Jump to content

User talk:Jarekt

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository

Tech News: 2025-15

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 18:49, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2025-16

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 00:21, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Frames and digital representation

[edit]

Hi Jarek, I was thinking of a good way to represent than an image includes a frame (or other context) in digital representation of (P6243) to check files in Category:Artworks main subject 2D work. I took File:Jean-Baptiste Le Paon - Officier de Hussards.jpg as an example. Here I set it to "no value". Would it be possible to update the tracker category to Category:Artworks main subject 2D work with frame based on this? What do you think? Multichill (talk) 16:43, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

And as a second point: Would be nice to flag files like File:Jan Mostaert - Landscape with a Scene of the Conquest of America.jpg that have depicts (P180) set (Landscape with a Scene of the Conquest of America (Q17341648) in this case), but main subject (P921) and digital representation of (P6243) are missing. Maybe Category:Artworks depicts 2D work? Multichill (talk) 17:14, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Multichill, I feel like setting digital representation of (P6243) to "no value" to mark existence of frame would be a little surprising to other editors. How about depicts (P180) = frame (Q860792)? Also in the past I was adding many images with frames to Category:Framed paintings category. The second point makes more sense to me, although since some files can have very large number of depicts I have to put an upper limit to how many of them I look up at Wikidata, so such category can miss some files. --Jarekt (talk) 17:12, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2025-17

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 20:56, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:March For Our Lives in Seattle - 019.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 06:05, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]