Skip to content

Update distributed-lock-implementations.md #2068

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
Snailclimb merged 1 commit into from
Jul 4, 2023
Merged

Update distributed-lock-implementations.md #2068

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions docs/distributed-system/distributed-lock-implementations.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -279,7 +279,7 @@ client.close();

使用 Redis 实现分布式锁的时候，我们是通过过期时间来避免锁无法被释放导致死锁问题的，而 ZooKeeper 直接利用临时节点的特性即可。

假设不适用顺序节点的话，所有尝试获取锁的客户端都会对持有锁的子节点加监听器。当该锁被释放之后，势必会造成所有尝试获取锁的客户端来争夺锁，这样对性能不友好。使用顺序节点之后，只需要监听前一个节点就好了，对性能更友好。
假设不使用顺序节点的话，所有尝试获取锁的客户端都会对持有锁的子节点加监听器。当该锁被释放之后，势必会造成所有尝试获取锁的客户端来争夺锁，这样对性能不友好。使用顺序节点之后，只需要监听前一个节点就好了，对性能更友好。

### 为什么要设置对前一个节点的监听？

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -363,4 +363,4 @@ private static class LockData

## 总结

这篇文章我们介绍了实现分布式锁的两种常见方式。至于具体选择 Redis 还是 ZooKeeper 来实现分布式锁，还是要看业务的具体需求。如果对性能要求比较高的话，建议使用 Redis 实现分布式锁。如果对可靠性要求比较高的话，建议使用 ZooKeeper 实现分布式锁。
这篇文章我们介绍了实现分布式锁的两种常见方式。至于具体选择 Redis 还是 ZooKeeper 来实现分布式锁，还是要看业务的具体需求。如果对性能要求比较高的话，建议使用 Redis 实现分布式锁。如果对可靠性要求比较高的话，建议使用 ZooKeeper 实现分布式锁。