Jump to content

User talk:kallerna

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository

Archive:

Hello, welcome to my talk page!

  • Please don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~.
  • If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page–my talk page–as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place.
  • If I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there.


Please leave a new message.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lido di Jesolo Pier 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:53, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 3 Zinnen Dolomites ski resort 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:45, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A.Savin 08:42, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lido di Jesolo 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Berthold Werner 10:39, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Venice Ponte dell'Accademia Grand Canal santa Maria della Salute 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 10:19, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bridge of Sighs sea facade night 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:43, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lido di Jesolo 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:35, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lido di Jesolo 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:11, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jesolo ferris wheel Pala Arrex.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 07:46, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Venezia - Empoli Serie A 04012025 Stadio Pier Luigi Penzo 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Both sides leaning out --Poco a poco 20:35, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, PC applied. --Kallerna 05:36, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Support QI --Poco a poco 10:04, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Venezia - Empoli Serie A 04012025 Stadio Pier Luigi Penzo 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Горбунова М.С. 09:43, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

File:Torri di Piazza Drago Jesolo 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torri di Piazza Drago Jesolo 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Горбунова М.С. 09:43, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:49, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jesolo Città del Natale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:18, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Venezia - Empoli Serie A 04012025 Stadio Pier Luigi Penzo 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:43, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

[edit]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Administrators%27_noticeboard. Maybe you want read it. Greetins. 78.208.14.17 10:14, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info. I do not want to participate in the conversation, as it could be interpreted as a "revenge". —kallerna (talk) 10:41, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Millennium Cross Cableway.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:57, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vodno snow 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 18:57, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Millennium Cross Vodno 2025 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:02, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Millennium Cross Vodno 2025 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Pdanese 16:02, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Millennium Cross Vodno 2025 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 21:30, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:45, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bansko ski 2025 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
PC is necessary. The poles are leaning to the left --FlocciNivis 17:54, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, PC done. --Kallerna 20:51, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 21:15, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ASNOM Delčevo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Could be a bit brighter, but ok IMO --PantheraLeo1359531 10:19, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bansko ski 2025 37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rbrechko 11:27, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Millennium Cross Vodno 2025 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 17:55, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bansko ski 2025 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Benjism89 21:35, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bregalnica Delčevo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 20:18, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bansko ski 2025 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 22:06, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bansko ski 2025 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Benjism89 21:35, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vodno Telecommunication Tower 2025 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Vsatinet 11:48, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bansko ski 2025 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. S5A-0043 09:05, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anteni Sin Vrv 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:15, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panorama Krasta 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Olivier LPB 16:37, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krasta Jakupica.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Olivier LPB 16:37, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kitka Jakupica range 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Olivier LPB 16:37, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grand Canal Ponte degli Scalzi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:17, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Popova Šapka ski center 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:22, 8 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Popova Šapka ski center 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:22, 8 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anteni Sin Vrv 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:22, 8 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Popova Šapka ski center 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:42, 8 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rozafa Fortress 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Comment Needs PC - see houses on left! --Scotch Mist 06:59, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, fixed. --Kallerna 07:28, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 08:21, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rozafa Fortress 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 20:54, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rozafa Fortress 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 08:02, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rozafa Fortress 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 09:41, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Duhël M25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:32, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bansko ski 2025 35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:41, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bansko ski 2025 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 17:54, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rozafa Fortress 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 06:57, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rozafa Fortress 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:02, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dubrovnik Old Town 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:22, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bay of Kotor 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:26, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pelješac Bridge 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:26, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pelješac Bridge 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Berthold Werner 13:43, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pelješac Bridge 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:59, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bay of Kotor 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:59, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skradinski buk Krka National Park 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:13, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skradinski buk Krka National Park 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 07:47, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skradinski buk Krka National Park 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rbrechko 13:42, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rozafa Fortress 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:13, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marmolada + Sellaronda tour 47.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rbrechko 15:43, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marmolada + Sellaronda tour 46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Berthold Werner 16:21, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marmolada + Sellaronda tour 43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rbrechko 15:45, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marmolada + Sellaronda tour 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 15:53, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skradinski buk Krka National Park 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:46, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marmolada + Sellaronda tour 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 13:01, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marmolada + Sellaronda tour 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 13:50, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marmolada + Sellaronda tour 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 13:01, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marmolada + Sellaronda tour 37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 13:50, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marmolada + Sellaronda tour 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 13:50, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marmolada + Sellaronda tour 39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, but enhanceable: you could try a highpass filtering to enhance the feeling of crisp! The antenna area may benefit the most. --Grand-Duc 20:10, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marmolada + Sellaronda tour 36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rbrechko 20:07, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marmolada + Sellaronda tour 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rbrechko 20:07, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marmolada + Sellaronda tour 42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Petro Stelte 07:20, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marmolada + Sellaronda tour 41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 08:03, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marmolada + Sellaronda tour 38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 09:31, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marmolada + Sellaronda tour 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 12:48, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marmolada + Sellaronda tour 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 16:06, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marmolada + Sellaronda tour 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:13, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marmolada + Sellaronda tour 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Harlock81 08:45, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marmolada + Sellaronda tour 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:23, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marmolada + Sellaronda tour 40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 08:29, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marmolada + Sellaronda tour 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rbrechko 12:03, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marmolada + Sellaronda tour 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 22:11, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marmolada + Sellaronda tour 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:27, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skradinski buk Krka National Park 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:40, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marmolada + Sellaronda tour 45a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rbrechko 13:23, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monte Civetta Caprile.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Harlock81 11:59, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marmolada-Arabba-Val di Fassa 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 15:51, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marmolada-Arabba-Val di Fassa 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 16:36, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marmolada-Arabba-Val di Fassa 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Harlock81 11:59, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marmolada-Arabba-Val di Fassa 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Harlock81 12:06, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marmolada from Porta Vescovo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:49, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marmolada-Arabba-Val di Fassa 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Olivier LPB 10:54, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Marmolada + Sellaronda tour 45a.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Marmolada + Sellaronda tour 45a.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Menettely käyttäjän ollessa kuollut

[edit]

Hei kallerna. Miten toimitaan, jos käyttäjä on kuollut? ”Wikipedia protects their userpages to prevent vandalism, and preserves them in their memory.” (en:Category:Deceased Wikipedians) Käyttäjä Tvkosone ilmoittaa suomenkielisen Wikipedian käyttäjäsivullaan ”Tatu Kosonen, Ylämaa” (katso myös historia). Hän on muokannut artikkelia Tatu Kosonen, jossa on lähteistetty hänen kuolleen 22. huhtikuuta 2022. Naukkarinen, Petri (2022-04-24). In memoriam – Tatu Kosonen. Kamiza. Archived from the original on 2025-01-24.

raid5 21:43, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Enpä tiedä tarvitseeko tehdä mitään. Laitoin nyt kuitenkin ikuisen suojauksen käyttäjäsivulle ja keskustelusivun alkuun bannerin ettei oleteta vastausta. Rauha hänelle siis. —kallerna (talk) 05:41, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Kiitos, teit riittävästi. Kuvien ongelmamerkinnöissä menee automaattisesti ilmoitus lataajalle. Bannerista taas näkee, ettei ei kannata vuosien takaisia muokkauksia kysellä. En tuntenut käyttäjää, mutta hänkin harrasti judoa ja kirjoitin pari kommenttia hänen keskustelusivulleen suomenkielisessä Wikipediassa. Lisäsin keskustelusivulle luokan Deceased Commons users. raid5 18:53, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Vodno Telecommunication Tower.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vodno Telecommunication Tower.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nervión river Puente de la Salve Bilbao 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 14:23, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Derio station Bilbao 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Berthold Werner 14:35, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puppy Jeff Koons.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 19:00, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Guggenheim Museum Bilbao 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 13:32, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Guggenheim Museum Bilbao 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:33, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zubizuri bridge Bilbao.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:36, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nervión River Bilbao 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:37, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Uribarri station Bilbao metro 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:41, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puente Pedro Arrupe 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good photo and I like the the man with the dog in the photo. --ArildV 06:36, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]