Skip to content

Upgrade eslint to version 7.30.0 #127

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

depfu[bot]
Copy link

@depfu depfu bot commented Jul 3, 2021

Here is everything you need to know about this upgrade. Please take a good look at what changed and the test results before merging this pull request.

What changed?

✳️ eslint (^5.6.0 → ^7.30.0) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

7.30.0

  • 5f74642 Chore: don't check Program.start in SourceCode#getComments (refs #14744) (#14748) (Milos Djermanovic)
  • 19a871a Docs: Suggest linting plugins for ESLint plugin developers (#14754) (Bryan Mishkin)
  • aa87329 Docs: fix broken links (#14756) (Sam Chen)
  • 278813a Docs: fix and add more examples for new-cap rule (fixes #12874) (#14725) (Nitin Kumar)
  • ed1da5d Update: ecmaVersion allows "latest" (#14720) (薛定谔的猫)
  • 104c0b5 Update: improve use-isnan rule to detect Number.NaN (fixes #14715) (#14718) (Nitin Kumar)
  • b08170b Update: Implement FlatConfigArray (refs #13481) (#14321) (Nicholas C. Zakas)
  • f113cdd Chore: upgrade eslint-plugin-eslint-plugin (#14738) (薛定谔的猫)
  • 1b8997a Docs: Fix getRulesMetaForResults link syntax (#14723) (Brandon Mills)
  • aada733 Docs: fix two broken links (#14726) (Sam Chen)
  • 8972529 Docs: Update README team and sponsors (ESLint Jenkins)

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 13 commits:


👉 No CI detected

You don't seem to have any Continuous Integration service set up!

Without a service that will test the Depfu branches and pull requests, we can't inform you if incoming updates actually work with your app. We think that this degrades the service we're trying to provide down to a point where it is more or less meaningless.

This is fine if you just want to give Depfu a quick try. If you want to really let Depfu help you keep your app up-to-date, we recommend setting up a CI system:

  • Circle CI, Semaphore and Travis-CI are all excellent options.
  • If you use something like Jenkins, make sure that you're using the Github integration correctly so that it reports status data back to Github.
  • If you have already set up a CI for this repository, you might need to check your configuration. Make sure it will run on all new branches. If you don’t want it to run on every branch, you can whitelist branches starting with depfu/.

Depfu Status

Depfu will automatically keep this PR conflict-free, as long as you don't add any commits to this branch yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting with @depfu rebase.

All Depfu comment commands
@​depfu rebase
Rebases against your default branch and redoes this update
@​depfu recreate
Recreates this PR, overwriting any edits that you've made to it
@​depfu merge
Merges this PR once your tests are passing and conflicts are resolved
@​depfu close
Closes this PR and deletes the branch
@​depfu reopen
Restores the branch and reopens this PR (if it's closed)
@​depfu pause
Ignores all future updates for this dependency and closes this PR
@​depfu pause [minor|major]
Ignores all future minor/major updates for this dependency and closes this PR
@​depfu resume
Future versions of this dependency will create PRs again (leaves this PR as is)

@depfu depfu bot added the depfu label Jul 3, 2021
@depfu depfu bot mentioned this pull request Jul 3, 2021
@depfu
Copy link
Author

depfu bot commented Jul 18, 2021

Closed in favor of #132.

@depfu depfu bot closed this Jul 18, 2021
@depfu depfu bot deleted the depfu/update/npm/eslint-7.30.0 branch July 18, 2021 23:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants