtuse, entire: feet formed for climbing.
SPECIFIC CHARACTER
AND
SYNONYMS.
Pale green, back and wings black: secondary wing feathers yellow,
at the tip blue: tail purple with a black band.
Psittacus Melanopterus: pallide viridis, dorso alisque nigris, remigibus
secundariis luteis apice cæruleis, rectricibus purpureis fascia
nigra.—Lath. Ind. Orn. T. 1. p. 132. n. 152.
Psittacus Melanopterus: pallide viridis, dorso, tectricibus alarum,
caudæ fascia remigibusque primariis nigris, secundariis
flavescentibus cæruleo punctatis.—Gmel. Linn. Syst. Nat. T.
1. p. 350. n. 132.
Perruche aux ailes variées.—Buff. Hist. Nat. des Ois. 6. p. 172.
Petite perruche de Batavia.—Buff. Pl. enlum. n. 791. f. 1.
Petite perruche de l’isle de Luçon.—Sonner. it. p. 78. t. 41.
Black Winged Parrakeet.—Brown Illus. t. 3.
London. Published by E. Donovan & Mess.rs Simpkin & Marshall, Feb. 1, 1823.
ENTOMOLOGY.
PLATE XXXI.
PAPILIO HIPPODAMIA
HIPPODAMIA’S BUTTERFLY.
Lepidoptera.
GENERIC CHARACTER.
Antennæ thicker towards the tip, and generally terminating in a
knob: wings erect when at rest. Fly by day.
**** P. Heliconii.
SPECIFIC CHARACTER
AND
SYNONYMS.
Wings oblong and entire; anterior pair black, with three hyaline
bands: lower ones hyaline.
Papilio Hippodamia: alis oblongis integerrimis: anticis nigris: fasciis
tribus hyalinis, posticis hyalinis. Fabr. Ent. Syst. T. 3. p. 1.
165. 509.
Jon. pict. n. 149.
London. Published by E. Donovan & Mess.rs Simpkin & Marshall, Feb.y 1, 1823.
CONCHOLOGY.
PLATE XXXII.
CYPRÆA AURORA
AURORA, MORNING-DAWN,
OR,
ORANGE COWRY.
* Univalve.
GENERIC CHARACTER.
Shell univalve, involute, subovate, smooth, obtuse at each end:
aperture effuse at each end, linear, extending the whole length of
the shell and denticulated each side.
SPECIFIC CHARACTER
AND
SYNONYMS.
Shell ovate ventricose, and somewhat globose, orange without
spots: margin white: throat orange or sometimes rosy.
Cypræa Aurora: ovato-ventricosa, subglobosa, aurantiâ immaculatâ:
margine alba, fauce aurantia vel incarnata.
Cypræa Aurantium: testa subturbinata aurantia margine alba
immaculata fauce rutila. Gmel. Linn. Syst. Nat. T. 1. p. 6.
3403. 121.
Cypræa Aurora: testa ovato-ventricosâ, turgidâ subglobosâ, aurantiâ,
immaculatâ; lateribus albis; fauce aurantiâ. Lamarck T. 7.
382. 14.
Sec. 6. Basium.
London. Published by E. Donovan & Mess.rs Simpkin & Marshall Feb. 1, 1823.
Welcome to our website – the ideal destination for book lovers and
knowledge seekers. With a mission to inspire endlessly, we offer a
vast collection of books, ranging from classic literary works to
specialized publications, self-development books, and children's
literature. Each book is a new journey of discovery, expanding
knowledge and enriching the soul of the reade
Our website is not just a platform for buying books, but a bridge
connecting readers to the timeless values of culture and wisdom. With
an elegant, user-friendly interface and an intelligent search system,
we are committed to providing a quick and convenient shopping
experience. Additionally, our special promotions and home delivery
services ensure that you save time and fully enjoy the joy of reading.
ebookultra.com