Data and the Built Environment: A Practical Guide to Building a Better World Using Data 1st Edition Ian Gordon download
Data and the Built Environment: A Practical Guide to Building a Better World Using Data 1st Edition Ian Gordon download
https://textbookfull.com/product/data-and-the-built-environment-
a-practical-guide-to-building-a-better-world-using-data-1st-
edition-ian-gordon/
https://textbookfull.com/product/making-data-visual-a-practical-
guide-to-using-visualization-for-insight-1st-edition-danyel-
fisher/
https://textbookfull.com/product/data-driven-multivalence-in-the-
built-environment-nimish-biloria/
https://textbookfull.com/product/modern-data-architecture-on-aws-
a-practical-guide-for-building-next-gen-data-platforms-on-aws-
behram-irani/
https://textbookfull.com/product/biomimicry-and-sustainable-
building-performance-a-nature-inspired-sustainability-guide-for-
the-built-environment-1st-edition-olusegun-aanuoluwapo-oguntona/
Jumpstart Tableau A Step By Step Guide to Better Data
Visualization 1st Edition Arshad Khan
https://textbookfull.com/product/jumpstart-tableau-a-step-by-
step-guide-to-better-data-visualization-1st-edition-arshad-khan/
https://textbookfull.com/product/better-data-visualizations-a-
guide-for-scholars-researchers-and-wonks-jonathan-schwabish/
https://textbookfull.com/product/shaping-the-future-of-the-
fourth-industrial-revolution-a-guide-to-building-a-better-world-
first-american-edition-edition-klaus-schwab/
https://textbookfull.com/product/prepare-your-data-for-tableau-a-
practical-guide-to-the-tableau-data-prep-tool-1st-edition-tim-
costello-lori-blackshear/
https://textbookfull.com/product/data-structure-and-algorithms-
using-c-a-practical-implementation-1st-edition-sachi-nandan-
mohanty/
Digital Innovations in Architecture,
Engineering and Construction
Ian Gordon
Neil Thompson
Data and
the Built
Environment
A Practical Guide to Building a Better
World Using Data
Digital Innovations in Architecture, Engineering
and Construction
Series Editors
Diogo Ribeiro , Department of Civil Engineering, Polytechnic Institute of Porto,
Porto, Portugal
M. Z. Naser, Glenn Department of Civil Engineering, Clemson University,
Clemson, SC, USA
Rudi Stouffs, Department of Architecture, National University of Singapore,
Singapore, Singapore
Marzia Bolpagni, Northumbria University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
The Architecture, Engineering and Construction (AEC) industry is experiencing
an unprecedented transformation from conventional labor-intensive activities to
automation using innovative digital technologies and processes. This new paradigm
also requires systemic changes focused on social, economic and sustainability
aspects. Within the scope of Industry 4.0, digital technologies are a key factor in
interconnecting information between the physical built environment and the digital
virtual ecosystem. The most advanced virtual ecosystems allow to simulate the built
to enable a real-time data-driven decision-making. This Book Series promotes and
expedites the dissemination of recent research, advances, and applications in the
field of digital innovations in the AEC industry. Topics of interest include but are not
limited to:
– Industrialization: digital fabrication, modularization, cobotics, lean.
– Material innovations: bio-inspired, nano and recycled materials.
– Reality capture: computer vision, photogrammetry, laser scanning, drones.
– Extended reality: augmented, virtual and mixed reality.
– Sustainability and circular building economy.
– Interoperability: building/city information modeling.
– Interactive and adaptive architecture.
– Computational design: data-driven, generative and performance-based design.
– Simulation and analysis: digital twins, virtual cities.
– Data analytics: artificial intelligence, machine/deep learning.
– Health and safety: mobile and wearable devices, QR codes, RFID.
– Big data: GIS, IoT, sensors, cloud computing.
– Smart transactions, cybersecurity, gamification, blockchain.
– Quality and project management, business models, legal prospective.
– Risk and disaster management.
Ian Gordon · Neil Thompson
© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature
Switzerland AG 2024
This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the Publisher, whether
the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse
of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and
transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar
or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed.
The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication
does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant
protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
The publisher, the authors, and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book
are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or
the editors give a warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any
errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional
claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This Springer imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature Switzerland AG
The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland
We want to start by thanking the generous people who volunteered their time to help
edit and review this book, and in doing so contributed massively to whatever clarity
and insight that this book musters. If any mistakes or inaccuracies remain, they are
our own.
Secondly, there is a thank you to those we cannot mention directly. There are
fingerprints all over this book in terms of guidance and memorable career moments.
We would like to thank the various communities we have leant on to learn and connect
with new knowledge. This includes the carefully crafted posts on LinkedIn by Ian to
crowdsource some wisdom to place in this book. For those that interacted, we hope
you find your pearls of wisdom sown into our book.
A special mention from Neil to Ian. Ian is the driving force behind this book;
he has poured his soul into these pages, and I have done my best to sprinkle my
experience around his prose. Thank you for sharing the journey with me, I am in
your debt!
There are a number of individuals who have informed our thinking on data and the
built environment, and who’s influence is explicit and implicit throughout this book.
These include Davin Crowley-Sweet who’s thinking on data capabilities informed
and clarified our own, Will Varah, Melissa Zanocco and Mark Enzer, who’s work
at the IPA and CDBB respectively provoked us to think bigger about data’s role in
the built environment, Sarah Hayes who’s writing on helped us to see data in a new
light, Miranda Sharp and Liam McGee who helped us to see meaning in data, Jon
Jarritt who’s healthy scepticism and wry sense of humour informed our style, and
Herman Heynes who captured the value of data better than anyone. We would like to
thank the following individuals for their extensive help in editing and reviewing this
book:
• Dexter Robinson, the first person to make it through the whole manuscript, and
a source of invaluable perspective and insight which allowed us to refine our
message.
• Daniel Rossiter, the pedant’s pedant, for keeping us consistent.
• Janet Greenwood, for pointing out our copious blind spots.
v
vi Acknowledgements
vii
viii Contents
Welcome to this journey where data meets the built environment, and innovation
intertwines with years of hard-won expertise. In the following pages, you will have
the opportunity to delve into the world of advanced analytics, digital integration, and
sustainable construction, guided by two of the field’s most ardent professionals—Ian
Gordon and Neil Thompson.
Ian Gordon is a leader in Data Advisory and Advanced Analytics at Arup and
brings with him a wealth of experience in the realm of the built environment. Ian has
applied his extensive knowledge to several critical national infrastructure projects.
His commitment to using data for societal benefit is evident in his role at Arup, where
he aims to forge better outcomes for society through innovative data techniques. Ian
has held data (and data-adjacent) leadership positions at a range of large client orga-
nizations. Highlights include stints as Head of Data Architecture and Engineering
at National Highways, Project Director for System Integration on Thames Tideway,
Interim Head of Performance at Network Rail Southeast Route, and most recently
Head of Data at the Houses of Parliament Restoration and Renewal Program. Areas of
expertise include cloud-first data strategy, data architecture, data modeling (including
taxonomies and ontologies), data quality, data governance, data valuation, and the
application of AI/ML to real-world problems. Ian is also passionate about interoper-
ability and Digital Twins where he has collaborated with the Centre for Digital Built
Britain, the Infrastructure Client Group, Innovate UK, and the Digital Twin Hub.
Neil Thompson is a fellow of the Institute of Engineering and Technology, a
Chartered Construction Manager and Member of the Data Management Association.
Neil currently serves as the director of Digital Integration & Delivery at AtkinsRealis,
bringing a unique perspective as a Chief Technology Officer in a complex defence
portfolio and a member of a major joint venture senior leadership team. Neil is also
the chair of the Built Environment for the Institution of Engineering and Technology
and an Honorary Associate Professor at the Bartlett School of Sustainable Construc-
tion, University College London. His academic background, paired with his prac-
tical experience, has positioned him as a leading voice in the industry, contributing
significantly to industry reports and policy formation on a global scale. Neil holds
a Bachelor of Engineering degree with honours in building services engineering, a
xiii
xiv About the Authors
xvii
Chapter 1
Purpose and Pedantry
Abstract Our built environment is the sum of all the stuff that human beings have
built and maintained. We all use it every day. It is how we move around, how we feed
and shelter ourselves. We use it to make our lives both more rewarding and comfort-
able. We depend upon it every day and suffer when it fails. As data emerged as a
phenomenon, then as a noun, and ultimately a profession, it changed large parts of
our lived experience, but left our experience of the built environment untouched. This
book seeks to describe if and how we can use data to help make the built environment
work better for society. This chapter covers the unique challenges and opportunities
presented to data professionals working in the built environment sector. It sets out
the structure, purpose, and philosophy of the book, and begins to establish what
words like data, information, knowledge, insight, and wisdom mean in the context
of the built environment. Your authors are both built environment and data fanatics.
We have been lucky enough to work for some of the largest physical asset owners
in the UK (and beyond). In doing so we have witnessed the unique challenges and
rewards that come from trying to apply data to the benefit of the built environment.
We have also drawn upon our extensive networks of subject matter experts across
the sector to inform and critique our thinking. We want readers to finish this chapter
with a useful overview of the main considerations involved in designing, communi-
cating, and implementing data strategies and solutions in the built environment sector.
These considerations include the economic, human, and technological dimensions.
During this chapter, we also consider the distinct types of data that built environment
data roles must cover, and the different perspectives that readers might bring to this
material.
Data isn’t neutral. Like any other tool, it can cause harm when used with the wrong inten-
tions… how data and digital technology are used in the built environment impacts all of us,
and all of us have a role in deciding the outcomes we want.—CDBB, Four Futures, One
Choice.
This is a love story about the built environment and the data it produces.
Like all good love stories, there is a meet-cute, followed by a blossoming romance,
followed by betrayal and heartbreak, followed by reunion.
Will our couple live happily ever after, or pass like ships in the night?
The purpose of this book is to express clearly and categorically how data, and the
digital technologies that use data, can help the built environment sector deliver value
to society. Whilst we want to avoid being deliberately over-prescriptive, we wish to
give you enough of a methodology such that you can say “I understand what I want
to accomplish with data, how I am roughly going to get there, and how it will add
value to my work.” We have sought to write in an honest and compelling manner
that allows you to understand how the topics covered apply to challenges you might
face in this sector.
Data isn’t solely a thing that Information Technology (IT) does. It is a resource
that we use as we seek to improve the built environment. Data, and the meaningful
information that we create with data, have always been part of the work of built envi-
ronment professionals, even if data professions have only recently become elevated
as distinct roles within the built environment sector. As investment in the collection
and application of data increases across the built environment sector, and as more
client, contractor, and consultant organisations build dedicated data functions and
define their data visions and strategies, it feels like an opportune moment to take
stock of what these changes might mean for the built environment and the people
who rely upon it.
Our transition into a globalised and interconnected digital economy has seen
the recognition of data as a valued asset, and the rise of a new profession–the
data manager–to function as its custodian.1 This profession has been at the heart
of enabling these new firms (and their intangible value) to scale to unprecedented
magnitudes in terms of data flow, storage, and computation.2 In this book we want
to bridge the gap between the emergent data managers (represented by the Data
Management Association) and the established information management practice of
the built environment sector (typified by Nima, previously the UK BIM Alliance).
1 Or at least individuals who would self-identify as data owners. The built environment has a long
history of individuals compiling information to make better decisions, beginning with the likes of
Dr John Snow who we discuss later in this book.
2 Indeed, as Dexter Robinson noted on reviewing this book, one could even argue that data and
digital technologies have revealed the value of intangible assets that was always there was not easy
to measure. As he noted, “you could argue that because of data and digital systems intangible assets
are now easier to measure and therefore we now put value against them.”
1.1 Why This Book and Why Now? 3
Over the past four decades, we have witnessed a profound and invisible change
in the global economy. In 1975 ‘tangible’ assets accounted for over 80% of the
value of the S&P 500 stock market index. By 2018 this figure had fallen to less
than 20% of the total value (Visual Capitalist, 2020). The most valuable assets in the
world are no longer physical things like factories, pipelines, gold, or oil. Whilst such
assets are clearly still valuable, they are now dwarfed in value terms by ‘intangible’
assets such as brands, intellectual property, algorithms, market share, acquired rights,
and–increasingly–data.
Data is itself an intangible asset. Moreover, data allows us to capture and measure
other intangible assets. Branding and intellectual property in the form of TV adver-
tising, logos, and jingles existed long before intangible assets dominated company
valuations. Part of the difference is that more of our economy, and our lives, have
become digitised. This digitisation in turn generate data that allow us to better identify
and quantify activity and economic value.
Over this same period, the built environment sector has both underperformed and
over-polluted. Construction alone accounts for 9% of EU GDP (European Commis-
sion, n.d.) and 13% of global carbon emissions (Architecture 2030, 2023). As a
sector it usually sees only 1% annual productivity gains (McKinsey & Co., 2017),
average margins in the developed world of far less than 5% (Turner & Townsend,
2022), rework costs amounting to 5% of the average project budget (Get It Right
Initiative, 2020), and average losses of up to 20% of project time on schedule over-
runs (McKinsey & Co., 2016). The built environment sector, including construction,
accounts for almost 40% of global emissions (Architecture 2030, 2023). This is a
self-reinforcing state of both financial and environmental stagnation. One that—to
date at least—the use of data has failed to meaningfully address.
The transition to a digital economy has left the built environment sector behind.
In addition to anecdotal evidence, we can detect the traces of slow digitisation in
the built environment sector’s slow rate of productivity growth compared to other
sectors3 and the lack of executive maturity in realising the strategic value of data
(Harvey Nash & KPMG, 2018). The built environment will–and should always–
focus on tangible assets. But the sector has yet to become ‘data centric’ or ‘data
savvy’. Whilst innovative technologies such as the Internet of Things (IoT) offer the
possibility of far greater data capture from physical assets, we remain in a period of
transition where the marginal cost of data in the built environment often far exceeds
the cost of data collection in other sectors.
We are now at liberty to digitise, virtualise, and measure huge parts of our lives:
socialising, shopping, exercise, health, finances, and romance. But we can’t (yet)
fully virtualise the infrastructure that meets our human needs for shelter, water, heat,
transport, power, and (in most instances) care. And our seemingly weightless digital
economy relies on huge investments in physical assets like fibre, telecoms, base
stations, and data centres.
However, we can’t completely digitise physical things out of existence, nor can we
wish away the impact the physical and carbon footprint of the built environment plays
in driving the climate crisis, loss of biodiversity, damage from natural disasters, and
insidious economic inequality. As Jo Da Silva writes, “over the coming decades, the
combination of rapid urbanisation and climate change is set to create a ‘perfect storm’
in terms of increasing vulnerability (Da Silva, 2012). Our built environment, which
we construct to shelter and protect us, is conversely one of the greatest hazards when
natural disasters (exacerbated in frequency and severity by climate change) strike.
That might mean buildings collapsing during earthquakes, urban areas with poor
drainage increasing the impact of flooding, and other forms of loss or damage to the
infrastructure that we rely upon to support us.
In describing the risks posed from failure to adapt our built environment to
emerging climate crises, Da Silva expresses eloquently a theme that will arise
throughout this book: the impact of complexity on the societal outcomes provided by
the built environment. Complexity gives rise to what Da Silva describes as “cascading
failure due to inter-relationships between infrastructure, institutions and ecosystems,”
where “our ability to accurately predict and prevent the consequences of a disaster is
limited by our ability to understand and model the dependencies and interdependen-
cies between different parts of a system (Da Silva, 2012).” The built environment is
a complex system-of-systems, one that has only become possible due to a massive
increase in the quantity and velocity of information exchange between organisations,
locations, and people. Whilst this system-of-systems has granted billions of people,
particularly in the Western world, an unprecedented standard of living, the merits of
its complexity should not be confused with what Nassim Nicholas Taleb describes
as ‘anti-fragility’ (Taleb, 2012). Interdependencies created to improve short-term
efficiency can remove redundancy and increase the fragility of our built environment
systems.
Data has played a crucial role in enabling the hallmarks of our age such as
globalisation, distributed just-in-time manufacturing, near-instantaneous market-
making and trading, ecommerce, personalised medicine, constant connectivity, social
networks, and data harvesting. These have in turn shaped the scale and density of our
built environment. What data has yet to accomplish is helping the built environment
to sustainably accommodate the repercussions of these developments, or to reduce
fragility and increase resiliency. As the EPSRC write, the sector suffers from “slow
adoption of proven technologies, large amounts of carbon emissions… and projects
that are often over cost and over budget (EPSRC-NSF, 2023).” Modern society has
birthed a Lovecraftian ‘Shoggoth’ (New York Times, 2023) of over-development
and over-consumption without yet providing us with the tools to limit the ensuing
destruction.
This book seeks to describe in detail how we, as data professionals working on
the built environment, should seek to make effective use of the intangible ‘data
domain.’ But it doesn’t lose sight of how those working in this sector—unlike more
mature business to consumer (B2C) and intangible sectors such as retail, finance, and
consumer tech—will always be defined by how they care for our physical domain
(and the natural world that supports it). This principle informs how we think about
1.1 Why This Book and Why Now? 5
the application of data, including the unique challenges of collecting data on physical
assets, storing it in an appropriate manner, and making use of that data to drive our
actions in the physical world.
Increasingly, the problems that strike large-scale built environment projects have
their roots in data and the systems that use data. The well-documented delays to Cross-
rail (the Elizabeth Line) resulted not, as one might expect, from the civil engineering
works required to dig the enormous tunnels and cathedral-like stations. Rather,
according to insiders and reports, the delays had their root in complex information-
based problems, including incompatibilities between signalling systems and ‘silo
thinking’ across disciplines (Wired, 2019). Of course, that doesn’t mean that all that
is required to solve these kinds of challenges are people with data skills. On the
contrary, what the built environment sector needs is people with data skills who
are also engineers, project managers, designers, and other systems-based thinkers.
Organisations need a critical mass of people who are data aware and digitally minded
effecting meaningful change, and they cannot all work for IT or have the word data
in their job title. These data-augmented professionals can then add data capabilities
to their organisation’s existing subject matter expertise and ways of working. The
complexity of projects such as Crossrail demand these cross-cutting capabilities to
continue to improve delivery.
In a sector that does not yet always think in terms of data, we often attribute
data problems to human failure. Many of the issues that bedevil megaprojects have
their origin in the use of complex data processing challenges, including optimism
bias in costs estimates and benefits projects (Reuters, 2023), working around bottle-
necks in the programme (Construction News, 2020), agreeing a regulated asset base
funding model (New Civil Engineer, 2023), or monitoring and managing supplier
performance.
These examples are all—at their root—questions of how built environment clients
capture and make use of the data that is available to them.4 Used well, data can help
organisations make decisions in a manner congruent with the complexity of projects
and allow them to anticipate, identify, and respond to problems before they become
untenable. Used poorly (or disingenuously), data can become a smokescreen between
the reality on the ground, and what we report outwards.
The built environment sector has the added challenge of often arbitrary dis-
continuities in responsibility between the stages of the asset life cycle. Even the most
basic of assets (a house for example) have become complex integration projects. Done
well, the use of data will reduce the information boundaries commonly seen in the
built environment between the different asset life cycle stages and the associated loss
of knowledge/creation of rework. It will realise greater sustainability by minimising
the number of carbon-intensive real-world activities required and by allowing us to
4 As we write, Bent Flyvbjerg and Dan Gardner released an expertly constructed account of how to
get significant and complex things done. Combining the behavioural economics of Daniel Kahneman
with his own experience and data collected on project delivery. From Flyvbjerg’s point of view
we need to ‘think slowly well’ and make impact through our data and information management
strategies and implementations (Bent Flyvbjerg, 2023).
6 1 Purpose and Pedantry
track our use of carbon across our work. The built environment exists to meet soci-
eties’ needs, and data has a sizable and unrealised role to play in improving how well
it does so.
We hope that this book will appeal to readers looking to make better use of built
environment data in their work, whether data is a complementary part of a broader
role, or the entirety of their role. Data is a creative rather than prescriptive pursuit.
Methods and aesthetics will vary with the skill and inclination of users. One cannot
mandate ‘proper’ use of data any more than one can mandate proper uses of any tool.
Part of the role of a data professional is to create some norms for the use of data in
our sector, and in doing so place boundaries around what constitutes allowable and
responsible use of data. As data professionals our role is to improve data practice
within our organisations, whether this is defining strategy, recruiting talent, creating
shared meaning, deploying infrastructure, or delivering analyses. Sometimes we
will work in isolation, other times we will function as an enabler, sowing a field of
possibilities for others to harvest.
We want to reckon with both the unique challenges and opportunities presented by
the built environment, covering both the established standards that we currently work
to, and the emerging thinking around how we can do better. Over the course of this
book, we approach the question of improving the outcomes of the built environment
through better use of data from several different angles, namely:
• Establishing the problem statement that we are trying to answer for the built
environment sector, as well as useful definitions to avoid confusion with data
terminology (this chapter).
• Describing the purpose of the built environment, and what makes the application
of data to the built environment meaningful, unique, and beneficial to society and
the wider natural environment (Chap. 2).
• How the built environment sector currently thinks about the opportunities created
by data, and how industry standards inform our data use (Chap. 3).
• How to create a meaningful data vision for a built environment organisation. How
to build a positive data culture within a built environment organisation and capture
the benefits of data (Chap. 4).
• How to define, procure, and deliver data projects in built environment organisa-
tions (Chap. 5).
• Specific technologies that apply data to built environment challenges (Chap. 6).
• What it means to be a data professional working in the built environment sector
(Chap. 7).
1.3 Intended Outcomes of This Book 7
Fundamentally, our use of data should improve the outcomes that the built environ-
ment delivers to its users and society, and reduce its detrimental impact on the natural
world. We want you to feel that you have the perspective required to function as a
data professional and to understand how to deploy data techniques within and beyond
your organisation to improve its impact on the built and natural environments. There
are opportunities to use data whatever your rank in your organisational hierarchy, but
we particularly want you to feel confident in expressing the value of data to leadership
(the so-called C-suite) within your organisation and wider stakeholder environment.
We understand that there are a wide range of different data roles, perspectives, and
contexts even within the built environment niche. We have sought to write in a way
that can be adapted to fit these different contexts.
Your role might be an internal ‘client side’ one, where you are delivering infras-
tructure and management systems for your own firm. Or it might be external, where
you are advising and consulting others on how to best make the case for data invest-
ment or creating a roadmap for implementation. Perhaps you may be delivering a
project as a supply chain member, either acting as a single party up to delivering as
a partner of a JV, consortium, or any large-scale enterprise. You might even think
8 1 Purpose and Pedantry
Built environment organisations, like people, are unique. It is these organisations that
take responsibility for improving and renewing the built environment. This might
be through new construction (e.g., projects) or through the on-going operation and
maintenance of existing infrastructure. Every project and every organisation will
bring unique geographic, architectural, logistical, cultural, and political challenges.
And yet they will all share some common features, and this is just as true for their
application of data.
Those that work in the built environment often speak of the ‘asset life cycle’: plan,
design, construct/build, operate, maintain, renew, dispose (give or take a few words).
There are various flavours of the standard life cycle; for example, the RIBA Plan of
Work or Network Rail’s PACE (formerly GRIP) stages, as well as broader overlays
such as the election cycle, or the five-yearly regulatory cycle that many public sector
infrastructure organisations follow.
In parallel, those that work in data will talk of the information life cycle: specify,
collect, collate, use/analyse, visualise/present, archive, dispose (again, the exact
formulation varies). These life cycles—however overly-simplistic—help us to orien-
tate ourselves within our organisations and projects, as well as when we change
projects or employers. If you know, for example, that you are leading on a data colla-
tion/aggregation solution to support a project in the ‘build’ stage then you already
have a decent idea of some of the types of data you are working with (e.g., models,
schedules, costs) and some of the use cases that you might be asked to meet (e.g.,
design visualisation, scheduling, ‘earned value analysis’), as well as some of the
data technologies that might be relevant. These answers will all vary if you move to
work on a different asset or data life cycle stage. The point is that whilst every built
environment project is different, patterns and conventions do exist and are important
to recognise.
Data creates value for the built environment sector only when used to improve the
actions that we take in the physical world. It is a question of getting the right data, to
the right people, with the right skills, at the right time. So, if data is failing to create
value, then there are a few obvious causes to investigate:
• Business and information architecture: has the organisation defined what it wants
to accomplish with data? Is there a generally accepted and working theory on how
and where data will make a difference to the organisation? Does it know what data
it holds, and who should be using it? Is that data easy to access, with appropriate
controls around permissions, version control, and other hygiene factors? Are the
staff who should be using data aware of this expectation, and have they been
trained in how to do so? Have they been sold on why they should adapt their ways
of working to make better use of data?
• Data quality: Is the data provided to users inaccurate or incomplete? This could be
because a lack of data modelling means that the data requirements are not speci-
fied, or because a lack of data governance means that it’s unclear who is empow-
ered to ensure that the data is fit-for-purpose. Data quality is key to ensuring that
organisations trust their own data, and thus their own decision-making processes.
10 1 Purpose and Pedantry
There are many whizzy tools (e.g., Collibra, Informatica, or Alation) that allow
you to scan your enterprises’ entire data estate for data quality issues. However,
the quickest fix for data quality is likely to be through business change, namely
creating a culture of data ownership, and introducing data stewardship obligations
and training to existing roles.
• User interfaces: the more people using data the better the outcomes we will see,
but data can be hard to use or interpret. Often the software used in the built
environment sector does not make it easy for people to access and use data in
their work. Delivering value from data means understanding what your users are
trying to accomplish with data or where they most need data. We should then seek
out user-friendly technologies ways to make that data available, whether than is
a handheld app, a business intelligence (BI) dashboard, or a chatbot. We must
also invest in the data pipelines to ensure that the data people have access to is
complete, authoritative, and up to date.
• Training and role definition: everyone learns in their own way. Some people like to
pick up technology and learn by doing, while others need structured training and a
well-defined set of goals or responsibilities. There’s no right way of doing things,
but organisations that do not define the data roles and skills that they need, and
provide training for staff to get there, will be making life harder for themselves.
Solving these issues will go a long way towards enabling better use of data on
built environment projects, particularly if complemented by a broader effort to build
their data culture.
Once the basics are in place, there exist a range of established and emerging data-
driven solutions that can demonstrably help the built environment to deliver better
outcomes for society.
These include better approaches to:
• People.
• Process.
• Organisational culture.
As well as technologies such as:
• Digital construction.
• GIS.
• Analytics.
• BI.
• Data science and AI.
• IoT and Smart buildings.
• Digital rehearsals.
• Digital twins.
Currently within the sector, adoption is patchy (at best), but the promise is there.
What these solutions have in common is that they rely upon, and make use of, data
of far greater quantity and quality than is readily accessible to most built environ-
ment organisations today. These solutions realise a return on investment through
efficiencies in how we interact with the physical world: by reducing unnecessary or
redundant use of scarce resources (particularly labour). Examples include:
1.5 Definitions 11
1.5 Definitions
Definitions are core to how we approach data. Used well, data should reduce
ambiguities within an organisation by bringing discipline to how you define your
terms and measures. Part of the fun of having a data-related role is that you have
licence to be a pedant, particularly when it concerns the meanings of words. Some
might even argue that this is core to the role. But pedantry is a double-edged sword, we
can’t expect the organisations that we work for to have a consistent and unambiguous
lexicon if we don’t first try to meet that standard ourselves.
You want your work to be legible to others, we want this book to be legible to
you. Clarity and consistency of definitions around language are crucial to avoiding
confusion whether one is selling a vision, setting out a strategy, or making the case
for investment in data.
12 1 Purpose and Pedantry
This book is about how we can use data—an intangible, weightless, digital thing—to
improve the outcomes of the real world. Throughout the writing process, we reminded
ourselves not to stray too far into the data world but to always return to the real,
physical world. Data is not a good unto itself. We care about data because of what it
can tell us about the real things that enable our lived experience. Specifically, we are
predominantly concerned with the physical assets that human beings create in the real
world to meet society’s needs. Throughout the book, we call these things physical
assets. ISO 55000 defines an asset as an “item, thing or entity that has potential or
actual value to an organisation.” Following ISO 55000, this book dives into how we
can use one type of asset (data assets), to improve the outcomes that we realise from
another type of asset (physical assets).
When referring to the collection assets that we work on, we use the phrase ‘built
environment’ as it feels that this term works best as a parent term. This parent term
may encompass construction, infrastructure, asset management, buildings, property,
facilities, operations, and so on. When using a noun to distinguish the built environ-
ment from other parts of the economy or professional fields we will use the term
‘sector’ (rather than ‘industry’). When we talk about the work of the data profession,
we will tend to use the term ‘domain.’ Following these definitions, this book is about
the intersection of the data domain and the built environment sector. When distin-
guishing between the built and natural environments, and between infrastructure and
the built environment, we will follow the excellent definitions from Transforming
Infrastructure Performance (Varah, 2021):
• Built environment: the human-made or induced surroundings that provide the
setting for human activity.
• Natural environment: all living and non-living things occurring naturally (e.g.,
not human-made).
• Infrastructure: the physical assets and services needed for the operation of human
society, a sub-set of the built environment.
Much of this book focuses on the management and interpretation of data to create
and use information, knowledge, insight, and even wisdom. None of these activities
are goods unto themselves, but things we do to improve decision-making and our
interaction with the physical world.
Human beings have lots of different words for records of things. Reference to the
DIKIW (Data, Information, Knowledge, Insight, Wisdom) pyramid (pictured below)
allows us to draw a clear distinction between terms. There is often some ambiguity
on this front within and between organisations, and so where possible we will seek to
Random documents with unrelated
content Scribd suggests to you:
others {661} cited by Cornelius à Lapide, who all teach that children
dying without baptism lead a happier life than those who are living
on the earth. Lessius writes, that although they may be said to be
damned because eternally deprived of the celestial glory for which
they were created, it is nevertheless credible that their state is far
happier and more joyful than that of any mortal man in this life.
Salmeron says, these children will rise again through Christ and
above this natural order, where they will daily advance in the
knowledge of the works of God and of separate substances, will
have angelic visits, and will be like our rustics living in the
country, so that as they are in a medium between glory and
punishment, they will also occupy an intermediate place. Suarez
says, that children will remain in their natural good and will be
content with their lot; and, together with Marsilius as quoted by
Azor, he describes to them a knowledge and love of God above
all things, and the other natural virtues. Didacus Ruiz, a theologian
of extensive reading, lays down this conclusion: Great mercy will be
mingled with the punishment of infants dying in original sin,
although not a diminution of the punishment of loss, since that is
incapable of diminution; yet in the remission of death which was the
punishment directly do to original sin, and would naturally have
endured to eternity, so that in spite of this infants will be
resuscitated at the day of judgment nevermore to die, endowed with
supernatural incorruptibility and impassibility, and they will also
supernaturally receive accidental, infused sciences, and will be
liberated from all pain, sadness, sickness, temptations, and personal
sins, which are naturally wont to arise from original sin.
Consequently, they are liberated from the punishment of hell which
they might have incurred. Albert (the Great), Alexander (de Hales),
and St. Thomas agree with this doctrine. Suarez shows that these
children obtain some benefit, in a certain way, from the merits of
Christ; and says that it pertains to the glory of Christ that he should
be adored and acknowledged as prince and supreme judge on the
day of universal judgment even by infants who died without grace.
He also considers it more probable that they will understand that
they have done neither good nor evil, and therefore receive neither
glory nor pain of sense, and also that they are deprived of glory on
account of sin (that is, original). He adds the reason of this, to wit,
that they may understand the benefit which they received, first in
Adam and afterward in Christ, and on this account may worship and
adore him. Martinonus adds: when even the demons love God in a
certain way even more than themselves as the common good of all,
according to St. Thomas, why shall not these children love Christ as
their benefactor and the author of their resurrection, and of the
benefits which they receive with it through Christ, who is the
destroyer of corporeal as well as spiritual death? He cites also what
Suarez says, that although one who should speak of the bodies of
infants in the same way as of the other damned would say nothing
improbable, since St. Thomas speaks of all indifferently, nevertheless
since those bodies will have a greater perfection and some gifts or
benefits which are not at all due to nature, therefore, in regard to
these gifts, Christ may be said to be their model. The same
Martinonus subjoins: although those words of the apostle, "In Christ
all shall be made alive," Suarez affirms, must be properly and
principally understood of the predestined, nevertheless they can
probably be applied to a certain extent to these children, inasmuch
as they will have in their risen bodies a certain special conformity
and relation to Christ, which will be much less and more imperfect in
the damned than in the predestined. Nicholas de Lyra affirms that
"infants dying without baptism do not endure any sensible
punishment, but have a more delightful {662} life than can be had in
this present life, according to all the doctors, [Footnote 185] who
speak concerning those who die in original sin alone."
Those who die in actual sin, and the fallen angels, although in the
same state of existence with those who die in original gin only, that
is, in the Infernum, or sphere below the supernatural sphere of the
elect angels and men, have to undergo a punishment corresponding
to their individual demerits. This truth, which is clearly revealed in
the Holy Scriptures and defined by the church, is confirmed by the
analogies of this present life. The transgressions of law is punished
in this world in accordance with the sense of justice which is
universal among men. There is no reason, therefore, for supposing
that the same principle of retribution is not continued in the future
life. Moreover, there is positive proof from reason that it must
continue. There has never been a more absurd doctrine broached
than that of the Universalists. To suppose that all men are saved on
account of the merits of Christ without regard to their moral state or
personal merits, is most unreasonable; and subversive of the moral
order as well as destructive of the idea of a state of probation. It is
equally absurd to imagine that the mere fact of death can make any
change in the state of the soul, or that separation from the body
causes the soul to make a mechanical rebound from a state of sin to
a state of holiness. The soul can be made happy only from its own
intrinsic principles, and not by a mere arbitrary appointment of God,
or a bestowal of extrinsic means of enjoyment. Sin brings its own
punishment, and the state of sin is in itself a state of misery. Plato
and other heathen sages taught the doctrine of future punishment,
Mr. Alger, who has written the most elaborate work on the subject of
the history of the doctrine of a future life which has appeared in
recent times, has fully proved the universality of the doctrine of
future punishment. Other rationalistic writers of ability have also of
late years seen the impossibility of removing this doctrine from the
teaching of Christianity and from universal tradition. We have
already fully proved that God does not deprive any of his rational
creatures of the felicity which is proper to their nature by his own
act. It follows from this that it is the creature himself who is the
author of his own misery. Existence is in itself a good, a boon
conceded from love by the Creator. So far as this good is turned into
an evil, it is by a voluntary perversion of the gift of a benevolent
sovereign by the subject himself. The punishment which he must
undergo in eternity is, therefore, the necessary consequence of his
own acts, together with such positive penalties as are required by
the ends of justice and the universal good. This doctrine, which is
the doctrine of the Catholic Church, based on the clear evidence of
Scripture and ecclesiastical tradition, [Footnote 186] is also the
doctrine of calm, unbiased reason, and of the common sense of
mankind. The probation of the Angels having been finished with
their first trial, and the probation of men ending for individuals at
death, and for mankind generically at the day of judgment, the epic
of grace is closed for ever with the completion of this present cycle
of providence; and consequently the state of all angels and men is
fixed for eternity. Hell is, therefore, an eternal state out of which
there is no possibility of transition into heaven.
Man being integrally composed by the union of soul and body, and
his corporeal nature being hypostatically United with the divine
nature in the person of the Word, the resurrection of the body must
necessarily precede his complete glorification. The only difficulty
which the doctrine of the resurrection of the body presents to the
understanding relates to the principal of identity between the earthly
and celestial body. This principle of identity, or unity and continuity
of life, must be the same with that which constitutes the unity of the
body in all the stages of its natural growth; and through all the
changes of its material particles, from the instant of its conception to
its disintegration by death. It is the soul which is the form of the
body, its vivifying principle. The soul and body have an innate
correspondence with each other, not only in the generic sense, but
in the sense of an individual aptitude of each separate soul for its
own body, and each separate body for its own soul. The soul and
body act and react upon each other perpetually while the
development of both is going on, producing a specific type in each
individual which is a modification of the generic type of manhood.
The determination of the active force of the soul to the production of
this type remains with it after the separation from the body. At the
resurrection, it forms anew its own proper body in accordance with
this type which is the product of the conjoint action of the soul and
body during the earthly life. There is, therefore, the same continuity
and identity between the earthly body and the celestial body that
there is between the body of the embryo and that of the full-grown
man. The celestial body is the same that it would have been if there
had been no death intervening between the two corporeal states,
but a transformation of the earthly body into the celestial perfection
and glorification of its proper type. If this is not all which is included
in the definition of the church respecting the identity of the body in
the two states, we must believe, in addition to what has been stated
already, that there is a material monad which forms the nucleus of
the corporeal organization and is a physical principle of identity. This
physical principle must contain virtually the whole body, as the germ
does the plant; it must be preserved when the body is disintegrated;
and reunited to the soul at the resurrection, in order to become the
physical germ from which the celestial body is developed.
The natural beatitude of the glorified angels and saints, which is only
a more exalted grade of that felicity which is accorded to the inferior
intelligent creation, need not be specially noticed. It is the essential
and supreme beatitude consisting in the clear, intuitive vision of God,
which is the principal subject of the divine revelation proposed by
the creed as the object of faith.
ORIGINAL.
MY AUNT'S WORK-BOX.
{667}
Original.
HOW MY AUNT PILCHER FOUND THE
CATHOLIC CHURCH.
Perhaps you don't know my aunt, Patients Pilcher? Very likely not. i
know her very well, and am going to tell you something about her.
She is my mother's sister, and was born in the town of Squankum,
Vermont, where she lived until she was over thirty years old—she
says, twenty-five, but that don't matter—when she came to New
York to see Uncle George. Well, Aunt Pilcher was mightily pleased
and surprised when she saw New York; and as she knew every
house, barn, and fence, and every lane and field in Squankum, and
to whom they belonged, she thought she must find out as much
about New York. She had no sooner taken off her bonnet and shawl
when she got to our house—I say our, because I live with Uncle
George since mother died—than she wanted to put them on again
and go out "and see the places, and find out where people lived,
and git introduced," as she said, adding that she would "hev to
begin directly, or she would never git through."
My Aunt Pilcher is a very tall, thin woman, with a very cold face, as I
found out on the first day she came to our house, when she bent
over and kissed me. She thought I wiped off her kiss, and said "Oh,
fie!" but it wasn't that, it was the cold. As I was saying, she wanted
to see all of New York, and I believe she has, too, by this time; but
she soon got disgusted with what she called "the offishness of the
Yorkers." "You don't know anybody," said she, "and nobody 'pears to
want to know you." She never tired, however, of seeing the many
beautiful buildings in the city, and among them all the churches
seem to her to be the most attractive and the most worthy of her
close investigation.
"I'm gittin 'most ashamed of our wooden meetin'-house to
Squankum," said she, one day, after returning from a visit to Trinity
Church; "we used to be kinder proud of it, though, when some of
the folks down to Rattlebog came over to spend Sabbath with us;
'cause ye know what a mis'able little country skule-house of a place
they've got over there. Then, ye've got sich a lot o' churches, my!
I'm 'most afeered never see them all, or I'll forgit abeout the first
ones afore I git through."
{668}
"Oh! I've seen white-marbled ones and brown-stun ones, and a sort
o' speckled mixed ones like Washin'ton cake, ye know, a streak o'
jelly and a streak o' cake. Then agin, I've seen all kinds o' styles;
Grecian, Beshantem, Gothys, high-steepled style, low-steepled style,
and no-steepled style. But I haint seeing a green winder-shutter one
like ours to Squankum yit. I s'pose the taste in architectur here in
York don't run that 'a way."
But I was not thinking of the outside of the churches when I asked
her the question, but of their inside. The truth was that Uncle
George and I had been two or three times to see Mass and Vespers
in the Catholic Church, and I was so full of all I had seen and heard
there that I was nearly dying to talk with some one about it. But
Uncle George had told me that he thought Aunt Jane—that is, Uncle
George's sister who keeps house for him and me—might possibly
disapprove of our going again if I happened to mention it, and so I
took care to say nothing about it. I was very anxious to find out if
Aunt Pilcher had seeing a Catholic Church, so I asked her if she
happened to see any boys in the churches she had been to.
"Oh! yes, he is!" said Uncle George, "that's the way the Catholics go
on in their churches, and I suppose that Fred must have seen it
somewhere."
"That won't do, you know, sister Pilcher," said Uncle George,
"because it is in the Apostles' Creed."
"I know it," returned Aunt Pilcher, "but I'd like to know what the
Holy Catholic Church in the Apostles' Creed has got to do with them
ignorant idolaters, the Catholics, the Roman papists, I mean?"
"It's the same name, that's all," said Uncle George, with a sly twinkle
in his eye; "and they say it's the same thing."
"Oh! of course it is," rejoined Uncle George. "We are the real and
true Catholic Church, and if some one wanted to come to our true
and real Holy Catholic Church we would just tell him to ask for the
Catholic church and anybody would show him."
"Well, they ort to, that's all I got to say," said Aunt Pilcher doubtfully.
"Well, I never sot eout to do a thing yit that I didn't do it, and I'm
going to do that."
"Hurrah! Aunt Pilcher," I shouted, "I would too, if I were you." And
that confirmed her in her engagement, {669} for the very next
morning she put on her bonnet and shawl, and hung her reticule on
her arm, without which she never went out of doors, and off she
started. She was gone all day and did not return until tea-time,
appearing completely fagged out and exhausted. She was not in the
best of humors either, to judge of the way she pulled off her out-
door additions to her ordinary dress, and bade me "carry them
things up-stairs, for people dead a'most and starved can't always be
expected to wait on theirselves." But not a word did she say about
the object of her long day's journey. I was all curiosity to know
where, she had been and what she had seen; and when we had
nearly got through tea, that is, Uncle George, Aunt Jane, Aunt
Pilcher, I, and Bub Thompson, who had come to play with me in the
afternoon, and said he smelt short-cake, and wondered whether
Aunt Jane could make it nice, and so got invited to try them—then I
could stand it no longer, and said I, "See anything nice to-day, Aunt
Pilcher?"
"I didn't particularly see anything, my dear, but I heered something
I shan't forgit, I can tell you, if hearin' a thing a hundred and ninety-
nine times over is enough to' make a body remember it."
"Well," said she, "I told you what I was goin' eout for, and I went.
Neow I always do things in order: commence at the beginnin', I say,
and then ye'll know when ye git to the eend. So I went clean deown
to the battery, and then I turns reound and comes up. Not wishin' to
ask questions of people too fur off (for these Yorkers don't know
where anythin' is ef it ain't right deown under their nose), I walked
on till I got pretty near Trinity Church, belongin' to the Episcopals,
and says I to a knowledgable lookin' man, says I, 'Couldn't ye pint
me eout, neow, a Catholic church?' 'I can't precisely pint ye to it,'
says he, which I thort was queer, with a Christian church right afore
his eyes, 'but I can tell you where one is: in Barclay street, right up
Broadway, ma'am, Saint Peter's church,' and off he went like a shot.
These Yorkers air in sich a hurry, they won't stop to hear a body
eout. Well, on I walks, and I saw another church, Saint Paul's in
Broadway, similarly belongin' to the Episcopals; and this time I got
straight in front of it. The folks 'peared to be in sich an orful hurry
jist here that I thort somebody must be dead; or somebody's house
had ketch't afire, and I couldn't git eout the first word afore the
person I spoke to was a whole block off, and I got kind o' bewildered
like. At last, I tried a lady—for I give the men folks up—and says I to
her:
"'Is this a meetin'-house of the Holy Catholic Church, ma'am?'
"'No, ma'am,' says she rather short, 'ef you want to go there, you
had better go deown Barclay street, next street above, St. Peter's on
the left,' and off she went. Well; I goes deown Barclay street, jist to
see this St. Peter's, and do you believe, I found eout it was one of
them papist churches.'
"I thort it was a leetle so myself," said Aunt Pilcher, "and I began to
conceit people took me for a papist or a Jesuit, so I made up my
mind to say so to once; and on I walks agin till I come to Broome
street, deown which I went till I found a nice look-in' church, and
says I to a minister-lookin' gentleman, says I:
{670}
"'Glad to hear it, ma'am,' says he, 'there are concealed Jesuits all
over.'
"I am grieved,' says he, 'that anybody should wish to know anythin'
abeout the Catholic Church, and I hope you have no intention of
goin' to sich a place of abomination.'
"He didn't 'pear to know my mean-in', so says I, 'I mean the real
Catholic Church.'
"'Ma'am,' says he, 'real or unreal, it is always the same thing; always
was and always will be. That is a Baptist church, ma'am, before you,
and not a Catholic mass house. There is one of them, called St.
Peter's, in Barclay street, I believe,' and off he walked without sayin'
another word. 'Patience,' says I to myself, 'be true to your name,'
for, to tell the truth, I was gettin' a leetle bit flustrated. I walks on,
turnin' corners and reound and reound, and at last I got into a street
called Bedford street. There I saw a meetin'-house with a sign over
the door tellin' it was a Methodist. Says I to a man that was jist then
sweepin reound the door—thinkin' to begin right this time—says 'I:
"'Yes, it is, and what's more, you ort to know it,' says I, gettin'
bothered with sich ignorance.
"'Why, good lands!' says I, almost swearin', 'they believe in the Holy
Catholic Church in this meetin'-house, don't they?'
"'No, they don't, and don't want to,' says he, and slammed the door
in my face. Then I wanders reound and seen lots of churches, but I
didn't see anybody, to speak to till I got ever so fur off in the Fifth
avenue, where I saw a handsome brick church with a tall steeple,
and there I saw some people goin' in. I asked what was goin' on,
and they said it was a prayer—meetin". I should liked to have jined
in a York prayer-meetin', but I wasn't in a fit state jist then—in sich a
twitter as I was—so I ups and speaks to a young lady who looked
like a Sabbath school teacher, and says I:
"'The real Catholic Church in the Apostles' Creed is where the gospil
is preached.' She kinder opened her eyes at me, and says she:
"'The gospil is preached here, ma'am; but this is not a Catholic
church; this is a Presbyterian church.'
"'But,' says I agin,' where the gospil is preached is the true Catholic
Church.'
"'I guess not,' says she, 'the gospil is not preached in the Catholic
Church.'
"Of course not," said Uncle George, "and what conclusion have you
come to, sister Pilcher?"
"I've come to the conclusion," said Aunt Pilcher, "that these Yorkers
don't know the Apostles' Creed."
"I should say," said Bub Thompson, "that those folks you 'saw didn't
believe it."
{671}
"My! I never!" ejaculated Aunt Pilcher, looking first at one and then
at another for explanation.
"Sister Pilcher," said Uncle George, "the truth is, it is no use for us
Protestants to call ourselves Catholics, for we are not. You see how
everybody denied it. Of course you could never get a Protestant to
own to the name of 'Catholic,' either here in New York or anywhere
else, any more than you could persuade any one to give us the
name; and it seems to me that where the name is, and always has
been, the reality is likely to be. As for your experiment to-day, it is
just what would have happened thirteen hundred years ago; for I
read in a book that Bub Thompson's father lent me, that St.
Augustine said, speaking about the sects that tried to call
themselves 'Catholics' in his time: 'The very name of Catholic
detains me in the Catholic Church, which that church has alone, and
not without cause, obtained among so many heretics, in such a way
as that while all heretics wish to be called Catholics, nevertheless not
one of them will dare to point out his basilica or house to a stranger
inquiring for a place of Catholic worship." [Footnote 187]
"Well! sakes alive! live and larn," exclaimed Aunt Pilcher, "but it's
enough to make a body think they never knowed anythin' when they
find oat some things!"
BY EDMOND LAFONDE.
{672}
Our website is not just a platform for buying books, but a bridge
connecting readers to the timeless values of culture and wisdom. With
an elegant, user-friendly interface and an intelligent search system,
we are committed to providing a quick and convenient shopping
experience. Additionally, our special promotions and home delivery
services ensure that you save time and fully enjoy the joy of reading.
textbookfull.com