I like this idea but for one point. If you do want everything, then you have 8 bazillion requests back and forth to the server. Not a problem for those of us on broadband, but on Dialup it becomes a a really show stopper with all the added latency.
Some method of bundling up (and compressing if possible, but that's secondary) all the necessary JS files into a single download would be best. Luke Sam Collett wrote: > > On 24/01/07, Klaus Hartl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> [-Stash-] wrote: >> > Unfortunately, it looks like Cody's giving up on ThickBox. He's put >> out a >> > request for someone to take it over: >> > >> http://codylindley.com/thickboxforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=166&page=1#Item_15 >> > >> > Given the improvements Klaus Hartl's already made to ThickBox 2.1, it >> would >> > be nice if he took it over ;) >> >> I'd love to do that! >> >> -- Klaus > > We all know you are capable of doing it. > > One suggestion though - make it modular. So if you only want to use it > for images, you don't download all the things you don't need. > > e.g. > - Images, inline content - include thickbox.js > - Gallery - thickbox.js, thickbox-gallery.js > - Ajax: thickbox.js, thickbox-ajax.js > - Rich media content (flash, quicktime, pdf's etc) - thickbox.js, > thickbox-media.js > > and so on. > > You could use blockUI for the overlay and bgiframe for rich media. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Thickbox-incompatible-with-jQuery-1.1-tf3063738.html#a8561057 Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list [email protected] http://jquery.com/discuss/
