Skip to content

Conversation

@JakeQZ
Copy link
Collaborator

@JakeQZ JakeQZ commented Dec 11, 2025

This, when used (in various places),
will be more efficient than doing a peek() followed by a consume().

This, when used (in various places),
will be more efficient than doing a `peek()` followed by a `consume()`.
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

coverage: 67.642% (+0.2%) from 67.402%
when pulling 59bbafa on task/consumeifcomes
into 42502fd on main.

@oliverklee oliverklee merged commit 1b1f91c into main Dec 12, 2025
23 checks passed
@oliverklee oliverklee deleted the task/consumeifcomes branch December 12, 2025 07:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants